![]() Although there is no central government, no central economy, no central anything in this future world (it is truly a World of Ends), the communities are not isolated — there is state-of-the-art multimedia communication between communities, and plenty of more-with-less technology and innovation as well. No hunting (except for knowledge) and not much gathering. In most of the communities portrayed, one’s teenage years are spent exploring other communities: One month blocks of time living and working with the people in other communities has replaced formal secondary education, and is the future world’s rite of passage — finding your true home. There is a universal language (I won’t say what it is, because its evolution is important to the story — but your first two guesses are probably wrong) as well as unique community languages that have evolved in each community. Because of the affluence of these communities, and because of the re-discovered importance of community, several of the key artifacts of civilization have crumbled and disappeared — most notably the (social and physical) family unit and the concept of private property. The societies are built on collaborative rather than private enterprise, and young people learn to find self-actualization through invention, discovery and cooperation rather than through acquisition and competition. That’s not to say these communities, and their members, are free from conflict. Some, but not all, of the stories in the novel revolve around such conflicts. Some of the stories are adult fables, like many of the stories of Earth’s aboriginal peoples. So my novel has to work on three different levels, and therein lies the challenge: It is an horrendous balancing act, and I have already thrown out hundreds of pages of writing and at times despaired of ever getting the novel finished. The three levels are:
Mean less. That is, don’t mean so much. Make up a story, screw around with it, paste junk on it, needle the characters, make them say queer stuff, go bad places, insert new people at inopportune moments, do some drive-bys. Make it up, please. Don’t let it make too much sense.
One of my readers, David M., sends me articulate critiques of my fiction, and he has passed along advice from EM Forster (via Willaim Gibson) about what Barthelme means by this: The story cannot be merely a didactic vehicle for your message, where the characters say unrealistic and absurdly intellectual things to further the author’s argument, and where the plot and the characters serve as relentless propaganda agents hammering home the author’s intended moral to the point where they become inauthentic and contrived, and to the point where the reader gets annoyed at being so baldly manipulated. This is a failing of Daniel Quinn’s Ishmael and Story of B and of JM Coetzee’s Elizabeth Costello. I love these books because I profoundly share the authors’ beliefs and concerns, so I am willing to overlook the fact that the characters in these books are shallow and inauthentic. But I want my book to appeal to a wider audience, to persuade those that aren’t quite ready to believe that there is a better way to live than the way we live today. I want each story to be real, inspiring, credible, a place my readers would like to live, with characters they’d like to know. So my writing has to be better than the era’s greatest philosopher’s, and better than a Nobel prize-winner in Literature’s. Yikes.
So I have to let my characters write each chapter’s unique story in their own way, and just be the channel, the scribe for it. It’s very hard. At times, thanks to my lazy imagination (in the face of aggravating distractions like needing to decide how to start getting some income flowing in to pay the bills), my characters just refuse to get out of bed and do anything. They tell me they’re waiting for inspiration, and ask me annoying questions like how do I know they wouldn’t want Ferraris just because they’re self-actualized and hence don’t need them (they rarely complain about the absence of SUVs at least). Even worse, they have this infuriating tendency to go off and do things just for the hell of it: My scientists want to learn to dance, and my artists are often spaced out on drugs which, living in such a paradise, they shouldn’t want or need (they say it helps in the creative process, even though we all know it doesn’t). And they want to have far too much sex. Damned ingrates. I put them in paradise and look how they treat me.
All of this should have been enough to make me give up. This is, surely, setting myself up to fail. But every time I ask myself “If you don’t want to write this novel, what do you want to do?”, and make a list of the alternatives, it makes me realize I am a writer. This is what I do. And so I reopen my laptop and unfold the storyboard and wake up my characters, and plug on. So now I’ve told you my problems, but I haven’t really answered the question posed by the title of this article: What are the elements of a good story? I’ve already written about the elements of a good speech, how to write clearly, how to write dialogue, the importance of a good editor, how to write a good essay, how to write funny (they say those that can’t do, teach), the need for a big ego and aesthetic enthusiasm and passion, and the need for the writer to pay attention, care, and be honest. But that’s the how. The elements are the what of the story, and I think there are six:
There is one thing that is critical to keep out of a good story as well: Waste. Every word, every phrase, every line of dialogue that isn’t essential to the story detracts from it — Get it out of there. Time for me to get back to practicing what I preach. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Essential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
I used to daydream about this place.
kind of tangential but you may find this useful if you feel you need to get back to basics. The key is to get away from thinking “how do i make this device work” and back to “why do i need to tell this story”. Its already out in the UK and will be available in the US end Jan’05:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0826452094/workingplanet-21/
Dave, don’t give up – it sounds GREAT! Have you read “Story” by Robert McKee? It’s primarily targeted at writing screenplays, but is certainly applicable to general storytelling. One great aspect of the screenplay approach is that the story must be stripped down to the basic plot twists and reversals that happen in 90-120 minutes on screen. As I craft my first novel I’m starting with a screenplay to make sure I get the story right. I’m planning to use that as the starting point for the novel. If all goes well, the novel will evolve and then inform the screenplay. I’m not trying to set a rigid approach, just some structure to help me fit it all together.One interesting trick I’ve learned is to write the dialogue last. Try to write the scenes using images; think visually. Apparently Alfred Hitchcock said (I paraphrase), “Once the screenplay is finished, then we add in any required dialogue.”
Thanks for mentioning me (David M ;-)!To expand on the topic, it occurs to me that it is not suprising that your characters don’t act like you’d think they would. Basically, I assume that you want to save the world because of the believes you acquired living through your own life, i.e. the experiences YOU made. If you already lived in the perfect world, or let’s say a world that at least could survive by itself without needing to be saved, you probably would not feel the urge to change or save anything.So if your characters have time to think of Ferraris, perhaps they need more obstacles to overcome ;-).
I’m blown away. I simply cannot imagine you producing a work of fiction. I’ll believe it when I see it. Your style is so technical and analytical. I picture you fighting strong urges to include charts and graphs illustrating your characters’ motivations, and flow charts showing their relationships to other characters. I certainly hope you’re one of those people who gets fired up by discouragement and then goes on to prove his critics wrong.
I’ve just remembered another book with a similar multi-voice device: “Ghost written” by David Mitchell. The voices work because Mitchell understands what it psychologically means to have a different point of view; he is not simply trying to decribe the world, which would be purely a political act, but describe a life within the world. It may also be worth looking at Queneau’s “Exercises In Style” where the same short story is retold several HUNDRED times using different voices.Incidentally, on your list: #6 should be #1. Voice is everything, and alone can carry an entire story. It’s entirely worked using turn of phrase and choice of individual words.IMHO, that is.