<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links (and Top Tweets) for the Week: May 30, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://howtosavetheworld.ca/2009/05/30/links-and-top-tweets-for-the-week-may-30-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://howtosavetheworld.ca/2009/05/30/links-and-top-tweets-for-the-week-may-30-2009/</link>
	<description>In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 01:47:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://howtosavetheworld.ca/2009/05/30/links-and-top-tweets-for-the-week-may-30-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Husband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howtosavetheworld.ca/2009/05/30/links-and-top-tweets-for-the-week-may-30-2009/#comment-501</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;Basically his argument is that classic American socially atomistic approaches to organizational improvement are not the answer; communitarian ones are. He also doesn&#039;t trust top-down networking efforts, even those ostensibly designed to help individuals find the content and contacts useful to them individually&lt;/i&gt;Why I like what I call the &lt;i&gt;mass customization of knowledge work&lt;/i&gt;.  People process information in individual ways )cognitive styles, etc.), but it&#039;s relatively useless unless their processing is connected, through exchange and conversation, to larger purpose and conversation about that &quot;mass&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a><i>Basically his argument is that classic American socially atomistic approaches to organizational improvement are not the answer; communitarian ones are. He also doesn&#8217;t trust top-down networking efforts, even those ostensibly designed to help individuals find the content and contacts useful to them individually</i>Why I like what I call the <i>mass customization of knowledge work</i>.  People process information in individual ways )cognitive styles, etc.), but it&#8217;s relatively useless unless their processing is connected, through exchange and conversation, to larger purpose and conversation about that &#8220;mass&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vera</title>
		<link>http://howtosavetheworld.ca/2009/05/30/links-and-top-tweets-for-the-week-may-30-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>vera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 01:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howtosavetheworld.ca/2009/05/30/links-and-top-tweets-for-the-week-may-30-2009/#comment-500</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Peeked at Google Wave. Couple of commenters there said: :This is so not Google like. I like to keep things simple, this is the exact opposite.&quot;&quot;I agree. I want simpler tools that move technology out of my way. This looks like it would give me ADD.&quot;Yup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>Peeked at Google Wave. Couple of commenters there said: :This is so not Google like. I like to keep things simple, this is the exact opposite.&#8221;"I agree. I want simpler tools that move technology out of my way. This looks like it would give me ADD.&#8221;Yup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

