In a recent post I quoted Bucky Fuller as saying
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” I argued that the best way to improve our terrible world — by reforming it socially and economically — was by walking away from the old culture and economic system that enslaves us all and diminishes the existence of all life on our planet, and creating a new relater-sharer culture and a new collaborative-well-being economy. Now, from Jonathan Schell’s new book The Unconquerable World comes, tentatively, almost identical advice for solving the world’s political ills. Citing the success of Ghandi’s and King’s non-violent activism, and the peaceful disintegration of the Soviet bloc, Schell argues that popular refusal to obey an oppressive government, irrational law or unwarranted call to arms, a manifestation of mass popular non-cooperation, the withholding of consent for violence and war, can undermine the mightiest of governments or tyrants bloodlessly. Schell suggests that “Lovers of freedom, of social justice, disarmers, peacekeepers, civil disobeyers, democrats, civil rights activists and defenders of the environment, legions in a single multiform cause…[wage] a revolution against violence — loosely coordinated, flexible, based on common principles and a common goal rather than a common blueprint — [that] would encompass a multitude of specific plans, including ones for disarmament, conventional as well as nuclear; democratization and human rights; advancement of international law; reform of the UN; local and regional peacekeeping and peacemaking; and social and ecological programs that form the indispensable content of a program of non-violent change. To neglect the last of these would be to neglact the lesson that campaigns of non-cooperation are empty without constructive programs. Justice for the poor (victims of “structural violence”) and rescue of the abused environment of the earth (victims of human violence done to other living creatures) are indispensable goals. So now we have three elements of a completely new society: a relater-sharer culture (to replace our 30,000 year old dysfunctional acquirer-settler culture), a collaborative-well-being economy (to replace our structurally obsolete and morally bankrupt consumer-capitalist economy), and a non-violent global consensual politic (to replace what Schell calls the “war system” that depends on military might to ensure at least occasional peace). That does not mean one global government. On the contrary, Schell argues we need greater accommodation of the rights of people and ‘nations’ within existing geographical borders, not homogenization. The enforcement of this new ‘order’, a purely democratic, feminist-inspired order, would come from simple non-cooperation with, withholding of consent from, regimes that call for arms and confrontation, until these regimes learn that people will not tolerate violence any more as a political solution, and in time will stop trying to resort to it. Perhaps naive, perhaps counter to our basic nature (if your view of that nature is pessimistic and catholic, which mine is not). But perhaps also the only hope for our battered and sick world. I feel some things starting to come together here. Maybe it isn’t too late. Time to stop fighting the old ways and start building something completely new. And when Mr. Bush, or his successors turn their frightened wrath on us, because we threaten everything they believe in, when they feel their windows shaking and their walls rattling, not because we’re tearing them down, but because we’re building underneath their rotting foundations, we can just peacefully sing them the song at right, urge them out of the way, and tell them: Something is happening here, but you don’t know what it is, |
Come writers and critics Come senators, congressmen Come mothers and fathers The line it is drawn, – Bob Dylan (a long, long time ago)
|
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Essential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
Evolution should take us there. I doubt that I will be alive to see it. I hope the child that the Baby is devoted to will have a crack at creating it.
Vaclav Havel provides some inspiration regarding protest/change.http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/VaclavHavel
While the new-usurps-the-old model is undeniably present, I don’t think this is a this-or-that situation.For example, please explain in Schell’s terms how the landmark Republican ideals of Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin became the GWB administration — where was the new that usurped the old?Or was it an incremental change opportuned by those with any intelligence who have receded from politics leaving a vacuum ripe for exploitation in their wake.
I agree with the basic premise of obsolescence as a greater force for change than revolutionary disruption. Obsolescence as a major change agent is reflected in non-activist aspects of society nearly everyday. If you want to replace the current hot cell phone, mp3 player, computer and so on, you do it by creating the next best model.In this case we are talking about replacing people’s value systems. Without real world examples and the traditional features and benefits of the new way, this won’t happen. No more than you will change an incumbent software application based on promised vaporware. So the question becomes, who will cover the R&D expenses for this new system? My hope is that the costs can be distributed in a peer-to-peer manner. (I almost hope this is the true purpose of P2P networks)Getting those costs addressed will be the greatest obstacle. The ideals, theories, and specifications are coming together as you mention. But, without a means to cover the cost of the time and resources required to build the working demos of these concepts, they will remain vaporware. From my experience, it’s almost a catch-22. It would work if everyone would do it. But, no one can afford to do it until it’s working in a manner that will support those involved.I won’t give up, but it’s going to be a long haul that will probably require completion by future generations dedicated to the change. The current capitalist leaders may find themselves supplanted by cultures that have fallen behind in regards to capitalist development. It may be a second or third world culture that knocks on the door of Mr. Bush’s future successor.
Bill: Don’t know if you’ve read Unconquerable World or not, but Havel’s story features prominently in it. It is an interesting and inspiring story. I confess, though, I don’t know what inspired him to support Bush’s invasion of Iraq. Did he really think it was about liberation?
Gary: Zakaria makes the point that today’s (US) political parties are merely organs available for purchase by the highest bidder, and I think he’s right in that. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats of today have any loyalty to the principles upon which their parties were founded. The fact that the Democrats can forward some of the racist Southerners and at the same time Robert Byrd, demonstrates how meaningless and expedient the parties have become. Until Byrd leaves the stage, fortunately, there won’t be a complete vacuum.
Doug: You’re probably right, though I’m not sure we have enough time for that slow an evolution. My hope is that we can do a cultural equivalent of ‘rapid prototyping’, and the resultant model will be so compelling that people will jump on board quickly. It will all depend on the perception of urgency, on getting past the slowly-boiling-frog problem we currently face. Even global warming has been too easy for ecological holocaust-denyers to shrug off. But if we wait until India and Pakistan nuke each other (almost an inevitability) it may be too late.
I wonder how the EU fits into this.
Britt Blaser on the blog Escapable Logic has a wonderful piece of writing on how thousands and thousands of people at $100 a head can buy back their government – rather than corporations and lobbyists in the hundreds buying the Bush administration encore at tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars a pop, delivered at sanctioned expensive fund-raising events.