Recently I summarized my long analysis of How to Save the World in four bullet points:
It’s a very ambitious goal, but after two years of study I don’t see how anything less that this revolutionary, worldwide program has a chance to save us from social and ecological catastrophe by the end of this century. I have couched this program as a social and educational one, because it so threatens the established hierarchies of wealth and power (it almost inevitably would mean massive decentralization of power, and the collapse of much of the capitalist economic system) that, as I have argued elsewhere, I don’t see a political and economic program aimed at the same ends standing any chance at all of succeeding. I’ve also said that I see innovation and technology playing a critical role in achieving these deadlines and targets, in three ways:
The idea of this third application of technology “just in case” has distressed many of my readers, but in my opinion if we don’t have this option available the alternatives could be much uglier and highly discriminatory. Likewise, I think we need a coercive “Plan B”, entailing the humane and carefully targeted sabotage of some of the most wasteful attributes of our existing economic system, to be used if and only if social and educational actions fail to achieve agreed upon deadlines and targets for consumption reduction: If you can’t get people to reduce demand, you have to intervene to reduce excess supply. I would hope that no “Plan B” would have to be deployed, but I also think it would be naive not to have one in case it’s needed. So I got to thinking about the probability of success. Both our instincts and our reasoning ability motivate us to take action when the probability of success is reasonably high, and not to act if it isn’t. I’ve had enough experience in my life (both personal and business) with situations where people are asked to make “leaps of faith” to appreciate that trying to persuade people to do things they don’t think will succeed is an arduous, if not impossible, task. Just take a look at Bush’s efforts to persuade politicians and then the American people of the wisdom of invading Iraq: He argued (dishonestly but very effectively) that the invasion would be quick, easy, and inexpensive, that the Iraqis would welcome Americans with flowers and crowds of joy. If he’d been honest about the probability of success, he would probably have failed to convince either Congress or the people of the wisdom of the invasion. What do we need to do to increase the probability of success of the 4-step change program above? Well, if we follow the most popular business change model, that espoused by John Kotter in Leading Change, we need to:
Kotter argues that you don’t bring about sustained, meaningful change by edict. You need to persuade, enthuse, and engage people in sufficient numbers to change behaviours, beliefs or processes. Miss one of these eight steps, or get them out of order, he says, and you’ll fail. How could we apply these eight steps to the 4-step process needed to save the world? Here are a few ideas:
The Kotter model, designed as it is for business, does not translate perfectly to a whole-world change program. As much as a ‘powerful guiding coalition’ for global change would help, it is probably unrealistic to expect global leaders in any sector, who have a vested interest in the status quo, to support the change, let alone guide it. This is going to have to be a mass movement in which the leaders follow (mostly reluctantly) the lead of the people. The Kotter model also came out before the power of the Internet to galvanize and influence public opinion and organize for change was well established, and before the Wisdom of Crowds successfully repudiated the cult of leadership and the conventional wisdom that the work and advice of experts is more valuable than that of the mass of people on the front lines. I don’t claim to have all, or even most, of the answers to convincing the majority of the people on this planet of the wisdom of my 4-point program. It’s an iterative process, and many of the ideas that will persuade people of its appropriateness, urgency and viability will come from the people themselves. But let’s suppose we are able to convince a few billion people that:
What’s next? Well, once someone is convinced of the merits of making a change, they want to know what to do, precisely and specifically, to achieve it. When it comes to overpopulation, that’s pretty obvious, but in the case of overconsumption, we need to have some standards that will provoke heavy consumers to cut back, and give them some specific ideas how to do it (kind of like an ecological footprint ‘diet plan’), and recognize and reward those who have already achieved that standard. When you break the problem down into these components, and look at solutions at the individual level, intractable problems start to look a lot more solvable. Maybe the chances for our world, fixed from the bottom up, are better than we thought. Now we only need to convince a few more billion people. The chart at the top of this post is explained in this article. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
I wonder how big the “huge concensus” needs to be. I have begun to think that perhaps the whole idea of a tipping point means that we don’t need to convince billions of people, as you say, but rather only a handfull (all be it a large handfull). If this is enough to cause the tipping point, wont the rest follow? Isn’t this the whole concept that the tipping point is based on? I wonder if when we reach that tipping point, the people who are passive now about our misuse of the environment will not be just as passive about any actions and policies that help the environment. The tipping point is that magical place where the momentum suddenly shifts, and our work becomes a whole lot easier. Or am I just thinking this way because the idea of reaching consensus among billions of people is so overwhelming?
I was just in a discussion with Goran Carstedt. Former president at Volvo and IKEA, the former president of Volvo France and Ikea, and one of the points he mentioned was that a leaders’ job is simply to remove obstacles. It’s uncanny how every day when I read your site it somehow relates to (and clarifies) something I had been thinking about recently.Regarding the “Plan B” I think I commented on your site once before wondering at what point you think a Plan B would be needed. In my mind, I somehow feel that if we ever reached a point where people decided that Plan B was needed, it is probably already too late. I wonder, at that point, what would be worth saving. Perhaps it is just that we have different ideas of when the Plan B would have to be implemented. Would this be something that would have to be democratically decided? Or is it something that would have to be imposed?”Miss one of these eight steps, or get them out of order, he says, and you’ll fail.” Yes, and it is also important to note that each step need not be fully completed before moving onto the next. Society is after all, a system. We must establish urgency enough to get a few people working (I think this already off to a great start). The further steps will also help to establish more urgency, etc… I also would like to change the word “Communicate” with “Share” in regards to the vision. “Communicate” sounds to dismally authoritarian in this context. If the “coalition” has to push it onto the rest of the people, perhaps it is not a good vision (even if it is the only way to save the world). Maybe when we are unable to get people to “share” the vision, as was presumably done by the guiding coalition, that is the point when we realize that our time is actually up. We can only save people who want to be saved of their own free will.
Regarding point number 2, two things.1. How does this not become the rhetoric of the early 70’s, whereby in “15 years there will be massive starvation, etc, etc”. One of the OTHER features of “civilization” has been the technological capacity to FIX things that were becoming very problematic – say like with the food revolution of the 70’s, we can and are supporting a much higher capacity of food production. In this case, things aren’t ‘FIXED’. 2. In the same vein, technological optimists such as Bucky Fuller, cheerfully think the earth could support 100 billion people. How do you avoid the doom and gloom label?Society can and will respond to real crisis – the real problem is that if things have gone to far, and can’t be repaired after said crisis. That’s the danger for humanity as a whole.
“2. We need to achieve a huge consensus that overpopulation and overconsumption are the two root causes underlying all the problems we face today, and agree on deadlines and targets for correcting them.”I believe this starts off on the wrong premise. The “root causes” of today’s problems are not overpopulation and overconsumption. These are only the symptoms of a more fundamental problem which is: the lack of an ethical consensus. The “root” of overconsumption arises from the greed of a few who advertise their wares and create an artificial “need” for the item. Get rid of the greed, you get rid of the rest.What I see as the most needed first step is the re-establishment of the Golden Rule, the fundamental basis of which is to show others the same dignity, respect, and kindness as we want for ourselves. This is where the whole concept of justice comes from and is about maintaining fairness, balance, and harmony.In America, workers are not being paid a fair wage. Why? Because a rapacious few have no regard for others. This lack of regard for others is the root of all evil and can be seen played out in just about every national policy America has or fails to enforce from not punishing and closing polluting businesses to denying health care to the elderly. This is between the Scrooges and the law of the jungle and the Tiny Tims and Golden Rule. I think you can get serious consensus on this without a lot of effort.Also, please see materials at http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org.
Kevin: Absolutely. But even with the power of the Tipping Point we have a lot of work to do. Once it’s reached I don’t think the problem will be indifference so much as ‘learned helplessness’ — the pathology that most people have built up that makes them timid to think there is anything they can do, no matter what they want to do. As for Plan B, maybe you’re right and I’m getting too far ahead of myself worrying about it. I just don’t want to put all my eggs in one basket. And ‘share’ is a better word than ‘communicate’, since we all internalize information differently.JC: I think the danger is that if we always believe that things will fix themselves in time, we will leave it too late. That’s why I’m so mad at Ehrich and those who predicted doom and gloom imminently. It’s going to take a while for things to go catastrophically wrong, and it’s going to happen in small incremental steps. It’s probably already started.NeoLotus: With respect, I think you have the cause and effect reversed. I believe the greed and hoarding is due to fear and stress caused by overpopulation and overcompetition for increasingly scarce resources. You can’t fix the symptom — you have to fix the cause.