A QUIZ: IS YOUR COUNTRY WAR-PRONE?

war I have long been interested in the causes of civil and international wars, and studied in university the high correlation between population density per arable acre, population growth rate, and the frequency and intensity of wars. Recently, I read approximately fifteen papers on the Internet, mostly by university professors or graduate students, analyzing various predictors of civil or international warfare. The twenty-three predictors they cite are listed in no particular order (more frequently cited factors are asterisked) in the following table:

Predictive Factor

Common in developed
countries? (A)
Common in under-
developed countries? (B)
Predictor of war
or civil unrest? (C)
Present in your country
today? (D)
1. Strong nationalist sentiment
sometimes
yes
yes

2. High rich/poor economic disparity*
no
sometimes
yes

3. Fear of critical resource shortages
sometimes
yes
yes

4. Economic growth slowing or negative
sometimes
yes
yes

5. High population density/arable sq.mi.
sometimes
sometimes
yes

6. High population growth rate
no
yes
yes

7. Feeling of political disenfranchisement
no
yes
yes

8. Crumbling or non-existent public
   infrastructure: health, schools,transport

no

yes

yes

9. Lingering bitterness or resentment    from a ‘defeated’ or suppressed group

no

sometimes

yes

10. Regional power bases with different
    interests than central government’s*

no

yes

yes

11. Financially or politically weak
    central government*

no

sometimes

yes

12. Recent loss of personal freedom or
    property, or climate of fear

no

sometimes

yes

13. High envy of others’ possessions
no
yes
yes

14. State terror: coercion or threats of
    violence against certain groups*

no

sometimes

yes

15. High number of weapons per capita
sometimes
sometimes
yes

16. High number of incarcerated citizens
sometimes
sometimes
yes

17. Government lacks legitimacy
no
yes
yes

18. Unstable economy or currency
no
yes
yes

19. Strong local personal hatreds*
no
yes
yes

20. Insurrection or war has a reasonable
    chance of succeeding

sometimes


sometimes

yes
21. High political polarization no
yes
yes
22. Lack of church-state separation no
sometimes
yes
23. Growing or chronic unemployment
no
yes
yes

What was most interesting to me was how factors felt locally, in every home and town and family, outweigh centrally fomented factors. War-mongering governments and insurgencies, even with captive media, apparently cannot sustain war support in the absence of these local factors.

It would seem from these predictors that the only things keeping many under-developed countries from constant warfare is strong totalitarian central control à la Tito (i.e. ‘no’ for factor eleven) and/or ensuring that everyone in the country is equally poor (i.e. ‘no’ for factor two). If so, it doesn’t bode well for democracy in Iraq or Afghanistan.

It would also seem that the US currently has an alarming number of the predictors of war or violent civil unrest, with a profile that looks more like that of an under-developed country than a developed one. I don’t know what to ascribe this to. Is it the lack of the sobering lesson of two world wars that Europe learned first hand in the last century? The enduring US legacy of frontier and civil war violence? The every-man-for-himself pioneer spirit? The impact of zealous and simplistic religious evangelism? An introspective education system that doesn’t adequately teach global history, geography, and cultural diversity, and the need for egalitarianism and tolerance?

Most of the academic studies that produced these predictors were focused on third world conflicts. We can only hope that their findings don’t translate to stabler, more affluent states.

This entry was posted in How the World Really Works. Bookmark the permalink.