For some time I’ve been thinking about ways we could more effectively find ‘like minds’ to make a living with or even just to work on projects we have a shared passion for. Too many of us are working alone, and if we’re going to make a real difference, and experience the full joy of Natural Enterprise and Intentional Community, we need to start working with others whose talents complement our own, and who we can come easily to love. This search for partners need not (indeed it must not) involve compromising what we want to do, or our values. It should enable us to do what we do best, connecting and collaborating with others, on our own terms, in our own context, developing our own plan of action, doing our own thing in sync, in community with others. Though it does require knowing yourself: What your personal Gift, Passion and Purpose are! I concluded quickly that the mechanism for finding others won’t be a website, database or other online technology: It needs to draw on a broader pool of talent and passion, including those on the other side of the digital divide. Likewise, the mechanism for finding others cannot be one of agency, because person-to-person connection agencies are fatally flawed by their intrinsic conflict of interest. As James Surowiecki has explained, the agent gets rewarded for making connections, and for that reason s/he will always be tempted to exaggerate the potential of every relationship, and to accept bribes to favour some parties over others. So what we need is a low-tech, peer-to-peer mechanism. That had me stumped for a while, but now I think I have a first iteration (illustrated above) of a method that might work. Here’s a walk-through; tell me what you think:
OK, I know you’re asking What’s the Business Model? How can anyone make a living off this? Well, in the first place, this solution co-development process will give those who want to make a living a huge amount of research and ‘qualification of need’ at little or no cost. And if some of the experiments need some additional investment of time or money to get from the successful experiment to the ubiquitous product or service stage, it should be pretty easy to find partners to provide it, since the risk has been largely eliminated. The network that has been immersed in qualifying the need and brainstorming solutions will provide ready-made viral marketing for commercial solutions. And ultimately this is a reputation system: Your involvement co-developing both the articulated needs and qualified approaches and solutions will give you instant credibility to partners and customers alike. Yeah, it’s an open source co-development and the intelligence is all out there. But you have the inside track because you’ve been immersed in the details since day one, so you (and your new partners) can do what even the richest and cleverest outsider can’t: implement first and best. No, you won’t make a million from this approach. There is an element of the Gift/Generosity Economy here. But there is no reason you can’t make enough, easily, with minimal risk, to let you keep doing what you love, what you’re uniquely good at doing,with people you love, and make the world a better place in the process. That’s all I’ve got so far. Additions welcome. Let’s co-develop this thing. Category: Finding and Creating Meaningful Work
|
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
We introverts have a way of building a scenario in our head, and then stepping into it to see if it will work. Then we propose it. As always, I love your ideas, Dave. However, the premise of “problem solving” is flawed. It places the focus on problems and therefore severely limits us. We need to move away from 20th Century problem solving. It doesn’t work. we need to be creators creating a new world that we want. I recommend “The Path of Least Resistance” as a model. However, even if we went with problem solving, your methodology fails to identify HOW we will find our partners. Instead of putting focus on the people, you again place it on “needs” or “problems”. People are NOT their needs and problems. People are so very much more!
Hi Dave, I love your idea. I am actually, writing my thesis on something very similar. It is about first finding a passion, then share your passion with others and out of this synergy some kind of value for society is created. If this value is worth money, the persons responsible for this value creation may expect temporary employment (or create their own employment). If you are interested, my very ugly wiki (sorry, I have to improve the layout and install some plugins) on my thesis can be found on http://myopen.tudelft.nl/bin/view/Main/WebHome, then go to report and chapter Two. I can let you know when I am finished, please drop me an email.
I was just discussing this last night with my boyfriend who looks at business plans pitched to his firm all day. What I like about your illustration is that it’s cyclic, because as my boyfriend said, “Entrepreneurs who aren’t willing to adapt and change to their audience’s need, are the ones that fail.” This means constantly re-access your work (without making changes that compromise your passion).I’m very much in the middle of this process and what a learning experience it is!
Dave,I love your vision and your thinking on this topic.I suspect your model is both too complicated and too simple.It is too complicated because at heart the process is very simple. Listen to your heart to find your interests and passion. Speak your truths and state your interests clearly. People will find you.On the other hand, the model is too simple because that’s hard. On the personal side, maybe someone is scared of showing their real self, of what people will think of them, of other people’s opinions of them and what they care enough about to say. But also on the practical side, there are issues of intellectual property, copyright, commercial sense, etc in sharing ideas with others.I think blogging and social networking sites like LinkedIn are part of the answer. The other part is just get going doing what you want and see what happens, who you meet along the way. And that takes courage.BTW, if you get the chance could you drop me a line by email to talk about that Jefferson High School study diagram you posted – I don’t understand why that big loop would form, rather than different parts of the loop connecting each other to make a more complicated 3-dimensional shape.Kind regardsLauchlan Mackinnon
Dave,I too always enjoy reading your blog.As I read your “Finding People to Make a Living With: A Methodology, Take One” entry I was struck by the following two paragraphs.”I concluded quickly that the mechanism for finding others won’t be a website, database or other online technology: It needs to draw on a broader pool of talent and passion, including those on the other side of the digital divide.” and “So what we need is a low-tech, peer-to-peer mechanism…”Lots to think about here and I’m interested in watching what others have to say about the nuts and bolts.Thanks for making us think, this is an important question and idea.(Coy Ison)
What about architecturally? This is what I think about often.Anyone heard of Arcosanti? Or megastructure?I studied this in school avidly and determined that political and financial ramifications are keeping us from developing this kind of City.For example: All of Chicago could be fit into a “building” 300 stories high, withpassive heating and analemic sun orientations, it would focus the human nestsinto a balanced harmony…BUT: who builds it holistically? Who controls it, and who finances it?
Dave, just came across your article and it kinda blew me away. It seems as if you were reading my mind since this is part of the philosophy behind the business model of the e-Biz Co-op at http://groups.google.com/group/e-biz-coop. I couldn’t have articulated better myself. Would love to help co-develop this thing. Count me in!
While I understand the need, I think this model is not adaptive enough given the uniqueness of each human mind and the need for people to COMMIT before any real progress is made.For a model that seeks to meet these requirements please see “Achieving Sustainable Development: The Integrative Improvement Institutes Project”. A copy is online at:http://topics.developmentgateway.org/businessenvironment/rc/ItemDetail.do?itemId=1091332That project seeks catalysts who are prepared to make a commitment to advancing Integrative Improvement.In brief, Integrative Improvement is an adaptive, science-based, demand-centred, technology-enabled, practical approach to meeting the governance and other challenges we face in our world, our organisations and our economies. It is applicable to individuals and all business, government and civil society organisations and is culturally neutral.
Kay Dayss got it right first, by pressing the question: HOW?
I’m inclined to agree with the sentiments of Lauchlan Mackinnon that the model is a bit too complicated. We need to use the “Keep it Simple” approach. I think that once “like minded individuals” gather together and make a commitment to brainstorm/discover a way to make this happen – it will happen. As Lauchlan also states, “The other part is just get going doing what you want and see what happens, who you meet along the way.” I agree that one needs to step out/take action in faith/conviction and see what happens. That’s precisely what I’m attempting to do at the e-Biz Co-op at http://groups.google.com/group/e-biz-coop.