Doesn’t it seem strange to you that we’re seeing all this gnashing of teeth over whether Iran — an oil-rich state — is or is not developing, or hiding, nuclear weapons capability, while at the same time:
I’m no conspiracy theorist, and I don’t believe the US government was behind, or knew in advance about, 9/11, but it is becoming clear to me that the US government only really cares about ‘terrorism’ when the possible perpetrator is an oil-rich state. They are not interested in investing time or taxpayers’ money to address terrorist threats from poor states (like North Korea), or from stateless groups (like the myriad Arab fundamentalist sects that the government likes to lump together under the name Al Qaeda is if it were one global coordinated group), or from individuals, nor is it interested in addressing bioterror threats at all. When it comes to non-oil-state players or bioweaponry, it’s all talk and no action. If I’m wrong about this, please point out the evidence to the contrary. If I’m right, what does this mean? Here’s some more information to digest, some of which I reported earlier in my discussion of Richard Preston’s investigative book The Demon in the Freezer:
Back to what all this means. I think the consequences are staggering, and have been played down by politicians, governments, the media, the biotech and genetic manufacturing industries because it is not in their interests to raise the level of public fear when there is no simple answer, no ready attackable scapegoat, and when the actions of many of these players contribute enormously to increasing the risk of bioterrorism (or of an horrendous bioweapons accident). What goes on at USAMRIID is not a top-level state secret for nothing. And while I don’t believe the US government and its researchers are preparing anything Machiavellian, I do believe they are doing most of the work that potential bioterrorists need done, and are certainly ready to respond in kind when other bioweapons-researching states attack. Problem is, just like the Daschle antrax and the 9/11 attacks, they won’t really know who launched the attack, it probably wouldn’t be an attackable state anyway, and, if the victims are food animals or plants, they won’t even know for sure if it was an attack. This is a genie-out-of-the-bottle problem with no easy answer. Bioweapons research, like any other military research, is as leaky as a sieve, and if you’ve studied history you’d have to be delusional to believe that anything discovered by USAMRIID will stay a secret for more than a few weeks. So a complete cessation of all bioweapons research, as well as a cessation of the HGDP (the human genome diversity project out of California, which is attempting to genetically map cultural and ethnic diversity, ostensibly to help rid the world of diseases to which certain ethnic groups seem genetically predisposed), would certainly slow down the risk of bioterrorism. But ultimately the knowledge needed to create devastating human and agricultural bioweapons with global reach, for a small amount of money with a small amount of work by a small number of people with relatively modest education and resources, will be upon us. It’s inevitable. So the answer to the implied question in the title of this article is simple: Just stick around and pay attention. If you’re so inclined, you’ll soon be able to make a name for yourself for sheer devastation that will push Osama bin Ladin, Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber, and the Daschle anthrax mailer, into the footnotes of history. Or, if you prefer, stay incognito. All due to the double-edged swords of technology, human ingenuity and the impossibility of keeping knowledge bottled up. You probably know I usually conclude my articles with some personal thoughts on ‘what we should do about it’. This time around I don’t know what to say. It would certainly help if only a few lunatics, rather than billions of oppressed people (and rising by leaps and bounds every day), were motivated to want to kill billions of others, even at the risk of ending the world. It would help, as well, if the most popular religions all over the planet didn’t promise an eternal afterlife, forgiveness for everything, divine intervention to save us from all calamities, and rewards for defending the faith against all others. But I might as well wish for the moon and the stars — we’re too far gone and going too fast to fix those things now. So, as unsatisfactory as it may be, I can only conclude by saying there’s really nothing that can be done. Unless something worse comes along first, it’s going to happen. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
We need an update on that appaling “deck of cards.” Don’t ask me why I don’t like it – I don’t know.
Perhaps bio-terrorism is Nature’s way of countering humanity’s lack of regard for the environment?
I suspect something is fishy about not being able to find OBL. Heck, all we have to do is turn his name over to Sallie Mae and tell them he didn’t pay back his school loan.
I find the Iran situation very interesting for two reasons.1. Colon Powell came out saying that despite Iran’s agreement to stop developing nukes that Iran is still in fact developing nukes. I wonder if he is using the same intelligence that told him that Saddam was developing nukes. Does this guy, or anyone in the American administration, have any credibility left?2. Let’s assume that Iran is developing nukes. Has anyone bothered to ask why? The typical explaination of why Iran wants nukes is to use them against Israel or the United States. But is this really a reason? Wouldn’t using nukes against anyone be paramount to a suicide mission? If there is anything that would unite the world, it is the use of nukes. Iran would immediately be obliterated off the map. Doesn’t seem like a smart move to me. If the doctrine of mutually assured destruction can work against the Soviets, I am sure it would work against the Iranians. So why the interest in developing nukes? The answer is a defensive one. Having nukes and the ability to use them is the best defense against an overly aggressive United States. If Iran could threaten to drop a nuke on Israel, does anything really think that the United States would consider invading? Not likely. Not only has the Iraq war been a boon to al Qaeda recruitment, it has probably initiated Iran and North Korea to increase its nuclear program efforts.As for bioterror and other terrorist attacks. You can’t do anything about that. You can defend the airports, they’ll attack the train stations. Defend the train stations, they’ll attack the malls. Defend big cities, they’ll attack rural America. The best way to secure yourself is to make friends, not enemies.
Have you heard of the new book by Rees called Our Final Century?http://www.iee.org/OnComms/PN/sustainability/Book_review0434008095.cfm
Sue: heh, I was going to say that, but I’m already accused of being too strident ;-)David: right on, but the conservative mind could never countenance such an idea (maybe we could reframe it)Heather: thanks, added to my reading list