Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.



September 28, 2009

More Thoughts About Intentionality, Split and Otherwise

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 22:48


dave's journey

In my post last week I described Gil Fronsdal’s meditation on intentionality, and the value of setting both long term (What do you intend to do with what’s left of your life?) and short term (What do you intend to do, now, today, this week?) intentions, and getting them somehow aligned. Intentions are more than aspirations or resolutions, they are “stretching toward” commitments, directions toward something one hopes to achieve or at least move consistently and steadily closer to.

But what do you do when you’re following a model (the one I adapted from Joanna Macy, pictured above) that has nine steps, and you have work to do in all nine areas? Can you have nine life intentions and nine short-term intentions, and really hope to accomplish more than a couple of them?

Patti Digh and David Robinson talk about “split intentions”, when your actions are diffused, confused or distracted from achieving your intention. In workplaces these are rife — one set of personal actions is called for (in the mission statement or personal goals statement), while a very different, often incompatible set of actions is actually rewarded. Many large corporations, hoping to attract talent but keep that talent in thrall to the corporation’s more mundane objectives (constant growth and increased profitability for shareholders at any cost), recruit and internally propagandize on the basis of one set of behaviours, but quietly (or not so quietly) promote and remunerate employees for a very different set of behaviours. Ultimately, the true talent of the organization (those with vision, creativity and balance) catch on to the ruse and quit, leaving behind the bullies, the witless, and those too desperate, dependent or overextended to get out. Hugh McLeod has a brilliant cartoon depicting this:

gaping void hierarchy

If you’re caught in this wage slavery hell, you will be living and breathing split intentions every day — not only between what the corporation says it wants and what it really rewards, but also between what it wants and what you want. The inevitable results are frustration, anger, self-hatred, disappointment and despair.

Once your work day ends, more split intentions appear. You may aspire to do your part to combat climate change and become less dependent on our rapacious and unsustainable modern economy, but how can you do that when you and your partner need two cars to get to work from the only house you can afford, which is miles from your workplaces?:

split intentions
image from Deborah McLean

And when you get home, you have things that have to be done (mowing the lawn, paying the bills) that prevent you from doing the things you intend to do (spending time with those you love, learning or practicing doing something you love, or just sitting down and thinking about what your real intentions in life are). If you’re like many, your personal life turns into the second job you always swore you would never let it become. And suddenly thirty years pass and what you always intended is unstarted, or even forgotten.

If you’ve escaped this hell, both in the corporate world and in your personal life, you still have the challenge of focusing in on one or two lifelong intentions, and really “stretching toward” them, and making sure that what you do each day moves you closer, while contributing at the same time to a lot of smaller but still important intentions, through actions that make the world a little better, for those you love, for strangers, and for all-life-on-Earth.

In my personal “scorecard” at the top of this article I’ve scored myself (green/yellow/red) on each of the nine steps in the roadmap to reconnecting and acting that are needed to help the world cope with the coming collapse of civilization. My intentions towards each of these nine steps are the words around the outside of the circle: exploring appreciative enquiry, practicing presence, learning to let go, improving my presentation, demonstration, conversation and creative writing skills, becoming more grace-full, balanced and empathetic, stopping the tar sands, keeping this blog interesting and useful, helping develop useful working models of natural enterprise and unschooling, while saving some time to pursue my less ‘purposeful’ passions and find the places I’m meant to live. Several lifetimes’ worth of activities! And this is just a partial list of my intentions. After meeting some fascinating new people at a drum circle yesterday, I realized that one of the intentions missing from the Dismantle Civilization step for me is smashing industrial agriculture and specifically ending the atrocity of factory farming. Add that to my list of intentions.

All my life I have struggled with having too many objectives, too many projects and intentions, and making far too little progress on any of them. I’ve tried the Getting Things Done approach, but concluded that my problem wasn’t (dis)organization or lack of focus, as much as an inability to say no.

I’ve also become more sanguine about achieving measurable ‘results’ and ‘objectives’ as I’ve learned more about the nature of complexity and come to appreciate that most systems and challenges we face today are complex ones that don’t lend themselves to achievable objectives. The only sensible way to work on complex challenges is collaboratively, with others, and to see the work as continuous, work of learning and discovery, of coming to understand the ‘problem’ and possible approaches to it, simultaneously and iteratively. There is no mastery, there is only the practice.

It’s been said that it takes 10,000 hours of practice at something to become highly competent at it. So how do I choose among fifteen or twenty intentions, all of which are important to me, when I will never have the time to learn and practice towards each of them, enough to be of any use to others at all? My intentions aren’t split, they’re fragmented.

I think the only way to start to put such a list (and most of the people I know have lists of intentions that are just as ambitious as mine) in some kind of priority order, is to start at the end. Supposing I die in twenty years: which of these things would I most want to be remembered for having done, or at least practiced? Which would be most useful to others, to the world, if I focused my time and attention on it, and on it alone?

Ironically, my reluctant answer is the answer that I have been saying for the past six months is not enough: helping people imagine a better way to live and make a living, principally through my writing. That’s what I’m most competent at. I need to work on appreciation, presence and letting go — letting my heart be broken and showing that broken heart to the world — but that is only (as Joanna Macy explains) the prerequisite work, the work of reconnecting, that must precede the work that really makes a difference.

I should not wait to start the work of helping people imagine a better way to live and make a living, until I’m fully ‘reconnected’, though that reconnection will undoubtedly help the quality, value and accessibility of my work. I should also strive to improve my presentation, demonstration, conversation and creative writing skills because all of these will help improve and promote my work. And I do want to help dismantle civilization and help create new real-world models of natural enterprise, permaculture, transition culture and unschooling — but I’ve already acknowledged that my sweet spot is not creating these models but imagining and writing about them — telling stories about what is possible that others can realize.

Last week Sharon Astyk, who is busy doing what I’ve been calling the ‘real work’ of creating these models (she’s working hands-on in permaculture and is connected to the transition movement and several activist causes) wrote about the importance of imagining a better world, rather than just rushing out to create it:

People may agitate for climate change action now, but they do not fully grasp what it will entail – a change in way of life… In order for a majority of the world’s rich people… to choose less, to actually recognize that giving their children better means choosing a life of less, there has to be a vision of what the life constitutes – and it has to be immediately accessible.

Perhaps, in those words, I should find my marching orders. Of all the things I keep thinking and hoping are the things I’m meant to do, her words suggest that what I’m meant to do is to practice and get better, much better, at doing what I am already doing.

So I just dusted off the outline of my novel of a post-civilization utopian culture The Only Life We Know. Five years since I started it. Still barely begun.

Time to begin again. Sign up for workshops and practice lots of things that will make my work better, but spend time, every day, on my principal intention, what I want to be remembered for — helping people imagine a better way to live.

How about you? Do you know what you’re meant to do? What’s your one intention, for what’s left of your life, something that you want to be remembered for, something that will be of use to others after you’re gone? What’s holding you back?

Category: What You Can Do

September 26, 2009

Links and Tweets of the Week: September 26, 2009

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 21:00


CO2 chart 1

CO2 chart 2

fun with figures:

  • the top chart shows historical levels of atmospheric CO2  (180 to 300 ppm) back through the last half million years until about 1850, and the current unprecedented level of 386 ppm (and still rising); 
  • the second chart shows the International Panel on Climate Change’s model of the worst (1100 ppm) and the best (just under 500 ppm, if we work immediately and furiously at it) we can expect/achieve by 2100; 
  • since the consequence of not reducing levels to below 350 ppm by 2020 is runaway (self-reinforcing) global warming and massive, catastrophic climate change, it’s game over folks (but thanks for playing)
  • meanwhile, James Lovelock, father of Gaia theory and reluctant supporter of nukes to tide us over until renewable energy technology improves, warns against the recklessness of geo-engineering to address climate change
  • and at a UN summit this week, politicians agreed on nothing in talks preparatory to December’s Copenhagen meeting
  • oh, and today (Sept. 26) is Earth Overshoot Day; so far this year, we’ve used up as much resources as the Earth can generate in a whole year. If we were to allow 1/2 of Earth’s resources for non-human creatures, we’d reach Overshoot Day by mid-May each year. Thanks to Cheryl for the link.

PREPARING FOR CIVILIZATION’S COLLAPSE

What Would a Better World Look Like?: Sharon Astyk says that we need a realistic vision of what a sustainable future would look like, and makes the argument that we need viable alternative working models — now:

Why, when there is so much new attention to climate change, so much scientific consensus and so much activism, are governments so reluctant to act?  It isn’t because of lack of knowledge of the long term consequences.  My own take is this – that it is simply because they recognize what many climate activists have not – that their own people may agitate for climate change action now, but they do not fully grasp what it will entail – a change in way of life.  There are plenty of other reasons – business interests and political realities, but the truth is that we will continue merrily on our way to disaster if the world’s politicians believe that the people don’t want them to act – not really.  And it does not take a great deal of critical thought to realize that the average person, at this stage, would like, all things being equal, for politicians to take care of climate change, along with all the other of the world’s problems, without inconveniencing them, but are far less clear on what inconveniences they might be willing to tolerate…

The climate target that Monbiot used [in Heat], while cutting edge for 2006, has now been superceded.  If we could just-barely-but-not-quite pull off a maintenence of modernity with a 450ppm carbon target, what are the chances of doing it with 350?  None at all, I fear…

And the danger of telling people that they can have all the things they want – a future for their children and an affluent present now – is that when they realize (and they are realizing right now) that this is not true, that there’s not enough money, or time or alternative energy to provide it, people will be very, very angry indeed.  It is not pleasant to tell people hard truths.  It is less pleasant to deal with people facing hard truths who believe they have been lied to.  I believe we are seeing the early stages of the political unrest that will accompany this sense of being lied to, of having lost more than is being accounted for on both the left or the right, and I also believe quite strongly that unless a true and comprehensible story is offered, false ones will be taken up, and used as bludgeons…

In order for a majority of the world’s rich people (and here I mean rich by world standards) to choose less, to actually recognize that giving their children better means choosing a life of less, there has to be a vision of what the life constitutes – and it has to be immediately accessible. It cannot require vast creative energies, because honestly, most people don’t have them.  It cannot require that everyone go against the grain, because, quite honestly, most of us go with the grain.  It cannot require that we be able to imagine it – you have to be able to go look at it.

Learning to be Present: Drawn from Nature: From Lorianne DiSabato (thanks to Dave Bonta for the link):

Last Thursday afternoon, I took my first-year writing students outside to draw in their nature journals. It was sunny and mild, and I gave them a choice of two tasks: either draw clouds or draw the lilac tree that sprawls in front of Parker Hall. It’s an exercise in seeing as much as drawing: once you stop and look, what do you see?…

It’s what both Henry David Thoreau and Clare Walker Leslie do in their journals, and it’s what I urge my students to do in their semester-long projects. Pick a topic that truly interests you and spend a semester investigating it from every conceivable angle. Really look at it, deeply and and repeatedly, noticing its nuance and details over time. Read about your topic, think about your topic, and talk to others about your topic: get to know it first-hand and up-close, in a way none of the rest of us do. Become our resident expert in the minute details of your topic and its intersection with your life…

It’s a foreign concept to many of my students, this invitation to explore their own life deeply…The best topics are usually the most obscure ones, the ones that Only This Student deeply loves and is genuinely interested in. In asking my students to be intellectually curious, I’m actually asking them to take a deep and genuine interest in their own lives. I’m asking them to show up on a partly cloudy day in the shade of a sprawling tree and capture what they see.

A Guide to Unschooling: This week’s Yi-Tan conference call on unschooling featured some people (including PS Pirro and me) describing their experiences and challenges with unschooling. Host Jerry Michalski has a ton of unschooling resources in his Brain. One of the participants, Sandra Dodd provides some comprehensive resources to learn about, and start, unschooling. Example: Marin Holmes’ Principles of Unschooling:

1. Let Go and Trust: Let go of learning, as a focus, a concern, an issue—trust that it happens. Let go of control of your child—trust they know what they need. Some examples: no chores, no bedtimes, no eating controls, no limits on media.

2. Joy and Connection as Primary Goals: Parent’s job (since it isn’t the controller of the child) is something like being the Provider of Joy. When in doubt, go for the option that offers the most joy. Family Relationships: Make deposits here, not withdrawals. Relationships based on respecting needs and interests, empathy and fun together. Being each other’s allies not adversaries.

3. Being a Better Person: Principles over Rules – you must model principles (rather than enforce rules) therefore you must LIVE them (which makes you a better person). Some examples: Freedom, Golden Rule, Kindness, Respect. Staying in the Moment – mindfulness, play, connection, and joy all happen in the present moment, not the future (worry) nor the past (fears). Kids are already the masters of this so learn from them. Childhood is not a preparation for life, it IS life. Being someone they want to spend time with.

4. Tools for Daily Life: Create a Rich Environment: strew stuff they might like (but don’t be attached to them liking it). Ride the Waves: of interests and passions (yours and theirs), as well as the flow of the day. Follow Your Heart: and encourage them to follow theirs. Creative Brainstorming: about any situation until everyone’s needs can be met as well as possible.


Beyond Talk:
Upcoming events to protest government and corporate inaction on climate change. I’ve taken the pledge, but acknowledge it’s not enough.

LIVING BETTER

Home in the Jungle: This Hawai’ian permaculture community looks like a wonderful place to live. Great music too. Thanks to Tree for the link, and the one that follows (and also for the Butterfly Nebula link later in this post).

Mali’s Gift Economy: The economy of Mali, consistent with that of many indigenous cultures, is based on paying gifts forward, not on exacting a ‘market value’ of exchange for every transaction. Meanwhile, Melissa Holbrook Pierson shows that some communities in our mercenary world understand the gift economy too.

POLITICS AND ECONOMICS AS USUAL
buy this car
image from Deborah McLean; thanks to Natalie Shell for the link

The Disease of Death: Rob Paterson talks about the elephant in the room in the health care debate: That we treat dying as if it were a curable disease, and lavish half of all health care spending on patients in their final year of life, mostly to prolong the inevitable, uncomfortably, in a cold, clinical institutional environment.

GE Pushes Coal as Clean and Sexy: You’ll have to suppress your gag instinct when you watch this pro-coal commercial for GE, which Keith Farnish says stands for Greenwashing Experts. The ad was pulled not for its barefaced deception but because viewers found it in bad taste. I’ll say.

Get a Permit, Stay Way Over Here, Don’t Get Out of Line, and We’ll Let You Protest: Pittsburgh offered G20 protestors a sandbox to demonstrate in, miles from the G20 summit, where they could be safely ignored. When the protestors declined, they were gased and arrested. Nothing new here. Thanks to Malik Datardina for the links.

us dollar 2009
with the rush to the ’safe haven’ of the US dollar during the Great Recession now over, the world’s most overvalued and fundamentally worthless currency has resumed its race towards zero; two years ago I said it would plunge below 60, and, as usual, I’ll be proved ultimately right but not as fast as I’d expected (I now see it falling below 40 by 2012)

NYT Belatedly Warns of Dangers of Corporate Personhood: It only took them a century, but the NYT has finally acknowledged that the court decision that gave corporations the rights of personhood, without the commensurate responsibilities, was a mistake. The statement came as the extreme right-wing US supreme court is about to extend corporate rights even further.

FUN AND INSPIRATION

butterfly nebula
the butterfly nebula, 4000 light-years away; photo by the hubble telescope  
THOUGHTS OF THE WEEK

From Meg Wheatley (via Sheri Herndon):

“In order to improve the health of a system, connect it to more of itself.” 

From Dave Bonta:

THE DARK NIGHT

I am listening for an owl that doesn’t call.
It’s as taciturn as the coyotes whose presence here
we mainly infer from footprints.
Night ripens on the boughs, its blue-black fruit
an antidote to the 24-hour Wal-Mart of the soul
in which I sink.

September 24, 2009

Leaning Towards Intention

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 22:57


What You Can Do 2009

My last few posts have been part of my process of deciding what I’m going to do next, as I prepare to move, to retire, and to become more active in living the ways I have been writing about for six years, my “trying on” different models of the me that I’m becoming.

My post on What You Can Do (graphic above) is my attempt at a roadmap of possibilities. My post yesterday (graphic below) drills down Step 7 of this roadmap (the step I’m most unfamiliar and anxious about) in greater detail.

keith farnish making the change

And my personal “scorecard” on the 9 steps was in my post at the end of last week:

dave's journey

I gave myself a “some progress but a way to go” (yellow) score for Step 5 (Know Yourself and Discover the Courage to Act). I was listening yesterday to a talk (recommended by Chris Corrigan) by Gil Fronsdal on Intentions. In it, Gil makes the point that, before acting, we should know what our intention is for what’s left of our life, and then also for today. The word “intention” comes from the Latin meaning “stretch toward”. An intention is not a hope, dream, plan or aspiration. It is something we are actively working towards, now. So by thinking about our true intention for what’s left of our lives (which may be 37 days, or 37 years), and then about our true intention for today, and aligning those intentions, we can begin to actively “stretch toward” realizing both intentions.

My life has been through so many remarkable changes in the past five years I keep having to cycle back with what I’ve just learned about myself, and about the world, and revisiting these intentions. Looking at the 9 steps in the What You Can Do chart, and my progress in each of them, I have to acknowledge some continuing unease and trepidation. Is this really what I want to do with what’s left of my life? Is this really what I’m meant to do? Like my friend Pete McGregor, I keep doubting myself as soon as I think I’ve decided anything.

So I thought I’d go back to my Step 5 standby, my “what you’re meant to do” three-circle chart from my book Finding the Sweet Spot:

ftss circles

My latest effort at “filling in” the three circles looks like this:

ftss circles

My Passions are the things I love doing, copied from my personal scorecard, with the ones that I also do well (I think) shown in the overlap with my Gifts (area 2). I tried to think if I have other Gifts, things I’m uniquely good at, and decided that I’m actually pretty good at “playing” (although non-human creatures seem to appreciate this more than humans), so I moved it to area 2 as well. The three things I put in my Purpose circle (what’s needed that I care about) are the things described in Steps 6-8 of the What You Can Do chart.

So then I asked myself: Do any of the things in any of these circle areas (1, 2 and 6) actually belong in area 4, 5 or (ideally) 3?

I think there are a few, but not many:

  • My Gifts/Passions for imagining possibilities and writing could be applied to dismantling civilization (specifically the undermining and innovating activities), if I would apply them collaboratively instead of individually
  • These same Gifts/Passions might be applied to writing fiction about what might be (utopian depictions), something to inspire and guide the creation of natural working models, but does the world really need more idealistic utopian fiction (I’m not sure — if it’s needed I don’t know that it’s recognized as a need)?
  • If I could increase my competency at conversing and showing (and move them from area 1 to area 2), then they could probably be applied to dismantling civilization (undermining, innovating, influencing and educating activities), but am I too old to finally become highly competent at these things — I’ve been working on them for years?
  • Just about any if the Passions in area 1 could arguably be applied to any of the needs in area 6. But if I’m not highly competent at them, they’re still not in my sweet spot (area 3), only in area 4 — the area of disapppointment and self-disappointment. And that’s the last thing I need.
  • Besides, I don’t really want to build the working models (transition communities, permaculture gardens, natural enterprises, unschooling environments) — I’m more interested in (collaboratively thinking and writing about) the ideas than the actual implementation, which to me is messy, risky, political and fraught with difficulty.
  • Likewise, it’s the ideation involved in the innovating component of dismantling civilization that I’m most competent at and interested in, not the dangerous activities of physical obstruction and sabotage (as much as I admire those who do this, as long as no one gets physically hurt), nor the exhausting political aspects of activism (demonstration, debate, organizing and persuading). I try to psych myself up into wanting to do these other things, but so far at least, I honestly can’t.

So here I am, still perched on the edge, still not entirely sure what I want to do, what I’m meant to do. But I’m getting close, I think. A little more thought on the intention part, on envisioning what I want to “stretch toward”, what I want to give, and I’ll be there.

September 23, 2009

Making the Change: How to Dismantle Industrial Civilization

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 18:05


What You Can Do 2009
Keith Farnish’s book Time’s Up (also available as a free e-book called A Matter of Scale) provides a valuable framework for Step 7 in the What You Can Do process (see graphic above) that I outlined last week — the step that’s about dismantling industrial civilization. I’ve summarized some of the key elements of Keith’s framework for action in the graphic below.

keith farnish making the change

Here’s an explanation of this framework:

There are six categories of actions that Keith suggests we can make:

  1. Finding better ways to live: These are personal actions that you can take that will help starve industrial civilization of the consumer dollars and labour hours that it requires to continue: 
    • Consuming less (and strategically)
    • Eating better (local, organic, small-farm, organic, self-prepared, unpackaged and GMO- and chemical-free)
    • Traveling less and using non-air, multi-user public transport
    • Living in more modest, more durable, homes (using less power/heat/air conditioning)
    • Working for ourselves and not big multinationals (either as employees or as consultants to them)
    • Unschooling/deschooling ourselves, our peers and children (i.e. self-directed, not institutional learning)
    • Having at most one child
    • Doing what we can to restore some of the damage to land, environment and society wreaked by industrial civilization
  2. Undermining industrial civilization: As Keith points out, the above personal activities by themselves are not enough. Unless we work actively to undermine and dismantle industrial civilization, it will just keep destroying and exhausting our planet until we’ve passed the point of no return on climate change, and exhausted the planet’s resources. Keith outlines four rules for this ‘undermining’ work, whose objective is to slow down the machine so that growth (and hence industrial civilization’s viability) ends, so that citizens realize its (and their) vulnerability and the damage it causes, and so that alternative models of living and making a living have a chance to flourish:
    • Focus on the tools of disconnection and their perpetrators
    • Only act if the rewards outweigh the risks (that generally means avoiding harm to people and other creatures)
    • Plan carefully (don’t let your emotions get the better of you)
    • Don’t get caught (the book explains how)
These are the perpetrators of the ten ‘tools of disconnection’ that we need to target in our actions. They include most but not all:

Corporations (including government-owned power generators and similar organizations)
Politicians, lawyers, judges, police and the military
Economists, junk scientists, shills and other generators of misinformation
The mainstream media, advertisers and PR firms
Religious organizations, therapists, techno-salvationists and PR-focused environmentalists
Educators

These perpetrators systematically disconnect us from our own instincts, knowledge and ideas, from other radical thinkers and actors, and from the natural environment and all-life-on-Earth. They do this using the ten tools of disconnection illustrated in the red circle in the graphic above:

  • Reward us for being good consumers: They make shoddy stuff that has to be constantly replaced, and through advertising and how they measure prosperity (GDP) they equate wealth and consumption with well-being and self-worth.
  • Make us feel good for doing trivial things: Their con job of labeling products as “healthy”, “natural” and “environmentally friendly” is designed to divert attention from the damage they are doing to the planet and make us believe that by recycling, signing petitions and buying their stuff we’re “doing our share” to make things better.
  • Give us selected freedom: They let us demonstrate, as long as it achieves nothing. They give us Tweedledum vs Tweedledee choices of political parties and products, while blocking electoral reforms like proportionate representation that might reduce their power.
  • Give us insignificant choices: They pretend to offer us a real choice of banks, of jobs, of schools, of media, and of products when in fact they’re all controlled by the same oligopoly and the differences are minuscule.
  • Sell us a dream: They foment in us, through advertising, a constant sense of dissatisfaction with what we own, to distract us from being dissatisfied with what they are doing to our world. So we keep striving for the personal and unsustainable, for property, instead of sustainable, collective well-being.
  • Exploit our trust in authority: They brainwash us to believe obedience to authority is necessary to maintain civil order. They redefine anarchy in their propaganda to be something evil, dangerous and unworkable. And they tell us over and over that their security forces and laws are in our best interest, when nothing could be further from the truth.
  • Lie to us: In addition to telling us their way is the only way to live, and that growth is essential to well-being, the mainstream media, handmaidens of the corpocracy, bombard us with misinformation, distraction and simplistic false dichotomies to obfuscate the truth.
  • Scare us: Fear has always been used by despots to keep subjects in thrall, disconnected, distracted and obedient. They invent phony and wildly-exaggerated enemies and then fear-monger to stir up panic and enable them to suppress dissent and information. The threat of “terrorists”, real and invented, and defined as they choose to include anyone who opposes their agenda, sustains a constant atmosphere of fear.
  • Abuse and exploit us: By decimating the middle class, they’ve created a frightened and isolated working class with a huge underclass that has been propagandized to believe their misfortune (illness, poverty, ignorance etc.) is their own fault. The result is desperation and learned helplessness that saps the anger and energy that would otherwise be directed against the oppressors.
  • Give us false hope: We’re constantly told, by religious leaders, corporate greenwashers, techno-salvationists and even most environmental organizations that all we have to do is give them our political and financial support and they’ll look after our problems for us. So we become dependent, and ignorant of how to look after ourselves.
  • Turn us against each other: [this is my addition to Keith's list] From our first encounters with sibling rivalry, through the education system, media and sports programming, the job market and job performance, everything is presented to us as competition, a struggle against our peers for scarce resources and results. While we’re battling each other, they’re stealing most of everything. And so we learn to contest and argue, instead of how to collaborate.
  1. Innovating and pioneering: My personal opinion is that activists are mostly (like most other people nowadays) pretty unimaginative. The lists and sites that describe how to bring about change tend to focus on measures to create media buzz rather than bring about any real behaviour change (Keith hasn’t much use for environmental groups of this ilk). Because of the effectiveness of the tools of disconnection, media attention rarely generates much more than feelings of learned helplessness and frustration. I’ve stopped reading the news and press releases about environmental destruction and loss, because they rarely offer suggestions beyond voting, petitions and writing cheques (which generally change nothing, other than perhaps keeping some environmentalists employed).
So how can we innovatively undermine and disrupt industrial civilization? In my book Finding the Sweet Spot, I outline a process for innovation that entails:
  • researching the challenge or need
  • inviting and forming a diverse and motivated innovation team
  • collaboratively brainstorming, creatively and critically, ideas for action
  • organizing how to realize the most promising ideas
  • bringing the most promising ideas to fruition
  • experimenting, to test the new ideas’ viability
  • scaling up of successful experiments
I believe this collaborative methodology is the best way for us to identify new, innovative methods to undermine and disrupt industrial civilization. I’d like to convene an Open Space event around this specific topic, in Canada, using, as a test case, the challenge of stopping any further development of the Alberta Tar Sands.
  1. Influencing others: Part of any change initiative is to engage others and get them involved in the change activities as well. Keith describes Gladwell’s Tipping Point methods for doing this through “connectors” who spread the message to others outside the current group, and through “salespeople” who persuade others of the value of changing behaviour. Most importantly, this influencing effort needs to be targeted at people who are ready to listen and ready for a behaviour change. Keith also asserts that we need a clear and compelling, positive statement of purpose to explain why we advocate change. Here is his:
Human activity is destroying the natural systems that we depend upon for our survival. Our most basic instinct as humans is to survive; yet we continue to destroy our life-support machine. Connected humans understand this terrible contradiction; disconnected humans are not able to.

Not all humans are responsible: just those who are part of Industrial Civilization. Industrial Civilization depends on economic growth and the unsustainable use of natural resources, so it has developed a complex set of tools for keeping people disconnected from the real world and living a life that keeps civilization running. Humans have been manipulated in order to be part of a destructive system.

The only way to prevent global ecological collapse and thus ensure the survival of humanity is to rid the world of Industrial Civilization.

Civilization is complex and delicate: it depends on everything running smoothly and also depends upon people having faith in its goodness. Global ecological systems are changing in unpredictable and major ways; natural resources are running out rapidly; the population is growing, particularly the population of urban areas; there is considerable political and civil unrest developing throughout the world: any combination of these factors are likely to lead to a sudden and catastrophic collapse of civilization during the 21st century.

It is possible to create a situation where civilization is left to crumble gradually, reducing the impact on humanity, and the sooner this is done, the less the global environment will be harmed. The key things we need to do are:

   1. Reconnect with the real world, so that we can understand our close relationships with it in everything we do. The more you connect, the more you will realise how unreal civilization is.
   2. Live in such a way that we do not contribute to the expansion of the global economy, reducing our impact on the natural environment in the process. Be aware that authority figures within the system, such as political leaders and corporations, will attempt to provide you with ‘green’ advice: this advice is designed to ensure that civilization continues, and should be ignored.
   3. Create the conditions so that others may also change through education and, even more importantly, undermining the tools that civilization uses to keep us part of the machine. Don’t waste time protesting: this changes nothing – that is why it is legal.

A future outside of civilization is a better life; one in which we can actually decide for ourselves how we are going to live.

  1. Educating others: Even more important than influencing others is educating others — helping to debunk the misinformation they’re getting from the perpetrators listed above, by presenting factual knowledge, new ideas, and different perspectives. We need to have the courage and patience to speak up when we hear misinformation, no matter how awkward, political and radical that may come across.
  2. Relearning capacities and competencies: Keith identifies both survival skills and social/collaborative skills that we need to re-learn, in his book. His list is not that different from the list I have published on this site several times, which is reproduced again below.

critical life skills

What do you think? Other than that this is a lot of work, is this a viable framework for undermining, disrupting and finally dismantling industrial civilization, before it can do too much more damage?

September 21, 2009

The Philosophy of Loren Eiseley, in Verse

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 22:08


I wrote this three years ago, and just rediscovered it. I thought it was worth reposting.
starfish

The Star Thrower, by Loren Eiseley

Once upon a time, there was a wise man who used to go to the ocean to do his writing. He had a habit of walking on the beach before he began his work. One day, as he was walking along the shore, he looked down the beach and saw a human figure moving like a dancer. He smiled to himself at the thought of someone who would dance to the day, and so, he walked faster to catch up.

As he got closer, he noticed that the figure was that of a young man, and that what he was doing was not dancing at all. The young man was reaching down to the shore, picking up small objects, and throwing them into the ocean. He came closer still and called out “Good morning! May I ask what it is that you are doing?”

The young man paused, looked up, and replied “Throwing starfish into the ocean.”

“I must ask, then, why are you throwing starfish into the ocean?”  To this, the young man replied, “The sun is up and the tide is going out. If I don’t throw them in, they’ll die.”

Upon hearing this, the wise man commented, “But, young man, do you not realize that there are miles and miles of beach and there are starfish all along every mile? You can’t possibly make a difference!”

At this, the young man bent down, picked up yet another starfish, and threw it into the ocean. As it met the water, he said, “It made a difference for that one.”


Loren Eiseley died in 1977. He was a scientist and humanist greatly alarmed at the accelerating destruction of our planet in the last century, and would, I am sure, have been horrified at the setbacks at the start of the 21st century. Eiseley wrote several books on anthropology and natural philosophy, and, in a very different style, some dense, complex and (to me) inaccessible poetry.

What I find astonishing is that his prose seems more lyrical, more moving and profound and passionate than his verse. So, below, I’m taking the liberty of presenting some excerpts from his scientific and philosophical writing as poetry, parsing them as I think they would flow if Eiseley himself were to read them aloud. The ‘titles’ are my own ostentation.


our reputation precedes us

I have never entered a wood
     but what I hear
                              footsteps in the leaves
tiptoeing
     away


dying to remember

Man would kill for shadowy ideas
more ferociously than other creatures kill for food,
then,
in a generation or less,
forget what bloody dream had so oppressed him


“the notion of some infinitely gentle, infinitely suffering thing” 

Let men beat men, if they will,
     but why do they have to beat and starve small things?
Why? — Why? I will never forget that dog’s eyes,
nor the eyes of every starved mongrel I have fed from Curacao to Cuernavaca.
Nor the drowning one I once fished out of an irrigation ditch in California,
only to see him limp away with his ribs showing
as mine once showed in that cabin long ago in Manitou.

This is why I am a wanderer forever in the streets of men,
a wanderer in mind,
and, in these matters, a creature of desperate impulse.

It is not because I am filled with obscure guilt
     that I step gently over, and not upon, an autumn cricket.
It is not because of guilt
     that I refuse to shoot the last osprey from her nest in the tide marsh.
I posses empathy;
I have grown with man in his mind’s growing.
I share that sympathy and compassion
which extends beyond the barriers of class and race and form
until it partakes of the universal whole.

I am not ashamed to profess this emotion, nor will I call it a pathology.
Only through this experience many times repeated and enhanced
does man become truly human.

Only then will his gun arm be forever lowered.


nothing sacred

Modern man, the world eater,
respects no space
and no thing green or furred as sacred.

The march of the machines has entered his blood.

And if inventions of power outrun understanding,
as they now threaten to do,
man may well sink into a night
     more abysmal than any he has yet experienced.


on playing with a young fox

for just a moment
          I held the universe at bay

by the simple expedient
     of sitting on my haunches before a fox den
     and tumbling about with a chicken bone.

it is the gravest, most meaningful act I shall ever accomplish,
but,
as Thoreau once remarked
     of some peculiar errand of his own,

there is no use reporting it to the Royal Society


how we learn

The teacher must teach men
     not alone to dream,
but to dream so substantially
     that they will never in after years
     capitulate through the demands of a passing and ephemeral materialism.

It has ever been my lot,
though formally myself a teacher,
     to be taught surely by none. There are times
when I have thought to read lessons in the sky,
or in books,
or from the behavior of my fellows,
but in the end my perceptions
     have been frequently inadequate or betrayed.

Nevertheless, I venture to say
     that of what man may be
I have caught a fugitive glimpse,
not among multitudes of men,

but along an endless wave-beaten coast at dawn.


re  discovery

Every time we walk along a beach
     some ancient urge disturbs us
     so that we find ourselves shedding shoes and garments
or scavenging among seaweed and whitened timbers
like the homesick refugees of a long war.


other

one does not meet oneself

               until one catches the reflection

                    from an eye          other

than human


pacing

many of us
who walk to and fro upon our usual tasks
are prisoners
drawing mental maps of escape


the secret

there are things
     down
          there
                    still
                         coming ashore


the gift

The power to change is both creative and destructive –
a sinister gift, which,
unrestricted,
leads onward toward the formless and inchoate void
of the possible.

Mostly the animals understand their roles,
but man,
by comparison,
seems troubled by a message that,
it is often said,
he cannot quite remember,

or has gotten wrong.


a difficult re-entry

The nature of the human predicament
     is how nature is to be reentered; how man,
the relatively unthinking and proud creator of the second world –
          the world of culture
may revivify and restore the first world
     which cherished and brought him into being.

For what, increasingly, is required of man
is that he pursue the paradox of return.

Yet man does not wish to retrace his steps
down to the margins of the reeds and peer within,
lest by some magic he be permanently recaptured.

Instead, men prefer to hide
in cities of their own devising.


alchemy

I have lifted up a fistful of that ground.
I held it
     while that wild flight of south-bound warblers
     hurtled over me into the oncoming dark.

There went phosphorus, there went iron,
     there went carbon, there beat the calcium
in those hurrying wings.


“and time future contained in time past”

we lack the penetration
     to see the present and the onrushing future
          contending for the soft feathers of a flying bird,
or a beetle’s armor,
or shaking painfully
the frail confines of the human heart

man is himself a flame —
     he has burned through the animal world
and appropriated its vast stores of protein for his own

it has been said repeatedly that one can never,
try as he will, get around
     to the front of the universe:  man is destined
to see only its far side,
to realize nature
only in retreat

and if it should turn out
     that we have mishandled our own lives
as several civilizations before us have done,

it seems a pity that we should involve the violet
     and the tree frog in our departure


the mystery

In the world
     there is nothing
          below a certain depth
that is truly explanatory:

It is as if matter dreamed
     and muttered in its sleep.

But why,
and for what reason it dreams,
there is no evidence. 


A couple of readers have asked me to explain the expression après nous les dragons that I have used in several of my essays and one of my poems. It’s adapted from this excerpt from Eiseley’s book The Night Country:

Shake the seeds out of their pods, I say, launch the milkweed down, and set the lizards scuttling. We are in a creative universe. Let us then create. After all, humans are the unlikely consequence or such forces. In the spring when a breath of wind sets the propellers of the maple tree whirring, I always say to myself hopefully, “After us the dragons.” It is not out of sadistic malice that I have carried cockleburs out of their orbit or blown puffball smoke into new worlds. One out of these seeds may grope forward into the future and writhe out of its current shape. It is similarly so on the windswept uplands of the human mind.

When Eiseley says “After us the dragons” I take this to mean that, as an anthropologist (as fellow anthropologist Stephen Jay Gould explained so well in Full House) he understands that the emergence of humans (and even animals with backbones) on the planet was an improbable accident, a one in many million unlikelihood, and that the emergent forms of previous evolutions of life on our planet and all the other planets that support it in the universe were/are undoubtedly strange, unimaginable, perhaps even unrecognizable to us as life. He would be aware, too, of the evolution of birds from the dinosaurs, and their ability to survive when the dinosaurs perished. Are his “dragons” birds, strange flying reptiles? Or perhaps dragonflies, a member of the other genus, insects, that thrives on catastrophe and is so adaptable it is likely to outlive us and do well in the next phase of life on Earth? Or is he being metaphorical and referring to dragons as any strange, unimaginable, wonderful species that will rise after our fall? Or all three?

I have translated Eiseley’s phrase into French a bit mischievously, since the word ‘dragon’ in French has the additional connotations of monster, demigogue, or soldier. Another inspiration for the translation to French: It was Louis XV, the end of a line, the king who presided over a horrifically inegalitarian empire, bankrupted, its treasury looted by the rich (sound familiar?), who, realizing its instability and unsustainability, said “Après moi le deluge” — after me come the floods (as an additional historical irony, part of his empire at that time was New Orleans).


If I haven’t been sufficiently pretentious so far, I’d like to conclude with a concatenation of another quote from Eiseley, in italics below (which I only just discovered yesterday, from his 1978 book The Star Thrower), followed by one of my own poems, written 35 years ago after a night sleeping under the stars. I think they just go together, almost eerily:

With time,
the bony fin is transformed into a paw,
a round, insectivorous eye
into the near-sighted gaze of a scholar.

At night the forest is not what it seems,
The wolf, in the shadows of half-sleep, evolves into a dragonfly,
the fire into a clown, the owl into a junkie, the lady into a child in rags.
The forest becomes a desert, then a city. The clown offers a balloon to the child,
watches it rise into the crimson sky,
pulsing with ventricular booms.
The junkie becomes a priest.
Child becomes a surgeon.
Clown becomes a voodoo magician, laughs the laugh of birth and death.
Dragonfly into hypodermic, into the arm of the Patient Lover.
In the heart of the night come the mating calls.
The rapturous moans of the opium den.
On the beach of no footprints,
by the night lit by lightning,
is a scorpion with wolf’s tattered claws.
Becomes a sea-snake
rising to the song of a flute
played by a woman clothed in strips of ragged fur.
Then the shadow of a vulture,
wearing the cloth of last rites,
and the snake’s devoured.

Thanks to the many Loren Eiseley fan sites for the quotes above, especially Tom Thomson’s wonderful Earth Talk and, for the starfish story, MuttCats.

September 20, 2009

Links and Tweets of the Week: September 20, 2009

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 22:18


colourblind cawthra bush
photo by colourblind (Payam Rajabi), taken not far from where I live

PREPARING FOR CIVILIZATION’S COLLAPSE

Moving Beyond Hope: From Sharon Astyk, fine words of inspiration for those of us who are past debating:

We are closer now to Neilah, the closing of the gates, in which our fate is inscribed, and we shift to acceptance of our fate.  Much closer – perhaps they are already closed, we do not know and can not know, and must live our lives as though they are open.   Most of us don’t grasp how very close we are to disaster – we go on through our everyday life, and things don’t seem so very bad, and so many people have predicted disaster before, and there’s every reason to believe we’ve got all the time in the world.  Except, of course, the fact that nearly every expression of our science tells us otherwise, that it is time and past time.

It is possible to believe that it is both too late to do anything and possible to do a great deal – in fact, I think this contradiction is the only way to go forward. I spend a lot of my time and energy finding ways to deal with this contradiction, asking how I simultaneously say to people “what you have had is lost, and there is no hope to get it back, you are living in a dead culture and simply haven’t seen it fall over yet” and also “you are needed to act, there is reason to hope and things to look forward to, and much, much work to do” – how does one do it, and say it so that others can hear?

The Long Descent Begins: From John Michael Greer, on what comes next:

The bright new tomorrow we’ve all been promised is not going to arrive. This is the bad news brought to us by the unfolding collision between industrial society and the unyielding limits of the planetary biosphere. Peak oil, global warming, and all the other crises gathering around the world are all manifestations of a single root cause: the impossibility of infinite growth on a finite planet. They are warning signals telling us that we have gone into full-blown overshoot – the state, familiar to ecologists, in which a species outruns the resource base that supports it – and they tell us also that growth is not merely going to stop; it’s going to reverse, and that reversal will continue until our population, resource use, and waste production drop to levels that can be sustained over the long term by a damaged planetary ecosystem.

That bitter outcome might have been prevented if we had collectively taken decisive action before we went into overshoot. We did not do so, and at this point the window of opportunity is firmly shut. Nearly all the proposals currently being floated to deal with the symptoms of our planetary overshoot assume, tacitly or otherwise, that this is not the case and we still have as much time as we need. Such proposals are wasted breath, and if any of them are enacted – and some of them very likely will be enacted, once today’s complacency gives way to tomorrow’s stark panic – the resources poured into them will be wasted as well.

And Each Place is a State of Mind: The author of Spell of the Sensuous says we need to become aware that “we are bodily immersed in an awareness that is not ours, but is rather the Earth’s“. David Abram’s descriptions of natural places and phenomena are poetic, transporting.

Farmageddon and #2 Corn: Guy McPherson rants about what industrial agriculture has done to us. Thanks to Dismantle Civilization for the link.

Once Again The Animals Were Conscious of A Vague Uneasiness: Another rant, about our unwillingness to acknowledge that Obama is only marginally less awful than Cheney-Bush. (If you’re wondering, the title of the op-ed is from the book Animal Farm.)

What Is Your Life Dedicated To?: Chris Corrigan points us to a great Gil Fronsdal talk on unselfish intention (also available as a podcast).

Leadership in a Self-Organizing World: Harrison Owen of Open Space fame says that leadership in complex systems isn’t about telling people what to do, or showing them what to do, or facilitating their self-organization; it’s about inspiring with ideas, passion, personal intention and commitment, hard work, creating space and opportunity, and inviting in ways that cannot be refused. Thanks to Tree for the link.

“There is No Reason for a Confinement House Anywhere”: The Bay Area Video Coalition is using videos to show what’s possible, starting with the local, organic food system, networked with Harvest Cloud, a collaborative of farmers who offer healthy local food, and Leave it Better, photo stories of individuals using the system. Thanks to Cheryl for the link.

LIVING BETTER

Better Measures of Economic Health and Well-Being than GDP: The long-awaited Stiglitz-Sen report on measurement of economic performance and social progress is out. Good recommendations, likely to be ignored by everyone except the Sarkozy government that commissioned the report. The rest, afraid of citizens knowing the real truth about the economy, will continue to report GDP, stock market indexes, and fictitious inflation and unemployment data, as measures of economic health, through the compliant mainstream media to a gullible public. Thanks to Andrew Tilling for the link. Summary:

  1. There is significant evidence that large segments of the population do not believe that reported government economic measures (e.g. inflation, unemployment) represent reality, because they don’t correlate to perceived and observed changes in actual personal experience and because there is significant motivation for governments producing the data to overstate it (conflict of interest). This has led to great public skepticism of GDP data.
  2. Government decision-making often overuses and misuses GDP data. This was a significant factor in aggravating and failing to cope with the recent, ongoing economic crisis, and is hampering efforts to combat climate change.
  3. GDP measures must be significantly reformed to remove distortions (e.g. economic events currently reflected in GDP that do nothing to create wealth, or actually negatively affect wealth), and should be shifted from a production to consumption focus.
  4. GDP measures should include measures of the equal/unequal distribution of wealth among the population (Gini index factors), not just a single ‘average’ number.
  5. Reformed GDP should be presented alongside two additional measures: National Well-Being, and Wealth/Well-Being Sustainability. (Some specific proposals for these new measures are included in the report, though it calls for more research.) All these measures should be included in a standardized national “Annual Report”, analogous to a corporation’s annual report.

POLITICS AND ECONOMICS AS USUAL

Tar Sands Told to Step Up Propaganda: Right-wing corporatist apologist Diane Francis tells Big Oil they need an all-out greenwashing spin war to prevent Canadians (and their foreign customers) discovering the truth about the Alberta Tar Sands holocaust. She cites the success of the American Petroleum Institute’s use of phony “citizen” websites broadcasting deceptive, PR-crafted pro-drilling messages on Facebook and Twitter, and urges Big Oil to do the same to greenwash the Alberta Tar Sands. You know, just like the Big Oil and HMO-funded Republicans have done in the US. Of course, that’s not how she puts it. Thanks to Malik Datardina for the links. This is a knee-jerk reaction of the right to Greenpeace’s success at briefly shutting down the Tar Sands, and accurately labeling Canada a “global carbon bully“.

Carter Tells Progressives to Not Stand for Bigotry: The former US president says right-wing extremists are exploiting the left’s reverence for freedom of speech and the press as cover for racism, hate-mongering and other behaviour that no constitution was meant to protect, and we should not put up with it.

Don’t Risk the Swine Flu Vaccine: The squalene-based swine flu vaccine you’ll be asked to get injected with this year, not only causes auto-immune diseases but also nerve diseases according to neurologists.

Half Million Clean Water Violations in US Ignored: The NYT, using public records of violations that state enforcement agencies and the EPA have ignored, have created a national database of the violations.

FUN AND INSPIRATION

viv mcwaters rock balancing
rock balancing success in Oz by Viv McWaters

Thousands of swifts return in a graceful swarm to their night-time roost in an industrial chimney in Eugene OR. The birds originally nested in hollow trees, but as development occurred they adapted to chimneys, and now, with the advent of chimney caps, they resort to large group accommodations in abandoned industrial chimneys. Thanks to Tree for the link, and the one that follows.

300-year-old permaculture garden discovered in Vietnam. “This is a view of the past, and a view of the future.”

THOUGHTS FOR THE WEEK

Remembering David Foster Wallace: A new retrospective on the troubled novelist insists his greatest and most memorable accomplishment will be the non-fiction he wrote, reluctantly, in his spare time, like his brilliant commencement address and the astonishining animal cruelty article he managed to get published in Gourmet magazine. Thanks to Karen Hay-Draude for the links.

From Herbert Read in To Hell With Culture (1963): “We may note that when the profit system has to place function before profit, as in the production of an aeroplane or a racing-car, it also inevitably produces a work of art. But the question to ask is; why are not all the things produced under capitalism as beautiful as its aeroplanes and racing-cars?” 

Patti Digh has produced a small pdf book called Four Word Self-Help that contains a few dozen “four-words” of wisdom on various subjects. It’s brilliant, but Patti somehow felt compelled to provide context for each four-word gem by saying what it was “about”. In my opinion, just as stories are much stronger without the moral being stated explicitly, these four-words are much more powerful without the “about”. So here are my favourites, sans context. (I’m working on four-words for each of the nine steps in my What You Can Do process.) Additions from readers of this blog are welcome:
  • Show up, be real.
  • Take people with you.
  • Look inside for answers.
  • Ask why, not how.
  • Don’t pretend it works.
  • Surprise them with presence.

September 16, 2009

My Journey

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 22:55


dave's journey

In my previous post I provided a framework for making the world a better place. Today I’m going to ’score’ myself using that framework, and admit that despite all the work and energy I’ve put into learning how the world really works and imagining how it might be made better,, I’m still not far along this journey. My ’scorecard’ is shown above. Red squares represent areas of my journey where I’m stuck or barely underway; yellow squares represent areas where I’m making some progress but still have a long way to go; and green squares represent areas where I’m well advanced. Here’s what this scorecard says:

  1. Appreciating: I’m trying hard, but not succeeding. Despite my belief that as our civilization unwinds later in this century, life is going to be pretty awful, I’m basically happy, centred, determined, and ready to live every minute of my life with joy and purpose. My problem is that I have difficulty appreciating (most) other people. I am an incorrigible misanthrope. I need to explore what to do about this. 
  2. Presence: I’m still stuck. I understand being present, living in the Now, the same way I understand meditation and playing music — my head gets the concept, but my body won’t play. I need to keep practicing. 
  3. Opening My Heart: I’m making progress. I’ve come to acknowledge my grief for Gaia, for all the suffering in the world. I’m beginning to show the world my broken heart. You’ve seen the change, I think, in my recent writing. I’m still learning to let go, however, and I still have a lot to let go.
  4. Understanding the World: It’s taken the reading of 500 books and the writing of 2500 pages of blog articles, and my own book, but I think I’ve got this covered. I know what’s going on, and why, and why what all the politicians and business leaders and economists and social scientists and educators and activists and gurus and social networkers are doing isn’t making much of a difference, and won’t. 
  5. Knowing Myself: I’m getting a lot better at this, but I am still procrastinating at the intersection of knowing and doing. What’s holding me back? For all the self-knowledge I’ve acquired, especially over the last year (my Self-Portrait in Words, in the centre of the graphic above, is, I think, a more complete and honest self-portrait than most people would be able to produce), I still have more self-questions than answers. But despite my rather miserable scores in these 5 reconnecting steps, I’m ready for the action steps (6-8).
  6. Building Capacity & Competency: I have acquired some important new skills in the past year, and already had a few, but I still have at least the 7 shown in the lower left of the diagram above to acquire (here’s an explanation of SSUQIOC, the method for approaching challenges that I’m continuing to practice).
  7. Dismantling Civilization: Barely begun. The blog has been important, and will continue to be part of my contribution to taking down this civilization as gently as possible to reduce the amount of further damage it will do. But it’s not enough. For a Canadian, the Alberta tar sands are an obvious target. What my role will be I’m still sorting out.
  8. Creating Natural Working Models: Also barely begun. Lots of ideas on Intentional Community, on unschooling, a good (but not very popular) book Finding the Sweet Spot published to show what Natural Enterprise can do. But it’s time to move beyond writing about these models and start actually building them, and living them.
  9. Being a Model: I think I’m a long way down this path. I am spending more and more of my time living my principles and practicing what I preach, and my message is getting more coherent and more compelling. And I really am getting rid of all of the gunk that had made me too much everybody-else, and am now much closer to being nobody-but-myself. I still need to find my ‘places’, the warm forests and beaches that call to me, and I need to keep making time and space to do the things I love doing, the things that manifest this nobody-but-myself, and keep me joyful, but I’m well on my way.

Not a great scorecard — 2 A’s, 3 C’s and 4 D’s — but I’m making progress, and I know what needs to be done.

September 14, 2009

What You Can Do: A Framework for Personal Action (version 0.9)

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 22:55


What You Can Do 2009
to print out this framework, right click and select “view image”, then save the resultant image as a jpg or pdf and print that

It’s been a couple of years since I tried to provide a comprehensive answer to the question of many of my readers: “What can I do?” in light of all the suffering in this world, and the looming collapse, some time in this century, of our unsustainable, teetering civilization. Past versions of What You Can Do have been mostly checklists, and I thought this time I’d try to provide a model, a process that each individual can tailor to her or his own capacities, abilities and passions. It’s illustrated above, and it’s fairly ambitious, but I think it makes sense. It draws heavily on the work of Joanna Macy I wrote about last week (and I hope to attend one of her workshops later this year). It also draws on the work of Richard Moss, Otto Scharmer, and my book Finding the Sweet Spot.

Here’s a walkthrough of the process, which to some extent I’ve applied in my own life. I won’t pretend I did any of this in this order, or with this much focus or rigour, but if I knew then what I know now perhaps I would have. Here we go.

STEP 1: APPRECIATE

If you’re going to start on this journey, you need to be positive, “yes…and” affirmative, grateful, self-accepting, and appreciative of the astonishing joys of living. As long as you’re negative, always working against The Man, you will find that as soon as your energy is fed by anger, it is exhausted by frustration and despair.

Kenny Ausubel and Nina Simons explain it this way: This work, as important as it is, depends on us being true to ourselves, self-appreciative, giving ourselves permission to take risks, learning to accept compliments, “smelling fear and heading straight for it”, and managing our own and others’ expectations. We have to balance idealism and realism, perseverance and pragmatism, masculine aggressiveness and feminine perceptiveness and resilience. We must see that the glass is half full and half empty. We have to get past the internalized oppression that we carry inside us, the fear of saying and talking about what we most care about, even though doing so makes us vulnerable and may expose us to disbelief and even ridicule.

Tom Robbins lives by the principle of “crazy wisdom”: “the wisdom that evolves when one, while refusing to avert one’s gaze from the sorrows and injustices of the world, insists on joy in spite of everything.”

Joanna Macy describes gratitude as a revolutionary act — it contradicts the relentless message of the industrial growth society that we, and what we have, are never enough, so we are made to be perpetually dissatisfied. Gratitude breaks this hold on us, showing us that we are sufficient, and hence liberates us from industrial growth society’s propaganda, mindset and entrenched behaviours.

Your journey will be a long and challenging one, and for you to usefully complete it, it must be rooted in indefatigable appreciation, gratitude and joy. Are you ready for this?

STEP 2: BE PRESENT

You’re going to have to bring all your attention to this journey, all your focus. Changing the world in any meaningful way doesn’t lend itself to multitasking, distraction, or living inside your head, or in your dreams.

Richard Moss argues that most of us envisage ourselves through the stories we tell ourselves, about our past, our future, about ourselves and others and the world, and that these stories and the emotions they evoke (fear, hope, guilt, regret, nostalgia, insecurity, self-importance, self-hatred, anger, jealousy and bitterness) are a mere shadow world, an invention of our minds, that keeps us from being in and living in the Now.

David Abram shows us how to rediscover the spell of the sensuous, and hence how to reconnect with our instincts, emotions, senses and all-life-on-Earth, by spending time in wild places, and paying attention. Once reconnected, we come to know, intuitively and viscerally, with our heart and body and senses, not just our head, what needs to be done. Time disappears, we remember who we really are, freed from the stories and all the gunk that’s been attached to us. And we can then bring that attention and presence to everything we do, and we’re going to need it!

We are Gaia.

STEP 3: LET YOUR HEART BE BROKEN

When we are disconnected from our feelings, our senses, and our instincts, and live in our heads, we act (intellectually) as if everything is all right, while we know (emotionally, viscerally) that something is terribly wrong. It is as if there are two highly dissonant people inside us: an active one that goes about our daily work, engaging in normal relationships; and a passive one that suffers silently from a profound, unnamed and unexpressed grief and a deep but unexplored sense of anxiety.

Richard Bruce Anderson describes the process of working through this disconnection: “At the heart of the modern age is a core of grief. At some level, we’re aware that something terrible is happening, that we humans are laying waste to our natural inheritance. A great sorrow arises as we witness the changes in the atmosphere, the waste of resources and the consequent pollution, the ongoing deforestation and destruction of fisheries, the rapidly spreading deserts and the mass extinction of species. All these changes signal a turning point in human history, and the outlook is not particularly bright. The anger, irritability, frustration and intolerance that increasingly pervade our common life are symptoms associated with grief… Grief is a natural reaction to calamity, and the stages of grief are visible in our reaction to the rapid decline of the natural world. There are a number of steps that people go through in the grief process. The first stage is often denial: ‘This can’t really be happening,’ a feeling common among millions of Americans… We know the facts, but we’re ignoring them in the interests of emotional survival.” When we acknowledge this pain we can begin to move forward through the remaining stages of grief — anger, despair, and finally “a peaceful accommodation of reality.”

Nick Smith explains: “Here’s an alternative to [endless] effort and struggle:  Instead of living in hope of a better life or anyone coming to make it feel better, we can elect to allow everything to be exactly as it is… and then welcome whatever angst or despair or other form of fear appears, so that we can really face it.  Instead of following the mind’s need to move, we can choose to sit still in the middle of it all and allow it, consume it, regardless of the consequences.  This can feel like death itself, but by letting our heart be broken like this, what we discover in the rubble can never be lost.  What flows free from an heart that’s been broken open is an unimaginable love that could never be put back, and which envelops everything.”

Joanna Macy explains that the pain we feel for the world (what I have described as “our unbearable grief for Gaia”) is universal; we all sense it, and that this pain is unprecedented; never since the start of our civilization have we faced the possibility of the end of our society and a massive life extinction event. We tend to block or repress this pain, for fear it will deeply depress or paralyze us (or be socially unacceptable to express); the consequence is that we end up suppressing our instinct for the preservation of life. We need to reframe the “silent scream” of these emotions as our deep capacity to hear within ourselves the sound of the Earth crying, and hence as a feeling of deep, instinctive compassion in which we “suffer with” all-life-on-Earth. When we let our hearts be broken, she explains, the grief and sorrow we feel for the world is transformed into love, the fear and dread is transformed into courage and trust, the anger and outrage finds expression as passion for justice, and the feelings of ignorance and helplessness yield to glimpses of opportunity.

Show the world your broken heart.

STEP 4: UNDERSTAND HOW THE WORLD REALLY WORKS

Our world (like all ecological and social systems) is inherently, staggeringly and wonderfully complex, but everything we are taught about the world and how it works (in schools, and in the mainstream media) is reduced to simplistic, mechanistic terms. We continue to believe that “the environment” (something that is portrayed as somehow apart from us) is just facing “problems” that need “solutions” (political, economic, scientific, technological, or spiritual). In complicated systems (like your car), “problems” can be fixed. But in complex systems there are no problems, only predicaments, unintended consequences of actions that cannot be undone. Nature teaches us (if we will only listen) that you don’t fix a predicament, you adapt to it. The reason so many of our modern crises are so wicked and intractable is that they are not problems, but predicaments, unintended consequences of (mostly) well-intended human actions. To understand how the world really works, and how we can start to learn to adapt to our modern predicaments, we need to understand complexity.

With that context, of adaptation rather than futilely chasing “solutions”, my blog and my Save the World reading list can help you understand how the world really works. If that’s too much reading for you, at least read these seven books, in this order:

  1. Full House, by Stephen J. Gould. The improbable emergence of humans on Earth.
  2. Story of B, by Daniel Quinn. A radical revisionist history of civilization, in fictional format, and an explanation of how we got to where we are now.
  3. A Language Older Than Words, by Derrick Jensen. A dark explanation of the reason for the core of grief at the heart of the modern age.
  4. A Short History of Progess, by Ronald Wright. Why all civilizations collapse. A survey of past civilizations’ savagery and short-term thinking. Jared Diamond but shorter.
  5. Against the Grain, by Richard Manning. Why Jared Diamond said monoculture agriculture was the greatest mistake in human history, and what it’s come to now.
  6. Straw Dogs, by John Gray. While we have a responsibility to try to make the world better and joyful, for those we love and leave behind, we cannot be other than what we are: a fierce, brilliantly adaptable species destined to bring out the next great extinction, and annihilate ourselves in the process.
  7. The Long Emergency, by James Kunstler. What the near future will look like when this century’s looming ecological, economic, political and resource crises begin to cascade.

You should also study and meet with people from indigenous cultures, to appreciate there are many ways to live that are different from (and arguably superior to) the ways of living that our industrial growth society would have us believe is the only way to live. A great primer on this is Hugh Brody’s The Other Side of Eden, a personal study of several indigenous cultures around the world.

Now you know what really happened, and what’s really happening. Cycle back to steps 1-3, take a deep breath, and fare forward.

STEP 5: KNOW YOURSELF; DISCOVER THE COURAGE TO ACT

At this point you should be reconnected with your heart, your instincts, your senses, and all-life-on-Earth, and prepared to bring appreciation, presence and openness to the work you will be doing. And you should have a reasonable idea of what needs to be done. The next step is to connect with yourself, to learn what you are meant to do, what your role in making the world a better place should be. My book Finding the Sweet Spot describes how to do this in the specific context of making a living. But the same principles and approach can also help you learn what you are meant to do in the broader context. This involves self-exploration to discover (a) your Gifts (what you are uniquely good at doing), your Passions (what you love doing), and your Purpose (what is needed in the world that you care about, and which resonates with who you are). Where these three things intersect lies what you are meant to do.

David Robinson describes a method for discovering these three things:

  • Practice (doing what you can) is the means to discover your Gifts, what you have the capacity and competency to do.
  • Intention (doing what you want) is the means to discover your Passions, what you love doing. 
  • Autonomy (being nobody-but-yourself, in spite of everything) is the means to discover who you really are, and hence discover your Purpose.

The only way to know, he suggests, is to do. Until you try things, you can’t know if they are your Gifts, or your Passions, or your Purpose. My book has lots of exercises for finding this intersection, what you’re meant to do.

Through self-knowledge comes the courage to act. When you know what you’re meant to do, that’s a huge step towards doing it. When this is who you really are, what you want, and what you can do, how can you not do it? There is still, of course, the fear of change, which is mostly the fear of the unknown. These first five steps are the reconnecting cycle; the last four are the actions, which you will take in collaboration with others to realize what you’re meant to do. As you go through these four steps and determine precisely what actions you’re meant to pursue, some of the fear of change and of the unknown will dissipate. When you’re ready to act, you’ll know.

These first five steps are a cycle, or as Joanna Macy describes them a spiral. They’re never done and forgotten. They’re a continuous process, a set of practices to keep you reconnected.

The final four steps are a balance, a set of actions you do more or less together, because each informs and enriches the others and keeps you from being ’stuck’ in one type of action.

STEP 6: BUILD PERSONAL AND COLLECTIVE CAPACITY AND COMPETENCY

These are the ‘head’ actions, the ones rooted mostly in intellectual (thinking and learning) activity. Knowing who you are, and what you know and need to know, will direct and inform these types of actions, at the personal level. You may conclude that some of the things you believe to be in your sweet spot are not currently Gifts (distinctive competencies) of yours, or you may be lacking the capacity to do them, so you’ll need to open space and time, and study and practice, until they are.

At the collective level, you will need to connect, communicate, share, teach and show what you know with others in your community. You will also need to collaborate with others in your communities to develop collective capacities and competencies. That doesn’t mean everyone needs to have these qualities, just that someone in each community needs to have them, and others in the community need to recognize and draw on them. This is done as part of a collaborative process that, at a high level, follows this flow:

  1. Passion: Individual reflection on the subject at hand. 
  2. Conversation: Collective reflection, through a collective engagement of the collaborators.
  3. Consensus: Collective decision, though the understanding that emerged from the conversations.
  4. Action: Individual decision, through the acceptance of personal responsibility by individuals.

This process of “letting go” of personal perspectives and “letting come” of consensus is an application of Otto Scharmer’s ‘theory U‘. The acceptance of personal responsibility by individuals is part of Chris Corrigan’s teachings of Open Space and the collaborative processes of indigenous cultures.

STEP 7: DISMANTLE CIVILIZATION

These are the ‘hands’ actions, the ones rooted mostly in physical activity. This is the hard, thankless work of blockading, obstructing, boycotting and otherwise preventing the unsustainable industrial growth society from functioning. It will collapse under its own weight, given time, but we cannot wait: by acting to undermine it now we can lessen its damage and shorten its longevity, so that the collapse, though still devastating, will be less disastrous than if we allowed industrial civilization to pollute and enhaust resources to the bitter end.

Of course there are also many personal actions you can and must take to live simpler, more responsible and sustainable lives. They are not enough, however; much more radical action is needed.

Keith Farnish’s book Time’s Up! provides a blueprint for achieving this type of radical action effectively and safely (Derrick Jensen’s recent books also provide some excellent ideas). Here is Keith’s key message:

A Simple Message for Mankind

Human activity is destroying the natural systems that we depend upon for our survival. Our most basic instinct as humans is to survive; yet we continue to destroy our life-support machine. Connected humans understand this terrible contradiction; disconnected humans are not able to.

Not all humans are responsible: just those who are part of Industrial Civilization. Industrial Civilization depends on economic growth and the unsustainable use of natural resources, so it has developed a complex set of tools for keeping people disconnected from the real world and living a life that keeps civilization running. Humans have been manipulated in order to be part of a destructive system.

The only way to prevent global ecological collapse and thus ensure the survival of humanity is to rid the world of Industrial Civilization.

Civilization is complex and delicate: it depends on everything running smoothly and also depends upon people having faith in its goodness. Global ecological systems are changing in unpredictable and major ways; natural resources are running out rapidly; the population is growing, particularly the population of urban areas; there is considerable political and civil unrest developing throughout the world: any combination of these factors are likely to lead to a sudden and catastrophic collapse of civilization during the 21st century.

It is possible to create a situation where civilization is left to crumble gradually, reducing the impact on humanity, and the sooner this is done, the less the global environment will be harmed. The key things we need to do are:

  1. Reconnect with the real world, so that we can understand our close relationships with it in everything we do. The more you connect, the more you will realise how unreal civilization is.
  2. Live in such a way that we do not contribute to the expansion of the global economy, reducing our impact on the natural environment in the process. Be aware that authority figures within the system, such as political leaders and corporations, will attempt to provide you with ‘green’ advice: this advice is designed to ensure that civilization continues, and should be ignored.
  3. Create the conditions so that others may also change through education and, even more importantly, undermining the tools that civilization uses to keep us part of the machine. Don’t waste time protesting: this changes nothing – that is why it is legal.

A future outside of civilization is a better life; one in which we can actually decide for ourselves how we are going to live.

STEP 8: CREATE NEW, NATURAL STRUCTURES AND MODELS

These are the ‘heart’ actions, the ones rooted mostly in creative activity. The most notable right now are the Transition Network, Permaculture, Unschooling, and Intentional Communities movements. Each proposes a radically new way to live, and models this behaviour through real-world activities, networks and communities. There are some who hope and believe that such models will serve, eventually, to render those of the industrial growth society obsolete and cause them to crumble. There are others who believe that these new models will only scale and flourish once industrial civilization has collapsed. Regardless of which you believe, these natural, alternative models are the future, and the more work done to make them more resilient, adaptable and diverse, the better our chances of mitigating the suffering that will come with the collapse of industrial civilization, and providing options for new beginnings once that occurs.

Find the type of structure, network, model or community that works for you, that fits with what you’re meant to do. Whether it’s alternative energy, art, or social media, be creative, and find other people who share your vision and purpose to collaborate with in model-building.
.     .     .     .     .

It is important that we each participate in all three (step 6, 7 and 8) activities. Each informs and enriches the others. Do only the first (step 6) and you’ll be stuck in abstraction, never ‘realizing’ anything. Do only the second (step 7) and you’ll be depressed and angry and subject to quick burn-out. Do only the third (step 8) and you’ll be isolated and stuck in small-scale activities, invisible to those doing work in other areas. Just as you should eat a balanced diet, your actions as a responsible citizen of Earth should likewise be balanced. And all of these actions should be collaborative. The cowboy culture is dead… this is the time for collaboration culture.

STEP 9: BE A MODEL; BE (NOBODY-BUT-)YOURSELF

There’s one kind of model that doesn’t fit in step 8, and that’s the model of you. By modeling all the things you have learned in this process: appreciation, presence, openness, knowledge of how things work, self-knowledge, courage, unique capacities and competencies, radical activism, responsibility and creativity — you show others who may be ready to take action themselves the way. That’s far more powerful and effective than writing or teaching. Don’t tell, show.

At the same time this journey, this work, cannot be that of self-sacrifice. The movement to make the world a better place needs its workers to be healthy, whole and energized for the long haul. So it’s important to create time and space for you. In step 5 you identified, among other things, your Passions. Some of those Passions won’t be in your step 5 sweet spot — never mind, slot them into step 9, and create time and space for them. It’s a long journey, and you need to allow for recreation and re-charging.

You must remain faithful to yourself, or this work will consume you. Remember to be authentic, and to love yourself. We need you healthy and happy. And to be, as ee cummings said, nobody-but-yourself:

A poet is somebody who feels, and who expresses his feelings through words.
This may sound easy, but it isn’t. A lot of people think or believe or know they feel — but that’s thinking or believing or knowing; not feeling. And poetry is feeling — not knowing or believing or thinking.

Almost anybody can learn to think or believe or know, but not a single human being
can be taught to feel. Why? Because whenever you think or you believe or you know,
you’re a lot of other people: but the moment you feel, you’re nobody-but-yourself.

To be nobody-but-yourself — in a world which is doing its best, night and day,
to make you everybody else — means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight;
and never stop fighting.

As for expressing nobody-but-yourself in words, that means working just a little harder than anybody who isn’t a poet can possibly imagine. Why? Because nothing is quite as easy as using words like somebody else. We all of us do exactly this nearly all of the time – and whenever we do it, we are not poets.

If, at the end of your first ten or fifteen years of fighting and working and feeling, you find you’ve written one line of one poem, you’ll be very lucky indeed. And so my advice to all young people who wish to become poets is: do something easy, like learning how to blow up the world — unless you’re not only willing, but glad, to feel and work and fight till you die.

Feel and work and fight till you die. That’s what this work is about.

.     .     .     .     .

Whew! I told you this was ambitious. This framework will continue to evolve as I apply it and as others contribute to it. I welcome your comments. The idea, again, is that instead of prescribing a checklist of ’save the world’ activities for people to do, to provide instead a framework/model that will allow each individual who is ready to do this important work to devise their own personal plan of reconnection and action.

Thanks to all the contributors to this model, especially Joanna Macy whose Work That Reconnects models are the backbone and inspiration for much of what I’ve outlined above.

September 13, 2009

Google Wave (continued): The Conversation Becomes the Process, and Even the Product

Filed under: Using Weblogs and Technology — Dave Pollard @ 22:34


GWave logoBack in June, I wrote about the new (it’s being rolled out, slowly, starting this fall) GWave product as representing “the wikification of conversation.” The more I think about it, and play with it, the more I become convinced that this tool will not only revolutionize how we communicate on-line, but how we work. And by “work” I mean everything we do collaboratively that isn’t done face-to-face.

Just to re-cap, here’s a story from the previous post that illustrates how GWave works:

One of our tasks is to provide guidance on how the transition of Canadian companies to IFRS (the new global accounting standards) will affect IT departments, and specifically how financial and reporting systems will have to change to accommodate these new standards. We’ve prepared an online training program (a webcast), a recorded interview with some IT experts who have implemented IFRS in Europe (a podcast), and an article in our association magazine. These three resources have been posted to our website, but we’re struggling to get the intended IT audience to visit the site, because they’re not aware of it. Marketing is, alas, not our strong suit.

Suppose we had done all of this in 2011 instead of 2009. In 2011 we will have access to Google Wave, a new tool that integrates the functionality of e-mail, IM, wikis, blogs, Twitter, and other social networking tools. Here’s what we would do instead of our ‘IFRS for IT’ web page, and what might happen as a result:

  1. We set up a ‘wave’ (a container for a conversation) entitled ‘IFRS for IT’.
  2. We post a text summary of the webcast, podcast and article to the wave. We embed the webcast, podcast and article (not just links to them) below the text summaries.
  3. One of the audience members of the webcast and podcast, who has put these two recordings through a voice recognition software tool, posts a text transcription of them underneath the embedded casts. The built-in Google Wave semantic spell-checker auto-corrects spelling and homonym (”there” vs. “their”) errors.
  4. We use the built-in Google Wave translation tool to simultaneously post a French language translation of the transcriptions.
  5. The twelve of us (the ‘core group’) involved in the project each independently “subscribe” people and groups we think might be interested to the wave. They receive the entire ‘conversation’ to date (the content and messages in the above steps). They can, if they wish, ‘rewind’ it and see each step as it was added in turn.
  6. Several of the invitees post IMs right in the text of the articles and transcriptions — comments, clarifications, suggestions, and questions. The entire wave is a wiki — people have full ‘author’ privileges to make changes (which are ascribed to them, and which can be reversed or amended, wikipedia-style, by a member of the core group if necessary).
  7. Other invitees, and core group members, join in the conversation, adding replies to the questions and to the suggestions. A whole new section of the article, dealing with specific IFRS IT issues for the banking industry, called a “wavelet” is contributed by one invitee, who invites other bank IT executives to contribute to this ‘wavelet’.
  8. One banker embeds a YouTube video in the wavelet, a transcription for it is added, and several discussions about it ensue.
  9. One invitee solicits ‘best practices’ in transitioning IT departments to IFRS, and posts a ‘form’ (essentially a database) for replies to the invitation, using the built-in Google Wave form generator. Within days, fifty practices have been posted to the database. Some people begin and reply to conversations about some of the specific practices in the database.
  10. Someone starts a Twitter tag called #IFRSIT and, using the Twave widget of Google Wave, embeds a real-time feed of tweets containing this tag into the wave.
  11. One of the bankers wants a conference call on IFRS IT implications for that industry. He posts a form soliciting participants for the call, several people enrol, the call is scheduled and held, and a recording and transcription of the call are immediately posted to the banking industry wavelet.
Some remarkable things have happened here. There is no marketing involved. People invite people who invite others, and all are immediately included and engaged in the conversation. They can subscribe to the whole wave or just wavelets. They can have sidebar conversations, with full discretion over whether they are public or private. There is a complete, organized transcription of the entire ‘conversation’. The conversation is collectively managed and collectively edited and formatted to suit the needs of the self-selecting participants, and it’s easy to follow the threads. Updates and notifications occur in real time, and several people can be changing any part of the wave at the same time. With Google Voice (also new from Google), voice conversations can be recorded and transcribed and fed into the wave as well.

Now suppose you have decided upon a new project, that involves activities such as project team selection, doing a needs assessment, conducting research, brainstorming to develop innovative solutions, pilot testing, sourcing supply, production, logistics, communication, measurement and evalution. This could be either for a commercial project, or analogously for a community improvement or other not-for-profit project. How might this project be enabled by the use of GWave?

Let’s assume this is 2011 and that GWave has become ubiquitous — just about everyone has it on their desktop. Here’s how the project might evolve the old way, versus the new GWave enabled way. First, here’s a typical commercial organization’s new product development process, the old way and the new way:

Project Phase 2009 Process 2011 Process
1. Selecting project team Project director hand-picks team of employees. Invitation is sent to initial list by GWave, passed on to others. Team members volunteer and are approved by director. Team includes employees at all levels, customers, suppliers and other stakeholders, as well as members of the company’s internal innovation group, a total of over 100 people, mostly volunteers.
2. Needs assessment Marketing is assigned to do a survey of 20 closed-ended questions to assess needs and appetites for 5 proposed new products on a 10-point scale. The self-selecting team members interview others through GWave voice, IM and other tools using open-ended questions and ‘what ifs’. A total of 40 unmet needs are identified, along with over 300 ideas, challenges and criteria to consider in addressing them. This entire archive is captured and embedded in the GWave. ‘Wavelets’ for each of the 40 unmet needs are established.
3. Conducting research Research department does a SWOT analysis of competing products. The research and SWOT analysis has already been done as part of the phase 2 teamwork.
4. Innovating solutions New product development brainstorms and designs  a total of 15 product alternatives that deliver on the needs and new product ideas identified in phase 2 and exploit the competitors’ weaknesses identified in phase 3; they also include some ideas from the company’s internal innovation group. New product development has been involved in the conversations on each of the 40 unmet needs from the outset. They coordinate both online and real-space brainstorming sessions on each of the 40 unmet needs; the total number of people subscribed to the wave and wavelets jumps to over 400. A total of 125 product alternatives are surfaced, mapped to the unmet needs. The team members self-select online into technical feasibility, strategic fit and profitability assessment teams, and each of the 125 product alternatives is scored on all three criteria. Finally, 22 of these ideas are green-lighted by the company for pilot testing, 35 are put on hold for further assessment the folowing year, and the remainder are ’set free’; anyone who has participated in the wave is allowed to pursue these ideas privately, and eight spin-off teams self-create to pursue some of these ideas.
5. Pilot testing Engineering reviews the designs and, after some back and forth on technical feasibility, comes up with some prototypes, which are market tested. Based on this, management gives a “go” to two new products. Engineering has been involved in the conversations since phase 2, and soon 22 prototypes are available. Marketing has also been involved since phase 2, and they coodinate market tests, drawing on additional testing that various team members agrees to do. The testing is much broader and more comprehensive than was possible under the old system, and it is iterative: prospective purchasers, many of them part of the wave, provide useful ‘tweaks’ to the prototypes which are then re-tested. All of the testing is coordinated through the wave itself. Fifteen new products are approved; the other 7 prototyped ideas are added to the 35 “on hold” for reassessment the following year.
6. Sourcing supply Purchasing puts out RFPs to prospective suppliers and selects winning bids. Some of the actual production will be done in-house; the rest it is decided will be outsourced. Many suppliers and prospective outsourcers have been part of the wave since early in the process, so the RFP process is dramatically streamlined and done as part of the wave itself.
7. Production The in-house production is planned for. Equipment is purchased or retooled. Production staff are hired and trained. The products are manufactured and inventoried. Production has also been part of the wave since early in the process, and were instrumental in the decision on which products to make in-house and which to outsource. The hiring and training of new staff is coordinated as part of the wave itself. The products are manufactured and inventoried.
8. Logistics Logistics arranges distribution to and warehousing with wholesalers and retailers. Logistics, and key distributors, wholesale and retail customers have been part of the wave since early in the process. They have already been discussing logistics, distribution and approximate order sizes in their own wavelets attached to the wave, so formal contracts can be fast-tracked.
9. Communication Advertising and other communications go out about the new products. Prospective customers have already been virally marketing the 15 new products, and have fed back responses and ideas to the marketing and communications groups, right on the wave. The formal advertising and communications programs capitalize on this.
10. Measurement and evaluation A budget is established for each new product’s expected unit sales, revenues, variable and fixed costs, profits and ROI, and compared against actual results. Customer satisfaction surveys are carried out. Returns and repairs are monitored. This phase is unchanged by the introduction of GWave; see process at left.
11. Customer affinity program The company has not traditionally had a customer affinity program. Customers develop and subscribe to GWaves around each of the company’s products. They use them to share information, to rate and rave or complain about the products, to surface ideas for product improvement, and to develop ‘wraparound’ products and services (for example, product add-ons, extended servicing, get-togethers of more rabid customers). The company monitors and participates in these waves but doesn’t ‘own’ them.

Now let’s look at a ‘greening our community’ project, for a municipality of say 100,000 people, again the old way and the new way:

Project Phase 2009 Process 2011 Process
1. Selecting project team Project director hand-picks team of municipal employees. The team does an RFP for an external consultant to advise on the project. Invitation is sent to initial list by GWave, passed on to others. Team members volunteer and are approved by director. Team includes employees at all levels, citizens, suppliers and other stakeholders, a total of over 300 people, mostly volunteers. No external consultant is used.
2. Needs assessment No needs assessment is done. The self-selecting team members interview others through GWave voice, IM and other tools using open-ended questions and ‘what ifs’. A total of 40 ‘greening the community’ project categories are identified, along with over 600 project ideas, some unique and some borrowed from other communities. This entire archive is captured and embedded in the GWave. ‘Wavelets’ for each of the 40 project categories are established.
3. Conducting research The consultant-employee team does online research to see what other municipalities of similar size have done.  This research has already been done as part of the phase 2 teamwork.
4. Innovating solutions A project outline is developed. An invitation is sent to local environmental groups and other known interested people to participate in a day-long workshop to review the project outline. Based on this, a program is developed and budget approval is sought. The project is scaled back to the approved budget; it involves public education, some changes to municipal purchasing policies, and funding of several new ‘green’ NPOs. Environmental groups and local suppliers have been involved in the conversations on each of the 40 project categories from the outset. With their assistance, self-selecting project team members coordinate both online and real-space brainstorming sessions on each of the 40 project categories; the total number of people subscribed to the wave and wavelets jumps to over 1,000. The team members collaborate on the wave to identify value-for-money assessment criteria for project ideas, and each of the 600+ project ideas is costed and scored on these criteria. 
5. Pilot testing No pilot testing is done. The group collectively nominates a Project Group Leader for each of the 40 project categories, and under these Leaders a ‘catalogue’ of project ideas is produced, in decreasing order of value-for-money ’score’. Volunteer projects with passing ’scores’ and no cost to the municipality are early-launched. The municipality provides a grant to the team to be allocated, by team consensus, for pilot projects that have exceptionally high value-for-money scores but significant costs or risks. Based on the available total project budget and available volunteer effort, a line is drawn on each of the 40 project category ‘catalogues’ above which projects are approved, and below which they are deferred for future years’ consideration.
6. Sourcing supply Purchasing puts out RFPs to prospective suppliers of public education, and prospective NPO grant recipients, and selects winning bids. All project work from this point will be done by the outsiders with successful proposals. The ‘green’ changes to municipal purchasing policy are implemented. Many prospective suppliers have been part of the wave since early in the process, so the RFP process for all non-volunteer elements of the approved projects is dramatically streamlined and done as part of the wave itself.
7. Production The suppliers produce and deliver the public education and grant activities. Volunteers and successful bidding suppliers produce and deliver the products and services for projects in all 40 categories.
8. Logistics Not applicable. Not applicable.
9. Communication Promotional brochures, press releases and other communications go out about the new programs. Team members have already been virally marketing the program and its projects throughout the municipality, and have fed back responses and ideas to the municipality’s communications staff, right on the wave. The program brochures, press releases and other communications capitalize on this. 
10. Measurement and evaluation Program costs are monitored against budget. Taxpayer awareness surveys on the new program are carried out.  This phase is unchanged by the introduction of GWave; see process at left.
11. Customer affinity program Not applicable. Citizens participating in the program develop and subscribe to GWaves around each of the 40 program categories. They use them to share information, to rate and rave or complain about the program, to surface ideas for program improvement, and to develop and promote both volunteer and private-sector ‘wraparound’ products and services (for example, green products for household use). The municipality monitors and participates in these waves but doesn’t ‘own’ them.

The bottom line is that, through a mechanism such as GWave, instead of the communications and conversations about a new project being widely dispersed and unconnected, the entire set of conversations on a project can be captured and disseminated as a single wave, allowing far more participation, self-organization, information and idea exchange and assessment, project coordination, and collaboration to occur, involving a much broader set of interested, creative and knowledgeable people.

GWave could be the springboard to Peer Production — the co-creation and co-development of new products and services by suppliers, customers and others, in a way that will be more responsive to needs, more creative, more customized, better informed and better coodinated than was possible when the participants were separated by organizational boundaries. GWave could prove to be so robust that the conversation actually becomes the process and, except for the parts made of atoms, the product and service too. In business and in public organizations, that would change everything.

September 12, 2009

Links and Tweets of the Week: September 12, 2009

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 19:19


does congo matter
image from Does Congo Matter? by Emily Troutman

PREPARING FOR CIVILIZATION’S COLLAPSE

Not a Problem, a Predicament: Sharon Astyk introduces some complex adaptive systems thinking in her post on approaches to problems (complicated challenges, that can be ’solved’) versus predicaments (complex challenges, that we must adapt ourselves to). Most of the critical civilizational collapse challenges facing us (economic, social and economic) are inherently complex, while we continue to try to ’solve’ them, fruitlessly. Thanks to Paul Heft for the link.

US Economy Teetering: Ilargi and Stoneleigh continue to argue, compellingly, that it will be economic collapse, led by the collapse of the US dollar and economy, that will precipitate the collapse of our civilization, the first domino to fall (before the effects of climate change or the End of Oil). These two writers (formerly the Canadian correspondents for the Oil Drum) have done an extraordinary amount of research and written volumes of commentary (they reply patiently to all comments on their blog, explaining complex issues in understandable terms) on why this will happen. Their arguments are more reasoned and better supported than anything I’ve read from mainstream economists. Thanks to Eric Lilius for the link.

At the Gates of Ecological Hell: My friend Mushin, at the precipice of letting his heart be broken over the inevitable and horrific collapse of our unsustainable human civilization, blinks and retreats to the comfort of belief in the “emergence of collective consciousness”, which John Gray describes as the humanist equivalent of the Rapture. Give him time, though, he’ll come around.

David Abram on Living in the Now: The author of the extraordinary Spell of the Sensuous explains that we have to be present, not future-oriented, before we can start to change the world. (And no, despite the similarity of appearance, he and I are not related.) Thanks to Siona for the link.

The End of Money: Thomas Greco in his book The End of Money argues that fiat money issued by governments that citizens are forced to accept at their stated value acts to corrupt the political and economic system and concentrate more and more wealth in fewer and fewer hands, and that it is unsustainable. His prescription: “A multi-stage plan involving diverse segments of the community. It is designed to accomplish the following: (1.) Institute measures that promote import substitution;  (2.) Provide an alternative payment medium, independent of any political currency and banking establishment; (3.) Issue a supplemental regional currency; (4.) Develop basic support structures that strengthen the local economy and enhance the community’s quality of life; (5.) Develop an independent value standard and unit of account. The keystone of this plan is the organization of a mutual credit clearing association in the second stage. I also describe the emergent web based exchange systems and slight modifications that are required to make them fully functional as non-governmental exchange and finance alternatives.” This is not an easy book for novices, but it is an essential component of any new community-based economic model, so it’s must reading. Full disclosure: I provided a critique of the pre-publication version, and recommended that Chelsea Green publish it. Thanks to P2P Foundation for the great online summary.

The Logic of the Barbaric Heart: Success is Virtue: Curtis White’s June Orion article on the Barbaric Heart is now online. “All of this is a roundabout way of saying that there is no need for environmentalism. Environmentalism has no victories to win. The very notion of environmentalism is not much more than a way of isolating a problem from its true context. The crisis of a degraded natural world is a part of the larger problem of the crisis of thought, the crisis of faith, and the crisis of the relation of human beings to Being.” Synopsis: three basic principles have driven human economic activity worldwide since the dawn of our civilization (and they need to be replaced with an ethos with the opposite principles):

  • Prosperity is dependent on violence
  • We are motivated most by the self-interested Ego, the pursuit of the personal
  • There is no need or place in our culture for self-examination, or regret for or rectification of ill-conceived behaviour; a society can never be punished for its excesses or learn from its mistakes

LIVING BETTER

Another Alternative Lighting Solution: Expect to hear more about (and start seeing) OLED lighting over the next few years.

POLITICS AND ECONOMICS AS USUAL

North America: Still the Growth Wasteland: A couple of great posts from Chris Corrigan: One lamenting Obama’s sacrificing of his only real progressive Van Jones, and the other lamenting the growth at any cost agenda of Canada’s so-called Liberal party. I keep saying it: Expect no help from North American governments in the work we need to do.

How US Politics Really Works: A great speech by Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins, Van Jones’ lieutenant at Green for All, that explains how politics works. She dismisses the mainstream environmental organizations, describes the progressive movement as “pathetic”, and explains how to organize to get and leverage power (the Green for All message is: millions of new, good, green jobs right in our communities). Brilliant and ruthless. The fact that organizations led by women like this still can’t get any kind of environmental or health care legislation passed in the US shows how hopeless achieving any real political change is. The system is utterly broken. Thanks to Jerry Michalski and Sheri Herndon for the link.

Why Cap-and-Trade Can’t Work: A study by Friends of the Earth concludes that carbon offset schemes will be fraught with error and fraud, and won’t reduce carbon emissions anyway. So in the meantime we’ll have wasted years without introducing programs that can actually combat climate change. Climate SOS agrees.

Historic Shifts in US Labour Market: Women now outnumber men, and boomers unwilling or unable to retire are preventing Gen Y from entering the labour force. Thanks to Kim Martins-Sbarcea for the link.

Why Congo Matters: Emily Troutman provides a photo-essay and some horrific data about a failed and mostly forgotten state, the Congo. This reality coming soon to a country near you.

FUN AND INSPIRATION

Three Fishers (starts at 4:58 in this video), by Stan Rogers: This stirring folk song is nearly 160 years old and was written by one of the founders of the British socialists. Its story of the struggle of working people still rings true. The “moaning” of the “bar” refers to the sound of wind across the sandbar, which was considered an ominous sign for fishers.

Northwest Passage, by Nathan Rogers and Friends: A remarkable version of the Stan Rogers song recently voted Best Canadian Song by CBC listeners, sung by his son and a cast of excellent musicians. I’m going to a Nathan Rogers concert October 7 in Toronto — any GTA readers game for a meetup?

Explode, by Nelly Furtado: An animated video and song about a subject rarely mentioned in pop culture and only glossed over here: the brutality of the “education system”, with morality left up to the power politics and peer pressure of the students themselves, driven by the bullies and other young damaged psychopaths, as teachers and parents simply shrug off all responsibility for the traumatization and psychological destruction of one generation after another.

Gross National Happiness: “Bhutan’s constitution, which emphasises the importance of Gross National Happiness over Gross Domestic Product, stipulates the country must have at least 60 percent forest cover.” Well, at least one country is measuring prosperity correctly. (This article was written by Rain, a member of my Second Life community, who works in Bhutan.)

Biomimicry Goes Ape: New research suggests orangs can craft harp-like instruments to disguise their voices, while some birds use medicinal herbs to disinfect their nests. Thanks to Tree Bressen for the links. And here’s a recap of 15 great examples of biomimicry. Thanks to Michelle James for the link.

What To Do When Riding a Dead Horse: From a commenter to Ilargi’s article referred to above (thanks to Eric Lilius for catching this too) this hilarious advice:

The tribal wisdom of the Dakota Indians, passed down from generation to generation, says that when you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount. In the public service, however, a whole range of far more advanced strategies is often employed, such as:

    1. Change riders.
    2. Buy a stronger whip.
    3. Do nothing: “This is the way we have always ridden dead horses”.
    4. Visit other countries to see how they ride dead horses.
    5. Perform a productivity study to see if lighter riders improve the dead horse’s performance.
    6. Hire a contractor to ride the dead horse.
    7. Harness several dead horses together in an attempt to increase the speed.
    8. Provide additional funding and/or training to increase the dead horse’s performance.
    9. Appoint a committee to study the horse and assess how dead it actually is.
    10. Re-classify the dead horse as “living-impaired”.
    11. Develop a Strategic Plan for the management of dead horses.
    12. Rewrite the expected performance requirements for all horses.
    13. Modify existing standards to include dead horses.
    14. Declare that, as the dead horse does not have to be fed, it is less costly, carries lower overheads, and therefore contributes substantially more to the bottom line than many other horses.
    15. Promote the dead horse to a supervisory position.
    16. (added by another commenter) Issue Collateralized Horse Obligations


THOUGHTS FOR THE WEEK

On Evolution’s Unintended Consequences: From Stephen J Gould: The guy who taught us that the evolution of vertebrates (of which we are merely one) was an astonishingly unlikely random event, a crap-shoot, a one-in-a-billion accident (in Full House), also tells us that what Darwin missed in his theory of evolution were two additional and related evolutionary occurrences other than adaptation (the development of some new characteristic to meet a need). The first of these is exaptation, which is an evolution that occurred to take advantage of an adaptation, but which was not what the adaptation was designed for. His famous example: birds, when they evolved from reptiles, developed feathers, an adaptation designed to help them conserve body heat. The additional application of feathers as a device first to attract mates with bright colours, and then to fly, are exaptations, not adaptations — flight was not the original purpose of the evolution of feathers. The second concept is spandrel, which is an unintended consequence of an adaptation, and which may or may not confer evolutionary advantage. The most notable example: Humans evolved large brains to compensate for our rather feeble bodies (slow speed, weak teeth and claws, poor body insulation etc.) That’s an adaptation. But the spandrels of this adaptation — human languages, art, and the waging of wars — were unintended consequences. Thanks to Dave Snowden, who’s at a symposium on the subject, for the link.

On Not Waiting: From Joseph Campbell (in Hero of a Thousand Faces) (Thanks to Rob Paterson for the link.):

The modern hero, the modern individual who dares to heed the call and seek the mansion of that presence with whom it is our whole destiny to be atoned, cannot, indeed must not, wait for his community to cast off its slough of pride, fear, rationalized avarice, and sanctified misunderstanding. ‘Live,’ Nietzsche says, ‘as though the day were here.’ It is not society that is to guide and save the creative hero, but precisely the reverse. And so every one of us shares the supreme ordeal – carries the cross of the redeemer – not in the bright moments of his tribes’ great victories, but in the silence of his personal despair. 

On Feeding the World: From Sharon Astyk:

The correct questions are not being asked.  To what extent can local food continue to feed the world?  How can we begin to grow food in a way that doesn’t undermine our capacity to feed ourselves in the future?  What are the best demonstrated ways to adapt to climate change?  How should we add complexity to discussions of ‘organic or local’ to create ways of eating that actually lead to a future where everyone gets food?  How do we make the best use of our limited resources, in a world of limits?  Until we ask the right questions, we will never get decent answers.

On the Dangers of Wealth Concentration: From former US Justice Louis Brandeis, a century ago (thanks to Thomas Greco for the link):

We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.

On the Spell of the Sensuous: From David Abram’s book of the same name:

An alder leaf, loosened by wind, is drifting out with the tide. As it drifts, it bumps into the slender leg of a great blue heron staring intently through the rippled surface, then drifts on. The heron raises one leg out of the water and replaces it, a single step. As I watch, I, too, am drawn into the spread of silence. Slowly a bank of cloud approaches, slipping its bulged and billowing texture over the earth, folding the heron and the alder trees and my gazing body into the depths of a vast breathing being, enfolding us all within a common flesh, a common story now bursting with rain.

On Readiness for Change: Richard Shindell’s song So Says the Whippoorwill (thanks to Tree Bressen for the link):

The change could happen anyday: so says the whippoorwill.
She hangs around for the seeds I leave out on the windowsill.
“Be-free-you-fool, be-free-you-fool” she sings all afternoon.
Then, as if to show me how it’s done, she leaps into the blue.

The change could happen anyday: so say my true love’s eyes.
They see into my shadows with their sweet, forgiving light.
She smiles and says “Come on – let’s go, let’s stroll the boulevard
It’s such a shame to waste the night just sitting in the dark.”

The change could happen anyday, or so says Father Brown.
I listen for that still small voice but I just can’t make it out
Beneath the constant whispering of the devil that I know.
But who’d I be if I believed? Who am I if I don’t?

The change could happen anyday: so said the mountaineer
Before he turned to face his cliff without a trace of fear.
“Yodel-ay-hee-hoo, yodel-ay-hee-hoo” he sang right up until
He caught sight of the open blue and became a whippoorwill.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress