Fareed Zacharia describes two distinct qualities, constitutional liberalism (“the rule of law and basic human rights”), and democracy (“selection of government through free and fair, competitive, multiparty elections”) as the cornerstones of a healthy, peaceful and sustainable state. He laments the rise of “illiberal democracies”, where democratic governments have deemed their ballot victory to put them above the law, eroding basic constitutional freedoms and corrupting the democratic process. As the result of an horrendous double blow yesterday, the U.S. has lost its credibility as either a democracy or a constitutionally liberal state. First, the arch-conservative and deeply partisan U.S. Supreme Court ruled, by its now standard 5-4 margin, that gerrymandering is not unconstitutional. Ruling on the outrageous redistricting plan in Pennsylvania, which essentially guarantees incumbent Republicans two thirds of the state’s seats in Congress although they have a minority of the registered voters, the Chief Justice threw it back to the executive and legislative branches, saying, incredibly, “Our legislators have reached the point of declaring that, when it comes to apportionment, ‘We are in the business of rigging elections.'”
The Court made it clear that there is not really any point in anyone in the U.S. bothering to vote in future Congressional elections because gerrymandering has already determined the results in all but a handful of districts. But in abrogating its responsibility in a baldly partisan manner, the Court also said that it is up to the ‘legislators’ to fix the system, and that even though, under Zacharia’s definition above, the U.S. can no longer call itself a democracy, they will not declare this completely fraudulent practice unconstitutional. The NYT calls on both parties to introduce “nonpartisan redistricting”, as is done in Iowa, Canada, and just about every true Western democracy, a process that the thoroughly corrupt judge Scalia denied, in his argument for the majority supporting the continuation of gerrymandering, was reasonably possible. But asking the legislators to regulate themselves is like asking the fox to run the hen-house. The judiciary, not the legislature, is responsible for protecting the country against laws that are undemocratic and unconstitutional, and it has utterly and disgracefully failed to do so in this ruling. The second blow came in an announcement from the ACLU that its constitutional challenge of the Patriot Act cannot be publicized because the Justice Department has put a ‘gag order’ on the challenge while the Presnit campaigns around the country for renewal and expansion of this outrageous law. So, first, we have a law that allows the arbitrary arrest, indefinite detention, denial of constitutional rights and freedoms, and unlimited rights of search and seizure of anyone by the paramilitary FBI/Homeland Security brownshirts, with no need for demonstration of reasonable cause, just the issuance of a vaguely worded “national security letter”. And the perpetrators can hide behind “national security” to deprive the victims of this law, their families and their lawyers, of any information about why they have been victimized, and who authorized it. And now, to muffle any criticism of the law, the Justice Department is prohibiting opponents of the law from even talking to the public about challenges to it. So, again, under Zacharia’s definition, the U.S. is now no longer a constitutionally liberal state — the rule of law, and basic human rights and freedoms, are both abrogated, and in no small way, by the Patriot Act. There is no longer freedom of speech, freedom of dissent, freedom of assembly, right to a speedy and fair trial, or right to information about government actions. Rule of law has been subverted to the absolute authority of the FBI and Department of Homeland Security to do whatever, in its discretion, limited only by the whim of the government of the day, it wants to do. To someone living in a democracy and a constitutional liberal country, as I do, where gerrymandering and laws like the Patriot Act are unthinkable, the fact that these two rulings occurred in one day, in an election year, with hardly a peep from the mainstream press or the candidates, is absolutely terrifying. Although, to be sure, these outrages have not yet been used in the U.S. to the extent that similarly undemocratic and constitutionally illiberal processes and laws have been used in Cuba, China, Iraq, North Korea and others of the most “unfree” states in the world, there is no reason to believe, after yesterday’s double blow, that they couldn’t be, and won’t be in the future. Especially when (not if) the next terrorist attack on U.S. soil occurs. History is replete with examples showing that the decline from liberal democracy to ruthless and tyrannical dictatorship can occur quickly, and begins with a single step. Yesterday, the U.S. took two giant leaps along that path. The rest of the world can only watch, and shudder, at how easily and quietly the fall of a once-great country is beginning. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
A thoroughly excellent post.It would also be nice to have a fundamentally just (in a Rawlsian sense) society. For example, a just tax structure and a commitment to employment.On the tax structure, see David Cay Johnston.On employment, see today’s Center For American Progress report comparing Canada and the US on employment.
I don’t see why you want the courts involved in districting. The current system of defining districts in Canada was devised by the Canadian legislature, not its courts. Some states in the U.S. have similar independent commissions.This decision reversed one from 1986, so the law has been set back to the dark days of 1985, where–according to you, evidently–there was no multi-party democracy in the U.S.
Ken: I don’t want the courts ‘involved’, I want them to strike down gerrymandering as unconstitutional, and mandate the appointment of independent electoral commissions in each state (my understanding is that only Iowa has such a commission now). The legislators won’t act until they have no constitutional alternative — it’s against their self-interest. And I don’t think you can compare the recent computer-assisted redistricting exercises with the much less sophisticated gerrymandering that went on in the ’80s and before.
Unfortunately, the Rawlsian system of justice is predicated on a practice of reflection that alienates one from reality. I would prefer a system of government along the lines of Nozick’s minimalism (IMHO, “just tax structure” is an oxymoron, since a tax is always an injustice). Unfortunately, there is nothing minimalist about the Bush administration. Tax less but spend more, become more socially invasive, mess with crap oversees, renew a failing war on drugs – sheesh, is this guy the anti-libertarian, or what?
The fact that Kennedy would decry gerrymandering in such strong language, yet still join the majority decision, suggests the problem is in the Constitution. Just because fair districting is fundamental to the proper functioning of district-based representation doesn’t mean the Founders thought to put it explicitly in the Constitution. Which means that we need to stop wasting time with anti-gay-marriage and anti-flag-burning amendments and work on an anti-gerrymandering one.(psst … Maybe we should all move to Alaska — in your graphic it’s still free.)
It’s profound to think that the civic mechanisms that are in place to make the U.S. a liberal democracy and a “land of the free” can be so corrupted and perverted to this extent. It’s very depressing to think about it. Yup, pretty spooky. Makes me think of Margaret Atwood’s ‘Handmaid’s Tale’.
On the point… I hope you don’t mind if I share your post on Ryze (network SANS FRONTIERE)Agnes