HOW TO CONVINCE THE MEDIA YOU’RE A TERRORIST

Interesting snippet from John Gehl’s great ‘Above the Fold’ IT-e-newsletter today on how easy it was for a journalist to con Computerworld into thinking one of their correspondents was the Slammer worm hyper-terrorist:
Although it violates journalistic ethics for a reporter to misrepresent his identity, freelance journalist Brian McWilliams (whose work has appeared in Salon and Wired News) used a fake Web site and phony ID to deceive Computerworld’s Dan Verton into believing that he was a Pakistan-based terrorist who unleashed the recent Slammer network worm on the world. Computerworld published, then quickly retracted, Verton’s story. McWilliams says he wanted to teach reporters “to be more skeptical of people who claim they’re involved in cyber-terrorism.” Computerworld editor-in-chief Maryfran Johnson says, “I couldn’t believe a journalist could do this to another journalist,” and Verton says, “I feel like I’ve been had, and that’s never an easy thing to swallow. So, I’m left here scratching fleas as the price you sometimes pay for sleeping with dogs.” (AP/San Jose Mercury News 7 Feb2003)
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/5127584.htm

This entry was posted in How the World Really Works. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to HOW TO CONVINCE THE MEDIA YOU’RE A TERRORIST

  1. The Raven says:

    I was tracking this one, too. Interesting case testing several aspects of journalistic ethics. I’d say in this case that the level of fraud was excessive, once the Pakistani server was routed through the reporter’s phony address path. – R.

  2. Dave says:

    Agreed – I think this is another instance where the end doesn’t justify the means. Seems to be a lot of that going around lately. -/- Dave

Comments are closed.