![]() A bit of a homework assignment for you today, dear readers:
What’s your reaction to Korten’s proposal? Mine was that it’s exactly the impossible and unachievable change we need. Citizens just don’t rise up against a dysfunctional socio-economic-political system and replace it with something else. And if they did, they would be fighting the government of the day to the death, since that government exists precisely to defend and sustain the existing dysfunctional economy. We are not going to have a collective anti-capitalist uprising and revolution, and even if we were governments certainly wouldn’t be responsive to it. Let me say it again: Whether you want to change the political or economic system, save the whales, stop global warming, reform education, spark innovation or anything else, the answer is in how meaning, and understanding of what needs to be done, emerges from conversation in community with people you love, people who care. That’s the way you see the solution to problems when you take the ‘feminine’ Natural social worldview in the lower right of the graphic above. If (let’s be optimistic, when) communities start having conversations about this, and start to really care about it, so it goes from the ‘nice to do’ list (that never gets done) to the ‘have to do’ list (that does get done) — when that happens, the kind of emergence of ‘what needs to be done’ is unlikely to be revolution, mass uprising, or pressuring of governments. The consensus on ‘What needs to be done’ is more likely to be a walking away from the existing economy, a refusal to do business with ‘private-benefit’ corporations, and the creation of local, mostly women-run cooperatives, Natural Enterprises within a cooperative local Natural Economy. We’ll just drop out of the industrial economy, and starve it to death. It’s our consumption that drives the current dysfunctional economy, after all. I wonder if I can persuade my publisher, Chelsea Green, to give copies of my book on Natural Enterprise awayfree to aspiring women entrepreneurs. Categories: Natural Enterprise and Understanding Economics
|
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Essential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
What moves us human beings is need… need produces a desequilibrium that makes us act …. so ¿how are we going to act towards these changes if we do not know we need them?
I have much more to say about this, but I’ll leave just a quick thought. It’s not ‘feminine’ as an alternative to ‘masculine,’ but the ability to balance and hold and revere both. The two poles need each other. I know you recognize this, but it’s so easy sometimes to sound as though one is being promoted over the other. ‘Feminine’ is not a solution. There is no solution. There’s only the ongoing play between both, and the process of keeping that game in motion. I’m only sorry that my intuition around that need for dialog between the two ‘voices’ or approaches is so deep as to be hard to express.
(Also, so much of your writing here–not to mention your process–reminds me of Jung’s work around masculine and feminine archetypes and the integration into wholeness at both the personal and collective levels. I’m not sure whether you’ve explored his thinking much, but it might provide you with a bit of language to work with around these topics, especially given that you already share his sensibilities around masks and personas…)
Dave, will your book be available as a free downloadable pdf? Such as Yochai Benkler did with _Wealth of Networks_ or Cory Doctorow does with all his works?I’ll gladly pay for a copy of your book, if you give it away for free first. I’ve purchased two or three of Doctorow’s works, even though I already read them in pdf form. I have no intention of reading them again, I’ll likely give them away.Having to actually work (using energy, generating heat) to buy a dead-tree version of something that should be free seems like a waste to me. Nonetheless, I’ll but a copy — just to put some coin in your pocket — if I can read it free first.Cory Doctorow has some good arguments for lesser-known authors to give their works away.
I’m glad you summarized Korten’s speech, because I don’t want to read another of his treatises. He is a good writer, seems smart, points to the right problems in the political/economic realm, but the proposals seem merely ideals to me. I think you’re right to turn away from the grand attempts at social engineering–exercises in wishful thinking–since these planners don’t know how to overcome the enormous popular resistance to those “progressive” or radical ideas/perspectives/values that seem so obvious to them. Dave, you claim that “meaning, and understanding of what needs to be done, emerges from conversation in community with people you love, people who care.” At least that formula is aiming closer to our personal reality, what makes us tick, while still allowing connections back to the larger social reality. And I’m sympathetic to a communal approach, rather than merely individual or a mass movement.But I don’t know how to just walk away from the economy, and how to bring others with me. In conversation with colleagues (more than half are women) at the non-profit where I work–caring progressives offering services to poor people who can really use the help–we don’t seem able to create a common understanding of what needs to be done. They believe the world is going to hell, or Clinton might be able to reverse the tide, or shopping and marriage is their best hope for happiness (but a lottery win and a good man better come along soon), or there’s nothing left but to plan for retirement and try to get their kids through college. Polyamorous, communal enterprise is completely foreign to them, as they seek security in lifelong monogamy and in (hopefully) steady jobs that keep the money flowing, though funds are always inadequate. A crash will make them more scared, but I’m afraid neither wiser nor more adventurous. Where do I find my comrades who can Let-Ourselves-Change?As your focus shifts to the people you love and you discover what needs to be done with them, I’ll watch with interest and with envy for your passion. Love on!
Siona’s comments remind me of Riane Eisler’s seminal book: “The chalice and the blade”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riane_EislerShe had to use the word “gylanic” to describe “woman-man balanced” societies.
I am very impressed with David’s article. I do agree that we have taken the concept of private-benefit corporation, a little too far. In that, everything is fair in the name of the corporation and the next quarter. What happens beyond that does’nt really matter – does it?. I myself am getting close to product release, that I hope will set a new direction for our children. I refused to seek venture funding primarily, because, I did not want profit motives to drive its development and success. Rather, I wanted the value it generates for its community to motivate them to drive its financial success. I did not also, want the model to depend on vendors and corporations annoyingly peddling their products and services, but instead, for the community to set the standards for what should be peddled and what should not.The idea being that when the community does make it a success, I want most of the revenue it generates to be shared within the community, based of course, on their individual levels of contribution towards its success.However, what I am finding is that, for me to get even the community interested, the product needs a “social facelift”, meaning, it has to appear financially successful.The fundamental problem behind all this is that we are a society of consumers – even of wealth. There is very little motivation to go through the pains of creating something collectively and nurture it to success – the right, even if longer, way – but rather, there is a mentality to lay in wait for a good bargain. So, what I do have to end up doing is look for the funding that I will need to see it through it’s initial stages of release. There are investors who are interested but only a couple, who like the “revenue sharing” concept. And all of them are looking for a quick buck – they want everyone involved. Its a catch 22 situation. I must first start as a traditional private-benefit organization, in order to become a community-oriented model that I want itto become.