Links of the Month: March 2022


message I recently received from FB; I hadn’t realized they were so powerful ;-)  

“The modern sense of being a hero is shining a bright light on things that need to be seen.” — Ali Smith

Thank you to Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange and other journalists, whistleblowers and writers who dare to suggest an alternative truth to that of the rich and powerful, and present the evidence for it. We need you, more than ever.

Please be forewarned — the links are heavy going this month.


COLLAPSE WATCH


photo of pumpjack by Jeff McIntosh for CP/AP/CBC; methane emissions from the oil & gas sector are rising by at least 5%/year, but most of the leaks and emissions are unmonitored

Future’s so bright I gotta wear green shades: Tim Watkins explains the absurdity of “net-zero”, carbon capture, renewable energy, Green New Deal, carbon offsets and other shovel-this-under-the-rug schemes. “One final imperialist blowout before global industrial civilisation is done”. Thanks to Paul Heft for the link.

And that’s an understatement: Methane emissions are at least 70% higher than “official” data, according to a recent study focused on the huge methane leakage from all forms of hydrocarbon extraction.

So what “we” need to do…: The token environmentalist in Trudeau’s cabinet says “we” need to prepare for catastrophic climate change. And while “we” need to reduce emissions, his government is merrily doing the opposite. I guess they’re not “we”.


LIVING BETTER


“sorry mom, I just can’t get used to the heels”; photo by David Irving of Kagus in New Caledonia, from the Macaulay Library collection

Just don’t be white: Indi Samarajiva says it’s time to quit apologizing for being a member of White Empire and its excesses, and instead, reject it. The battery of global industrial capitalism needs to be called out, named and shamed.

De-task the police: Former Toronto Mayor John Sewell (yes, that city once had some good ones) says the only way to reform the police is to take away most of the work of police forces and give it to social service workers who are far more competent to deal with 90% of the issues police now are called to attend to. And much cheaper.


POLITICS AND ECONOMICS AS USUAL


Countries sanctioning Russia so far (green). Countries in grey have imposed no sanctions, and many have said they will not do so. Up to date per Reuters. Map from wikipedia; thanks to Indi Samarajiva for the link.

Everywhere but in the mirror: In a gut-wrenching new piece, Indi suggests that maybe we’re the bad guys, the global bullies, the committers of endless atrocities. Maybe fascists actually won WWII and, thanks to the endless propaganda, we’ve been in denial ever since. He writes:

And so [we have] Umair Haque, saying that America shouldn’t leave [Afghanistan], that the Taliban, who could barely pay their soldiers, wanted to take over the world… It’s a fucking joke, like everything is a Bond movie and every villain is always trying to take over the world. It’s a killing joke because millions of Afghan people are being starved right now… The idea that the Taliban is imperial, as Umair calls it, is just a lie. We live in a unipolar world and there’s only one Empire, with over 800 military bases and financial sieges encircling the world. And it’s not the fucking Taliban. We have a bunch of local terrors, but keep an eye on the Empire stitching its terror into one, global [forever] war. Let’s be honest. Saddam, Bin Laden, the amorphous Taliban, these are all knock-off Hitlers. White Empire requires the idea of someone worse than them so they can continue doing [the horrible things they do]. After fucking decades of this, however, the crowds are getting bored. They’ve seen it before… They long for the good old days, fighting the good old Red Empire. And so White Empire kept expanding NATO long after the USSR fell, despite many strategists saying this was madness. Who was NATO fighting, after the Warsaw Pact fell?… What they were really doing was looking for a fight. And so after many warnings in 2008 and 2014—after so many strategists saying parking missiles next to Russia was as bad as the Cuban Missile Crisis—they finally got a real fucking war. Happening to real (honorary) Europeans…White Empire could barely contain its glee. A villain, a real villain, something to stop all the fingers pointing at [us].”

The horrors of starvation and of suffering: It’s easy when you live thousands of miles and sometimes decades away from them, to not think about the costs, the misery, the terror and the fury of war, oppression, and destitution. Two essays offer that missing perspective. Tad Patzek describes the hardest moments in his life as an emigré from Poland and Ukraine and how he understandably came to hate Russia and everything it stands for. And Indi describes the ghastly horror of hunger and starvation, especially of one’s children, and the outrage that we continue to allow and enable it to happen so often. Thanks to Joe Clarkson for the first link.

The Russia/NATO proxy war in Ukraine: You can get one side of this story, written by the CIA/DOD “intelligence reporters” and dutifully published without question or evidence by the stenographers at the NYT, WaPo (“Democracy dies in darkness.”), Guardian, Atlantic, New Yorker, or indeed Fox News or any of the other mainstream media. You know, the same gang that brought you the Iraq War you almost all bought into. Following, for anyone interested, is a short library of articles explaining a different perspective on this war. It fully acknowledges and doesn’t condone the extreme cruelty and stupidity of Putin’s invasion, but otherwise it’s a very different story. Better read it now, before the censors take away your right to do so. Thanks to John Whiting and Paul and Ben Heft for many of these links:

The “War On Of Terror”: Nafeez Ahmed, based on a recent commission, has concluded that about six million people have died so far as a result of the “war on terror” since 2001. And 38 million others have been displaced.

The growing shadow of censorship: Many writers, concerned about being censored or demonetized by the silicon valley social media mafia, are starting to censor themselves. “People shying away from speech they could be punished for does a lot more to restrict speech than the punishments themselves.” And a US State Dept rep has already called for the censorship of Caitlin Johnstone. Wonder who will be next? And what happens when they take over Wikipedia?

CoVid-19 is more like smoking than the ‘flu: Hundreds of thousands of deaths, from either tobacco or the pandemic, could be prevented with a single behavioral change.” Yep, and millions of deaths from unhealthy diets could likewise be prevented. But, alas, only in theory. That would require restricting people’s “freedoms”.

Harvesting animals for their organs — a new obscenity: The New Yorker celebrates the “medical miracle” of the first successful transplant of a heart from a pig to a human (update: the patient died), and envisions the days when pigs and other intelligent creatures can be used to grow all kinds of human organs, and then slaughtered to harvest them. Am I the only one that finds this grotesque, a reason for outrage not celebration? PBS discussed this a few years ago, but still it goes on.


FUN AND INSPIRATION


cartoon by David Ostow and Dan Salomon

Funny headlines:

    • A spoof, from Andy Borowitz: “Republicans Support Democracy in Ukraine as Long as It Does Not Spread to U.S.”
    • And a real one, strange and macabrely funny, from the CBC: “B.C. reports 14 fewer people in hospital with COVID-19, 14 more deaths.”

You don’t want a gas stovetop: Hank Green explains why. (You need an induction cooktop, but don’t plan to use it with your copper, aluminum, or glass cookware.)

It’s your friends who break your heart: An interesting reflection from the Atlantic’s Jennifer Senior on the struggles to find and nurture and sustain friendships. And an equally fascinating rebuttal from Margaret Atwood.

Ask Bill what’s next: Veritasium’s Derek Muller asked Bill Gates about the successes and failures of the pandemic, and also what he thought might be the next crises: His answer? Climate collapse and bioterrorism.

Work is pointless: What happens when an online community gets hijacked by a group who want to take it in a very different direction from what the founders intended? It’s called sanewashing (“taking a movement that was originally extreme and attempting to rehabilitate its image by downplaying its origins.”) The antiwork subreddit began as a small group who philosophically wanted to overthrow capitalism and abolish work, but morphed into a huge gentrified neoliberal group who wanted more meaningful work, better working conditions and respectful bosses. So when the founder appeared on Fox News and was ridiculed, she was booted out of her own group. So if you think work really is pointless and the system needs to be overthrown, you’ll have to find another group. Thanks to Ben Collver for the link.

Did the universe “inflate”?: Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder takes on the scientific controversy over whether the universe exponentially inflated right after the supposed Big Bang. In her usual erudite, accessible and enjoyable style, she skewers the ideologues on both sides of the debate. She’s also a skeptic on “dark matter”, and is remarkably open-minded about the nature of reality and the origin and make-up of the universe, insisting “We just don’t know.”


THOUGHTS OF THE MONTH


cartoon by the ever-astonishing Will McPhail

From Loren Eiseley in The Star Thrower:

We are rag dolls made out of many ages and skins, changelings who have slept in wood nests, and hissed in the uncouth guise of waddling amphibians. We have played such roles for infinitely longer ages than we have been human. Our identity is a dream. We are process, not reality.

Over the whole earth — this infinitely small globe that possesses all we know of sunshine and bird song — an unfamiliar blight is creeping: man. Man, who has become at last a planetary disease and who would, if his technology yet permitted, pass this infection to another star.

From Dennis Mitchell (comment to my blog):

I worked as an apprentice, painting. My teacher and friend told me,”Be careful of what you do, because you will end up doing it.” I wasted too many years working construction because I failed to follow his advice.

From Milk and Honey by Indian-Canadian poet Rupi Kaur:

people go
but how
they left
always stays

From Ali Smith‘s Spring:

Dear Dermot and Patrick, Thank you for your email. It was your mother who was the writer not me, so forgive the infelicities of expression there will no doubt be in this ‘story’ I am sending you to try to express what she meant to me. There are of course literally close to a million stories I could send you, to illustrate what she meant, both to me and in the world. But here is just one. When my marriage broke up 30 years ago and my wife and child left the country and to all intents and purposes left my life I was very depressed and for quite some time. One day your mother suggested that I ‘take’ my child to see some theatre shows or films, or take her on holiday, or to see an art exhibition – which basically meant of course anything your mother had made up her mind that I myself should make the effort to go and see. I said, ‘But how?’ She said, ‘Use your imagination. Take her to see things. Believe me your child will be imagining you too wherever she is in the world. So meet each other imaginatively.’ I laughed. ‘I’m serious,’ your mother said. ‘Take her to see things. And tell her to send me a postcard whenever you do go to see things or places. Just so I know you’ve taken me seriously.’ I thought your mother was being very kind, but that it was a rather silly idea. But to my surprise I found myself doing just that, ‘taking’ an imaginary daughter to things I’d never have gone to otherwise. Arcadia, Cats, all the big shows. I saw works by Leonardo at the Hayward, by Monet at the Royal Academy, modern art, Hockney, Moore, I saw too many Shakespeares, I visited the Dome show at the Millennium. I can’t begin to count the number of films and shows I saw at cinemas and theatres and galleries and museums all over the world, and strange as it may seem and still does seem to me, I did none of it alone, thanks to the gift of your mother’s imagination.


This entry was posted in Collapse Watch, How the World Really Works, Our Culture / Ourselves. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Links of the Month: March 2022

  1. Joe Clarkson says:

    OK, one last comment here about the war (after reading several of the posts you linked to regarding the war in Ukraine).

    All of the folks expressing the “NATO ‘forced’ Russia to invade to counter NATO’s eastward expansion” argument presume that NATO is somehow willing and able to invade Russia. If we presume the opposite, that neither NATO (as a US proxy or for itself) nor the US has any intention of invading a major nuclear power like Russia to take over its territory, then none of the “Russia had no choice” arguments make any sense at all. So, how plausible is it that the West was about to, or would ever, invade Russia? My opinion is that a US/NATO invasion of Russia was never even slightly possible, for several reasons. (A decapitating first strike against Russia from Ukraine is also impossible since Russia has plenty of nukes on subs as deterrence. That’s a non-starter).

    One reason is that NATO didn’t expand eastward by invasion. None of the newly admitted NATO nations of the Eastern bloc were forced to join after being invaded by NATO members. To the contrary, at least two nations, Georgia and Ukraine, were in fact invaded by Russia to prevent NATO membership. Russia does have a very strong desire to prevent nearby nations from joining NATO, but that’s not because Russia fears military attack from NATO. Rather, a country’s NATO membership makes it much riskier for Russia to invade that country, thereby diminishing Russia’s influence greatly. That’s the reason why all those eastern european countries rushed to join NATO and why Russia dislikes NATO membership so much.

    Reason two is that Russia is a major nuclear power. Russia has already demonstrated that they can invade neighboring non-nuclear, non-NATO countries at will. We may soon find out whether Russia is willing to take the risk of invading a NATO member by using a nuclear ultimatum to expand west or north of Ukraine. I hope not, but if Russia does, I hope and expect that NATO will “blink”. Nothing is worth starting a nuclear WW3, and Putin knows it. Biden certainly knows it and keeps saying it. If Russia does invade Estonia or Latvia, for example, it will probably get away with it. But that wouldn’t make Putin “smart”, it would just confirm his willingness to take unconscionable risk.

    An additional supporting fact is that NATO forces are not now willing to directly confront the Russian military in Ukraine, depite desperate pleas from Ukraine to do so. This shows how unlikely it ever was that NATO would have been willing to invade Russia and confront the Russian military on Russian soil. To reiterate, NATO was never going to invade or attack Russia and Putin knows it. Indeed, that knowledge was what allowed him to order the military mobilization and invasion of Ukraine in the first place, despite the fact that everyone saw it coming for months.

    Another reason is that the United States was the only nuclear power in the world from the end of WW2 until the first Russian nuclear test in 1949. The US could have used that singular power to take over any country in the world, including Russia, if it wanted to but it didn’t. It’s no coincidence that NATO was also formed in 1949 so that Europe could be placed under the US “nuclear umbrella” as a deterrent to the new nuclear power of the USSR.

    No NATO member invaded any Warsaw Pact nation during the 40 years after NATO formed. Then the cold war ended with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. How anyone can assert that Russia has a reasonable fear of invasion from NATO now, 32 years later (and decades after the bulk of the new NATO members joined), is beyond me.

    While it’s obvious that the US is willing and able to invade a lot of countries and has, to our shame, done so many times without really good reasons (as in Iraq and Vietnam, for example), Russia is not one of them. Putin knows it and so should everyone else. Russia and the US/NATO may some day obliterate each other with nuclear weapons, probably by a stupid mistake, but NATO will never invade Russia. To suggest that Putin is invading Ukraine out of fear of a NATO military attack on, or invasion of, Russia is just nonsense.

  2. Dave Pollard says:

    OK, one last comment back, Joe. Russia does not fear a direct military attack from NATO, and NATO doesn’t plan one, agreed. But Russia’s back is to the wall and it is still being pressed. Again, imagine the shoe on the other foot, with a Russian military base in Toronto or Montréal and others in hostile countries all around it. It’s an intolerable provocation, and even worse is the economic isolation that goes with it. Russia has to play to the home crowd, who love their country but justifiably feel like their country is falling further and further behind. The old Cold War zealots in the CIA/DOD/NATO want Russia to crumble non-militarily (via economic collapse and/or internal civil war, with subtle NATO help of course). So they can then dictate the shutting down of the nukes and unilateral disarmament to Russia, in return for “normal” relations with west, restored trade etc. They want, in other words, to “win” the Cold War they never stopped fighting. And they just might do so. That ending, a unipolar global hegemony under control of a US government that is quickly sliding into fascism, is absolutely terrifying to me.

Comments are closed.