Last week’s (April 16th) New Yorker presented an article The Interpreter by John Colapinto (not online, abstract here, photo above by Martin Schoeller from this portfolio), describing the language and culture of the Amazonian Pirahã.The article reviews the research of ex-missionary and linguist Dan Everett into the unique language of the Pirahã. The language nominally contains eight consonants and three vowels, but words and conversations between Pirahã who know each other well dispense with the consonants and vowels entirely.So, for example, when the Pirahã are introduced to someone new, they talk among themselves and agree upon a name for the newcomer, and then iteratively whittle that name down to a single agreed-upon tone, stress and duration combination, one note. In essence, then, they sing rather than speak, and their language has more in common with music than with language. Or, to put it another way, it has more in common with the language of birds and other animals than with the dominant human languages of the planet, which are so structurally similar to each other that, as Chomsky has put it, an alien landing on the planet would have no doubt that all human languages came from a single root. Chomsky has spent much of his life writing the ‘rules’ to this language, and argues that the human brain is ‘hard wired’ for it.Not surprisingly, the discovery of a language which does not appear to follow any of these rules has stirred up a lot of controversy and denial. Yet a language based on the principles of music seems entirely natural to me, especially for a people who have lived for millennia in a rainforest replete with the musical language of thousands of birds and other species. I suspect that what is troubling the linguistic establishment most about Everett’s findings are these three things:
I sense that wild creatures, including those who visit my bird feeder when it’s convenient for them, feel the same way about us that the Pirahã do. They feel sorry for us, perhaps the same way we feel sorry for big, clumsy, maladapted King Kong, or the dinosaurs. We’ll put up with these big dumb creatures, but if they were to all disappear suddenly once and for all, that would be just fine with us, too. Perhaps their instincts, much more nuanced and attended to than ours, have made them prophets. We just can’t hear their warning. Categories: Understanding How Gaia Works, and Our Culture
|
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
A very interesting piece. I found your ideas about the possibilities of animals having a greater degree of communication ability to be quite fascinating. Great stuff.
Well, that’s fascinating. I hadn’t heard of this language and people. This whittling away the excess is quite poetic, a natural extension of culturally embedded understandings. In a way like a taciturn man who is read and who communicates by the inflection of grunts, or like fresh lovers who can scramble over scaffold from thought to thought without speech. To communicate so much on a group-level and without necessarily xenophobia but autonomous culture is a lovely variation.
Or had I heard of these people? Are they the ones with no counterpart for concept of numbers and a literacy based in spatial movement through forest and water that seems almost mystical to us?
Thanks for the link to the Piraha article and your insight. I can only hope that contact with “civilization” doesn’t harm them.Currently I’m in the middle of The Weather Makers. It’s very depressing. It
Hi David–Thanks for the head’s up on the New Yorker piece and for your writing on the implications of the Piraha language and culture. It is a fascinating story and it left me with more questions than answers. I was glad that, unlike most New Yorker stories, there were some documentary photos, because the story itself didn’t really speak to the spirit of these people and by that, I don’t mean any kind of transcendent soul, but rather their being in the world. But in the photos, they look amazingly content and self assured–the cognitive state shaped by their language looks to give them what zen masters take years to achieve: a state of presence, or enlightenment, if you will. The implication that these people are more like animals (which caused such an uproar in the scientific community, by the sounds of it) seems to me the greatest of benedictions. I do think if humans have hope, it lies down this thin branch of our cultural/linguistic possibility.zane
If you get Alzheimer’s you may move toward your ideal–in your escape into “now time” you won’t remember who your friends are or why you came into the room. It will be so pure–so much better than life in highly organized society.
mlu’s comment brings up something interesting – do they remember? do they have conversations about things past? hmmm – whistle – hmmmmm – ugh?
You might take a look at this recent response to the linguistics presented in the NYT article. It is an effective response by an anthropologist and a psychologist to some of the anthropological issues in play in the article and in Everett’s research. Bottom line: the Piraha and their are very interesting. Their language represents the world differently than English does for English speakers. But they should not be exoticized as something so strange as to be barely human. Example: “Our research on Amondawa conceptualizations of time leads us to the speculative conclusion that the absence
Judging by how often this romantic exotification of other cultures comes back, Sapir and Whorf were right about some people conceiving time as non-linear. Most such people, however, seem not to be American Indian.To address the three points made in the article:1. “The language lacks tenses”So does Chinese, among other languages. We see the world through our Indo-European eyes, and thus we consider morphology (inflections, conjugations, etc.) to be the only “real” way of expressing temporal relationships. We seem to forget that adverbs can perform exactly the same function.2. “The language lacks taxonomy”A couple points here. First, I would be very hesitant to come to this conclusion quite so quickly. It’s extremely difficult to acquire a near-native fluency in any language, and a language not previously studied, with no textbooks, grammars or dictionaries, is a tremendous challenge. Second, to the best of my knowledge generative linguistics postulates nothing that requires a taxonomy in order to be true (or false, for that matter). The kind of taxonomy you mention is lexical, and that’s an area generativists don’t consider central to the language “machine”.Third, comparing something to something else, and using the name of that something else to describe things, is universal. Go have an orange and get back to me. Or a plum. Or a wine with an oaky, fruity boquet. Preferably a blood-red wine.I’d strongly suggest that everyone be very careful about exoticizing other cultures. It’s easy. It’s fascinating. It’s attractive. But it rarely if ever leads to correct conclusions.There is a people that live in the central mountains and lush plains of their continent. They started off settling around rivers, as most peoples do, but as they developed trade and technology they began to lose sight of the eternal flow of the river, a metaphor for time. They began to focus on the trading posts along their rivers, and began to see time not as a flowing line, but as a series of points. This affected their language, which has no progressive tenses, no way to express the fluid, flowing nature of time. For them, things either are or are not. Things are either “now”, “in the past”, or “in the future”. Nothing but perfect tenses graces their language, due to their special worldview.These people are the Germans.
Point three from above, plus two bonus points!3. “The Pirahã have no interest in our language or our culture.”There are many, many other cultures that are like this. There is an especially exotic group that takes this to unprecedented extremes, so much so that most anthropologist don’t even mess with them. They’re variously known as “Amis”, “Gringos” or “Murkins”.4. All languages whittle excess away through time. You’ll note that the most common words in any language are short. They’ve been whittled down through time to make communication ever more efficient. Every language has a relatively small set of words that are used with tremendous frequency, and a large set of words that are hardly used at all — more efficiency-seeking whittling (see Zipf’s law for more details). And languages tend to lose their “more baroque” elements over time — Latin-derived languages have lost almost all of their cases (with fossils mostly present in pronouns), English has for all intents and purposes shedded old Germanic cases, conjugations and inflections, etc. Every language seeks an optimal balance of efficiency and reliability. Not just indigenous languages.5. Indigenous people are not simple-minded folks, any more than you or I are. They can have as much fun pulling the wool over people’s eyes as the next folks. Perhaps they are in this case and perhaps they aren’t. I’d urge caution here.Cheers!