The Idea: A current state overview of KM, with particular emphasis on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) and The Cost of Not Knowing.
I had the great pleasure of speaking, alongside Howard Deane, CKO of KPMG Canada, with the students and faculty of Ivey School of Business yesterday, on the subject of Knowledge Management. They asked us some excellent questions, and since I’m a fan of the FAQ format, I thought I’d summarize some of their (excellent) questions, and some of my answers, not all of which we had the time to address during our meetings with them. Special thanks to Mazi Raz, Prof. Darren Meister and alumnus Alina Polonskaya for the invitation, facilitation and hospitality during our day in London. Q: How do you help management become aware of knowledge gaps in their organization? I’m not sure you can expect management to know what the gaps are, in this era when, as Drucker says, for the first time most employees know more about their jobs (and hence more about their ‘knowledge gaps’) than their boss. That’s why it’s so important to do what Dave Snowden calls ‘Cultural Anthropology’ — talk to the people on the front lines, not just to the business unit leaders and managers. And even when you do, you have to be creative in identifying the gaps and needs — if you just ask ‘what additional knowledge do you need’, you’ll get less constructive ideas than if you offer possibilities, ask about real business problems and obstacles, and iteratively agree on how ‘knowledge’ could help address them. Q: How do you address resistance to change when it occurs at the implementation stage of a KM project? Q: What are the main factors that make organizations realize they have a need for KM? It’s usually precipitated by a crisis — the collapse of Enron, the e coli deaths in Walkerton, Ontario, SARS and Avian Flu and even 9/11 had a huge impact on the perceived quality of existing knowledge and the need for more and better knowledge in affected organizations. Every organization whether they have a formal KM system or not is assessing the cost of knowledge against the cost of not knowing, as the chart above indicates, and judgementally picking the level of investment in knowledge and in KM that balances these costs (K1 in the diagram). When a crisis occurs, the perceived cost of not knowing soars, and this equilibrium point shifts sharply to the right (K2) as a result, and there is an appetite for investing more (K2-K1) in knowledge and KM. What was always perceived as important suddenly becomes urgent as well. Q: What are the most important elements of, land-mines to watch out for in, any KM project? A KM project is like any other change project, and the key is to ensure you follow John Kotter’s Leading Change approach. If you don’t have, or lose, a sense of urgency, if you don’t have, or lose, executive sponsorship, if you don’t have a clear, well-articulated and communicated vision of where you’re going and why, if you don’t have a well-researched plan to realize that vision, your project is in trouble. Q: What do you use as incentives to encourage contribution to and use of KM systems? How do you overcome resistance to sharing knowledge? Q: How do you pitch and implement KM differently in smaller companies? In smaller companies budgets are smaller and most of the knowledge-sharing is external rather than within the organization. So you need to use simple, inexpensive, commercial tools that work between organizations — IM, Skype, and collaboration tools for example — and whatever you implement needs to work seamlessly with the organizations of alliance partners, customers and advisers. That means striking the delicate balance when developing applications between ability to work around firewalls and protecting the confidentiality and integrity of the organization’s own knowledge. Q: Once you have executive sponsorship, what’s the biggest challenge in developing an effective KM system? In my opinion there are three great challenges: (1) Getting sufficient budget and dedicated resources to do the job right, (2) narrowing the project list to focus on a few things you can do really well instead of juggling a mass of projects, and (3) balancing the KM pet projects of managers (who have the budgets and resources and power to support or block you, but who often have mistaken views on what their employees’ real needs are, and just as often an unwelcome passion for playing a heavy personal role in the fine points of design and look-and-feel of the system) against the favoured projects of the people on the front lines. Politics, in other words. Q: What role should blogs play in KM systems? My view on this is that off-the-shelf blog tools are not yet ready for prime time in business organizations: They are too complicated for busy employees to learn and use effectively, and their hard-wired reverse-date organization and indexing doesn’t match users’ needs to be able to browse blog content other ways. There are three constituencies in organizations who could benefit from doing some experimentation now with blogs before they’re improved: (1) Subject Matter Experts who are inundated with requests for information and advice, who could benefit from having their ‘electronic filing cabinet’ accessible to and browsable by others in the organization, (2) those in the company who are already publishing newsletters and similar regular bulletins, and (3) those who are coordinating Community of Practice networks. These three groups will more readily see the benefits of using blogs and will be more patient with their current shortcomings. Q: What are the best KM tools to start with? Q: How to you measure the impact and success of KM in your company? This is the question we all shudder to answer, because there are no good answers. I think you have to use a mix of quantitative (e.g. usage stats, average currency of content) and qualitative (e.g. user survey scores). And then you need to find some way to connect improvement in KM infrastructure to improvement in more high-level critical business measures (e.g. revenue per employee, speed-to-market measures). But this is KM’s toughest challenge. Q: What are the characteristics of a good KM implementation? Q: What is your preferred framework/model for KM, and how do you see it evolving? Using the ‘information highway’ analogy, I’ve used the Architecture, Infrastructure, Culture model. Architecture: Is it well-designed for ‘traffic flow’. Infrastructure: Is there enough (but not too much) in place that the user’s experience is a pleasant one, free of bottlenecks and other hassles. Culture: Is it ‘friendly’ to the users and the communities in which it is placed, consistent and connected with other infrastructure, or is it just contributing to (information) pollution and congestion. In future I see it evolving quickly to a decentralized model based on Personal Knowledge Management: Decentralized content (on your hard drive, where you’ll care enough to maintain it properly, not on some huge impersonal centralized database), Personally-set sharing and permissioning protocols (for subscribing and publishing ‘your’ content), focus on finding Who to have a context-rich conversation with instead of What context-free content they have produced in past), and a shift from Just in Case knowledge warehousing to Just in Time knowledge canvassing. Q: What is the CKO’s most difficult task? What is KM’s greatest risk? Getting enough budget and resources to do the job right, and assessing the real cost of not knowing. The greatest risk is raising expectations in management’s and users’ minds that you can’t possibly meet. Q: Which company do you think has an exemplary KM system and why? Q: What will take for KM to make it into the core strategic business goals of organizations? Unless you work for organizations like NASA, the CDC, the WHO or the CIA where the cost of not knowing is enormous, I believe the only way you’re going to tie KM closely to the core strategic values of the organization is by re-branding it as Personal Productivity Improvement or Work Effectiveness Improvement. Q: Where do you see KM fitting organizationally in the future? Q: How do you assess the companies’ and employees’ readiness for a formal KM system? Q: What are the biggest “don’ts” in implementing KM? Don’t obsess over content and ignore contact and context. Don’t do it all top-down. Don’t do it until you understand the culture of the organization and how they’re ‘working around’ knowledge problems now. Don’t expect to get credit or insist on taking credit for your success. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
I was in your speech at Ivey. Besides all the issues discussed, I particularly liked your thoughts on “work effectiveness management” as an alternative concept to “knowledge management”. “Knowledge Management” literally imposes a managerial perspective with a sense of separating knowledge from its owner – the worker. Just as you said today and composed in one of your blog articles, knowledge management really has to be a “personal” thing being viewed from a user-centric perspective. Its purpose is not even anywhere close to separating knowledge from people (e.g., codifying, documenting), but to help people leverage knowledge more effectively and efficiently to get their work done. To the extent that knowledge is defined as “the capacity for effective action” (Senge, 1997), the ultimate measure for how good “the capacity” is should be the effectiveness and efficiency of improved actions. This perspective is well in line with employees’ needs too – to get jobs done effectively and efficiently. In other words, the WIFM question is really important (What’s it for me).
These were excellent questions and very good answers. Why the difference? Among my concerns, perhaps the strongest is that I think it advances the discipline not one iota to change its name. And as to the conmtent in general, I don’t see in there an addressing of what might well be the most important issue of all: the managers who see quite clearly what the implications of KM are, and are either scared to death of it, or dedicated to the death in ensuring it doesn’t happen on their watch.
Hi David: Care to elaborate on this ‘most important issue’, either here, or by e-mail? I’d love to post our ‘conversation’ on this as a weblog post, and also send it to the AOK group.