Last year I wrote an article about ‘unconferencing‘, including a suggested approach that involved having discussion leaders instead of speakers, whose job is
This has worked for me when the audience is small, engaged, reasonably informed, and know (and trust) each other. But what do we do when the audience is there to learn about something they know little about (or just because it’s a chance to get away from the office)? Or when the audience is too large and diverse to converse meaningfully with each other without being sidetracked with a lot of context-setting information? The pat answer is to ‘break up into small groups’, using some organizing principle to do so like Open Space (where people stand and propose discussion topics, are assigned a place and time-slot, and then attendees sign up for the ones that appeal to them, and ‘vote with their feet’ if a session fails to live up to its promise). This tends to mix the informed with the uninformed, and get people focused on subjects they at least think they care about. In a short unconference, however, doing this would use up most of the available time just hearing the topics and deciding which sessions to attend. David Gurteen has written about the idea of ‘conversation meetings’, where there is a pre-set ‘menu’ of topics around a common theme, and people pre-select the topics that interest them, which are posted on a large board (real or virtual). Then participants can select others interested in the same topics to ‘pair up’ with for conversations in break-out areas, over meals or on outdoor walks. Presumably the pairs could be pre-selected by the unconference organizer, and groups of perhaps three or four might also be accommodated, to avoid conversations of uninformed pairs with no ‘content provider’. David also writes about network badges, where you write something about yourself, your objectives or your interests on your name tag, to allow others at a conference to identify areas of affinity with you and cut through the small talk. I remember reading about an electronic version of these, where you identify your conference interests in advance and, when you come close to another participant, the areas of common interest are displayed on both badges (can’t find this online anymore — did the company that made them go under?) If common interests could be captured in advance of a ‘conversation meeting’, the ‘pairing’ process might be automated, and made more effective. Suppose you had a group of, say, 100 people willing to sign up for a half-day ‘unconference’ session. How would you organize it? Would you get people to ‘profile’ their interests (and depth of knowledge) in advance? Since there wouldn’t be time for Open Space topic-setting, would you use a virtual board and matching algorithm (see fictional illustration above) to schedule the conversations and do the pairing of participants, or would the participants prefer to (or insist on) choosing their own conversation partners, even if that takes time? Since these conversations are relatively intimate, compared to the safe anonymity of a large conference, would participants balk at them? Could they be relied upon to show up for one-on-one conversations with ‘strangers’? How could we make this work? And perhaps most important, if we could make it work F2F, could we then use desktop video and make it work virtually? Category: Collaboration
|
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
Last year, while editor of http://www.knowledgeboard.com, I co-ran a gathering called ‘Contactivity’ in Greenwich, London (partnered with the University and David Gurteen). We faced some very similar questions.Our approach was focused on the ‘unconference’ (we preferred constructivist) model and whether a bunch of people who hadn’t met could co-design a conference together virtually in advance (we avoided pre-setting a topic, powerpoints etc.). It was also about how to transfer knowledge and decisions from the virtual domain into the physical gathering (as we’ve all seen in the early adopting unconferences – can this be done in the less early adopting domains?). We learnt a lot (in part about multi-domain group facilitation) and there’s a lot I could go on about, and I’m happy to point you to some reports etc., but specific to your point is the networking and consequent discussions. We asked everyone to profile themselves virtually in advance on the wiki with a set of pre-defined (but loose) questions and then kicked the event off with a purposeful networking session. This was facilitated by Patricia Wolf and Peter Troxler, who are now collaborating around http://www.unbla.org. We printed out the profiles and stuck them to some boards then asked the attendees to find discussion partners from the profiles. Being that part of the profiles was a knowledge exchange style ‘offer’ and ‘seeking’ angle, their conversations were instantly effective (I’m not a great fan of networking for networking’s sake) – and, because the subjects were things they had already expressed an interest in, really quite deep, constructive etc…
We’ve (oilawareness Stockholm)been using the excellent “meetup.com” (www.meetup.com) facilities to both hold discussions as well as arrange small meetings in real life. Well worth a look, it combines the ubiquitousness of internet with the ability to hold informal meetings in cafes or wherever. I also like the files facility you can take a picture of any conference notes and post it.
Open Space. If I only had 3.5 hours and 100 people, I’d open space with an introduction, agenda setting and market place taking no longer than 45 mins. Thence two one-hour concurrent sessions and a 15 minute closing. Capture sessions notes, photo and audio on the web. Supporting the invitation with up front stuff is always a fine idea, but every piece of controlled process you introduce on the day gets in the way of people’s experience of each other. 100 smart and curious people will find each other quickly in open sapce. Just trust them and get out of the way.
What Chris wrote. Exactly. And I’d underline the last sentence.
Some of my favorite community meetings were like this. 75 passionate people, three hours in open space: 45 minute opening (could have been shorter), two 45-50 minute sessions, 30-40 minutes to circle round and share next steps. Fifteen distinct group conversations (and lots of duos and trios in the halls.) All the proceedings were online the next day. One facilitator, who spent most of the evening trying to get my keys out of my locked car in the parking lot. Out of the way, as Chris and Siona say!