When I was young, the quality of Japanese merchandise was so poor that many consumers began to boycott Japanese goods. Consumer groups warned that, although these shoddy goods were cheap, they were actually poor value for money because they lasted only one-fifth as long as products costing only twice as much. Eventually the spontaneous consumer rebuff of poor quality worked: Japanese manufacturers were starved and shamed into improving the quality of their practices and components, and now have a reputation for high quality. But how soon we forget. We are now barraged with cheaply made, poor quality products and services from both domestic and third world suppliers, and this time we appear a lot more timid about objecting to it, and about demanding better. To understand what’s behind this (no, it’s not a conspiracy) we need to appreciate the economics that produce this declining quality in today’s global, oligopolistic marketplace:
Inevitably this has resulted in much lower product quality, poor or non-existent service, less value for money, domestic unemployment, and unwanted garbage. But it’s happened so slowly that you probably haven’t noticed that as large corporations have been lowering their standards, they’ve gradually coerced you into lowering yours as well. Anyone who blows the whistle on this fraud (that’s exactly what it is — an intentional deception of consumers) is sued by an army of corporate lawyers (as in the famous Nike case where that company sued for the right to lie to consumers about its sweatshops, and the pending Suzuki case where Consumers’ Union has been sued for reporting safety defects on Suzuki SUVs). Anyone who tries to get around this high-price, low-quality quandary by creating their own markets (knock-offs and file-swappers for example) is also sued. And all because the management of these companies are constantly forced by greedy shareholders (that’s us!) to use any method at their disposal, whatever the consequences, to increase profits by utterly-unsustainable double-digit amounts every year. Sound like a ‘bubble’ to you? Here are just a few examples:
As consumers, we can either wait for the bubble to burst, and the stock market to move down to more reasonable levels (taking half of our savings with it, alas), or we can start raising our standards and refuse to put up with this crap. What are some of the things we can do (without being sued)?
Corporations won’t raise their standards until and unless we raise ours. And they won’t take responsibility if we don’t. We’re being inundated with messages to make our voice count in the ballot booth this year. We need to make it count in the corporate boardrooms and shopping malls as well. The best way to do that is to teach them what we taught the Japanese — that we won’t buy junk at any price. We have our standards. It’s time to live up to them. Just do it? Just don’t buy it. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
David,While I agree whole-heartedly with your assessment of the current state of things and have found myself over the past few years doing some of the things you mention (admittedly more from a personal sense of standards than an overt desire to change things), I’m not sure that the comparison to the initially poor quality of Japanese is valid, nor your reason given for the improvement in their products. From other readings, in various fields, I’ve come to the understanding that American tariff policies following WWII, and into the 60’s and early 70’s, made it more economical for other countries to produce large quantities of lousy merchandise. This, and not an inability or lack of desire to produce quality, dictated the quality of the products. Likewise, when the tariff laws were changed Japan could create fewer big ticket items of good quality.Of course, both of these situations developed as they did because the Japanese companies wanted to do exactly what you discuss: maximize profit and shareholder value.
More evidence of the “race to the bottom”, I think. Pity that someone hasn’t come up with an “Am I Canadian ?” TV (or Flash, for the Internet) rant similar to Molson’s popular advert of a couple of years ago.On a more serious note, the issues you raise are very important. I really think we are all trapped in such a complex machinery in which the markets and coporations keep pushing, pushing, pushing because *they* know we aren’t pushing back … and so you’re right IMO to flag that issue.And I suspect that the only push-back that will be effective is some form of one-by-one truning our back on all the crap and swill that is so readily offered us to pour down our throughts. As Doc Searls has said, so many of us are figuratively tied to a chair in front of TV’s and advertising, heads tilted back, swallowing all the marketing and crapping cash (or debt, I suppose). We consume, that’s what we DO.
Jon: Three Dead Trolls in a Baggie, Canadian Fringe vetrans, have a good “I Am Canadian,” riff on their “Steaming Pile of Skit” album. William Shatner also does a pretty funny one, can’t remember where I heard it… “All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” – Edmund Burke. We get it because we put up with it. Push back, and they listen.
http://www.ampcast.com/music/22488/artist.php down about the middle :)
Dave:To me Dave you do not realize about something basic, companies are alive because people buy their products, the price is the equilibrium between what they want to get and what people (¿consumers?) are able or want to give them in money for their product or service, and here comes some very interesting points related with your post: From point 1 to 4 you are completely right, but is that bad??? NO, because that is fertile land for entrepreneurs, innovation and small business, if they raise the price fight against them with lower price and extra services in a very delimitated areas (some kind of guerrilla strategy), if they are based just in the price so innovate!!!! Once the products have very clear characteristics find what else the consumer wants, give to them and raise the price that
I remember cautioning my mother about her constant efforts to buy the lowest prices…that, inevitably, she would get and evoke the lowest quality. I watched it happen. Hey! I am 61. It has been a real downer watching it all happen. From quality to quantity in a single lifetime. And, it continues, albeit Japan’s output quality has improved beyond our own (what output?). I understand that we are talking about global distribution of wealth. I am just questioning what exactly we are talking about. To me, quality is wealth, and, we have all already lost it. JMHO.
BTW, I do not buy cheap stuff becuase it is cheap. Ocassionally, I buy it because I am poor.Sad sideline to the today story. :(
Arts & Letters Daily (http://www.aldaily.com) recently referred to an interesting review in The Guardian, “Myths and Corrections,” July 10, 2004. Here’s the link, although it might be too long for your comments window:http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/politicsphilosophyandsociety/0,6121,1257871,00.htmlThe author, Will Hutton, reviews two books about globalisation: one by an advocate (Martin Wolf’s Why Globalisation Works), the other by a more critical writer (David Held, Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus). I agree with Miguel Pancardo that “we have to learn how to use it [globalisation] in a better way to get wealth, safety and justice [for] ALL no matter if you are in a first world economy or in a third world economy,” and I agree with the rest of his comment as well. Globalisation is not going to go away. David Held’s take, that we have to find ways of managing it from, more or less, a socially democratic perspective so as to avert disaster, seems critical and realistic. It’s not just a “race to the bottom,” but it will be if the pigs have the last word.
Thanks, everyone, this is a useful comment thread. There’s a great article this week in The New Yorker about globalization. The gist of the article is that in theory it’s a win-win situation, but for a whole host of reasons (oligopolies, hidden subsidies, political corruption etc. etc.) we do not live in a perfect world of free markets and equal playing fields so it turns out to be, at best, a win-lose, and often a lose-lose (unemployment in the first world, slavery in the third). Globalization, like Marxism, is a *wonderful* idea in theory, but the more you study about how both work in practice, the more you realize they make the real world situation worse, not better. I used to be a fan of both globalization and Marxism; now I believe in neither. What is needed is a more pragmatic and balanced solution.GB: What you’re describing is what I’ve called The Wal-Mart Dilemma, and it’s the most insidious and dehumanizing thing about globalization.