The image above is of the original manuscript copy of T.S. Eliot’s The Fire Sermon, part of his epic work The Wasteland. On it are marked editorial annotations, primarily those of his brilliant collaborator Ezra Pound, no mean poet in his own right. Although the onomatopoeic bird song at the start of the passage is left intact, the large passage crossed out in the middle, marked “B–ll–s” by Pound, never made it into the final edition. Neither did the words marked for excision by Pound, the clumsy and pretentious “I have seen and see” and the inappropriate “your” in the subsequent line. And Pound constantly critisizes Eliot’s use of wimpy qualifiers, writing after the line that includes the word ‘perhaps’, “dam per’apsey”. There is no ‘perhaps’ in the final version. Eliot’s wife also suggests the word ‘demotic’ instead of ‘abominable’ to describe Mr. Eugenides’ French. The shorter word also fits better with the metre of the line, and appears in the published version. So what survives of this page is: Twit twit twit I can only sigh, and hope that one day I will find an editor as kind and ruthless as Pound was to Eliot. But suppose I did? How would this saviour of dense and ponderous prose work his or her magic on my etherial text, never once committed to paper for the editor’s surgery (Pound was fond of editing in green crayon)? Malcolm Gladwell, he of the brilliant Tipping Point and expose of Olympic Sins, wrote a New Yorker article last year called The Social Life of Paper. In it, he argues that at present there is no replacement for paper, because paper offers several “affordances” that other media that capture words do not have:
Gladwell defends the apparent mess of knowledge workers’ desktops, insisting that filing of the mounds of stuff on our desktops is inefficient, premature, and logically impossible. He damns filng cabinets (invented by the same Dewey who invented the library indexing system) as, at best, the final resting place for documents that are unlikely thereafter ever to see the light of day again. These stacks of paper are, he says, ‘contextual clues to unresolved ideas’. And the documents themselves, with earmarks, annotations, marginalia and ungainly attachments, are not knowledge themselves but rather support for the knowledge that resides in people’s heads, and hence any digitization that changes the organization of this ‘support material’ inevitably lessens, rather than increases its value. ‘The mark of the contemporary office is not the file’, writes Gladwell, ‘it’s the pile.’ The three-dimensional, multivariate physical desktop, with all its flexibility of arrangement, allows for ‘situational awareness’ that the misnamed ‘electronic desktop’ simply cannot replicate. So, herewith, a challenge to software developers. Throw away all the preconceptions and Microsoft standards about how the computer should organize and display information and documents. Start with, dare I say, a clean desktop, and invent new virtual surrogates for the physical desktop, and for the physical document, that replicate as closely as possible their ‘user experiences’ and convey their advantages: spacial flexibility, tailorability, browsability, and capacity for situational awareness. Gladwell’s right, but I don’t want to be tied to my desk, I want to carry it in my briefcase, and save some trees in the process. And make it so instinctively obvious that we don’t need ‘user training’ to use it. It’s time to obsolesce Dewey, desktops and paper. Surely there are some creative minds out there that are up to the task? My future editor thanks you in advance, as do I. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
So do we place paper in the dustbin of history along with cunieform tablets? The electons that now store our information, thoughts, ideas, and creations are eternal but only so long as we can maintain the infrastructure that imposes our will on their organization.
I think there will always be paper, it’s just that in future it will be erasable. As for the organization of electrons (I presume you meant that, rather than elections, an interestingly ambiguous typo), I am comfortable that we can bend them to our will as reliably as we manufacture from the strange mulch of fibre and bleach what we call ‘paper’, which has also been known to decompose perilously quickly.
Darn “r” key sometimes it misses and I don’t proofread my post before hitting send. But yes our elections have much to do with history don’t they… Soon our elections will be electrons too, I fear without a proper audit trail (paper?) those electrons will be bent against our will if they haven’t been already…. great responsibilities and challenges lie ahead.
This story from a while back by Stephen Dulaney collects a number of observations on practical KM in the real world -http://radio.weblogs.com/0104704/stories/2002/09/24/digitalDashboardsDirtyDishesMessyDeskWorkspacesAndWebLogs.html
Great idea. I have no idea how to go about it, being barely computer-literate, but I am a Pound fan, and I’m pretty sure what he’s writing there is “per’apsez” (ie, “perhapses”) rather than “per’apsey.”
Seb: Can’t get the link to work. Could you please re-send?language hat: I know better than to debate with you on this — I’m sure you’re right, though Valerie Eliot says it’s “per’apsey”. And calling yourself barely computer literate is surely the height of false modesty — I would wager you would have some excellent ideas on how to design this. What does your physical desktop look like?
It’s the dash at the start that’s the problem–it makes it look like a local URL. This should work: http://radio.weblogs.com/0104704/stories/2002/09/24/digitalDashboardsDirtyDishesMessyDeskWorkspacesAndWebLogs.html
Thanks, William. And thanks Séb, this is a great article. Wonder why I’ve never encountered Dulaney’s blog before, since his blogroll overlaps so much with mine.
Dave. Thank you for your comment and link to this very nice material here. I enjoyed reading it. There’s not much editing that’s necessary. My only point is that I’m not sure if your wish at the end of your essay can be granted unless we create a physical environment in which we can use all of our limbs. Computers are notoriously bad at this sort of thing.Now, to the main topic.Paper is another form of technology. (At least that’s what I’m going to say in a blog that I’m now putting together in my head.)We just miss that (technology) aspect of paper. Paper is technology because it helps us accomplish certain things in certain ways. It’s a more suitable technology because somehow our physical being, i.e. our hands, eyes, movements, etc., are one with our minds. The Mind in the Body comes to mind. I think Dreyfus has solved the problem it its essence: It is simply insoluable. Whatever we do, each thing has its own essential being that cannot be replaced by some surrogate. (I touched on the unity of mind and body here.)