No Time to Think

aha 6My current contract entails a lot of hours at ‘the office’, something I have become unused to. As I build new relationships with my client I am finding myself being given more and more responsibility mainly because, being new on the job, I am not yet inundated with routine tasks and regular emergencies to cope with. I still have time to think about things.

My observation, throughout my career, has been that as businesses become more ‘efficient’ (i.e. they lay more people off and load the work onto fewer and fewer workers), there is less and less time to think. Most of the CEOs I have known openly lament that they have no time to think at all. I suspect that’s why they like mission statements and strategic planning sessions — they are forced, briefly, to get above the day-to-day crises of operation and think about what they are doing and should be doing and how and why to do it. Unfortunately, these often turn into rushed, uninformed, sterile exercises that are totally disconnected from what’s actually happening in the organizations — because the people who participate in these exercises don’t have time to find out what’s really going on (and generally, no one on the front lines is foolish enough to tell them).

The result is that these organizations become completely dysfunctional. A few overpaid people make uninformed, thoughtless decisions and impose them on front-line people who must then find workarounds so they can continue to do their jobs reasonably effectively despite what they are told to do by management (usually ignorantly), told to achieve by management (usually unrealistically), and told to provide to management (usually pointlessly).

This isn’t unique to organizations. Most of us fill our days so full (or have them filled for us) that we have no time to think, until we’re too tired to think.

Thinking is a skill, and like any skill it takes considerable and continuous practice. My sense is that those of us who are paid to think are mostly pretty rusty at doing it. It’s a holistic skill in many senses: it entails both deductive and inductive reasoning. It synthesizes conscious and subconscious knowledge. It requires recalling and drawing on a lot of ideas and information from many different sources. It entails imagining, opening oneself up to and carefully considering novel approaches, perspectives and alternatives. It requires digestion, perception, provocation, attention, and avoiding preconception.

Many of us do puzzles or play games of intellectual skill to try to exercise our brains so we can continue to think effectively. But that’s not really thinking practice — these exercises are generally pretty prescriptive. Real practice involves using everything you know and everything you can do well, and sometimes things you do not so well. It requires stretching, challenging yourself. It’s hard work. And it takes time. There’s a reason why some of our best thinking comes after we’ve ‘slept on it’ — consciously or subconsciously we are finally investing time in thinking.

Not only are too many of us becoming too unpracticed at thinking, I believe many of us no longer have the breadth of useful information, or the generalist experiences and competencies of our ancestors, or the diversity of experiences, or the introspective, meditative, peaceful, uneventful moments, or the unhurried and pensive conversations to draw on, all of which comprise the raw material that effective thinking depends on.

I’m not sure how we can change this — it’s pretty naive to think we can just slow down and take the time it needs to re-learn and practice to think effectively. It requires a completely different management mindset — setting realistic goals, assigning sensible roles, establishing useful processes by consensus and where necessary, and otherwise staying out of the way.

By listening to and observing staff instead of telling them, we empower them to learn more about what works and how it fits with what others do and need. And it frees up management time for thinking. One person can’t do this alone — it requires an entire workforce that can self-manage and function in a flat and largely unsupervised environment. Do this with the wrong staff and you’re a goner — the power vacuum will be filled by the (probably unqualified) person with the biggest ego, as others willingly allow him/her to take the fall for all the incompetent decisions that ensue.

But in the right organization, self-management can produce amazing results. An organization whose people all have the time and capacity to think effectively, and the authority to act on that thought, will trounce their competitors. Who knows, they might even create a model for a better workplace, and go onto change the world. Aha!

This entry was posted in Working Smarter. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to No Time to Think

  1. cindy says:

    Hello Dave,You said them so well. These were the arguments that I gave to my former superiors (I am not employed at the moment), that eventually cause me my own job. For example, I told them instead of hiring/promoting another director, why not use the money spent on this direcotr and GIVE me 3 engineers? So that I can let the engineers have more time to catch up with training? The logic behind it is, the better trained engineers provide better services to the customers and therefore better in retaining customers etc. etc. What we do see is UNNECESSARY crisis management. Most of the crisis were created because no one has time to think and plan. The root of the problem is, CEOs are encourage to do bad jobs by shareholders. Shareholders don’t THINK deeply of their action in rewarding CEOs with big bonuses. And most of the board of directors are crooks and based on buddy system …

  2. For people who like to talk things out, business coaches can be very helpful in ‘allowing’ the time to think through problems. My partner, for example, has derived great benefit from a coach. I haven’t found coaching that helpful, mostly because it feels unhelpful and unproductive to me.

  3. Excellent post, Dave. I worked in an organization that went through a lot of downsizing and reorganizing in the years I was there, and it’s true about the dysfunction that sets in. There were breaks in the chain of knowledge and experience, which was detrimental to getting the job done. The reduction in people eliminated time to be creative about problem solving. Much of the knowledge was still there, but upper management and new hires didn’t know where it was, and those who had the knowledge weren’t kept aware of what others were doing so they could provide experienced help — and even if they had known, they wouldn’t have had time to help. Even with good managers who sincerely wanted to fix things, the problems cut so deep it seemed hopeless at times. Just getting the job done became a daily fire drill. The saddest thing is that there were lots of capable, talented people there, and the problems were hardest on them, because they had a true desire to do the best job possible.

  4. Ralf Beuker says:

    Hi Dave, you (surely) know how right you are ;-) As an MBA (post-graduate) lecturer for one of the largest distance learning universities in the world I regularly experience this trade-off. In the meantime I can tell you within 2 minutes after studying the TOC of a student’s assignment if she/he had “time to think”. While I really admire my students for their energy and effort to do an MBA parallel to their job, family, leisure time I doubt more and more if this “rite de passage” will make them better managers …?

Comments are closed.