Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.



January 31, 2009

Links for the Week — Saturday January 31, 2009

Filed under: Our Culture / Ourselves — Dave Pollard @ 22:37


nonconform cartoon Charles E MartinThis world is fucked. Maybe it’s the endless brutal winter getting to me. Maybe it’s my resultant lack of exercise. Maybe it’s the total absurdity of the belief that Obama or anyone else can possibly hope to prevent the ghastly slide into truly horrific civilizational collapse that’s now well underway. Or just maybe the wave of changes I’ve been going through for the past year is reaching a tipping point, and I’m on the cusp of a truly radical change, a complete starting-all-over.

Whatever it is, I’m in a cranky mood. I’ve read all my favourite blogs, chatted this week to many of the people I love and think I might come to love, and they have provided me with neither inspiration nor consolation. That is not, of course, their fault, nor their responsibility. But the result is that I’m feeling disinclined to write, to talk, or to do any of the things that I had previously been working on with considerable enthusiasm.

More on this tomorrow, I think. In the meantime, if this week’s links seem a little bland and superficial, it’s because my head and heart are somewhere else. I’m not quite sure where.

The Solution to Peak Oil and Climate Change: Dream On: Richard Heinberg lays out the five steps needed to prevent, or at least mitigate, the coming peak oil and climate change crises. Nice plan, even though it would require a collective will and coordination that our political/economic systems are incapable of. Thanks to Lucas Gonzales for the link.

 
1. Make a massive and immediate shift to renewable energy
 2. Electrify the transportation system (and stop investing in oil-powered transportation infrastructure)
 3. Rebuild the electricity grid (relocalize, move to “smart” grid)
 4. De-carbonize and relocalize the food system
 5. Retrofit all buildings for energy efficiency and energy production

The Solution to the Broken US Health Care System: Beth Patterson points us to ex-Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber’s We Can Do Better movement, which has come up with 12 principles for a viable US health care system based on a year of community based discussions — the wisdom of crowds:


1. We cannot solve the health care crisis by simply giving everyone insurance coverage (i.e. this is not just an insurance problem).
2. We are all in this together and have challenged the whole concept of “categorical eligibility.”
3. All Americans should be eligible for and have timely access to effective treatment for at least the same set of essential health conditions (“core benefit”)
4. The core benefit should be portable and not tied to employment.
5. In terms of financing, we believe the first emphasis should be on the public resources already being spent on health care. We are not trying to dictate what people do with their private after-tax dollars, but rather to ensure that public resources are spent in a way that is equitable, efficient and effective in producing health.
6. Market competition should be based on cost, quality and outcomes, not the avoidance of risk.
7. We must explicitly recognize the reality of fiscal limits and that we cannot purchase everything for everyone.
8. We must acknowledge the inevitability of at least a two-tiered system; that people with more disposable income will always be able to purchase more than people with fewer resources. People should be able to purchase additional services that may not be covered in the core benefit. The challenge is to ensure that the core benefit (the “floor”) is adequate to provide for the health of all Americans.
9. All medical interventions are not of equal value and effectiveness in producing health, and therefore a prioritization process must be established to decide what will be financed with the public resources.
10. Individuals should be more directly involved in their own health care treatment decisions.
11. It is important to promote healthy behaviors through strategies that focus on both individual choices (responsibility) and environmental influences.
12. Co-payments should be used not simply to shift costs to individuals, but rather to influence individual behavior by placing lower co-payments (or no co-payments) for highly effective procedures backed by good scientific evidence and higher co-payments on lower priority interventions.


Six Rules for Book Reviewers:
From the late John Updike (thanks to Tree for the link and the one that follows):


1. Try to understand what the author wished to do, and do not blame him for not achieving what he did not attempt.
2. Give him enough direct quotation–at least one extended passage–of the book’s prose so the review’s reader can form his own impression, can get his own taste.
3. Confirm your description of the book with quotation from the book, if only phrase-long, rather than proceeding by fuzzy precis.
4. Go easy on plot summary, and do not give away the ending. (How astounded and indignant was I, when innocent, to find reviewers blabbing, and with the sublime inaccuracy of drunken lords reporting on a peasants’ revolt, all the turns of my suspenseful and surpriseful narrative! Most ironically, the only readers who approach a book as the author intends, unpolluted by pre-knowledge of the plot, are the detested reviewers themselves. And then, years later, the blessed fool who picks the volume at random from a library shelf.)
5. If the book is judged deficient, cite a successful example along the same lines, from the author’s ouevre or elsewhere. Try to understand the failure. Sure it’s his and not yours?
6. Do not accept for review a book you are predisposed to dislike, or committed by friendship to like. Do not imagine yourself a caretaker of any tradition, an enforcer of any party standards, a warrior in an idealogical battle, a corrections officer of any kind. Never, never (John Aldridge, Norman Podhoretz) try to put the author “in his place,” making him a pawn in a contest with other reviewers. Review the book, not the reputation. Submit to whatever spell, weak or strong, is being cast. Better to praise and share than blame and ban. The communion between reviewer and his public is based upon the presumption of certain possible joys in reading, and all our discriminations should curve toward that end.”

Eating Dirt is Good For You: Scientists say exposure to a wide range of germs as a baby helps build a healthy immune system. Duh. And still the sales of disinfectants, antibiotics and antibacterials soar, parents shrug off their pets to the pound when the baby’s born, and autoimmune disease rates skyrocket.

The Future of Food: A 2020 scenario from a local food system researcher predicts starvation and riots. I think it’s further off, but accurate. Thanks to Paul Heft for the link.

California Emission Rules Would Bankrupt Detroit: So say the US auto makers, who want more time to fiddle. And they were doing so well before these new rules were announced.

Global Worries Over US Debt Levels: The annual Davos Circus is back in session, with the usual doltish clowns presenting the usual discredited nonsense to the usual clueless crowd of rich and powerful barons digging in to defend their obscene entitlements.

Will an Endless Recession Usher In the Long Emergency?: The tunnel-visioned economists are still talking about how to stimulate citizens to spend more and get deeper in debt, and the timing of the ‘recovery’. But what happens if, this time, there is no recovery, no insane belief in perpetual growth and spending your way out of the crises caused by reckless spending? The Automatic Earth says we should watch Iceland, the Baltics, the Balkans, and Ireland as states that could fall first, as personal and corporate bankruptcies lead to national bankruptcies and, perhaps, a ‘recession’ without end. Thanks to Eric Lilius for the link, and the link to the silly money videos below. And in a similar vein Douglas Coupland asks:

What if we actually do spend 10 percent less this year — and then decide to stay at that level? Is that healthy? Will China implode? What will be the next Iceland?… Right now, it seems almost impossible to imagine ever spending more on things except, maybe, gasoline. And yet the prospect of less consumption fills us with dread. It’s not the having less part that is frightening — people are generally happy as long as everybody’s in the same boat. What’s frightening is the fear that our system can’t handle less, and it’s not as if there’s some other system out there shouting: “Try me! Try me!”

Cloud Computing and the End of the Desktop PC?: Some are speculating that ubiquitous high-speed bandwidth means the end of the need for a hard drive, and hence the end of the desktop computer. I told you so.

All the Key US Economic Data in One Document: From this New York Fed site you can download, each month, in chart form, all the key economic data for the US in one 32-page PDF file. Bookmark it.

Just for Fun: Some treasures on YouTube:

  • Acoustic Alchemy – Wind of Change – music to meditate by
  • The Late Victor Borge – Improvisation – then 80 years of age, Borge had heard but never played this music, and made up this accompaniment on the spot
  • 16-year-old Mary Copeley – Bach’s Little Fugue – recorded by her little brother, as she was just playing around from memory
  • Bernstein – Ravel Concerto in G – second movement, played and conducted by the maestro
  • And finally, the British send up the financial industry, as only they can, in Silly Money. Part 4 is the funniest, but they’re all good.
And if you’re not into video, why not join me as part of Ivor Tymchak’s Cult of Culture. My role in the cult: Big Ass Flonking Integration Luminary (BAFIL), offering other cult members transformation to stellar perfection (TSP), one TSP at a time, through my guided ascension breakthrough (BAFIL-GAB) sessions. It is likely however, that those humble enough to actually enroll for BAFIL-GAB will probably be inherently inadequate to be allowed ascension. But I might be persuaded.

Or you can play The Bailout Game, and see if you can beat Bernanke at his own game. Thanks to Theresa Purcell for the link.

Thoughts for the Week: 

HOUSE FINCH by David Bonta

One finch doesn’t
fly with the others,
his eyes clouded
over. Whatever
panics the others
never shakes him,
gripping the perch
he had struggled
to find, flying by
sound, by shadows,
by the sudden wind
from fifty wings
leaving him alone
at the round
house of a feeder,
pulling gray sun-
flower seeds
from under
its doors.

IF I COULD DO IT ALL OVER AGAIN by EO Wilson

If I could do it all over again and relive my vision in the twenty-first century, I would be a microbial ecologist…Into that world I would go with the aid of modern microscopy and molecular analysis. I would cut my way through clonal forests sprawled across grains of sand, travel in an imagined submarine through drops of water proportionately the size of lakes, and track predators and prey in order to discover new life ways and alien food webs. All this, and I need venture no farther than ten paces outside my laboratory building. The jaguars, ants, and orchids would still occupy distant forests in all their splendor, but now they would be joined by an even stranger and vastly more complex living world virtually without end.

Image: New Yorker cover by Charles E Martin from September 11, 1971

January 28, 2009

A Short History of Earth

Filed under: Our Culture / Ourselves — Dave Pollard @ 17:24


green turtle

There is greater difference between the genetic code of the cholera bacterium and the tuberculosis bacterium than there is between the genetic code of the human being and the potato.
          — Report of researchers who have recently sequenced all four genomes

———-

Because the turtles [I was studying in Costa Rica] come out to nest after dark, much of my work was done at night. There was a great deal of waiting between turtles, plenty of time to sit on a driftwood log and think. In the first years of my research I was often the only one on the beach for miles. After ten or twenty minutes of sitting without using my flashlight, my eyes adapted to the dark and I could make out forms against the brown-black sand: the beach plum and coconut palm silhouettes in back, the flicker of the surf in front, sometimes even the shadowy outline of a trailing railroad vine or the scurry of a ghost crab at my feet. The air was heavy and damp with a distinctive primal smell that I can remember but not describe. The rhythmic roar of the surf a few feet away never ceased — my favourite sound. I hear it as I write in my landlocked office in New Jersey. And then, with ponderous, dramatic slowness, a giant turtle would emerge from the sea.

Usually I would see the track first, a vivid black line standing out against the lesser blackness, like the swath of a bulldozer. If I was closer, I could hear the animal’s deep hiss of breath and the sounds of her undershell scraping over logs. If there was a moon, I might see the light glistening off the parabolic curve of the still wet shell. Size at night is hard to determine: even the sprightly 180-pounders, probably nesting for the first time, looked big when nearby, but the 400-pound ancients, with shells nearly four feet long, were colossal in the darkness. Then when the excavations of the body pit and egg cavity were done, if I slowly parted the hind flippers of the now-oblivious turtle, I could watch the perfect white spheres falling and falling into the flask-shaped pit scooped into the soft sand.

Falling as they have fallen for a hundred million years, with the same slow cadence, always shielded from the rain or stars by the same massive bulk with the beaked head and the same large, myopic eyes rimmed with crusts of sand washed out by tears. Minutes and hours, days and months dissolve into eons. I am on an Oligocene beach, an Eocene beach, a Cretaceous beach — the scene is the same. It is night. The turtles are coming back, always back; I hear a deep hiss of breath and catch a glint of wet shell as the continents slide and crash, the oceans form and grow. The turtles were coming here before here was here.

                — David Ehrenfeld, from Beginning Again

Imagine that a tiny creature, just 1/2 micron long, hitched a ride from outer space and landed on Earth just as it was formed 4.6 billion years ago. This indomitable creature, let’s call her Pri, decides to travel from where she lands, at a gaseous, ammonia-swirling prebiotic place that would one day be called Paris, toward the sun. Pri has been endowed with the ability to withstand all of Earth’s climates, but she moves very slowly, just 1/4 micron every hour, half her body length. At this pace she moves 5.5 microns a day, or 2mm (the width of a pinhead) every year. But she’s persistent. It doesn’t matter if the place she is traveling across is ocean, desert, or glacier, she keeps going, one pinhead-width every year.

This is what she sees.

For the first 3/4 of a billion years, it is a hostile and dramatic journey. There is no free oxygen in the air, no protective atmosphere, so temperature, winds, and geological activity are so wild that life for any creature (other than the alien Pri) is impossible.

Then, after 3/4 of a billion years, in a place not far from what would one day be called Ireland, she spots a few single-celled creatures called prokaryotes, floating in the warmer turbulent waters. They are about the same size as Pri, but they each contain these remarkable strands, a million pairs of molecules wound together in a tiny helix. What might they be for?

It takes another billion years of travel before Pri notices that some of these prokaryotes have evolved photosynthesis — they are making things from the sun! There is amazing diversity of these creatures — the ones called archaea and the ones called bacteria are utterly different, and even the bacteria are utterly different from each other. There is a huge amount of construction going on, even though, to a creature much larger than Pri, none of it would be visible. But something is definitely happening here. Pri is now a third the way through her great-circle Westward journey, in a place that would one day be called Greenland.

Another 400 million years pass, and suddenly it gets very cold, and the entire planet is covered miles deep in ice. She is now at the North end of what will one day be called Québec. Her trip is nearly half over, and she despairs that these strange creatures she has been seeing, working so hard, will not survive.

But they do. The ice melts and re-forms into another frozen ball, and melts again, but somehow these microscopic creatures endure, and they start to change the atmosphere in a way that calms the whole planet, makes it friendlier for all life on Earth. And after another 1.8 billion years, her trip now 90% done, Pri notices that some of these creatures have found a way to form together into multi-cellular life, into “organisms”. And an astonishing profusion of life begins. In the last 550 million years of her voyage, as she makes her way from what would one day be called Utah to her final rest in the Pacific Ocean, she witnesses the transformation of the planet by all this life, in a furious battle with the planet’s natural forces — alternately explosions of life and collapses into extinction. Here is her log for this last leg of her journey:

Time to End of Voyage (million years) Observations
490 Extinction! 80% of all life gone.
440 Extinction! 30% of all life gone.
400 Fish! Amphibians! Plants on Land! Such wonder!
370 Extinction Again! 20% of all life gone.
330 The Land is Splitting Apart! Huge Forests! Flying Insects!
250 Extinction Again! Horrible! Over 50% of all life gone. The Darkness Lasts for Years.
220 Huge Monsters Reign Over Pitiable Small Mammals.
200 Extinction Yet Again! 30% of all life gone.
175 Ocean Monsters and Land Monsters! The Prey Has Taken Wing to Escape!*
100 Water Almost Everywhere! And Flowers! And Oh the Lovely Turtles!
65 Another Extinction! Dinosaurs Gone! So Dark! The Sky Has Disappeared!
40 Sky Again! Water Receding! Funny Tiny ‘Mammal’ Creatures! Horses! Rodents! Little Chattery Monkeys! Birds That Soar and Swoop! Forests That Die Each Year! Oh and the Whales and the Elephants! And Some of the Horses Have Returned to the Sea!*
10 My Voyage is 99.8% Over. Such Wonders These Last Brief 500 Million Years! Cooling and Drying. Mountains! Grasses. Profusion of Big Mammals!
5 My Voyage is 99.9% Over. I Can See the Pacific Ocean From These Mountains! My Final Home. Lovely Giant Forest By the Sea! So Many Wild Creatures!
1 Oh Horrors! I Can Smell the Ocean But I Sense the Ice Coming Again and Again! But I Am So Close! The Creatures Tell Me of a New Monster Coming Too, Monkey Monster That Kills Everything! Another Extinction Beginning!

Only a bit over a kilometer from her ocean destination, 650 thousand years ago, Pri encounters the first of six ice ages that will freeze much of the planet, again, for much of the next 638 thousand years. When the last of these recedes, when Pri is only 24 meters from the ocean, the new monster species begins to extinguish all other life on the planet, organized now and using terrible new tools to destroy and to spread across the globe.

And when Pri is only one half meter, 250 years from the ocean, the monsters arrive at the ocean. And when she is only twenty centimeters, eight inches, 100 years from the ocean, the monsters block access to the ocean with huge buildings and walls, and foul the water until it is full of poisons, unable to support life.

And then, as she waits, patiently, as she’d done before for the other monsters and the ice and the storms to pass, the monsters suddenly vanish. As she waits and 100 years pass, most of the monsters die, and take with them most of the other life on the planet. Another Extinction!, she writes. So she waits a short thousand years more, the time it had taken her to crawl the last two meters of her astonishing halfway round-the-world journey. By then the buildings and walls have fallen, the water has cleansed itself, and Pri is able to make her final eight-inch hundred-year sprint, and her final log entry:

0                                                   And Now, Another Profusion of Life! My Shining Forest! And Oh the Birds! The Buzzing Insects! And in My Sweet Ocean, Those Lovely Turtles, Nearly Gone After 100 Million Years, Still Lumber On!

* Scientists now believe dolphins evolved from ungulate mammals, which some describe as the second most remarkable evolutionary invention in our planet’s history (next to the invention of heavier-than-air flight by birds).

Pri's Journey

Category: Science

January 26, 2009

Conjurer

Filed under: Creative Works — Dave Pollard @ 23:01


barsotti angry disappointed
cartoon by charles barsotti; purchase his remarkable work here

You say you want it fixed. It is not good enough, you say, it does not work the way it was supposed to, the way it was advertised to work. It does not meet your expectations.

All right, then, I will look at it. I will perform a laying of hands on it, and free it to become what it was intended to be. I will mind-meld with it, to enlighten it. I will percolate it with my aura, blinding, pulsing waves of meaning, of intent.

But still I know it won’t be enough. It doesn’t soar, you say. It doesn’t end world poverty. It does not make you desirable to others by whom you wish to be desired. It lacks resonance, purpose, that old magic.

I bring it into the shop. I apply torque, and ratchet it up tighter. I mesmerize it, enthrall it with my very presence. It offers to do anything I want, so I ask it to grant you a hundred wishes, provided they are each worded in the form of a question.

Won’t do, you insist. It doesn’t sparkle, enchant. It cannot cut through steel, or broken hearts. It shudders when it hears the cries of children. It leaves calcium deposits, puncture wounds, a bitter aftertaste.

I take it to the specialist, the guru, the wizard, the doctor of imperfect things, the one who surpasseth understanding. I am in tears now, pleading for improvement, repair, freedom from the pain, the injury, the injustice.

The all-knowing one blesses it, decrees it to be of the highest colour, beyond colour even, achieving perfect clarity, integral, transcendent, at one with the force, copacetic.

But as soon as you see it, you frown. It still hasn’t provided global liquidity, you complain. Poxviruses continue to proliferate, everywhere there are locusts, sexual dysfunctions, fungi, celebrity scientologists, plagues of idealists, reality tv. It’s not working, it’s worse than useless. Take it away, you demand.

So I do. I wrap it in feather down and steal it away, in my arms, through the blizzard, the sandstorm, the anticyclonic gloom. I place it in a pyramid, which I place in turn in a box of styrofoam worms.

I return empty-handed, chastened, cleansed. I should have known better, I confess. I throw myself at your mercy. I genuflect, bow, drill holes in my forehead, scrub myself with baryons, admit to past indiscretions, libels, illicit thoughts about checkout girls, minor felonies involving periscopes, bicycle seats.

You are inconsolable. It’s not that, you say, not that thing that you kept trying to fix. It’s you. You are the cause of the epidemics, assasinations, Davos conferences, stuttering, extreme sports, anomie, conspicuous consumption, genital warts, Nascar, pthalates, failure to achieve cold fusion, failure to achieve carbon sequestration, YouTube beheading videos.

There is no defence for this. I failed to factor in the causes and effects, do the multivariate analysis. I ask how I should pay for this, what should be my recompense.

Accept responsibility, you reply. That is enough. Carry that weight. Push that rock uphill, and don’t stop. Wear a sign on your forehead, so everyone will know.

I sighed. This was much worse than I had feared. I had expected hanging, electrocution by faulty taser, lethal melamine injection, death by water.

I had hoped for excommunication, banishment. Exile.

Category: Satire

January 25, 2009

a faerie story

Filed under: Creative Works — Dave Pollard @ 23:03


eyzaathe by enayla

asherah, fae of the kaitka, called up to her winged friend kraka.
she was looking for advice.
kraka scooped her up in his wings and hoisted her onto his back.
together they swooped down the hills in the falling dark,
watching the deer browsing for food in the dusk,
in the lamplight of the kaitka settlement.

crow stock 3 by inki_stock

“what is your question, fae asherah?” croaked kraka.

“i want to discover why it is so hard to find where i belong,” she replied.

“this is a question for someone wiser than i”, kraka responded,
“let us go to the land of rains, and ask raaf”.

so they flew deep into the rainforest, and when they found raaf,
they asked her asherah’s question.

raaf flapped her enormous raven wings and thought for a moment,
and then replied:
“we are each destined to follow three streams:
the first is the stream of the place we belong, where we are meant to be.
the second is the stream of the creatures we love, who we are meant to be with.
the third is the stream of the work that has meaning for us,
what we are meant to do and to be.
the challenge is that these streams may be far apart,
and as the world grows larger and more crowded and more complex,
these streams get faster and wilder and farther apart still.
it’s possible that all three streams may begin at the same source,
in which case you have to follow them upstream.
it’s possible that all three streams may end at the same sea,
in which case you have to follow them downstream.
and it’s possible that the three streams may flow into each other,
in which case you will have to discover how they are connected.
all i can tell you is that for each of us, there is a confluence,
and to answer your question, that is what you must find.”

asherah seemed puzzled: this seemed more a riddle than an answer.
but they thanked raaf with deep bows, and flew off
to look for the confluence of the streams.

for several days kraka and asherah flew over the countryside
studying the streams.
they found streams that looked like lovely places to live,
but there were no other creatures there.
they found streams that were full of wonderful creatures,
but they were troubled places, where it would be struggle to live,
or crowded places, where asherah could not do what she wanted to do.

they found some places so beautiful it took their breath away,
mountains where it seemed the whole world revolved below you,
forests so rich and dark they drew you in as if welcoming you, at last, home,
and places where the winter snow was melting into spring,
where the world was filled with promise and renewal.

snow and green and brown grass

but they could find no confluence of the three streams raff spoke about,
and each night they agreed to try again the next day, and slept in the trees,
asherah nestled in the down of kraka’s wings,
crying herself softly to sleep.

finally asherah said, in despair,
“perhaps we’re flying too high, or we’re looking for the wrong thing;
i’m no longer sure i would recognize the confluence if i saw it.”
and kraka suggested they gather together a group of friends
to get some advice on what to do next.

soon they were talking with kraka’s avian friends sperling the sparrow
and mésange the chickadee.

sperling said:
“i find that when i have to make a decision, it’s best to lay out all the facts,
and set priorities for what i want most.
so, asherah, can you give us a list, in order, of what you look for in a place,
and what you look for in the creatures you love,
and what are the things that are important for you to do, to be fulfilled?”

asherah thought for awhile and then made these three lists:

WHAT: important to do:
1. reflecting/imagining possibilities
2. writing
3. loving
4. learning
5. conversing
6. 
sensing/being present
7. playing
8. coaching and showing
9. self-managing
10. building working models
WHERE: important to be in
places that are:
1. wild/natural
2. peaceful
3. warm
4. forests near oceans
WHO: important to be with
creatures who are:
1. very intelligent
2. sensitive
3. emotionally strong
4. articulate
5. imaginative

and then mésange asked:
“which of these three columns is the most important to you?”
and asherah said the first was most important
and the other two were equally important but less important than the first.

and sperling asked:
“where must you be, and with whom, to do the things on the first list?”
and asherah said that she could do and did do these things anywhere.
sperling replied:
“so this stream is everywhere for you, it underlies all streams,
so you do not need to look for it,
and you can focus on looking for the other two streams.”

asherah smiled and nodded.
kraka then asked:
“of the other two lists, which is easiest for you to find?”
and asherah answered that they were both very difficult,
and impossible to find together: there was, it seemed,
no confluence between the two.

“well then”, said kraka, “it seems you have a difficult decision:
you can live in a place that meets the criteria in your second list,
and visit the creatures who meet the criteria in your third list, when you can.
or you can live with the creatures who meet the criteria in your third list,
and visit the places that meet the criteria in your second list, when you can.”

asherah sighed. “well today, kaitka, the place i live, meets neither,
so i guess either decision is better than the place i live now.
but it would be so hard, leaving the places i love or the creatures i love,
to go to the other.
but i guess you’re right: i have to choose.”

and then mésange asked:
“perhaps the confluence has yet to be discovered:
imagine a place that meets the criteria in your second list,
and think how likely it is you might discover creatures there
who meet the criteria in your third list.
and then imagine the creatures who meet the criteria in your third list,
and imagine attracting them to a place
that meets the criteria in your second list.
which do you think would be more likely?
perhaps that could help you make this difficult decision.”

asherah smiled and thanked her feathered friends, and soon
kraka had flown her home, leaving her
in a forest near the lonely house in which she lived.

she pulled the covers up over her on the bed,
and imagined she was still sleeping in the downy feathers
of her friend kraka, and she dreamed
of playing and splashing in the water in a warm forest
with all the creatures she loved and would come to love.

in her dream she changed places with her friend kraka:
she had traded in her tiny fae wings for his strong feathered ones,
and it was she who transported and sheltered him.
she wished she had been born a bird:
so much easier to soar from the places you belong
to the places the creatures you love call their home.

and when she awoke she added an eleventh item
to her first list, the things important for her to do:
it was to explore and discover the places she was meant to be,
and the creatures she was meant to be with,
and beside it, she put a star and an arrow to the top of the list.

then she packed up her few important possessions
and left a message giving away everything else
and flew off to visit the beautiful places she had found with kraka,
and to explore and discover the world beyond.

images:
faerie asherah: enyaathe by enayla (linda bergkvist)
kraka the crow: stock photo by inkibus (alana schmitt)
snow and green and brown grass by smi (paul schmidinger)

Category: Fables

Links of the Week — Saturday January 24, 2009

Filed under: Our Culture / Ourselves — Dave Pollard @ 17:24


Banks Market Capitalization
Value of leading banks’ shares 2007 (blue) and today (green). Thanks to Rob Paterson for the link.

“Thoughtful Blogs” challenge: The mainstream media continue to view the blogosphere as an echo chamber for uninformed chatter about the “news” they (the meanstream media) are providing us with. The blogosphere is, in fact, at its worst, a means for those who increasingly find the “news” these media report so banal, context-free and unactionable as to be worthless, to find and re-port real, actionable news (from the alternative and indymedia and an unlimited number of other sources) to others who want to know how the world really works and how to make it better. The blogosphere, at its best, is a place for thoughtful reflection and ideation — not the clever and inflammatory rhetoric of the op-ed pages (which produce heat but no light), but intelligent insight and imaginative ideas — what it all means and what we could do about it. Recently, PS Pirro listed ten sites worth a visit, and her list got me thinking about the fact there most be more thoughtful blogs out there, blogs that offer such thoughtful reflection, insights and actionable ideas. So here’s a challenge for you, dear reader: What are the most thoughtful weblogs you know of?

Last chance to save mankind?: James Lovelock, originator of the Gaia Theory (perhaps the most important theory since Darwin), has recently alienated many of his supporters with his apocalyptic vision of the future and his embracing of nuclear power as an inevitable way to reduce the impact of catastrophic climate change. Some believe he has just lost it. In a new interview, he trashes cap-and-trade systems, wind farms, and carbon sequestration, predicts human population will drop up to 90% this century, and proposes massive low-oxygen burning of crop waste and tilling of the resultant charcoal into the soil as the only solution. This solution, he says, would deprive bacteria and worms of the food they consume, which would otherwise release over 500 GT of CO2, far more than human activity. “I don’t think humans react fast enough or are clever enough to handle what’s coming up.” Thanks to Dale Asberry for the link.

The link between unschooling and creativity: Astra Taylor, creator of the new and celebrated documentary Examined Life, muses that her unschooling background might be behind her creativity and ability to think critically. Thanks to Michael Serres for the link.

Fifty things your customers wish you knew: Interesting list of ’seeing things from a different perspective’. As one of a growing number of informed-and-reluctant consumers, I disagree with quite a few of these, but I especially like these four (and thanks to Joan in Vancouver, who points out that these points apply to other types of relationships as well, for the link):

  • (11) My life is very complicated. If you make it easy for me to just buy a simple all-in-one package that I can use without learning anything, I’ll take it and be grateful.
  • (22) Our relationship isn’t equal and it never will be.
  • (36) What you think you’re good at is not what you’re good at. Ask me, and I’ll tell you what you do better than anyone else.
  • (45) I believe I deserve much more than I’m getting.

Pakistan: Afghanistan redux: Interesting account on the fall of parts of Pakistan to local Taliban warlords, and the use of the media, torture, and slaughter of civilians to terrorize locals into submission. This is Afghanistan all over again, and unless we learn the lessons of Afghanistan, we’re going to repeat the same mistakes we made there. You can’t defeat organized crime with missiles.

Iceland: Could we be next?: Rob Paterson describes the situation in Iceland, where the economy has collapsed and bankruptcies have reached Great Depression levels.

Printing our own money: Great article by George Monbiot on why now is the time to create local currencies. In a nutshell, affluent nations are printing trillions of dollars of new paper money to finance their bailouts of incompetently managed financial institutions. The result will inevitably be devaluation of those currencies (since there is nothing of value to secure this new printed money) and potentially hyperinflation. If it’s good enough for the government, maybe it’s good for us too: let’s create local currencies, that encourage local investment and local spending, and which will keep their value regardless of what the monkeys running the central banks do to the value of national currencies. Thanks to Dave Smith for the link.

WhiteHouse.gov transformed: Wow.

Esperance by Dan Paris
Photo: Esperance by Dan Paris. Thanks to Cheryl (who’s currently living in Esperance) for the link

Just for Fun: Comics about the challenges of living in community, by Richard Curran. Thanks to Tree for the link.

Thought for the Week: The Book of Endings, by Sam Taylor:

THE BOOK OF ENDINGS

Some time while you read this page or the next one, a species – a species as vast as your life and the lives of all your ancestors chasing bison across Old Europe or huddled around a fire – will disappear. A species that has found its own ways of eating, of moving, of hiding from predators; a species that meets itself and makes love in the bark of a tree or on the leaves of the canopy or in the humid dirt.

And it has come with us for millions of years, for millions of years it has watched the night and day follow each other, it has breathed with the frogs, it has wrapped the stars around it like a blanket, a patterned music, a map.

At the beginning of this page there may have been three or four left, but now there is only one. And if you read this page again, it will be another one, another species, another story of four billion years telling itself for the last time. Wherever life began – a word, a wish breathed into water, a seed falling through space – it was all of us there – as it is now in this unknown last one.

It has bored into wood, it has carried water on its back, it has drunk the dew from its back in the desert, it has fed its young with strips of leaves, it has built homes out of bark, it has carved the sky into a song, it has spoken in ways no man has heard.

It has emerald wings, it has sapphire wings, it has wings of night. You will never see it.

It is already gone.

January 23, 2009

The Ideology of Growth

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 20:22


BRIC
The BRIC countries (Brasil, Rossiya, Bhārat (India) and Zhōngguó (China)) and their economic areas of influence.
Today I attended an invitation-only forum on the future of Canada. It was attended by many of Canada’s business and political leaders, and had a speaker’s roster so exceptional that one of the speakers (a household name) actually sponsored the event (apparently to ensure a seat on the podium).

Keynote speaker was Fareed Zakaria, one of my favourite political and economic commentators, despite his willingness to work with (and hence provide a bit of credibility to) mainstream media networks. I was impressed at his grasp of the current financial crisis (he blew away the rest of the speakers both in his eloquence and his imagination), a subject he has not talked or written about much.

He had five recommendations for Canada and Canadian business leaders:

  1. Manage for uncertainty and change: Nothing lasts forever, and trends tend to “regress to the mean”.
  2. Focus on opportunities, not threats: Canada is uniquely positioned today, strong in both natural and intellectual capital, with a better health system than Americans’ and the healthiest banking system in the world.
  3. Encourage your kids to learn a foreign language: English is not enough in the 21st century.
  4. Think laterally: Be agile, and innovative. The old solutions won’t work any more, if they ever did.
  5. Look to and listen to struggling nations for ideas: They’ve had to deal with problems we’re facing now, and without the resources we have at our disposal. And now that struggling nations make up half of the world’s productive capacity, they’re not going to just accept our models and rules anymore.

Some of his other key insights:

  • Brasil, India and China (and perhaps Russia) are the future world economic leaders, because their domestic markets alone are sufficient to sustain them, and because they’re surrounded by other countries that are now economically outperforming the affluent nations. China is no longer co-dependent on the US, and now they know it — despite the collapse of US orders in the last year, they will still grow by 6% this year. These countries have studied affluent nations’ economic systems and endured the rigors of IMF/World Bank scrutiny, and they know what they’re doing, perhaps better than we do.
  • The advice given by the IMF/World Bank to Asia on what to do when their economies imploded in the 1980s is the exact opposite of what affluent nations are now doing in the same situation. As a result the IMF/World Bank has lost the last of its credibility.
  • In North America, 60-75% of science program graduates are immigrants. Our future as innovators, and as countries that actually produce anything of value, is almost entirely dependent on generous immigration policy. 

What was sobering about all of the discussion of the day, including Fareed’s, was the assumption that the objective of all the current bailouts, interventions and government actions on the economy should be to stimulate rapid growth of consumer spending. The word ‘growth’ was mentioned by four panelists no fewer than 40 times in an hour-long discussion.

When will economic and political thinkers realize that growth is the problem, not the solution?

World population is still growing at a 50-year doubling rate, when we already have far more humans than the planet can sustainably support. These struggling nations, in order to have a reasonable quality of life, are aspiring to increase their per-capita wealth and consumption by a factor of ten, at which point we will be going through the Earth’s resources at twenty times sustainable level, like a horde of locusts stripping everything in sight bare. Yet all the economic thinking is aimed at bringing about precisely this outcome. This is short-termism carried to its extreme, and it’s exceedingly dangerous. The belief that it is somehow attainable is magical thinking, an ideology of growth.

Why is it that normally intelligent people are so stupid they don’t get this?

There seems to be several (lunatic) assumptions underlying this ideology:

  1. Human population will magically level off at the level of resources sustainably available on the planet. Daniel Quinn has shown the absurdity of this assumption, which is fueled by the fact that, in recent times, birth rates have fallen as wealth has risen. This has not been true throughout history and there is no basis to believe it will continue. In fact, most women in both affluent and struggling nations want more children than they’re actually having, and it is their relative poverty, not their wealth or education, that they cite as the reason for not having as many children as they want.
  2. Struggling nations, in the interest of preserving the planet, will give up their ambition to live at the same standard of living as affluent nations. The nonsensical assumption is baked into immigration forecasts and forecasts about what struggling nations will do to help combat climate change (i.e. much more than their share).
  3. We can live, forever, beyond our means. Our debt levels (expenditures over income, consumption over production, use and loss of resources over restoration and regeneration), debt levels in our personal and corporate and government accounts, debts at the expense of our environment and future generations, are at unprecedented levels and accelerating out of control. But still we think we can print more money, borrow more, spend more, consume more, use more, and never have to be accountable for the excess.
  4. Human ingenuity will always come up with ways to accommodate perpetual growth. This is the most fantastical assumption of all, since it runs counter to all evidence from history (civilizations always collapse, and usually collapse suddenly and spectacularly when they become unsustainable). This assumption runs counter to the laws of thermodynamics (somehow we’re going to be able to increase the total amount of energy on the planet, forever). It assumes that we will be able to produce more and more heat without ever changing the climate of the planet (when in fact evidence is the opposite). It assumes that problems of energy production and climate change that the most knowledgeable scientists on the planet virtually unanimously agree are beyond their wildest dreams to imagine and conceive of viable solutions to, will be solved, and soon, and without unforseen consequences.

The enemy, as always, is short-termism, the fact that it is in the nature of humans (and indeed all creatures) to be preoccupied with the needs of the moment, and leave ‘tomorrow’ to take care of itself.

So once again we are distracted by today’s crisis (Enron, 9/11, Katrina, and now the financial system meltdown) and our solution, in each case, is to do everything possible, at any cost, to restore things to the way they were before the crisis.

In the meantime, the debts mount up, the pressures on the systems wound ever tighter grow more intense and frequent, our whole way of life becomes more leveraged and more fragile, and we remain oblivious. There is no significant difference between the Ideology of Growth and the Ideology of the Rapture. Both are reckless, religious, fantastical, mythological, and ultimately nihilistic. They’re manifest in the acedia that Gene McCarthy warned about 40 years ago, and in the anomie of today’s young people that Michael Adams alerted us to three years ago.

It’s been going on for thirty thousand years. I guess we should be used to it by now.

January 19, 2009

Becoming Light

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 21:30


Bastish swans
Photo by Kevin at the Bastish blog.

For the past 40 years, I’ve led something of a double life. On the surface, I’ve lived and worked mostly within the system, adhering to social norms of behaviour, holding down respectable jobs, working my way up, buying more as I earned more, living in an extraordinary (but orthodox) house in a lovely and progressive (but conformist) community.

But beneath the surface, I’ve always been a questioner, a radical (in the true sense of the word). Those among whom I live and work find my blog troubling, unexpected, too complex and difficult, so mostly I don’t talk with them about these ideas. As I dig deeper into how the world works, and imagine better possibilities, I’ve become more radical and pessimistic, and disengaged from these busy, unquestioning people. I’ve connected instead with those Too Far Ahead, those Living on the Edge. Those like you, dear reader.

I am mostly disconnected as well from the things that bind most people to the status quo, to the Centre: I don’t watch television or movies or read mainstream newspapers, and am appalled when I occasionally hear or see the ghastly propaganda, ignorance and desensitized, decontextualized tripe that passes for information and entertainment in these media. I find the arguments and mores of all the mainstream political parties, churches, economic thinkers, social thinkers, business and educational theorists, and even ‘leading’ artists and scientists, to be preposterous, offensively simplistic and dangerous. I no longer pay them any attention. When I am in the presence of those indulging these stale and untenable ideas, and those who espouse them, I get impatient, and go elsewhere.

These are big disconnects between who I appear to be and who I am, between what I have ‘always’ done and what I am beginning to do now, and between who I was and who I am becoming. I’ve called this process of disconnection and reconnection ‘let-self-change’ and there seems to be a lot of it going on now, everywhere. It’s not easy. One has to be ready for the voyage.

I expect to live to see our massive centralized industrial-model systems (political, economic, social, health, education, media etc.) crumble under their own unsustainable weight and be replaced (after an unpleasant transition) with light-weight, agile, egalitarian, ’sufficient’ community-based systems. These new local networked systems won’t work terribly well, but we’ll make them work, because we’ll have no choice. This isn’t idealism, just awareness of how the world really works, and always has.

To be ready for this, and to ready my children and grandchildren for this, I need to (re)learn some survival skills, such as the ones in this chart:

Critical Life Skills

But I’m coming to believe that before I can acquire these skills, really learn them, I have to approach them from a place that is unencumbered by all the presumptions and preconceptions that are ingrained in most of us throughout our lives. I have to unlearn not only all the nonsense that we’ve all been taught, but also the way in which we’ve all been subtly wired to see the world and everything in it.

Instead of seeing conceptually I have to learn to see perceptually.

Instead of using the tools of propagandized modern language, I have to learn to use the natural tools of intuition and attention and appreciation and sensation and presence.

Instead of learning based on planning and presupposition (based on what I’ve ‘learned’ before) my learning must be based on openness to all possibility, on appreciation of emergence, and most of all on humility.

Instead of applying complicated, analytical learning methods I must apply the ways of complexity: experimentation, discovery, observation, imagination, and practice.

Instead of learning by the traditional means of separating myself from the object of my study (”the environment”, “the culture”), I must learn integrally, as a connected part of all-life-on-Earth.

I have to relearn to learn how a child learns: authentically (=Gk. being oneself).

surtes

For almost six years now this blog has espoused the importance of being authentic — as ee cummings put it:

To be nobody-but-yourself — in a world which is doing its best, night and day, to make you everybody else — means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight; and never stop fighting*.

Or, to put it another way, the importance of getting rid of all the ‘gunk’ that we take on, that adheres to us as we get older and assume the trappings, the costume of civilization, that prevents us from being honest, raw, authentic, nobody-but-ourselves — stuff that others put on us to make us more like them, more acceptable, more obedient, tamer, quieter, more familiar, more ‘like-able’.

To move forward now I have to become un-civilized, wild. Agile. Authentic. Finally, fully, nobody-but-myself.

To do that I must let go of everything I believe, everything I think I ‘know’, everything I fear, everything I think is appropriate (or not), expected, accepted (and acceptable, or not), everything I have unintentionally become and everything I have ‘taken on’. All that baggage. All that stuff that holds me, holds all of us, back, and holds us in place.

I have to become light.

There will come a time, as our familiar, once-comfortable world starts to fall apart around us, when there will be no choice but to let go, to become light.

Now, we have a choice.

What are we waiting for?

What am I waiting for?

* The full article containing this quote, in context, which is about the job of the poet, is shown at the bottom of this post.

Category: Let-Self-Change

January 18, 2009

A Post-Civilization Story

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 15:53


Natural Community

The following story, reproduced by permission, was written by Usul of the Blackfoot, about life after the collapse of our civilization. It is part of a longer exploration that describes our unsustainable civilization, why romantic neo-primitivism is no solution, and how he sees the collapse occurring. It was brought to my attention by Usul’s new webzine colleague, Magpie, who’s asking for submissions of models, history lessons, theories and stories of how we might live effectively in a post-civilization world.  

While I’m interested in comments on this story, I’d like to hear ideas on how it could be made better, rather than  criticisms. Those who have read A Scientific Romance, or The World Without Us, or who have been following Jason Godesky’s (ex-Anthropik) Fifth World game (bottom image below is from the game site) will probably have some ideas here.

My general thought, as someone who is writing a utopian novel, The Only Life We Know, set in a post-civilization world (see illustration above), and who has written a couple of stories as practice for that novel, is that while Usul’s portrait could well be accurate for some post-civilization villages, there will be astonishing diversity in such future communities, to the extent that it will take extraordinary (and probably collective) imagination to even conceive of what life after the crash will be like.

So please join the conversation. How could this story be broadened, enhanced? What other stories, films, games and other media exist that portray a positive (utopian not dystopian) post-civilization future? How might we collaborate to create something better than any of us individually could come up with?

afterculture
flow painters in post-civilization world preparing ritual space, from the afterculture

[Author's note: The use of a fictionalized post-civ society is meant only to show post-civilized solutions to the persistent problems of past societies. Although many of the things listed below would no doubt exist in a tangible post-civ community, this is by no means a strict formula for the creation of such a community. With that in mind:]

by Usul of the Blackfoot

Imagine a dawn. The sun is just beginning to cast its first rays, a welcome bit of warmth on a chilly spring morning. The night watch volunteers are elated to see the day shift coming to relieve them. Theirs is a necessary but dangerous job, for those who would conquer and oppress are still a force to be reckoned with. The thought of violence doesn’t please or excite them, but they are more than prepared to defend their homes and community with lethal force.  

Others are just beginning to stir. The village is coming to life. Many meet up in the communal food hall for a shared breakfast. Laughter and jovial conversation carry out of the food hall and down to the river, where several groups and individuals eat their food. Some others eat in their homes, preferring solitary quietude to the company of others so early in the day.  

When breakfast is finished people mill about, heading to a number of destinations. The bulk of the villagers make their way to various permaculture gardens. It is here that the village produces almost all the food it consumes. Work in the gardens is necessary but isn’t difficult. The damp nature of the area provides enough rainfall so that watering is mostly a non-issue for six to eight months of the year. And in the drier months, water that has been collected and stored is fed to the food crops by recycled metal pipes and newly fabricated ones made of bark. So, most of the work in the gardens is weeding, composting, mulching, and harvesting, which isn’t very much work at all.  

Early spring is a time for planting, a time for encouraging new life as the winter crops are dying out. People dig holes, fill them with compost, and transfer seeds and plant starts into the ground, singing songs all the while. A few others take soil samples. They’ll take the soil to a makeshift lab—probably in one of their homes—where its pH levels will be established. The pH paper they’ll use is made from dried cornhusks died purple with the juice of cabbages.  

This homemade litmus paper is but one example of high-tech/low-tech the community employs. Nearby, the folks working the garden utilize all manner of manual tools designed to put out maximum efficiency with minimal effort, maximum durability with minimal impact of the environment. Elsewhere in the village, a woman works one of the community’s primitive lathes. Though an advanced technology, skilled woodworkers make these by hand with tools they’ve also fashioned themselves. They’re then used by a number of people for a wide variety of applications: wood and metalworking, pottery, glassworking, and drilling among other things.  

In another area of the village, a group of people is conducting an experiment with spindles and hearthboards. Fire is an extremely important tool in post-civ life, as it always has been for humans. But the desire to live in harmony with the earth and to avoid tremendous resource consumption means that fires are once again made without electricity or lighters. This still leaves many “primitive” options in fire making, but the people of this community typically rely on hand drill and bow drill fires. So, a few of the most skilled fire makers and a handful of physicists have gathered together to determine the best spindle and hearthboard combinations. To be thorough, they’ve made spindles from a living and a dead sample of 20 species of native plants, and they’re using these to try and achieve a coal on each of 6 different hearthboards.  

Similar experiments have been done to determine the native woods best suited to bow making, and to find out which plants in the area yield the strongest and longest-lived fibers. The results of these studies are all printed on a very small scale using a manual press, plant inks, and paper either salvaged from the civilized world or made from pressed plant fibers. Once printed, these results are shared with neighboring communities. These communities reciprocate with their results in other fields.  

The results of this particular test are a long way off. As the participants alternate between spindles and hearthboards and record their findings, other people pursue a variety of tasks. Outside the village proper, the woods are teeming with human life where long ago saws and cranes and logging trucks decimated the ecosystem. Here instead, a crew of ecologists busy themselves with reforesting the area. This is an intimidating, generation-spanning goal, taken one step at a time. Today, most of the crew is concerned with the removal of invasive non-native plants, especially English ivy and Himalayan blackberries. A few others survey the area, looking for species of plant and animal life that indicate the health of the ecosystem.  Not too far from the ecology crew, a small group of hunters track a deer that they’ve been after for hours. When the opportunity comes, they’ll kill the deer and take it back to the village to be skinned, butchered, and eaten. They’ve also recovered and killed three hares and a raccoon from their traps.  

Not everyone in the community agrees with the taking of animal life. In fact, there are many opinions in this post- civ village regarding people’s relationship with other animals. Some people, like the hunters, think that hunting and killing animals for all the resources their bodies provide is perfectly fine. They represent a minority in this specific village. Although they kill, they never do so excessively or for sport; these hunters possess formidable knowledge about ecology and understand their impact on a damaged but healing ecosystem. They only use bows, spears, and traps they’ve made themselves or salvaged from the old world. They never use tree stands or other lazy industrial abominations, for their prowess at stealth and tracking is extraordinary. And when they do kill they show reverence to the animal and to the forest, and they guarantee every part of the animal is used.  

A majority of people in the community disagree with the hunters. These people survive almost exclusively on crops grown in the village’s ubiquitous permaculture gardens and supplement their diets with food they scavenge in the wild. Though this majority is opposed to killing other animals, they don’t exclude animal food from their diets. This comes mainly in the form of eggs and goat’s milk cheese. Chickens are a crucial part of the vast permaculture gardens because they devour all kinds of pests and their waste acts as fertilizer. In similar fashion, the goats are useful to the forest rewilders and ecologists because they can survive exclusively on invasive plants.  

Besides goat cheese and eggs, these villagers occasionally consume animal flesh. The goats and chickens die eventually, and the villagers sometimes come across a fresh corpse in the woods. On such occasions these folks eat animal flesh and harvest animal bodies for bones, sinew, and hide. In our world these people would be called freegan.

The rest of the villagers keep a traditional vegan diet. They make up a small minority, but everyone respects their opinions about veganism and their right to a vegan diet. These folks consume nothing but food grown in the permaculture gardens. Because of their increased reliance on the gardens, they typically put more time and effort into maintaining them.  

The peaceful coexistence and cooperation among all of these people, regardless of their dietary choices, is a result of the anarchist governance of the village. The village has meetings whenever they’re necessary, and its small population ensures that everyone truly has a voice and that every opinion matters. The consensus process—that is, reaching a decision everyone agrees upon—is on many occasions slow and tedious. However, the people of this community have plenty of time for talk and mediation since their “work day” consists of so few hours. Almost everyone in the village attends meetings, understanding that the freedom they enjoy is bound to the responsibilities of voluntary politics.  

The communal hall in which village meetings are conducted also doubles as a mediation hall. Mediation is the process by which personal disputes are settled and minor infractions of community “law” are remedied. Today, in the early afternoon, five people enter the hall to begin a mediation. They all sit together in a circle—no one superior to or more authoritative than anyone else—and begin. One of the people in the room has been accused of stealing by three of the others present. The fifth person is a trained mediator and empath. She has devoted most of her life to learning the ways in which various people interact, the ways people express emotion, the ways people reserve emotion, the meaning behind certain emotions, and how to help dissimilar people interact without violent or oppressive speech.  

She is neither judge nor jury, certainly not a cop, and the hall itself is nothing like a courtroom. Stealing is considered wrong and unnecessary in post-civ communities because all necessities are shared. The village has common tools, common food stores, common clothing for those who can’t make or scavenge their own, common medicinal herb stores, and housing for everyone. All people have access to these things at all times.  

Most people still keep personal property; not in the sense of land or resources, but belongings with emotional meaning and objects people make themselves. It is personal belongings the person is accused of stealing: a necklace made for one of the accusers by a friend, a bow of exceptional quality made by the owner, and a cedar vest made for the third accuser by his mother. If the thief had taken any of these items from the communal caches, no one would have noticed, let alone cared. But these were all taken from individuals and have personal meaning to each of them.  

Under the wise guidance of the mediator, the group comes to several conclusions. The accused admits to stealing these items, and explains that he has done so because he feels neglected by the others. They are all good friends and the thief felt ignored, unappreciated, and hurt, and didn’t know how to express his feelings. The three friends all pledge to be more mindful of his feelings and show him their love more often in the future. He apologizes, promises to return their things, and pledges to make amends for stealing from members of the community.  

In post-civ mediation there is no punishment as in the civilized world. More often than not, people care so deeply for their friends and community that they feel intense shame when they act unethically. When people are called out for mediation, every person involved states what they’d like to see happen as a result of the situation. In the case of the thief above, each side in the discussion has made promises to amend certain wrongs. In the interest of improving themselves and their community, the people involved will most likely keep these promises.  

Mediation doesn’t always work, because it relies on the willing participation of all parties involved in conflict. In this post-civ village, as in most, the penalty for continued oppressive behavior toward one’s friends or community or continued disinterest in solving problems with mediation results in exile. The need to invoke this penalty almost never arises, and when it is suggested as a solution to certain problems, the entire village meets and must reach consensus on the issue. Only one person has ever been exiled from this village, after showing over a period of many months he had no interest in community, anarchist politics, or post-civ ethics.  

However, the man accused of stealing is still interested in being a part of this community, like most people who act unethically. He has promised to make up for what he’s done. No one will hold him to this and no one dictates the terms of his recompense. Because he is handy at fixing broken things, he has decided to mend several things in disrepair owned by the friends he wronged. And to show the entire community he’s sorry for acting poorly, he’s decided to spend an extra half- day scavenging useful items from the past.  

This is a prudent choice, one he knows the larger community will appreciate. All post-civ communities, to some extent, make use of the almost inexhaustible supply of resources that can be harvested from the wasteful civilized world. All manner of discarded and forgotten tools and objects are recovered from the ruins of civilization. The benefits of scavenging and recycling the waste of the old world are twofold. It is first beneficial to the planet, as recycling and reusing old waste helps reduce the amount of trash polluting the world’s delicate ecosystems. It also allows post-civ communities and individuals to relearn sustainable, permacultural, non-industrialized ways of making all the tools and technologies they need and have forgotten.  

There are hundreds of examples of scavenged and recycled goods in this post-civ village alone. Upon the walls of the communal food hall are scores of cast-iron pans and steel pots, which will last indefinitely if properly cared for. In the event the village does need new dishes, the individuals who have learned metalworking, woodworking, glassworking, and pottery can easily make them with minimal impact on the earth.  

Throughout the village huge quantities of medicinal and edible plants are grown in old tires and raised beds made from disassembled shipping pallets. Ancient dumpsters are used to cultivate potatoes and sunchokes. As with the cast iron they’ll last almost indefinitely. By the time the tires and pallets eventually rot back into the earth, craftspeople will have made many replacement planters and raised beds.  

Glass jars are extremely useful, and are among the most abundant items scavenged from the old world. They are used for storing medicinal herbs, tinctures, harvested grains, seeds for planting, water, honey, beads, foodstuffs, etc. The village brewers seek out and use one-gallon glass jugs and five- to ten-gallon carboys for making booze. While they rely on these artifacts of the old world, they learn pottery or glassblowing in order to replace these vessels when there are no more to be found.  

Tins are equally useful and as highly sought after as glass jars. They’re used for making and storing char-cloth, storing percussive fire making supplies, storing needles and thread or sinew, and for storing and preserving many other things. In time these containers will erode and become useless, but will be easily replaced by those who can work bone, wood, stone, metal, bark, and even grass and reeds.  

On a larger scale, old vans and large trucks are used now as houses or as storage closets, or they’re converted into huge solar dehydrators. Many building materials from the civilized world are also scavenged and put toward new uses. Bricks, concrete chunks, wood, metal supports and beams, and even plastic are given new purpose in the post-civ world. As these things slowly decay and become scarcer, people in post-civ communities learn to fashion a plethora of shelters from natural materials: adobe hogans, long-term debris huts, tipis, wikkiups, and scavenged debris cabins.  

Besides scrounging old world materials for building and storage, people frequently put these materials to use in artistic creations. The importance of art in post-civ society can’t be overestimated. Interspersed throughout the village’s sprawling permaculture gardens are countless sculptures and murals, mostly made from recycled old world rubbish. Paintings, found object art, sculptures, and statues can be found in the communal food hall, the village meeting hall, and in most homes. On the east end of this village there is also a small amphitheater that acts as an open air historical gallery.  

In the civilized world art is thought of as the domain of the bourgeoisie and the wealthy, and is thought to be abstract and incomprehensible to most. In the post-civ world art belongs to and speaks to everyone. The giant metal sculptures and multitude of paintings and tapestries in the village play several important roles. Most of the art in the village portrays scenes of the past, visions of the civilized world and the world of industry, and they act as terrifying reminders of why a society made up of such things is odious and destructive. These images of the poor under the yoke of the rich, of the world being destroyed by industry and capitalist commerce, and visions of women being the slaves of men are used to teach children the errors of the past and to instill confidence in and satisfaction with the world post-civ society is building.  

This art also acts as tangible representations of post-civilized ethics and the merit of a society built on such values. Alongside the terrible portrayals of yesteryear, pieces of art in many forms show people of all genders, ages, and races working together, and they show humanity as a positive force in helping a damaged planet to heal.  

Art is also used as an instructional tool. Besides printing the results of studies, small presses are also used to publish educational material for those who learn best with visualizations and those who prefer to learn on their own. These materials almost always include illustrations or other forms of art.  

Art in post-civilized anarchist society is further used to exemplify the accumulated mythology of its people.  In primitive societies, most people rely singly on superstition, intuition, and mythology or religion. In civilized societies, many people instead rely on logic, science, and mathematics, rejecting and belittling primitive ways of thinking about the world. Post-civilized society embraces all of these ways of thinking, and mythology is of particular importance.  

scout by Jason GodeskyIn this post-civ community a number of myths and rites are respected. Each time a fire is made, the maker thanks the spirits of the spindle and hearthboard, and the spirits of fire and oxygen. When plant starts or seeds are sewn into the ground, the planters ask the earth to harbor the new life being placed into it, and they talk to the plants themselves and encourage them to grow strong. When food plants are harvested, the harvesters thank the plants, the soil, the sky, and the earth itself. When weather is dry and the gardens need water, the earth and sky are beseeched to send rain.  

The myths of this village don’t just involve asking for things and showing thanks. Many people feel kinship to a certain animal. People talk of some animals as being wise, some mischievous. Some animals are thought to embody human traits, even to speak human languages. Many people look to certain animals for advice or blessings.  Gods, goddesses, and genderless deities are invented and played with daily. Some talk about the god of lost-and-found and scavenged things, while others seek help from the patron deity of fletching. Many see the forest as a living goddess, or the moon as a lunatic trickster god.  

Belief in these myths and reliance upon them is by no means a religion, nor is it irrational. The people of this post-civ community still believe in reason and logic, and comprehend that myths aren’t the same as reality. They understand that myth or superstition ungoverned by reason causes crusades, evangelical genocide, and religious persecution. But they also recognize that fantastic imaginative thinking is a vital part of human experience, and that reason without myth causes emotional coldness, mental stagnation, and the limitation of human perception. In short, post-civ society recognizes the need for reason and science, magic and myth, and it fosters all of them.  

Beyond using physical art to express and embody myth, this village is fond of storytelling. Without television and other huge media keeping the populace pacified and numb, people need an outlet to the fantastic. Many evenings the people of this community gather together and weave tales for their mutual enjoyment.  The village has four storytellers who have given themselves to the art and have mastered it. These four troubadours take turns each night telling all sorts of tales, epics, and odysseys. When they are finished, or on nights when none of them feel compelled to speak, their apprentices and other members of the village take the stage.  

The stories told span everything imaginable. All the old myths are told: Norse sagas, Greco-Roman myths, Aesop’s fables, tales of Japanese kami, parables from native peoples across North and South America, fables from across Africa, Celtic tales, even Christian and Islamic myths. Fantasy, science fiction, cyberpunk, and steampunk written in the civilized world are recounted in a similar fashion. And of course hundreds of new myths, myths that reflect the post-civilized world and its ethics, are told in kind.  

Not all the narrations of the master storytellers are myths. Many are tales of people who acted heroically in the face of oppression, some the tragic histories of people martyred in the struggle against fascism or the fight against slavery.  

Many of the new stories integrate reason and wisdom with myth, as in the tradition of Aesop. Animals are personified, given voices, and made to illustrate good and bad ethics, actions, and attitudes to children and adults alike.  

Most important of all, the stories told every night often give insight into the adventure and excitement of post-civilized life. Where once a world of inactivity and repression existed, there is now a world of community, coexistence, and thrilling newness. And when the story telling is over this night, the people of this post-civ village will go off to bed, off to stand night watch, off on a midnight trek through the woods, thinking all the while that tomorrow is another day of fulfillment and freedom.

January 17, 2009

Links of the Week: Saturday January 17, 2009

Filed under: Our Culture / Ourselves — Dave Pollard @ 21:05


postcard jen lemenHow to be an artist: Jen Lemen provides the 25 steps to persevere and become an artist. The step that goes with the picture at right: “Beware of words you put on paintings. Two and a half years ago I made a postcard that I thought would be lovely for random unknown sad people. It only took two years for me to realize the person the postcard was meant for was me.” This is one for your fridge door (or to attach to your easel). There is no mastery; there is only the practice.

Symbols of the self: Gregory Lent is writing a series on the symbols we use to represent ourselves. So far he has three: The tree (emergence), the lotus (awareness), the buddha (grace). We can be anything we can imagine ourselves to be.

Dow at 4000, 60% drop for $US: Just a part of Jim Kunstler’s gloomy predictions for 2009.

The year of letting go: Geoff Brown and I often seem to be in sync in the directions our lives are headed. As the old year ended, I wrote about how I had finally begun to learn to let go, to give up control of my life, my feelings, my relationships, and most of all my efforts to live up to others’ expectations of me — to be raw and authentic and nobody-but-myself. This is the natural culmination of my progression from setting intentions to simply doing the nine things I am meant to do — playing, learning, loving, conversing, giving ideas, time, knowledge and capacity, self-managing, being present, writing and reflecting — and practicing doing them better, letting go of outcome and trusting the process, trusting others, living in the moment. And now Geoff has declared “letting go” as his theme, his approach, what he’s pledged to pay more attention to in 2009. Stay tuned — you’ll probably see Geoff and I riffing back and forth on this (perhaps in a podcast) in the weeks to come.

Turning across the walls: Nancy White has often written and spoken about the importance of building bridges — between disconnected communities rich and poor, local and far away, men and women, younger and older etc. Now she’s thinking about “the place between boundaries in communities or networks” the place where nomads and bridge-builders and curious creatives hang out, and about “how we navigate across them, and connect, disconnect and reconnect with ideas, content and people in those transversing practices”. I’m trying to figure out how to picture these spaces between boundaries — big or cramped, thick-walled or amorphous — and how to visualize “transversing” (= latin, turning across). What do they look like, do you think?

What’s at the core of skillful facilitation?: Tree Bressen tries to name it: Love, magic, energy, spirit, soul, presence. She also uses the word gravity (=latin, heaviness), keeping things on solid ground. At Art of Hosting we learned how to juggle, which is also a useful metaphor for facilitation. To me the core of facilitation is active attentive coaching, helping a group in real time to keep moving forward towards their intended goal. Think of a parent teaching a child how to ride a bicycle. Tree points out that a key purpose of facilitation is to help others build resiliency, an essential survival skill for this complex and turbulent century. Lots more wisdom in this post, too.

Heart Poems: Cassandra points us to a lovely vignette about a heart, and then to her colleague Dave Bonta’s equally poetic heart-felt reprise. Such brilliant lyrical conversation is only possible thanks to the blogosphere.

Pete McGregor kea

The world’s smartest bird: Pete McGregor’s astonishing photographs of the NZ kea, and lots of other birds.

Just for fun: Sheepdogs protect penguin colony. Thanks to Graham Clark for the link.

Thoughts for the week:

 Passing the Millennium at Gurnard’s Head by Dick Jones

PASSING THE MILLENNIUM AT GURNARD’S HEAD

Those three horsemen spotted by the prophets
balked the jump.  Their hour came and went:
no hooves beating down the dry stone walls,
just a bitter wind wrapping up the house.

Inside, ‘Auld Lang Syne’ and that choral counting
backwards, chanting out this year like it was
just another dead leaf burden to be kissed
into the fire. And then it was (implausibly) 2000

and they broke open the magnums. We stepped
outside, took the muddy path to the field’s edge.
So quiet at first. The wild world’s calm indifference:
cattle hunched clumsy by the bulky walls;

an owl that hooted once; the whisper of the gorse,
thorn against thorn, stones rasping underfoot.
And then, sensed first as restless space, then heard
as a presence inside silence, the black Atlantic,

breathing deep, breathing deep across the parabola
and beyond.  While Gurnard’s Head gazed inland,
uninvolved, one more optimistic tide clambered
over cobbles way below.  Out in the long darkness

it pulled, pulled, lingering on rocks and sand:
‘Reverse the narrative’, it seethed. ‘Turn back time
return to source’.  The message cackled
in the shingle, boomed along the shore.  We waited

in the rattling night one full hour into the millennium.
But nothing shifted, tilted, slipped or fell away.
Wind and sea, implacable land, unyielding
dark. So we climbed back up the slope

to the silent house, slept briefly and woke to a
blustery dawn. And a voice inside the wind laughed
in formless vowels; and a brief shape-changing
cloud-face grinned across the unaltered world

The End of the World, by João Cabral de Melo Neto (tr. James Wright)

THE END OF THE WORLD

At the end of the melancholy world
men read the newspapers.
Men indifferent to eating oranges
that flame like the sun.

They gave me an apple to remind me
of death. I know that cities telegraph
asking for kerosene. The veil I saw flying
fell in the desert.

No one will write the final poem
about this particular twelve o’clock world.
Instead of the last judgment, what worries me
is the final dream.

Goldfish Dream, by Sam Candide

GOLDFISH DREAM

Routine makes a perfect survival tool
for when you are lost in fog,
but when the fog begins to lift
it seems an endless death of sameness.

Memories of dreams offer some relief,
when they will linger and be fastened
like butterfly shards in the book of dreams.
Last night’s dream was a bewildering epic
of magical realism, realer and more magical than most.
Embedded in the horror and distress I fought through,
most of the dream was a central image
that seemed unrelated
to the complicated plotlines on either side:

I remembered I owned a goldfish;
I looked over (in the dim scary house I was trapped in)
and noticed it barely surviving in its bowl.
It was fat and gleaming, yet it gasped and listed a little:
how long since I’d fed it anything?

Interspersed with the other plots and diversions, then–
my quest for fish-food.
I found food for cats, food for dogs, none for fish.
At last I stood across the street from a large supermarket,
waiting for the cross traffic to part, when lo! there came the fish
swimming in midair up the street, over the tops of the cars.
It swelled, it was like a Macy’s parade balloon
untied and on a mission.
As it approached it got larger and larger,
and I realized my fish had died in its little bowl
and this was its spirit.
I called out Wait! Wait! I’m getting you food!
Give me one more minute!

But the goldfish soul was oblivious,
and as it drew even with me
it lifted higher into the air and made for heaven,
growing larger and more transparent the higher it got
until it had dissipated completely,
like a fading golden cloud.

January 16, 2009

Consensus Decision-Making: A Critical Capacity for the 21st Century

Filed under: Working Smarter — Dave Pollard @ 22:13


consensus process tree bressen
consensus flowchart by tree bressen

In our modern society, there are five distinct ways that decisions get made. Each entails power dynamics, and make no mistake: Decision-making is all about the exercise of power. Here’s a snapshot:

Decisions
Individual/
Collective
Decision Authority Contested/
Uncontested
Power Dynamics Who Ultimately Decides
Monarchy/ Oligarchy (Fiat) Individual Uncontested Dictatorial, arbitrary, conspiratorial backroom dealing, threat of overthrow, enforced through violence or threat of violence The monarch/ oligarchs and those who have influence over them
Anarchy (Free Market) Individual Uncontested (abundance); Contested
(scarcity)
Every individual ideally decides in personal interest, highly coercive at local level (dominant father, priest, bully, sheriff, gangleader, feudal lord, CEO), often unregulated, often violent in situations of scarcity or inequality Each individual when resources are abundant;
The rich & powerful when resources are scarce
Military / Revolutionary
Force (War)
Collective  Contested Might makes right, very hierarchical, usually violent and oppressive, highly unstable ‘Leaders’ of the winning side
Majority-Rule Democracy Collective Contested Elections are a form of ’staged war’, voters are bribed by combatants and then judge the ‘winner’, results are often rigged, highly adversarial, winners often oppress losers, real power resides with those who finance/own ‘elected’ reps The ‘winners’ and those who have influence over them
Consensus Collective Uncontested As much time as necessary is taken to hear and accommodate all points of view and achieve agreement among all — see flowchart above (Note: Proportional- representation democracy may entail some consensus but is often highly unstable) The collective (or in the absence of agreement, no one)

There is evidence that, prior to the advent of civilization and overcrowding, when resources were abundant and accessable to all, society was largely anarchic: that is, individuals (even within tribes) made their own decisions and lived with the consequences. At the local level in anarchic societies, with no regulatory system to prevent it, bullying by psychopaths could occur, but in a world of abundance individuals were free to leave the influence of such bullies at will. In pre-historic and indigenous societies, consensus methods then evolved to deal with disagreements and to manage psychopathic members of those tribes that settled in cohesive communities.

As the world became more crowded, abundance gave way to scarcity and stable tribes and communities became increasingly transient. Anarchic decision-making became untenable as frontiers and resources became exhausted, and consensus methods became more difficult as numbers swelled and the sense of community disappeared. In some areas, decision-making became centralized in monarchies and oligarchies, essentially fascist systems. In others, less centralized, local warlords seized power and made the decisions. Both these new systems were unstable and often led to continuous wars and revolutions, but these usually produced nothing more than changes in the people in power — the contested anarchic or monarchic/oligarchic system remained. Countries like Afghanistan continue to waver between anarchy (decision-making by local warlords) and war. The laissez-faire “free market” is a form of contested anarchy, with the ‘tribes’ (corporations) of local warlords (CEOs) constantly fighting for dominance.

As the cost of war rose, some nations decided to establish a new system for decision-making called ‘democracy’, in which the factions fighting for control would hold a staged war called an ‘election’, and then voters, responding mostly to propaganda, misinformation and bribery, would judge the ‘winners’ and install them in power for a fixed term. While less violent, the result of majority-rule democracy is the same as the result of war: the ‘winners’, and more particularly those who finance and wield influence over them, end up with all the decision-making power. In this system, the voters have no real stake in decision-making at all.

In recent years, winner-take-all majority-rule democracy has been replaced, at least on a trial basis, with proportional representation democracy, where no group is declared the outright ‘winners’ and those selected to represent the voters must continuously negotiate with each other to achieve some sort of consensus on each issue. Critics of this system argue that this is too time-consuming and unstable, but in those nations with most experience in various forms of democracy, this method is growing in popularity (at least in peace-time).

So there seems to be something in human nature longing for a return to the two decision-making systems that prevailed for most of our time on Earth: anarchy (which both right-libertarian “free market” adherants and anti-government neo-survivalists espouse), and consensus.

I’m a theoretical anarchist. I like the idea of living without authority, and everyone making his/her own decisions. But I think, in this age of staggering overcrowding, inequality, complexity and scarcity, it’s hopelessly naive. We’ve seen, in cults and corporatist abuses from the wild West and the mafia to Jim Jones and Scientology to Enron and Madoff, the consequences of clinging to anarchic ideals. Perhaps after civilization collapses, when overcrowding and inequality and scarcity give way again to abundance, we can re-embrace such ideals.

But for now, in my view, our only hope is consensus. So, let’s look at this very old (used by indigenous peoples for millennia) and very new method for decision-making. First, a definition from wikipedia:

Consensus Decision-Making is a group decision-making process that not only seeks the agreement of most participants, but also the resolution or mitigation of minority objections and concerns.

Consensus is not unanimity, but it is agreement among all members of a group that any concerns or objectives they may have are sufficiently small that they are willing to be bound by the decision. While it is not always an appropriate method for making decisions, it usually works:

Consensus Decision-Making is an appropriate process whenever (a) there is an informed lack of agreement, and (b) there is a collective interest in achieving such agreement.

In other words, it won’t work if the group is insufficiently informed to have a rational position on the issue at hand, or to appreciate the essence of any disagreement they might have with others. If you’re ignorant of the essential facts, or don’t care about the issue, or aren’t or don’t feel bound by the decision, you can’t meaningfully agree to such a decision. And if you’ve been brainwashed or propagandized to misunderstand others’ position, and hence are unable to consider the issue objectively, consensus will likely be impossible. Likewise, if the decision choices are substantively aesthetic, matters of personal taste, consensus decision-making may be the wrong approach. And if the members of the group don’t trust or care about each other, attempts to achieve consensus may be fruitless.

Consensus decision-making also won’t work if people are so inexperienced in using it that they don’t realize the consequences of their decisions. Or if they can (for any of a variety of reasons) be coerced, sweet-talked or ‘bought’ by others in the group. Or if there isn’t enough time (or the group is unwilling to allot enough time) for the process to take its course.

Despite these drawbacks and limitations, this process is getting more and more attention these days. Businesses are increasingly forming as cooperatives and other forms of non-hierarchical ‘Natural Enterprise’, comprising equal partners who trust many decisions to the most skilled and informed partner, and make the remaining decisions by consensus. The ‘wisdom of crowds‘ uses the collective knowledge of a large group of informed and independent people to make better decisions than any expert or management group could make — while this isn’t a consensus process per se it does use the same ‘front end’ steps. Enterprises are realizing the value of improving collaboration with those within and outside the organization, and consensus decision-making can be an essential collaborative tool. And as the adversarial legal system collapses under it’s own weight, alternative disputes resolution processes that have much in common with the consensus decision-making process are getting increased use.

As our political systems, prone to reducing everything to ‘either-or’ dichotomies that pit large power blocs against each other or allow the rich and powerful to make undemocratic back-room decisions, fall into disfavour, the consensus decision-making processes that are often used in jurisdictions using proportional representation to negotiate past impasses, are being more extensively studied and used. And as more people tire of dysfunctional centralized systems and establish community-based bottom-up networks and organizations to bring about change, they are finding that consensus decision-making is a very powerful and effective process for such groups.

Here are my 10 reasons why consensus decision-making will be one of the most important capacities for people to develop and practice in this turbulent century. Think about what’s going on in the Middle East, or the disagreements that are hobbling your government, your business, or your community organization, and how consensus decision-making might be a better way, as you read this list:

  1. It focuses on differences as learning opportunities, not ‘problems’: Gathering diverse and divergent points of view, and consideration of the diverse needs of different people and groups, is part of the consensus decision-making process. Rather than focusing on the differences, the consensus decision-making process focuses on using this information to inform the search for a solution, a resolution, that works for everyone. 
  2. It achieves buy-in and willingness to act, from everyone in the group: Unlike voting approaches that leave the ‘losers’ licking their wounds and uninspired to help implement the decision, consensus decision-making gives all members of the group ‘pride of ownership’ in the collectively achieved consensus, and hence is far more likely to be implemented well.
  3. It is non-confrontational and non-adversarial: Its objective is to look rationally at the issue, not to provoke emotional responses — anger, defensiveness, stubbornness. Cooler heads are encouraged and allowed to prevail.
  4. It builds connection: As valuable as consensual decision are, the positive connections, relationships and understanding that emerge from use of this process are even more valuable, putting the parties in a good position to work together more effectively in the future.
  5. It encourages and facilitates listening skills: The biggest problem with communication, said GB Shaw famously, is the illusion that it has occurred. Many traditional decision-making processes encourage people to articulate and stake out their own positions and not to listen to others’. Consensual decision-making requires effective listening skills, and the more people who practice this, the better off we’ll all be.
  6. It is a collaborative process, focused on achieving agreement: Collaborative skills teach us to look for what is best for the collective group, not our personal interest. When the objective is agreement rather than ‘winning’, the energies of the group are directed at finding something that works for everyone rather than staking out personal positions, and the essential skills of negotiation and conversation are learned differently, and more effectively.
  7. It is an emergent process, enabling discovery of a shared direction: Many processes we use in everyday life are linear, with a predetermined direction and expected result. In a complex world, understanding of the problem and the solution co-evolve, and we need processes that don’t presuppose knowledge of either. Consensus decision-making is such a process, and in this process participants often ‘find their direction’, and discover it is not what they’d presupposed, and that this direction informs them in making other decisions they are facing. Sometimes agreeing which way you are headed is more important than knowing your destination.
  8. It requires and encourages honesty, not posturing or rhetoric: Consensus-building provides no reward for the most skilled, clever, persuasive or articulate speaker. It is up to everyone in the group to draw out and articulate what the least articulate people in the group are trying to say. Dishonesty — overstating a position, understating a difficulty, or taking a position you don’t really believe — can totally undermine the process and cannot be tolerated.
  9. It is a creative process, enabling us to practice imagining what’s possible: We live in an age of dreadful imaginative poverty, and achieving consensus often requires the group to think creatively and imagine ways of doing things that will achieve consensus and which may not be at all obvious. The more practice we get imagining possibilities, the better equipped we will be to tackle the challenges facing us in this difficult century.
  10. We cannot afford any more of the old, unworkable decision-making processes: Leaving decisions to oligarchies, tyrants, rich and powerful interests, the “free market”, bullies, experts, executives and corrupt corpocracies has left our world in a terrible mess, full of war, corruption, ignorance, desperation, suffering, inequality, waste, indebtedness, incompetence, pollution, bankruptcy, violence and oppression. It’s time for us to find a better way to make decisions, one that is inclusive, conciliatory, engaging, creative, positive, non-adversarial, honest, responsible, emergent, sustainable, attentive, connected, and supportive of continuous learning. Consensus decision-making is such a process.

If you’d like to learn more about the process, I’d recommend Tree’s Summary of Consensus Decision-Making, Consensus Queries, and Voting Fallbacks articles and Randy Schutt’s Examples of Cooperative Decision-Making Processes.

After I attended the Bowen Island Art of Hosting event, I waxed rhapsodic about the facilitation process, and its importance. I feel much the same way about the consensus decision-making process. And the two are connected: Consensus decision-making requires all participants to become competent at and patient with the process, but also requires excellent facilitation — someone not directly affected by the direction or outcomes of the process who can work objectively and dispassionately to:

  • Model the process, set the stage, recapitulate, focus, synthesize, clarify, summarize, restate and sustain a positive atmosphere
  • Protect members and their ideas from attack and otherwise deal with abuse of the process
  • Make sure everyone speaks and is heard and engaged
  • Keep the process moving forward, deal with process problems, articulate key points, objections and problems honestly
  • Make sure the group takes collective ownership of the process and the decision

This is a huge task, and one that requires great skill, practice, intelligence, tact, alertness, grace, adaptability, and patience. Good facilitators are hard to find, and a poor facilitator can fatally damage the consensus decision-making process.

Like facilitation, consensus decision-making is a capacity that can be learned, but one that must be practiced over a lifetime. We owe it to ourselves, our fellow humans and to future generations to get better at it, and start using it in every aspect of our lives. Nothing less than the future of our planet is at stake.

Category: Collaboration

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress