I‘ve been a member of the Green Party for many years, but I’ve frequently duelled with them over their preoccupation with getting candidates elected rather than getting good legislation passed. In Canada, although ‘private members’ bills’ have an uphill battle to get time on the legislative agenda, they are often introduced and occasionally even passed into law.
I can appreciate that, a hundred years ago, it may have been necessary for elected politicians to hammer out legislation in smoke-filled back rooms. Communications and travel were slow and law-making is an iterative process, requiring not only consensus-building but also multiple redrafts to incorporate matters that the original draft forgot to consider.
But today there is no reason why the legislative (law-making) process cannot be completely transparent and draw on the collective wisdom of many citizens. In order for that to happen, I would propose a radical change to the way in which that legislative process occurs:
Such a process would have a number of benefits:
This proposal is directly analogous to the Wisdom of Crowds process I’ve recommended to devolve authority and decision-making in organizations from overpaid, isolated executives to a much broader, more informed (collectively) and more representative groups of employees and customers.
It’s not a panacea. It would reduce but not eliminate the need for comprehensive, real campaign finance reform towards a fully publicly-funded system. It would not reduce the need for the elimination of partisan, gerrymandering redistricting groups in favour of independent electoral boundary commissions. It would reduce but not eliminate the need for single transferable voting or other proportional representation systems of election.
I know, it’s a radical change and one that will be loathed and opposed by politicians and big political parties because it strips them of power. But it would not be at all difficult to do, if there was the political will to do it. We might even get groups like the NRDC and the Green Party to start the ball rolling by setting up sites to collectively draft scientifically-supportable, concrete, workable environmental laws and regulations, and get political candidates of all parties to announce where they stand on adopting them before the next elections. If that worked, such that instead of debating vague and emotionally-charged policy planks we were debating real legislation, we just might find that this becomes the way a true 21st century democracy operates.
|
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
Sounds in line in some ways with Wisdom Council proposed by Jim Rough (http://www.co-intelligence.org/P-wisdomcouncil.html)Thanks for this. Maybe some day we will mature towards a more collective governance structure. Until then, the US STILL has the Electoral College (now THAT’S a broken way of doing thinhs!).
All great ideas. However, would this also reduce the cost of getting elected? Part of what drives our political process is (a) the ability of candidates to raise tons of money and (b) the ability of corporate donors and wealthy individuals to write big checks and give away the kind of money that comes with expectations and accountability attached. Until we take care of that problem, making elected officials accountable to the voters is going to remain an uphill battle.
Funny, I have been saying that ever since I was a kid, looking at people’s disgruntled face whenever a politician would back-peddle on an electoral promise:
That this would place an extremely high burden on voters to be careful of what they demand from their politicians and require becoming deeply familiarize with a variety of issues, in order to make an informed decision about what they demand and who is the best qualified to represent them in Parliament is a whole other issue.
I would be willing to help out with the creation of a new political party drafted along these lines. The party would designate and elect figurehead representatives who would simply submit the legislation and amendments worked out by the party at large. The party would eventually take over our current government which could then be restructured. There are a few issues to be solved however. 1) Identity on the internet is complicated. 2) Without proper safeguards, interested technocrats (and corporations) would have a much greater say in shaping laws then they do now. (e.g. by paying large numbers of citizens to modify wikies / vote for certain ammendments, etc.) 3) Who’s to say that the graft and corruption in our system is the only reason that it works. If there aren’t ways for powerful interested parties to get the things they want, who says they would continue to support the system. Why do we elect puppet presidents who are controlled by the corporatocracy who puts them in power?
Dave,Yes. Wikis are perfect for this kind of thing. It can hardly be worse than the present situation.
While this suggestion offers a lot of promise for one of the main purposes of government (sharing resources), it defeats the other main purpose: providing people who want power with the chance to feel like they have it. Without some kind of mechanism to satisfy those people, no governing system can last, because eventually those people will turn to methods outside the system and undermine it.How would this system handle such people? Or would they perhaps seek to satisfy their power needs in other arenas such as private enterprise?I worry that without a strategy to manage this need, such a system could never survive.
This is creative and interesting, yet would need safeguards. Also, for the 21st century democracy, it does not address global collaborations of millions of groups but rather is regional. How can collaborations work and yet sovereignty is protected? The regional government must have constraints.