In a recent post I argued that IT and Knowledge Management (KM) should merge into a combined TechKnowledgy department that would, in addition to the traditional responsibilities for managing the financial, HR and sales systems and technical hardware of the organization, take on these two important new responsibilities focused on the individual ‘knowledge worker’:
1. Social Software Applications: Development of new social software applications for front-line employees, including:
Now I’ve put together, in Word format, a downloadable Business Case for Personal Productivity Improvement. I’ve written this so that it can be used by both:
I hope you find it useful and I would welcome comments on it. I am looking to organize a virtual collaborative enterprise of IT/KM professionals interested in providing this service, so I may also post it on Ryze/LinkedIn. What do you think — could people make a living doing this? |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Essential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
Hey DaveYou have been selected as one of the 10 ten blogs in Canada this monthhttp://www.blogscanada.ca/topblogs/Congrats Rob
Thanks, Rob. Look forward to your thoughts on this post.
Dear DavePlease bear with me. I think that you are one of the finest writers/thinkers around today but on the KM side of things I have a concern. Maybe I am misreading you?I sense that you hope that KM will enable workers to use information more efficiently? I don’t think that organizations need to become more efficient. I think that the whole idea of “efficiency” is part of our problem. It drives us to become like machines. It is in my mind the machine like culture of how we organize today that is at the dsource of our poor relationships with each other, with animals, with theland and with nature as a whole. What in nature is “efficient”? Nature is effective through having good relationships. System interact based on them. We have become so destructive because we have no sense of our relationship with the other and hence we destroy systems.My hope is the social software will be an agent of change in work culture to a place where real rather than machine relationship can thrive. I think that social softeare is very subversive – they open up relationships. They open up systems and make systems visible. I feel that the great work that we intuiitviely know is before us is to change the nature of work and how it is organized not only structurally but most importantly culturallyKM as I hear you assumes that the use of explicit information is a productive concept. We can challenge that quite easily. Firstly the explicit level for ideas etc is tiny compared to the implicit level which can only be accessed by dilaogue. Secondly really new ideas that will make a difference by definition have to be rejected by our meme immune system. We can only be moved to accept the new idea by the relationship that we have to the messenger. It is only a peer who cares for us that can break through thsi immune system. Explicit information and explicit process is not a powerful agency. True relationships are.I fear that “KM” is the coopt movement of the corporate worldthat I know repels you as it does me. I have written more herehttp://smartpei.typepad.com/robert_patersons_weblog/2003/11/the_social_limi.html
Rob: I’m with you all the way. If you will forgive me a bit of business-speak let me explain. PPI has two ‘customers’: (a) the front-line people who need it to be effective (and who are currently frustrated by systems that give them almost nothing useful), and (b) management of these organizations who will insist on efficiency improvements before they will pay for PPI. I deliberately chose the term ‘productivity’ as a surrogate for both terms.I have spoken to both front-line workers and management about PPI and it is the former who are most enthusiastic about it. They simply want to do their jobs better, and they believe PPI will help them do it. So PPI will make them happier, more confident, and improve the quality of their work. Perhaps even to the point it will prevent their jobs from being ‘offshored’, though that is not its function. And because PPI has to be done face-to-face it can only be done locally, so the people who provide the PPI service will be local.Don’t worry — I haven’t been coopted. I have other things up my sleeve to combat the evils of corporatism, as my ‘world of ends’ post I think indicated. And in the meantime I believe anything that makes the life of the front-line worker more humane and bearable is a good thing, and PPI I think will help. Even if it does have to be sold as an ‘efficiency’ booster to those that have to pay for the program.But you’ve got me thinking. To use an analogy, is making factory farms more humane until we can get rid of them helpful or harmful to the cause? Not sure…
Hera hear to the both of you. The nature of “work” will. I hope, move further and further away from Taylorism and towards dialogue – “what do we need to do and how do we need to do it, now, to get this or that done, to serve needs and wants.The trouble today is that it has all been streamlined and encased in “electronic concrete” in the service of efficiency, whereas a better goal might have been integration so as to allow more time, flexibility, randomness, care, respect and reciprocity.Given that the “electronic concrete” will continue to exist – there’s an industry selling that to industires, after all – should we not, through Dave’s personal productivity ideas, be trying to make the “mass customization” of work come to life…allowing people’s hearts and minds to be engaged while they are working in and on the large integrated IT systems, using those systems to better serve their fellow human beings, not only the profitability goals of the corporations?
Dave -I was just discussing this with a colleague of mine, who believes that the entire technology basis of knowledge management is in the process of evolving into much more flexible, inuitive and contextual systems he calls “Intelligent Content Services.” In his view, all of the KW services you talk about will, in 3-5 years, be integrated into powerful middleware suites that automate many of the “gateways” (e.g., improperly-constructed search queries, islands of data in disconnected repositories, poorly-understood practices for collaboration, etc.) and make access to critical information much easier and more contextual for knowledge workers.Key quote from his report: “Intelligent content services potentially mitigate the need for search and other forms of delivery by creating an environment that “makes sense” of content independently and proactively of human activity, then associates relevant content with work environments.”I think the widespread adoption of this kind of technology would mitigate many of the KW productivity problems and frustrations you mention.
Rob: This is, as Shakespeare would say, ‘devoutly to be wished’. My concern is that no matter how smart it is, middleware can’t ascertain context. Every human has his/her own set of mental models and semantics. There is huge signal loss as it gets ‘codified’ or ‘made explicit’ (written down), and further huge signal loss as the readers attempt to ‘translate’ it to their mental models and semantics. That’s one of the reasons ‘best practices’ databases never lived up to their promise. It’s also the reason why intelligent agents haven’t worked, and why “intelligent content services” is a pipedream. That’s why I’ve been advocating decentralized, personal content management, pulling knowledge back from context-poor central repositories to personal content repositories (weblogs +) where there is at least some chance of getting the context and reducing the signal loss. The author can provide context better, faster and more effectively than any database, and you get to the author using Social Network Apps. Search engines are great for finding information, next-to-useless for finding knowledge, and middleware ain’t going to change that.
I’m not so sure, Dave. If the system can learn the inter-relationships between people, the kind of content they produce and the kind of content they consume, it doesn’t seem such a big step to boil that information up into a metadata store that transparently applies a set of personalized filters to every search. There will always be certain kinds of content searches that are too ideosyncratic or ad-hoc to be simplified, but if you apply a series of 80-20 rules, I think it’s possible to limit the need for human intervention only to those situations where it really adds value.