![]() What I’m thinking about, and planning on writing (and podcasting) about soon: Open Space: Ever since I began learning about Open Space, I’ve been trying to ‘improve’ it (especially, trying to impose a ‘framework’ on the process and Open Space competency training on the invitees). Now I know a bit more about Open Space, I realize how foolish that was, and thank practitioners of OST for being so patient with me. I once believed that my ‘sweet spot’, where my Gift, my Passion and my Purpose intersect, was fomenting dissatisfaction; more recently I restated it as facilitating self-change. Now I’m thinking that it’s closer to my greatest Gift of imagining possibilities — facilitation is too ‘passive’ a role for me (I am not especially competent at or passionate about such a role). How can I capture, in a few words, this idea: The capacity to be a sounding board, observing, listening, imagining and interjecting relevant possibilities, and showing tools and methods that might improve effectiveness, to help people let themselves become who they really are and do what they were meant to do.
Not a coach, not a facilitator. Something in between, perhaps. Is there are name for this?
We Are 26%: I read last week (and am trying to find it again) that 26% of North Americans say they would buy products that are socially and environmentally responsible, and locally made, or would do without, rather than buy cheap imported junk, even if this involved considerable extra expense, or some self-sacrifice on their part. More interestingly, the economic demographic of this 26% is apparently U-shaped — it is the poor and the rich who would do so, while the lower-middle to upper-middle classes remain mostly addicted to consumption. Book Reviews: The World Without Us, by Alan Weisman, and How Everyday Products Make People Sick, by Paul Blanc. Blog-Hosted Conversations: Starting the last week of August, once a week, this blog will feature 30-minute conversations, initially on the subject of “What is your model of a better way to live, and what capacities do we need to develop or re-learn to live that way?” Open Thread Question: If you were suddenly put in the position of having to look after aseverely incapacitated loved one full time, how would you handle it? |
August 19, 2007
Sunday Open Thread — August 19, 2007
August 18, 2007
Saturday Links for the Week — August 18, 2007
People search for the bodies of loved ones in Pisco, south of Lima. Photo: REUTERS/Mariana Bazo Help the People of Peru: 30,000 families whose lives have been shattered by the recent earthquake need our help. Here’s how to do so:
Thanks to Mariella Rebora for the links.
‘Learning’ That Trying to Change the Political/Social/Economic System is Impossible: A brilliant and important essay by Naomi Klein explains the corporatist agenda to discourage us into believing that everything we want to do has been tried and failed. Excerpt: The real problem, I want to argue today, is confidence, our confidence, the confidence of people who gather…under the banner of building another world, a kinder more sustainable world. I think we lack the strength of our convictions, the guts to back up our ideas with enough muscle to scare our elites. We are missing movement power. Thatís what we’re missing. “The best lacked all convictions,” Yeats wrote, “while the worst are full of passionate intensity.” Think about it. Do you want to tackle climate change as much as Dick Cheney wants Kazakhstan’s oil? Do you? Do you want universal healthcare as much as Paris Hilton wants to be the next new face of EstÈe Lauder? If not, why not? What is wrong with us? Where is our passionate intensity?
What is at the root of our crisis of confidence? What drains us of our conviction at crucial moments when we are tested? At the root, I think itís the notion that we have accepted, which is that our ideas have already been tried and found wanting. Part of what keeps us from building the alternatives that we deserve and long for and that the world needs so desperately, like a healthcare system that doesn’t sicken us when we see it portrayed on film, like the ability to rebuild New Orleans without treating a massive human tragedy like an opportunity for rapid profit-making for politically connected contractors, the right to have bridges that don’t collapse and subways that don’t flood when it rains. I think that what lies at the root of that lack of confidence is that we’re told over and over again that progressive ideas have already been tried and failed. We hear it so much that we accepted it. So our alternatives are posed tentatively, almost apologetically. Chickens: Moving to Cage-Free But Not Free-Range: The realization of the horrific cruelty to billions of chickens in battery cages is beginning to dawn on humanity, but progress is at a snail’s pace. Several groups are trying to push for a change from battery cages to large cage-free barns, still cramped and locked inside, but at least with some room for movement. Even this tiny change is taking the capacity of the corporatist Big Agribusiness oligopoly. Google & Microsoft Enter Online Health Information Fray: Challenging online health leaders WebMD and Revolution Health, and the most popular government health sites, Google and Microsoft are trying to exploit the fact that most searchers for health information start with a search engine. Complexity Explained: A group called Calresco summarizes complexity theory and why understanding it is so important to grappling with the intractable problems of this century. Thanks to Andrew Campbell for the link. Thought for the Week: From reader Ayanleh in response to Wednesday’s post about the seven elements of effective collaboration: I am from Somalia (East Africa) and currently live in the United States. When I was growing up and was learning about “modernity” and how to attain it, I remember modernity’s focus on the individual, from individual rights to individual freedom. Yet everything in my culture revolved around the group, or more specifically the clan or sub-clan. In its day to day activity, the clan was a collaborative effort. It sought to help individuals to survive in an often harsh and unforgiving environment. Clans often fought each other for these scarce resources but they more often collaborated than fought with each other. There were many practices they instituted in order to mitigate the competition between clans, such as intermarriage.
But the clans then sent their kids to the West and their children came back with new ideas about collaboration. The collaborative efforts were to be restricted by new boundaries of class, ideology or nationhood. Some even tried to transform the clan into a closed collaborative effort that sought to simply eradicate (no longer inter-marry with) fellow clans. Our modern education swept away our traditional methods of collaboration, so we live in a state of perpetual anarchy. When the West looks at us now, they see in us the confirmation of our African “savagery”. When I talk to my elders, they wonder if sending their kids to be educated in the West was such a great idea after all. The irony is that in the West, we are now educated about “team work”and building “collaborative” efforts. These were skills that our elders perfected over centuries and that are now slowly dying. My hope is to bridge the two somehow. |
August 15, 2007
Non-Advice for Chronic Sufferers
![]() Image: Suicide by Scandinavian artist Joakim Back. The most moving character in Nick Hornby’s amazing novel A Long Way Down, about four would-be suicides who end up in a kind of crazy self-managed support group, is Maureen, the woman stuck looking after her severely handicapped teenage son. She is an example of a sufferer from what I called in my recent post on managing stress the ‘fourth source’, the chronic stress that imprisons the sufferer for a long period or even a lifetime, as contrasted to the three ‘transient sources’ of stress — sudden changes, time pressures, and unwelcome surprises. I explained: [This fourth source of stress is usually] a longer-term adversity, such as having to look after a loved one (or worse, someone you don’t love), or putting up with constant physical or emotional pain or disfigurement or a life-altering disability. The people I know who face such stresses have told me they don’t feel courageous or like martyrs: What seems to us to be courage, they say, is simply not having any other choice — we do what we must. Nevertheless, to me, this would be a form of imprisonment, and, like all of nature’s creatures, imprisonment is what we fear most, the form of stress that has no resolution, no relief, no way of coping through resilience. Those who are imprisoned, regardless of whether anyone thinks that imprisonment is real or self-inflicted, are the unhappiest people, I think, in the world. It is no wonder they seek escape, solace, through drugs or religion or suicide.
I know quite a few people in this situation. My father is coping with his second wife’s long-term dementia and physical illness. Some of my friends (and some respondents to the above post) are coping with similarly ill elders or children or other loved ones, and have put their own lives on hold, indefinitely. I know people who are living themselves with chronic agonizing physical diseases, or debilitating, exhausting mental illness. I know people who are in prison or some other involuntary institution, or trapped in jobs that they have no choice but to stay in. I know people who stay, for reasons that fill me with astonishment and dread, in relationships where they are chronically and severely abused. I know people who are addicted to substances that make their lives, and those of people who once loved them, an endless living hell. These are people in prisons as real as if they had bars and locks on them, who live lives of what Thoreau called “quiet desperation”. Suicide and other quick escapes from the constant suffering and agony are, for most, ‘a long way down’, as Hornby explains. For them, there is no conceivable way out. Some people have asked me what to do if you find yourself in this situation. I have no answers. In my youth I suffered from severe depression, and while it did not last that long it kept coming back, and when I was in that terrible place fighting the noonday demon it was as if time stretched out forever. I got lots of advice, most of it bad, and all of it useless. I tried all the solutions and none of them worked, and most of the people I spoke to admitted none of them worked for them either. Some of you may think it’s unfair or unreasonable to compare someone suffering from a crippling physical or mental illness or addiction to someone coping with the illness of someone else, but I see these all as just different types of prison — the experience is the same, and I will not pass judgement whether one prison is more honourable than another. Severe and uncontrollable suffering is unbearable, and chronic suffering that just endures and goes on and on every day is a thousand times more unbearable. I have no answers. We do what we must. Part of my unbearable grief for Gaia is feeling for all those in the world who are suffering, but my sympathy doesn’t help any. In Hornby’s book, his character Maureen says: You know that things aren’t going well for you when you can’t even tell people the simplest fact about your life, just because they’ll presume you’re asking them to feel sorry for you. I suppose it’s why you feel so far away from everyone, in the end; anything you can think of to tell them just ends up making them feel terrible.
When I was in the blackness of depression the fact that people cared for me and worried about me and wanted to help meant nothing to me. They couldn’t do anything. I didn’t expect anything from them. I didn’t care about them, and the ones that really pestered me with worry or useless suggestions or offers to help (if I told them how) or gratuitous advice (“cheer up, snap out of it”) just annoyed me. Depression is still considered by many a ‘selfish’ affliction, a weakness that indicates lack of resolve or lack of courage, so at least I didn’t have to cope with lots of people worrying about me. I did what I had to do, and was fortunate enough, unlike some, to wake up from the nightmare, with no one’s help, including my own. So I don’t know what to say to people who ask me What Can I Do? — to make the suffering less unbearable, to reconcile oneself to one’s lot. Some people swear by support groups, not those put on by well-intentioned (or not) psychologists or social workers, but those run by fellow sufferers who (supposedly) know what you’re going through, and can perhaps sympathize and offer coping tips. They never worked for me, so I won’t recommend them, but I guess it depends on your situation and your ability to get value from these things. I doubt prisoners on death row have a support group, or would want one. For some it can help just to talk it out, and if that works for you, that’s great, provided you can find a patient listener. That never worked for me either, though it has for some people I know, and I’ve tried to become a better listener, and to realize that my role is not to proffer answers (since there usually are none) but rather to help the other person make sense of their predicament and their agony in their own minds. I’m not great at this, but with practice I’m getting better. There are some who turn to drugs or religion or suicide, none of which I ever had much use for, or would recommend, but neither would I pass judgement on those who find any of these works for them, as long as the perpetrator of these ‘cures’ doesn’t gouge the sufferer for a lot of money when they are vulnerable to being gouged. I’m sorry. I usually offer answers or at least approaches on this blog, but for sufferers in long-term prisons of one kind or another I don’t have any to offer. If other readers have suggestions, they’re more than welcome to post them in the comments thread below (or e-mail them to me if the temperamental RadioUserland comments thread doesn’t work). That’s all I’ve got. Category: Being Human
|
Collective Emergence
![]() A collaborative drawing by Claudia and Sergio Olivos I‘ve told a few stories about great collaborations on this blog. Here are a couple of them:
How do these extraordinary occurrences happen? Given the staggering complexity of social environments and interrelationships, how we get attuned to each other to work such magic with no plan? You could not orchestrate these collaborative outcomes, these ‘collective emergences’, nor could you predict them, yet they are not rare. Under the right circumstances, they are commonplace miracles: We see them in at least five areas of human (and animal) endeavour:
I’ve studied the collaborations that seemed to be the most successful ones, and identified seven elements that seem to be present in most of them. Here they are, along with some ways in which these elements can be nurtured to increase the likelihood of a collaboration achieving remarkable results:
When you think about it, these same seven elements of great collaboration could also be the seven elements of great sex. The collective emergence that comes out of great collaboration is worth all the work to create the right conditions, and all the practice andlearning that are needed to make it extraordinary. Subject: Collaboration
|
August 13, 2007
Grateful
![]() Dali, The Persistence of Memory Stress can, if we are not careful, be our undoing. Modern stress, unlike that faced by prehistoric people, is often chronic (recurring, or never going away) and ‘unmanageable’ (there is no obvious, immediate action we can take to respond to it and hence discharge it). It served its purpose when we needed adrenaline to flee or fight predators. But now, it just makes us physically and mentally ill — our bodies just have not adapted to cope with ‘civilized’ stress. It has been a momentous few weeks for me. I started my new position. I completed and submitted my book manuscript. And I have grappled with a whole series of small problems — I cut a corner too tight in an underground garage and badly scraped the side of my car, the swimming pool sprung a leak, we had a grass fire caused by a faulty circuit breaker, someone accidentally damaged our side gate. The combination of all these things in rapid succession would have been too much for ‘the old me’ to handle. Sudden dramatic change, time pressure, and unwelcome surprises are all major stressers in our lives. How does resilience help us cope with all three of these sources of stress?
I’ve also been fortunate not to have faced a fourth source of stress — a longer-term adversity, such as having to look after a loved one (or worse, someone I don’t love), or putting up with constant pain or disfigurement or a life-altering disability. The people I know who face such stresses have told me they don’t feel courageous or like martyrs: What seems to us to be courage, they say, is simply not having any other choice — we do what we must. Nevertheless, to me, this would be a form of imprisonment, and, like all of nature’s creatures, imprisonment is what we fear most, the form of stress that has no resolution, no relief, no way of coping through resilience. Those who are imprisoned, regardless of whether I think, or anyone thinks, that imprisonment is real or self-inflicted, are the unhappiest people, I think, in the world. It is no wonder they seek escape, solace, through drugs or religion or suicide. So now whenever I experience one of the three transient stresses above I imagine being imprisoned — with no escape, no way of coping by slowing time down or just doing things in the moment or rationalizing that ‘what could have been’ is absurd to be unhappy about — and it’s the gratefulness I feel at realizing that my stressful situation will soon pass, vanish backwards into the fiction, the exhaust of the past that is disconnected from Now, that discharges my stress most quickly and powerfully. But that realization and that gratefulness also resurfaces my unbearable grief for Gaia, because I am, we all are (those of us who feel it, anyway) connected with all-life-on-Earth, and hence with every creature who is imprisoned, who is suffering not just for a brief moment but all the time of their life without escape. It is a paradox that that realization fills me, at once, with such sadness, and yet strengthens the growing joy and resolve that fills my life, a joy I never felt when I was disconnected. So we cope with transient stresses through resilience that comes from practice, from self-awareness and gratefulness and connection, but the by-product of all those things is grief for those whose stresses are not transient, but enduring and unrelieved, and that grief is, in a way, another source of stress, not personal or intense but sympathetic, chronic, a part of us all until the end of the world. Category: Let-Self-Change
|
Living Lightly on the Land
![]() A few readers have questioned how I can claim to be an environmentalist when I live in a large house with a pool on a large lot. Surely, they say, this is about as far from radical simplicity as you can get? I would certainly agree that building such a large house, even one as well insulated as ours, would be environmentally irresponsible. When we bought it 13 years ago, however, our two kids and their SO’s, two potential grandchildren and three dogs were in the picture. And although they’ve moved out, the fact is that the house is nearly 30 years old and if we weren’t living in it (responsibly), someone else would be living in it (probably less responsibly). When I think about it, I realize that we’ve made much greater strides towards radical simplicity than even I would have dared to think:
Our total expenses, excluding property taxes and insurance, are a third what they were a decade ago. We’ve made a lot of progress, and are still working on areas where our footprint can be further reduced:
But while we’ve made some important and conscientious choices to conserve, to consume less, the changes to our lifestyle have been more radical than just what we don’t buy and don’t use. Radical simplicity is about simple pleasures. Nothing gives me more joy than sitting out in the yard, at sunrise or sunset or after dark, and just listening to and watching, paying attention to things I never used to notice. Chelsea our wonderful pound rescue taught me that. I would sooner walk in the forest, in the moonlight, in the rain, than subject myself to any ‘commercial’ entertainment. I find small-talk a waste of time, and I’ve learned to excuse myself from it politely. I’d much sooner read, or talk about something important. I have no desire to travel, even to Toronto. I’ve found my place, right here, and I never get tired of it, or bored with it. There is always more to learn from it, and from the wild creatures who, like me, belong to it. When I buy a book that isn’t made from unbleached, recycled paper I complain to the publisher. There is no sacrifice here. The reductions in our footprint have been completely painless. I am happier than I have ever been, and healthier. With less noise and less unneeded light I notice things I never used to. I find more joy in lamplight, kittens, working together, bubble baths, dew, quiet conversation, sparrows, caresses, homemade music, fireflies, poetry, children’s laughter, stories, thunderstorms, self-organized community activities, wildflowers, helping people, learning how to do things and fix things, silence, wild hares and foxes and deer, scented candles, fruits and vegetables from the garden, love — all these things right here that cost nothing — than I ever found in costly, faraway entertainments. I wish you could all be here, to share these things with me. So I could show you. Radical simplicity is not just about what you consume. I just can’t believe it took me so long to learn, to understand. Not so simpleafter all. |
August 12, 2007
Sunday Open Thread – August 12, 2007
![]() What I’m thinking about, and planning on writing (and podcasting) about soon: Radical Simplicity: Much of what we need to do to create sustainable models of better ways of living and making a living requires us to simplify how we live: traveling less, buying less, owning less, owing less, supporting self-sustaining local community. How can we learn to appreciate radical simplicity, so we can become better at this? Personal Resilience and Collective Emergence: I’m learning how not to take the bad things that happen hard, angrily, or personally, and how to let things emerge, in their own time, collaboratively. Why are we never taught these important lessons before the accumulated stress does so much damage to us? Blog-Hosted Conversations: Starting the last week of August, once a week, this blog will feature 30-minute conversations, initially on the subject of “What is your model of a better way to live, and what capacities do we need to develop or re-learn to live that way?” Open Thread Question: How much progress have you made in the last five years towards reducing your footprint on the planet? |
August 11, 2007
Saturday Links for the Week — August 11, 2007
Amazing Visualizations Blog: Kudos to my colleague Greg Turko for finding Strange Maps, a blog of unusual and sometimes brilliant visualizations that add meaning to and make sense of information. The top one reproduced above is a picture, from Japan, of the most prevalent Web 2.0 sites and how they’re connected. The one below it tells lonely single males to go East, and lonely single females to go West. Helping Communities Work Better: The Institute for Local Self-Reliance is doing two things to make communities more resilient: Lobbying to change laws to encourage local sustainability (New Rules Project) and working to encourage extensive recycling in all US communities (Waste to Wealth Project). Journalism and Propaganda: John Pilger explains how the mainstream media and the mainstream political parties are distracting us from the need to dump them both in favour of independents interested in more than money and power. Republican Presidents Forever?: In a related story, both the New Yorker and the NYT have been following the efforts of both US parties to pervert the workings of the electoral college to their advantage (the Republicans may yet be able to guarantee presidential power forever thanks to a shrewd California initiative), and the efforts of some states and Common Cause to end the tyranny of the college entirely by going to one-person, one-vote (democracy, what a concept). Early Signs of Crash of Markets, Dollar, Economy: The collapse of the overextended housing market is now rippling through financial markets despite the trillions of dollars governments worldwide are furiously throwing into them, while the US dollar is poised to fall through the floor. Maybe just a dress rehearsal for the economic crisis ahead. Maybe not. Thanks to Dale Asberry for this link and the two that follow. ALEC, the Corporatist Trojan Horse: NRDC is co-sponsoring a site to throw light on the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a consortium of huge multinationals working together very successfully to get corporatist-friendly legislation and deregulation passed. Visual History of Religion in 90 Seconds: A neat video on a map of the world tracks the growth of the world’s Big 5 organized religions since prehistory. Thought for the Week: Another great quote on community, by eco-feminist Susan Griffin, contributed by reader Peter Dixon: [There is] a desire that is at the core of human imaginings, the desire to locate ourselves in community, to make of survival a shared effort, to experience a palpable reverence in our connections with each other and the earth that sustains us … to be defined by the largest arcs of meaning that connect flesh and river, sky and word, reverie and theleast act of survival.
|
August 9, 2007
Garbage Politics
You have to give it to conservatives — they know how to manipulate people. Economic “laissez-faire” elitist conservatives, the scions of the old robber barons, have learned to play the social conservatives, the fearful and resentful anti-city farmers, and the isolated, harried, anti-government suburbanites. Cobble them together and you have close to 50% of Americans and 30% of Canadians, enough in both countries to elect a conservative government.
The last conservative provincial government stuck it to the city of Toronto (which had the audacity to vote overwhelmingly against them) by downloading responsibility for a lot of services to the municipalities, while not downloading any of the related tax revenues. The current Liberal provincial government, unpopular for its ineptness and arrogance, is up against a conservative opposition again in an election in two months, and is not willing to rectify the inequity because they want the suburban vote, and have already conceded the Toronto urban vote to the left-leaning NDP. As a result, the NDP-dominated City of Toronto municipal government is now essentially bankrupt. The mayor has pleaded and threatened, and now must use its new municipal taxing authority to jack up taxes while also cutting back services. The conservatives love watching them squirm. Their answer, in a classic manipulation, is to argue that the city administration is bloated, and that salaries should be slashed, staff put on work-share programs (where they’d only work, and be paid for, four days a week, but still expected to get the same amount of work done). And of course, that all the ‘inefficient’ government services be ‘privatized’. Their favourite whipping boy is garbage collection. If you work in this profession long enough, you can earn $24/hour, or about $47,000 per year. This isn’t enough to live on in Toronto, where even tiny run-down houses cost over $300,000. Nevertheless, economic conservatives, most of whom probably earn between two and ten times that amount, for office work that many would suggest is worth less than the work of trash collectors, scream that these salaries are outrageous. Their friends in private industry, they insist, could get desperate immigrants who don’t speak English and don’t know their employment rights to do the same work for half that wage, allowing a nice profit for the private company and big savings to the government. Of course, those workers only hang around until they wise up, go bankrupt, starve, return to their native country, or find something that pays a living wage (like theft, smuggling or selling drugs). So the turnover at the private contractor’s is enormous, and the quality and reliability of the service atrocious. And the laid-off garbage collectors go on welfare or unemployment insurance (which the government and taxpayers pay for anyway), and find something else that pays a living wage (like theft, smuggling or selling drugs). The net effect of this ‘privatization’ is dislocation and other social problems, worse service, and higher costs to the taxpayer. But the conservatives, who know this full well, won’t admit it, because they can flog this lie to whip up anti-government sentiment and get elected on a ‘lower taxes’ platform. In the economic conservative suburbs, this works like a charm. Meanwhile, the farmers, the social conservatives’ political base, are struggling with low commodity prices (thanks to the economic conservative elites’ big agriculture oligopoly control of market prices) and rising oil costs. Their only hope is to make a profit from suburban sprawl onto their land, to take the money and run further from the city where prices are cheaper, and wait for the sprawl to reach them again. Most wealthy Torontonians and suburbanites made their fortunes in real estate development and land speculation (developers’ and speculators’ campaign contributions comprise an astonishing 95% of all elected municipal politicians’ campaign funds). The farmers want their turn. The Liberals and the NDP want land frozen for agriculture, and they want greenbelt areas with no development. So the conservatives alone support the farmers in their desire to make a killing selling their land for subdivision and suburban sprawl. Of course, manipulative to a fault, they don’t quite put it that way — they say that farmers should be “fully compensated” if they’re not permitted to make a killing on their property, in other words that the government (the taxpayers) should pay the farmers ten times the current agricultural value of their property to go on farming it. The result would be a draining of government coffers to make some millionaires who would have no motivation to continue farming or invest in their farms. They would likely subcontract the farms to subsistence farmers or factory farming corporations. Not surprisingly, the conservatives are popular in rural areas for this policy. So this October, we are likely to have another conservative provincial government, because just over a third of the voters (mostly in the suburbs and rural areas) will support the conservatives, and the Liberals and NDP will split the rest of the vote. It’s the same motley coalition that elected Bush, and Canadian minority PM Harper. It’s garbage politics, but it works. The really sad thing is that, when the people get fed up with the execrable conservative governments that these perverse coalitions produce, they tend to rally around the alternative (for the US Democrats or the Canadian Liberals) that is least to the left of the conservatives, because they perceive that this is the alternative that is most likely, one-on-one, to defeat theconservatives. So we have a choice between arch-right-wing or right-leaning middle-of-the-road (the two Clintons, Obama). True progressives need not apply. Ugh. Category: Frames, Left and Right
|
August 8, 2007
Waiting to Free the Crowd
![]() Dan O’Neill cartoon from the Jefferson Airplane CD Volunteers We all want to believe everything is going to be OK. So when things are going badly, the hucksters of phony miracle cures and reassurances come out in droves like worms after a heavy downpour. We get overweight, a thousand quacks will sell us diets that ‘worked’ for a small sample of people only because they were so desperate that anything would have worked for them, for awhile. We get sick, everyone from Big Pharma to faith healers will sell us something that will heal us, their cures’ efficacy based on doctored trials and hawked by disgraced physicians in white coats. We get depressed, organized religion will pounce on us in our fragile state with promises, for a tithe, of absolution for our negative thoughts and deeds, salvation in the next, perfect, eternal life, and a community of uncritical people who will embrace us even when we loathe ourselves, and wacko psychologists will fleece us into paying for their wondrous theories and never-ending therapies, and cults will show us, if we give them everything including our minds, the one true way. And in order to sell their patrons’ flawed and dangerous products, the whores of the corporatists will lie to us and prey on our desperate desire to believe that global warming won’t happen, that our beloved SUVs are better for the environment than hybrids, that ethanol and nukes will safely, cleanly provide all the energy we will ever need, and that the only thing that’s preventing a ‘victory’ in the Middle East is those Iranians, Syrians, and Palestinians, who need to be bombed into behaving properly. So we get Exxon and Monsanto and other pathological corporatists paying scads of money to incompetent and greedy people to write phony books and articles, and then spending scads more to promote these fraudulent works, and to get morons in the mainstream media to mindlessly propagate the propaganda (and to shamelessly broadcast, as ‘advertising’, these same criminals’ deceptions — such untruths that, if they were directed against shareholders or investors rather than mere consumers, would land the perps in prison for life). And we put up with it — the greenwashing ads and the fraudulent ‘scientific’ reports and the massive publicity given to the junk science and fictitious research put out by phony ‘think tanks’ and ‘foundations’ that are simply anonymous fronts (with Orwellian names like ‘Citizens for a Free America’) for these same corporatists — because we want to believe. If we believe that we don’t have to do anything, or that nothing we do (or cease doing) will make any difference anyway, then we are free to do nothing, to go on doing what we were doing before. We do what we must, then we do what’s easy, and then we do what’s fun. There is already so much we must do, to stave off the fear of not having enough, to meet the ever-increasing expectations of the boss, the family, the lawyer, the doctor, the police, the government, and nearly everyone else, that when someone tells us “you don’t have to do anything about that, it’s all a misunderstanding, we’re taking care of it” we will accept it no matter the source or its lack of credibility. One less thing to do, to worry about. More precious time for the easy and fun stuff. It is just too much to ask us to be informed, and to think critically. Informed, critical thinking is the road to disbelief, to greater personal responsibility, to having to do more that we don’t really want to do. There is just so much stress in our lives already, we don’t want to know. We don’t want to think. The corporatists, of every stripe, and their whores, understand this. They are playing us perfectly. We are now consumers instead of customers, disengaged cynics instead of citizens. We are not responsible. The corporatists don’t tell us what we don’t want to know. They tell us reassuringly what we don’t have to do. So, dumb and complacent, we don’t know, and we do nothing. And so we can’t complain. It’s our own fault, but now we’re helpless. Funny thing about information, though. It’s like a genie that won’t go back in the bottle. You learn a little, you can’t unlearn it. You start to pay attention, and that gets you thinking, imagining, wondering. Pretty soon you don’t believe what you’re hearing, what you’re being told. You stop feeling helpless, and blaming yourself, and start to feel responsible, compelled to learn more, to become more informed and think more critically, to do something. The ads don’t work anymore. You abandon the mainstream media for information sources that are still credible. You find yourself buying less, buying more critically. You discover that learning more creates stress but also makes you happier, more alive, more self-sufficient. You no longer don’t want to know. You know. You are no longer free to do nothing. You’re free to do something. Some of the people you know seem to get this. They’ve been going through the same thing you have. But what about everyone else? Daniel Quinn would tell us there’s no point in trying to persuade them, argue with them, until they’re ready. Until then we have to just wait. But there’s so many of them. What do we do? Can we afford to wait, while so many people remain the victims of whores in five thousand dollar suits, the apologists and front men and hucksters and lawyers and politicians of all major parties and dirty trick squads of the corporatists whose pathology ruins our world, and who keep so manyin their thrall? If people won’t understand until they’re ready, how can we help them be ready, help them set themselves free? Categories: Let-Self-Change
|
Waiting to Free the Crowd








You have to give it to conservatives — they know how to manipulate people. Economic “laissez-faire” elitist conservatives, the scions of the old robber barons, have learned to play the social conservatives, the fearful and resentful anti-city farmers, and the isolated, harried, anti-government suburbanites. Cobble them together and you have close to 50% of Americans and 30% of Canadians, enough in both countries to elect a conservative government.



