Before you can appreciate what the characters in this scenario are likely to do, you need to know something about them. If you knew and grew up with them, you might not see them this way, but here’s how they see themselves:
So there are the nine characters in our story. They’re not very likable, I confess. It’s a tough neighbourhood. What I’d like you to do is to put yourself in the place of each of these characters and imagine what they might do next. How will the story of this sad community unfold? For example:
As you may have guessed, I’m setting you up. This is another of my If the Shoe Were On the Other Foot exercises. The ‘neighbourhood’ is Asia and the MidEast, Mark is America, Ray is Israel, Paul is Palestine, Benny is Bin Laden, Randy is Iran, Russ is Russia, Chas is China, Alf is Afghanistan and Rick is Iraq. The purpose of the exercise is to try to get you to see how the leaders or the people of each of these countries see themselves now, and why they are doing what they are doing. I can appreciate what drives people to commit suicide, and to become a suicide bomber. I can see why people who have hated each other for a long time continue to attack each other irrationally and refuse to find any kind of workable compromise. I can see that Al Qaeda, while it has succeeded in nearly bankrupting the US, has been ineffective in getting mainstream Islamic people to rise up against their governments, expel all vestiges of the West and create a single monolithic Islamic state. In that sense, especially since Bush is bankrupting the US even without its increased military spending, Bin Laden’s campaign has been a total failure. I can see why the situation in Russia and in Afghanistan (and in many of the former Soviet states) is so hopeless that the only real choice of the people is to kill themselves (by suicide or by drugs) or to flee. I understand China’s ambivalence to the US, its interest in establishing the SCO China-Russia-Iran-(India-Pakistan-Former Southern SSRs) alternative economic and power bloc, and its desire to wean itself off dependence on the US. And I can appreciate why Iran feels it has no choice but to become a nuclear power and threaten Israel, in its own defence (and why, as Sy Hersh explains this week in The New Yorker, the first response of Iran if it is attacked will be to pour its troops into Iraq to fight the US there). The situation is complex, which is why there is no clear human answer to it. Aside from its scale, it is not all that different from the situation in many poor urban areas that the government has given up trying to serve or save, and which are loosely controlled by the equivalent of the Afghani warlords who control (except for the capital) that country. In that sense, my little gang war scenario is a miniaturization of the situation in Asia and the MidEast, but not an oversimplification of it. The approach of the West to impose a Western-style political and economic system on the MidEast, where such systems are utterly alien, is much like the approach to ‘clean up’ gang-controlled areas of American cities: send in the troops, level everything, and let the ‘market’ build something that they will own and look after, so they’ll keep the locals in line to defend it. The hope is that if everyplace looks like an American suburb, replete with McDonalds and the Gap and Starbucks and heavily-armed cops and vigilantes and big privatized jails and pro-American churches and all the other icons of American capitalism, everyplace will start to act and be like an American suburb, and the ‘problem’ will go away. It hasn’t gone away in America’s cities (where this tactic has been tried) and it won’t go away in the MidEast either. If the US could figure out how to ‘liberate’ its own poor and down-trodden areas from poverty, disease (the infant mortality in these areas of the US is higher than in many third world countries, and the life expectancy lower), crime, abuse of power, corruption and desperation, it might then discover that the same approach could liberate many nations struggling with the same cycle of despair. But because this is a complex problem, and the existing systems and prevailing imaginative poverty are only capable of addressing simple problems with simplistic solutions, the US hasn’t the faintest inkling how to do it. The ‘right answer’ is never invasion, occupation, more guns, more prisons, more law enforcement, or ‘leaving it to the market’. These merely contribute to the problem. The ‘complex system’ answer is to remove the obstacles that prevent the people from taking back power and resources from the warlords and the gangs, and to provide incentives that will encourage and reward them for doing this for themselves. If the people win the peace, the people will protect it. This is not easy, of course, and it will take generations and cost far more than the trillion or so that Bush has squandered in Iraq. Complex system changes never are. But it’s achievable, with enough time, energy, and resources. But first we need to get rid of the imaginative poverty and simplistic thinking that merely exacerbates these problems, and the people, like those in the Bush regime, who resort to them. There is a real question of whether we can still afford the money, the resources, the energy and the time that it will take, to do this in most of the world. My guess is that the answer to this is no. But perhaps if we try it in a few places, and discover that it works, we will be motivated to do everything we can do to make it work everywhere else. So that, ultimately, there will be no place left for those who would exploit the ignorance, anger and suffering of others for their own advantage. Andthe gang wars of this planet, at every scale, will finally be over. Image: Donna DeCesare, taken for Dart Center in Guatemala last year. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
So, you write stuff like this when you’re not feeling well? Hope it was just a 24-hour bug after all. Sure sounds like you’re back to fully fine form again!
chas is very sneaky and you would be surprised at how much in control of the situation he is. he knows when mark is going to take a pee, before even he knows and just wait and see who really is financially holding the ball. have you heard the story of the sleeping tiger?
Hi,This morning, as I was doing the dishes, thinking about the disgraceful cap which the French soccer player put on his career with that head butt, souring what was otherwise a pretty good world get-to-gether, it occurred to me that to change the world we need to change our minds and hearts. Some of us put a lot of effort into activism of all kinds, but we also need, in each of our interactions with anyone, to be kind, and to show the kind of understanding of circumstances which you are talking about in your latest blog. I found your site using the terms “Change Your Mind” and “Change the World”. If we can treat each and every person with respect and consideration on a one-to-one basis, there is hope for trickle-up diplomacy. I realize this is not quite on-topic, but I reckon it applies. FWIWChris
I’m glad to have found your site, Dave. Looks like I have quite a bit of reading to catch up on…
Doing the right thing has been attempted before. What happens then is that those who benefit from doing the wrong thing regroup and strike to ensure that things return to “normal”.I suggest looking up the Zion Protocol. One of its main lessons is that those who cheat, all while maintaining the appearance of fairplay, systematically win, while those who mean well and play by the book constantly get trampled. This is what makes it so difficult to achieve durable, positive change.Change is only ever accepted by the Powers That Be if it means more money and more power to them. Proposals to bring back the power to the people does not interest them, because it would weaken their position. Making everybody healthy, truely productive and individually empowered does not interest them, because it would kill the economy of learned helplessness.This is the threat that faces humanity: itself. Or rather, the few humans who strive to maintain the status quo, because it fills their pockets and fulfils their dreams of allmightiness, at everyone else’s expense.
How wonderful to disc0ver your blog… ^^you said: “The ‘complex system’ answer is to remove the obstacles that prevent the people from taking back power and resources from the warlords and the gangs, and to provide incentives that will encourage and reward them for doing this for themselves. If the people win the peace, the people will protect it.”I live in the Philippines, and the US always felt an obligation to interfere with us (done under the guise of “helping” ofcourse!) , inflicting Western ideals on us, such as dem0cracy (which destroys us, as the pe0ple are uneduCated and aren’t nati0nalistic and keep voting for the saMe old status-quo suppr0ting American-mimicking clowns in the governMent)and trying t0 run our ec0n0my. If Filipinos were left to their 0wn devices, they wouLd divide the state into small tribes and local towns (city counciLs, maybe?)- Filipinos find it so hard to be uniTed.and the people here would protect the peace- why shouldn’t they? the Americans have always wanted to help/save us- but I think that we should be SAVED from the US’ bullying us and controlling us and those in the status qu0 who supp0rt the Americans. I agree that we sh0uLd change our hearts, but we should also be very fiRm in BLAMING, AND JUDGING, AND SPEAKING OUT OUR OWN VERSION OF “TRUTH”- so that this endless cycle of despair of poverty will end….s0meday. ^^reporting from Manila, Philippines,Fredda