The release of Appleís new iPhone immediately made me groan: More encouragement to continue to throw out old cell phones and ‘obsolete’ high-tech toys. Consumers will buy over a billion cell phones this year, and the rate is growing by 10-20% per year. The average life of a cell phone is a year. Virtually none of them are recycled. They all end up in landfills, largely in struggling nations. A billion a year. Deliberately shoddily manufactured garbage, laced with cadmium, beryllium, lead and other toxic materials. Disgraceful. Last summer I charted the pathetic cradle-to-grave agribusiness food production system and all the atrocities and waste it produces. This is what the process looks like for high-tech products (and in fact for most manufactured goods):
There are three recent books out lamenting this sorry state: Heather Rogersí Gone Tomorrow, Giles Sladeís Made to Break and Elizabeth Grossmanís High Tech Trash. Their lesson is the same: Technology never creates less waste. Piled on top of the billion cell phones are the equally shoddy and toxic computers, MP3 players and other toys, as well as more traditional personal care, media and entertainment devices. Analogue TVs and CRT monitors, with their especially toxic components, are added to the pile, often replaced by energy-gulping plasma units. And some municipalities like New York and Washington DC, after being bribed or coerced by the tight ‘waste disposal’ oligopoly, actually stopped their recycling programs before consumer outrage forced them to be reinstated. Consumer protection legislation and education are too late in the process to change this. The answer is quite simple, but it would take more balls than we’ll ever see from a politician:
There are a lot of problems in our world that are complex and intractable, but this isn’t one of them. All itwould take is political will. Don’t hold your breath. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
I think your posting is bit blown out of porportion. My last cell phone I had for two years before I bought a new one. On average my phone last two years unless I drop it a few hundred times. It takes quite a bit to damage these phones. I think computers are a bigger waste of materials than cell phones, yet we keep upgrading those. The real problem is most of us are not about to stop buying cell phones and computers. Most of us are not about run over to these other countries and try and stop these mega corporations from doing what they are doing. We need to change the goverments we live in to stop the companies from doing business in the cut throat destructive way they have been doing. We need to dismantle global corporations.By the way I would really like to hear your thoughts on the whole Copyright laws that seem to be coming to Canada soon.
I agree with most of what you say, it’s a sorry state, and unlikely to change soon. However, there’s a little irony, while talking of such matters, in calling us all “consumers”. :-)That’s what we may be right now, but if you wish things to be different, wouldn’t it be better to start talking about “customers” instead?
There can be no doubt about the facts surrounding the impact to the environment of high technology devices. This is a big, complex problem that I don’t think the private sector (motivated by profits to frequently ignore common sense or good citizenship) or government (motivated to “compromise” by the need to get/stay in power).Dave, I think you’ve very succintly captured the problem, and some viable likely solutions. This is a big “hairy” problem that I think will take more than business and government working at cross-purposes to solve. Some sort of “third entity” is needed, one that thinks strategically and wholistically, one that truly has the best interests of global citizens at heart, and can bring together interests of business and government to achieve meaningful change. Not an easy task given the divergent mindsets that exist in differnt parts of the globe, war and conflict, difficult to bridge cultures and cultural norms, emerging economies, geopolitical agendas, the need to try and maintain financial stability or risk dire economic and social consequences.We need a different way of approaching the problem, with a different context. Someone smart once said you can’t solve a problem with the same thinking that created it.I seem to recall Drucker mentioning something about a “social sector” in his past writings, but I don’t remember much more than that. He must have been thinking about something different – I’m sure he can’t be talking about the fragmented environmental and social groups, who, like business and government, compete with each other for attention and funding rather than work together on behalf of citizens.
Municipalities stop recycling programs when they don’t make economic sense (which is often), not because they were coerced or bribed. Many recycling programs don’t make environmental sense either. Alumin[i]um recycling is a huge win, but glass recycling is not.The stuff that ends up in a landfill is almost never an environmental problem except for certain hazardous waste. The quantities of toxic materials in electronics is generally so small that’s it’s not really a problem. Batteries and CRTs are an exception (although the lead in CRTs is not likely to leach out in significant quantities). The alleged harm that has come from toxic substances in electronics has come from attempts to recycle the materials, not from disposing of it in landfills.Landfills are not much of an economic problem either as there’s now a glut of landfill space: http://tinyurl.com/y4ejew If you seriously think that cell phones are a waste disposal issue, I dare you to go to a landfill and try to find a cell phone. Let us know how many days (weeks?) it takes you. All electronics are only 1.1% of solid waste generated and an even smaller percentage of what ends up in landfills.I agree that taxing bads is a good idea, but I don’t agree with your specifics. Taxing pollution, energy use, having congesting charges for traffic, having more direct (linear) charges for waste disposal are all good ideas. But not, per se, taxing imports or short warranty life.I doubt “zero waste” is practical at all, but I’m sure it’s not desirable.
I seem to recall Drucker mentioning something about a “social sector” in his past writings, but I don’t remember much more than that. He must have been thinking about something different – I’m sure he can’t be talking about the fragmented environmental and social groups, who, like business and government, compete with each other for attention and funding rather than work together on behalf of citizens.Dale, that was likely in an article by Drucker titled “The Age of Social Transformation” (I keep it in my living room on a coffee table and I read it about once every three months or so). Yes, he was talking about the fragmented environmental and social (and other non-governmental) groups, and churches absent their over religious agendas … and he noted / suggested that it was likely that they would be forced, by the abdication of responsibility-taking by governments and the corporate world, to find ways to solder together some or much of the fragmentation.
Wow, lots of comments this time, and informative too.For myself I’ve had two cell phones over a space of 7 years.
I’m due for a replacement and am close to coming in my pants over the iPhone. It’t the closest thing to a pocket singularity device I’ve seen.In the saving-the-world solution space, technology has one advantage over ideas of mass enlightenment or whatever global consciousness change is needed: it actually works. And you can invent with it yourself. Thus not needing converts, just users.
I agree with Pearl — this provoked more comment than I expected. Nicola is right, that we should refuse to be ‘consumers’ and instead be ‘customers’, at least until Peer Production eliminates the distinction between customers and producers. As for the critics, I’m unrepentent — a billion pieces of electronic junk of just one kind, in the landfill, every year, has got to stop.
Perhaps if we look at the cell-phone as a tool, instead of toy, then we might not that easily persuaded to buy YET another one with more features. I am still using mine from 2001. The ONLY reason why I had to change my phone is because I was moving to a different country that uses different technology. I rarely use my phone because I maintain there are not many things can be that important that I MUST be contacted anywhere, anytime, anyplace. I bought it more for urgent/emergency purposes. Consider it funny because I used to work for the wireless division of Motorola and Lucent.The same with computer. Toy or Tool?
I think all the electronic devices I’ve bought take up less volume and weigh less than the 300 pound television and console phonograph/radio we had when I was a kid. And they used some truly wonderful chemicals for insulation, electrolytes, and other non-conducting components.Also, beryllium is not a toxic material. I wouldn’t want to breath the dust from grinding it, but then I wouldn’t want to breath in the thorium oxide dust from the welding tools I use, or the zinc fumes from spot welding. All of these things are poisonous in the wrong form, but not toxic in everyday use.