Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.



February 28, 2003

ANTI-WAR POETRY BY KIM ADDONISIO

Filed under: How the World Really Works, Our Culture / Ourselves — Dave Pollard @ 15:37
addonizio I was flattered and pleased that my anti-war poem led off last week’s special edition of Virtual Occoquan. But this week on Wood’s Lot I found what I think is the best anti-war poem of recent times. Here is Kim Addonizio ’s poem The Numbers:

How many nights have I lain here like this, feverish with plans,
with fears, with the last sentence someone spoke, still trying to finish
a conversation already over? How many nights were wasted
in not sleeping, how many in sleep?I don’t know
how many hungers there are, how much radiance or salt, how many times
the world breaks apart, disintegrates to nothing and starts up again
in the course of an ordinary hour. I don’t know how God can bear
seeing everything at once: the falling bodies, the monuments and burnings,
the lovers pacing the floors of how many locked hearts. I want to close
my eyes and find a quiet field in fog, a few sheep moving toward a fence.
I want to count them, I want them to end. I don’t want to wonder
how many people are sitting in restaurants about to close down,
which of them will wander the sidewalks all night
while the pies revolve in the refrigerated dark. How many days
are left of my life, how much does it matter if I manage to say
one true thing about it?how often have I tried, how often
failed and fallen into depression? The field is wet, each grassblade
gleaming with its own particularity, even here, so that I can’t help
asking again, the white sky filling with footprints, bricks,
with mutterings over rosaries, with hands that pass over flames
before covering the eyes. I’m tired, I want to rest now.
I want to kiss the body of my lover, the one mouth, the simple name
without a shadow. Let me go. How many prayers
are there tonight, how many of us must stay awake and listen?

SLUMMING THROUGH THE BLOGOSPHERE

Filed under: Using Weblogs and Technology — Dave Pollard @ 15:35
salon After a month in the small, safe world of Salon blogs, my curiosity got the better of me. I had already discovered some excellent non-Salon blogs, thanks to the posts and blogrolls of fellow Sloggers: K. at Different Strings , Charly Z at Driver 8 , Mark at Fried Green , xian at RFB/Salonika , the inimitable Raven , pomo Rayne , Blasphemous Jan, Emphatic Rob, Scott Rosenberg , Tom Tomorrow and eloquant essayist Toby .

Sloggers Raven and Tom were prolific enough to keep me busy, but once I added non-Sloggers Alas , Kos and Atrios to my daily reading I felt I would never be able to keep up. Now I’m up to 36 blogs and 20 e-zines, most of which listed are in my blogroll. I wade through them all almost every evening.

I had some unanswered questions: Why could I find no other Canadian bloggers of note? Were there any eloquent right-wingers (other than Volokh) in the blogosphere? Why was my blogroll predominently male writers when I’d read that the majority of bloggers were female? When I discovered some tools to search for blogs by subject, I decided to dig for some answers. Over the past week I’ve read or at least scanned over 300 blogs. This is what I learned:

  1. There are many visually stunning blogs, enough to make my Userland template look unseemingly staid, linear and unimaginative. Take a look at this one for example. Blogs by women, and by younger writers, generally seem to be more artistic in design.
  2. Alas, there seems to be something of an inverse correlation between physical attractiveness and quality of content (One very notable exception is Jeff Gates’ Life Outtacontext blog). Many, many pretty blogs contain sentences like: omigod i am sooooo not wanting to be studying for next week’s history test. These blogs generally seem to be written by bloggers with names like [See Note Below]. Capital letters, punctuation and spell-checkers are all used sparingly in this part of the blogosphere.
  3. This negative correlation turns out to be something of a blessing in disguise, because much of the more inane content is, I swear, written in four-point type on a textured background. See the link in point 1 above for example. Clearly meant to be undecipherable and unintelligible to anyone over 17.
  4. The tone of many blogs is so self-effacing and negative that I am convinced that blogging is now, next to Prozac, the leading therapy for people with moderate to severe depression. Initially I found this darkly amusing, but now I find it very disturbing. There are many people, young and old, quietly and desperately screaming into cyberspace.
  5. The vast majority of blogs of all political stripes evidence a complete lack of critical thinking. Most commentary is superficial, unoriginal and uninformed. Two remarkable exceptions are the erudite and prolific Wood’s Lot (at last! a great Canadian blog, and one with a huge hit count per Blogdex, but which strangely appears on few blogrolls, though his blogroll is massive ) and the melancholy but perceptive Texting . Wood has a lovely quote from Heidegger on his who? page and a thread that some of my fellow Sloggers (you know who you are) should read, suggesting that the Web is now infected with thought viruses – memes that could destroy the blogosphere.
  6. To the extent my modest grasp of French allows, in my sample of Canadian blogs I read a few that were penned by Quebecois, but discerned no significant cultural differences from English language blogs. There is even a French counterpart to Friday Five called Sept Instants.

In other words, the blogosphere outside our cloistered Salon world is a microcosm of the world it articulates. It is all interesting to those that have the energy and the voyeuristic streak needed to explore it, and who are not too jaundiced by the naivete, frivolity and noise that consumes most of blog space, just as it consumes most of the bandwidth of human discourse. But I’m glad to be home.
AFTERWORD: I had originally listed some blog names where it says “[See Note Below]” above. Turns out these were quite eloquent blogs with whimsical names. I apologize to the owners of these blogs. I should have known you can’t judge a blog by its name.

PICKING A FUEL-EFFICIENT HYBRID CAR

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 07:57
hybrid car

UCS has a thorough new report on how to select from the new breed of fuel-efficient hybrid cars .  Excerpt:

Using new research into the cost and performance of hybrid technology, this report provides a comprehensive assessment of the technology, the fuel economy, and the costs associated with a fleet of passenger cars and trucks that rely on hybrid technology to more than double the fuel economy commonly available today. If they are designed well, these hybrids can equal or better the utility, comfort, performance, and safety we’ve come to expect, while saving us thousands of dollars at the gas pump.

You can also download a consumer’s guide to buying a greener vehicle.

KIESLING’S RESIGNATION

Filed under: How the World Really Works — Dave Pollard @ 07:40
Wood’s Lot links to the full NYT text of life-long diplomat John Brady Kiesling’s scathing letter of resignation.  Excerpt:

The policies we are now asked to advance are incompatible not only with American values but also with American interests. Our fervent pursuit of war with Iraq is driving us to squander the international legitimacy that has been America’s most potent weapon of both offense and defense since the days of Woodrow Wilson. We have begun to dismantle the largest and most effective web of international relationships the world has ever known. Our current course will bring instability and danger, not security.

IRAQ RIGHT AND LEFT: USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS NOW, REBUILD LATER

Filed under: How the World Really Works — Dave Pollard @ 07:25
gulf war

Znet carries the story by Stephen Kerr on Rumsfeld’s plan to circumvent and subvert the Chemical Weapons Convention to allow “crowd control” during the upcoming Iraq War by using the very WMD that are allegedly causing the war in the first place. Excerpt:


On Wednesday February 5th while testifying before the House Armed Services Committee, Donald Rumsfeld revealed just how the Pentagon plans to deal with a hostile and armed Iraqi population, of “between one and seven million civilians with semi-automatic rifles, rocket launchers and other military weapons….The United States military has been busy transforming powerful synthetic opiates such as Fentanyl into an aerosol chemical weapon that knocks troublesome civilians unconscious…a chemical weapon similar to that which killed 20% of those who were exposed to it at the Palace of Culture Theatre in Moscow .

Nicholas Penniman argues in TomPaine.com that for strategic and humanitarian reasons the left must start now to dominate the dialogue on rebuilding Iraq after the war. Excerpt:

[We should be] saying that $100 million in humanitarian aid to post-war Iraq is not enough…[We need] to focus [debate] on improving the social conditions in Iraq, promoting true democracy, blocking foreign monopolization of the oil, bolstering health care and education, and establishing media… The rebuilding will be high-profile and expensive. If done right, it won’t be another Kuwait or Afghanistan. It will be a victory for the great tradition of liberalism, a beginning of a democratized Middle East, and a scrubbing of America’s tarnished integrity. If left solely to the corporations and the hawks, it will likely be just another black mark on our history — another conservative attempt to provide a “superior moral justification for selfishness.”

February 27, 2003

MEMORIES OF CHILDHOOD

Filed under: Creative Works — Dave Pollard @ 16:10
A friend of mine, David Jones, recently learned he was a first-place finalist in the annual International On-line Welsh Literary and Arts Festival (part of the Welsh Eisteddfod arts festival) in the Memories of Childhood category. Here is his submission.

EARTH OBSERVATORY

Filed under: Our Culture / Ourselves, Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 13:47
Yahoo Science today publicized NASA’s site that contains hundreds of high-resolution pictures of Earth from space, some of them so remarkably detailed you can pick out individual streets and houses. It’s called Earth Observatory and it would be doing it a gross disservice to use a thumbnail shot in this post to exemplify its contents. Just go visit it, see the smoke trail from the Staten Island refinery fire (click on the ‘large view’ link), or the Etna eruption, or the Australian bush fires. These photos are breathtaking. I’m hanging up my Nikon.

A MAN CONSUMED WITH RAGE

Filed under: How the World Really Works — Dave Pollard @ 09:56
sherriff Bush I watched Bush last evening speaking to his carefully chosen audience at the American Enterprise Institute and I thought:

This man is utterly consumed with rage. He is almost quivering with bloodlust to avenge what Osama did to his beloved America. He decided ages ago he is going to kill 50,000 Iraqi citizens and bankrupt his country, just for revenge. All he’s doing up there with his forced smirk is trying to justify doing so to himself and his closed inner circle. He doesn’t care what the world or the U.N. thinks.

In the loopy Walker Texas Ranger series, every week some lunatic terrorist would kidnap and torture and murder innocent Americans, and their families would try to settle the score. Walker would come in, tell them that killing thy enemy isn’t the way, and kung fu the bad guys into submission against overwhelming odds. Then improbably, the defeated bad guys would stagger up, pick up some WMD and aim it at some guy’s back, and Walker would whirl and shoot him dead.

My God, Bush is living an episode of ‘Walker’ over and over in his head. And this psychopath has his hand on the trigger that could end the world.

February 26, 2003

THE FUTURE OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Filed under: How the World Really Works — Dave Pollard @ 09:52
This week’s print version of the New Yorker includes an extensive article on U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, which is not included in the online version. It contains some interesting observations on the future of the U.N. at this critical juncture. A few examples:

For Annan, the chief lesson of the past decade is that the U.N. must say no to impossible missions and insufficiently supported mandates.

Annan has even suggested that preemptive military action may be justified to avert the threat of a massive slaughter or a genocide [such as occurred in Rwanda in 1994].

The reliance on ad-hoc coalitions of national armies [in Kosovo, East Timor, Afghanistan and the Ivory Coast] to take on the missions that the U.N. is incapable of managing leaves the organization more dependent than ever on the will of its member states.

For the past three years, Annan has been unable to raise a force of even 7000 troops – the number that failed to hold Srebrenica – to beef up the U.N.’s miniscule peace-keeping mission in the Congo…where it is estimated that two to three million people have died since 1998 as a result of civil war and foreign occupation.

THIS IS NOT THE TIME FOR WAR

Filed under: How the World Really Works — Dave Pollard @ 09:30
The London Guardian today urges Britons, and especially MPs voting this evening on a deceptively-worded resolution to give Blair authority to commit his country and troops to war on Iraq, to reject war and Bush’s artificial deadline. The Guardian instead supports the French/German/Russian proposal to extend and enhance inspections. The crux of the argument, lost in the rhetoric and arm-twisting, is that Resolution 1441 did not specify a deadline for Iraq compliance. Although Saddam is in material breach of the resolution, and behaving deplorably, there is no reason to believe that sustained pressure, at least for the four months proposed in the alternative proposal, will not allow progress to continue to be made.

The logical strategy should continue to be one of containment, and as long as Saddam does not pose an imminent threat to anyone (and there is no evidence he does) that strategy should prevail. Obviously, containment including continued inspections cannot be expected to work without the threat of consequences, but 1441 already does that, and it is working, even if too slowly for the warmongers. And the wording of 1441 does not say that the only possible consequence of non-compliance is war. There are many diplomatic alternatives short of war that can still be tried if Saddam even if fails to fully comply. For example, the U.N. could insist that Saddam step down, an action which might well be supported by many of Iraq’s neighbours. The point is that many untried alternatives exist, and there is no need for a short deadline.

Diplomacy takes time. It is messy, awkward, and frustrating. And if one of the combatants is so belligerent that no amount of persuasion will cause them to agree to a peaceful solution, diplomacy can sometimes fail. But until diplomatic alternatives have been exhausted, they need to be given time to work. As the Guardian concludes, this is not the time for war.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress