I‘m working on an update of the long paper that describes my ‘journey’ to environmental awareness and activism. Rather than starting the revision at the beginning, I thought I’d start with what was most important — the final section with the ‘root cause analysis’ and the ‘solution map’ that ultimately became my How to Save the World Roadmap.
When I first published this paper on my blog, the charts that accompanied it generated more buzz than the paper itself. You can find them here and here. Since then, I’ve come to realize that these variables are less cause-and-effect than components of a self-reinforcing and self-perpetuating system. In Systems Thinking terminology, the ‘virtuous circle’ of life that existed in nature until about 30,000 years ago was ‘disrupted’ by events that upset the equilibrium and rippled through the system, producing a new self-reinforcing and self-perpetuating system that we call ‘civilization’. Based on the research I’ve since done on population, violence, and on our political, economic and social systems, I’ve now updated the charts to show the circular nature and greater interrelationship of the 19 elements. The first chart shows how nature works as a self-managed, self-balancing planetary organism — a map perhaps of what is called the Gaia Theory: And the second chart shows the equivalent man-made systems that have come into play with the dawn of civilization 30,000 years ago. This replacement system, alas, is not self-balancing — it is utterly unsustainable, though our awareness of that fact is only a century old: How did this unfortunate transformation occur? We don’t know for sure, but the most compelling theory I have seen is that, as a consequence of the last ice age, and/or the invention of efficient hunting tools (like the spear, and the bow and arrow), there was a sudden and massive shortage of the big, lumbering game that man had hunted so easily since his emergence on the planet. So the element to the right of the red box changed from “Abundant Resources and Energy” (chart 1) to “Scarcity of Resources and Energy” (chart 2). Usually when this happens (except when it is a result of a major extinction event like that caused by the meteorite impact 65 million years ago that wiped out most of life on Earth), nature is able to fix the imbalance. It does so by causing the species suffering the shortage to reduce its fertility rate, temporarily increasing its mortality rate (more of them are eaten by predators, and epidemics arise to reduce over-crowding), and the result is a reduction in their consumption of the scarce resources (food, land etc.), until the scarce resources have had time to replenish themselves (illustrated in chart 3, below, which is based on the work of Darwin, Lovelock, and Edward T. Hall). In this sense, our planetary organism Earth behaves analogously to a human organism — when there’s a shortage of food, it goes into hibernation, lowers metabolism, and draws on internal reserves (fat) to compensate until a new external food supply is found. But the situation 30,000 years ago was different. Man had developed enough intellect to institute some man-made solutions to scarcity instead of relying on the ones nature had always used. These human inventions included agriculture, animal domestication, and then, to make those work, a whole series of social, political and economic systems. We created man-made ‘stores’ of resources to offset the natural shortages, and tools to protect ourselves and our food supplies from, and even eradicate, natural predators and diseases. Our intellect tipped the balance of power, at least temporarily, from nature to man. Once that ‘tipping point’ had been reached, the rest of the 19 elements on Chart 1 were transformed into the corresponding elements on Chart 2. By enormous strength of ingenuity and will, we have entrenched this New World Order for 30,000 years, and exported it to every corner of the globe. The problem is that it’s unsustainable, and the kind of tinkering with it espoused by optimists and those that deny we are in crisis, just won’t fix it — both nature and civilization are immensely complex systems, and civilization is also immensely fragile. We need to simultaneously work on many of these 19 elements to create a new ‘tipping point’ to restore the natural system that worked for millions of years before civilization. That doesn’t mean going back to a pre-civilization lifestyle — that would be foolish and impossible. It means moving forward on many fronts — political, social, economic, ecological, technological and in the way we make a living. Let’s take a look at some of the weakest points in Chart 2 to see how we might, with coordinated or ingenious small-group effort, flip some of them over to their corresponding Chart 1 states:
I have deliberately put political activism as the final category of this list, because the more I learn about change, the more I am coming to believe that politics and law are much less effective levers for change than innovation, social activism or community-based enterprise formation. Political activism is an uphill battle against the status quo and against entrenched wealth and power. Social activism and community-based enterprises, by contrast, work peer-to-peer, citizen-to-citizen and consumer-to-consumer and, thanks to the power of modern communications, can spread virally very quickly, undermining the political and economic establishment by working beneath their radar, until, starved of its grass-roots citizen and consumer support, this establishment simply crumbles, no longer needed. Most of the bullets on the Political Activism list above are, in fact, more about undoing things that are contributing to ecological collapse, than about doing something else. And innovation, which respects no political or economic authority, can help immensely. Many of my readers have told me “that’s fine, but I’m not rich, powerful, expert, entrepreneurial or innovative, so what can I do now to help, to make a difference?” That’s a fair question, and I’m developing the answer to it as the final section of the revised paper (and also as a more practical replacement for the Roadmap). I should have it finished next week, and I’ll publish it here first. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
Dear Dave here i go:You said “our intellectual tipped the balance of power” to me it sounds like the most of our technology (or inventions) has been developed to attack the nature and i think that its a focus problem: the real proble is not about what we develop, but how we use it , so the problem is not the technology it self or the human intellect but the human behaviour; being more specific: knifes are a great tool (ask doctors) but some peoples use it to hurt, so the proble is not the knife it self but the people who use it in the wrong way.Why is this important to mention it? because technology is not he problem so we cant BAN it, we have to use it in the best way we could, you mentioned too about ban the human fertility technologies, that would be very unfair and dictatorial!!!! What would happend to the people who cant have childrens and need this kind of help? Do you prefer children kidnaping int he underdeveloped countries to satisfy this need? its like the marihuana discussion, noy because some people use it as a drug it has to be banned, the real discussion has been forgotten for this prejudice How can we use the marihuana to have a better quality of life? it can help to control the pain in some ill people, but our prejudice avoid the discussion the passion is showes not the reason.Another difficult point its economical point (but i dont see you gice a clear wieght on your arguments) its the economical point, here you are talking about ban some technology or products…but What will we do with people that work in that industry? ill gice you an example: In Mexico several turistic areas has been stoped for negative ecological impact, but many, many people remains with no jobs and they hace to cross the border as “wetbacks” to be humilliated, asessinated, or trated as slaves in the states so How can we balance this equation?? (im not talkink about destroy the entire ecosystem to give jobs but putting the social econimical weight too in a very real scenario).You talk about bioreginalism Dave what seems amazing to me, but once again we are forgetting the economic theory… Do you know that the cost of s imple mango in Canada would be more than a kilo (more than 2 pounds) of the same fruit in any mexican market? would not be a waste od resources too? Would not you be helping some inefficient process too? (once again im trying to show or may be to ask What is the middel point Dave?, you have to see both sides of the story) in this case the politicians are not the guilties but the people who wants to buy more product, cheaper and faster (and i dont blame them either).What i am really agree its about education, that is the real key!!!!!Another interesting point, but very polemic, you talk about forgive the debt to the 3 world (and as you may realize i live in one of those countries) but we wold have to be very carefully with this topic How many people didnt use this debt for their personal use or benefit? How many of the presidents or secretaries didnt use the debt to cover their stupidity??? they have to pay Dave, not everybody (See the Lopez Portillo case, former president of Mexico, when we went out of politics was one of the richest men int he world, and the whole country was carrying a HUGE debt) they have to pay (may be not monetary but in jail) because they betray the confidence of the other countries and the other people!!!!.
sorry i forgot patadeperro@lycos.com
Nature, red in tooth and claw? Nasty, brutish and short?Remember that 30,000 years ago only one in five of us made it to adulthood. Of those, all of them died before they were 30. Of those, many had debilitating diseases and suffered crippling injuries.There’s no such thing as ecological balance. Nature exists in a constant state of flux, moving between one catastrophe and another. Self-correcting mechanisms aren’t driven by something, they don’t exist as forces: they occurr only as a result of overuse and resource abuse. Every single population grows out of control until it runs up against a barrier.
Renee: The picture of pre-civilization life as “nasty, brutish and short” is a complete myth, a con job by those that want to subjugate us, to have us to believe “we’ve never had it so good”. The anthropologists and economists who have studied human history before civilization (Peter Jay and Marshall Sahlins, notably) now say that this was a period of ‘original affluence’, with easy hunting, a ‘work day’ of one hour, with the rest of the day for leisure activities, and mortality not from diseases and ‘crippling injuries’ but, like every other species that lives today in joy and balance with the rest of Earth’s life, by being eaten, quickly and painlessly, as part of the food chain. The risk of a joyous, easy, comfortable life being cut short by being eaten was simply accepted, not feared, much as we today accept the risk of traffic deaths as just one of the risks one takes to make the most of life. The new consensus is that those that were not eaten had a good chance of living comfortably to their 70s and 80s, much as we do today. I don’t know where you got this dreadful picture of life before civilization, but whether it’s based on religious dogma or discredited scientific dogma, it’s nonsense — and you’ve been had. That’s precisely why improving our critical thinking figures so prominently in my ‘how to save the world’ prescription.
The Kalahari bushmen of today spend an average of 19 hours per week in pursuit of food – that’s about three hours per day, not one. But: they enjoy a much higher standard of living than their neighbours in non-industrialized nations. They also have 10% fewer people over 60 than their neighbours.According to an article by Jared Diamond in Discover, the average livespan of a hunter-gatherer was around 25; immediately following the agricultural revolution it fell to 19, due to the kind of epidemic dieases inherent to large populations. It wasn’t until the 20th century that average lifespans exceeded 50 years. Recent research in Shanghai has found that, 6000 years ago, the average lifespand was under 29.Hunter-gatherer societies practice infanticide as the most common form of birth control. This is because nomadic women can only have one baby every four years: they need to carry their toddlers until they’re big enough to keep up with the adults. Agricultural society results in an immediate spike in birth rate, understandably, and this perpetuates agricultural society since there are more and more people.Just some thoughts.
Renee: No argument with your data. I would guess that when South Africa abounded with wild game (before desertification and poaching and killing off much of the larger game) the hunting was easier. I’d also guess that Europeans brought many of the diseases that have lowered their lifespan. An average lifespan of 25-30 might mean that half of hunter-gatherers were eaten in their youth, and the other half lived to old age — I don’t think it necessarily correlates with quality of life or incidence of disease or injury. The infanticide data surprises me — it’s extremely rare in other species, so I wonder whether this, too, is a man-made ‘civilization’ behaviour. Thanks for keeping me honest ;-)
Infanticide is probably rare in other species because so many of the infants are simply eaten.
You wrote: “Many of my readers have told me ‘that’s fine, but I’m not rich, powerful, expert, entrepreneurial or innovative, so what can I do now to help, to make a difference?’I wouldn’t call it a fair question…I would call it an EASY question. It’s like saying “I’m not extraordinary and I don’t feel like doing what I need to do in order to become extraordinary in any particular area of life, so please tell me something easy that I can do every day that will be challenging in a generic, non-individualistic kind of way.” I’ve seen many people ignore their individual potential for one-size-fits-all prescriptions for change. In each of us there is the capacity to be an amazing writer, or a world-famous violinist, or the best whatever in the world, and it is in finding this niche that I believe one person can be at their most effective in changing the world.But anyhow, thanks for the fantastic content…I envy your writing skill and clarity of thought.-Krystlewww.SustainableWays.com
Thanks David. I posted an excerpt of yours on my blog – Technology Initiatives for Peace.Enjoy, Sri