The Future of the Media: Something More Than Worthless News

BLOG The Future of the Media: One More Time

adding value to information

Nearly 15 years ago I was asked to give a speech at a conference of Canadian mainstream media types and ‘content aggregators’. I quoted Marshall McLuhan (“Information is always trying to be free”) and told them that, in 15 years, if they didn’t change, they would be extinct. Specifically I told them that they had to do more than regurgitate stories from the newswires, and that if they wanted to be paid for their work they would have to do something valuable — either provide information content that was actionable, or provide some service that added value. I described seven ways to add value to information (see chart above):

  1. Provide an actionable alert about something new and urgent.
  2. Provide an actionable briefing about something new and important.
  3. Provide the results of a survey of informed people that has never appeared anywhere else.
  4. Provide genuine research that explores an issue in depth and gives readers/viewers a thorough and useful understanding of the issue, and which asks important and provocative questions.
  5. Provide guidance on what the readers/viewers should do about this information (something more valuable than “be on heightened alert”)
  6. Provide a gauge or measure by which people can self-assess what they know about an important subject vs. what they should know.
  7. Organize a real-time event where people can engage with each other and with people who know more than they do, about an important subject.

The media types laughed at me. They insisted “this is not what the mainstream media do”. I insisted that if that was so, they had better start looking for a steadier job. As usual I was a bit ahead of my time, but not by much. The mainstream media are drowning in debt and losing readers every year, and their only answer is to try to find ways to force us to pay for the same old content, what I call “worthless news”.

Bill Maher famously said “The job of the media is to make what’s important interesting.” And the above list provides seven ways to do so. So why don’t they do their job?

Well, for a start, it costs more to do these seven things, and media companies are notoriously cheap (that’s why, a century ago, media barons were so wealthy). It’s risky. It’s hard work. It requires real skills. And it requires the company to really know its readers/viewers. The mainstream media fail on all counts. The alternative/indymedia, by sheer force of numbers and the astonishing range of new technologies at their disposal, are proving more capable of all seven ways of adding value to information than the stodgy old media.

There are exceptions. Some local newsmedia do some excellent investigative reporting of local issues (corruption, neighbourhood pollution, local culture). The New Yorker provides great analysis on important issues like government torture, American cultural phenomena, and environmental issues. The NYT, in its weekend and special editions, does some admirable long pieces and multi-part investigative series. The Op-eds in both The New Yorker and the NYT are often insightful and informative, not just empty rhetoric. So are many of the environmental articles in Orion.

A lot of people are asking what will happen if most of the mainstream media fold — where will the raw ‘news’ that most of the new media write about come from then? The reality is that most of the ‘news’ in most of the mainstream media are not information items at all — they’re entertainment items. In fact many of them are entertainment items about the entertainment industry — pure pap. Much of the ‘news’ comes from wire services that, increasingly, use vast networks of freelance reporters, rather than having their own staffs, so in the worst case after the mainstream media’s demise, freelancers (who already work for next to nothing) will have to become part-time reporters, and earn their living doing something else. In that case the raw news reports (most of which aren’t actionable in any case — more worthless entertainment) will end up being served up by millions of part-time freelance reporters, who will provide their copy and multimedia free (it won’t cost them anything) just to see their name in the byline of all the narrowcasting blogs and e-newsletters that will thrive once the newspapers and the remains of real radio/TV journalism disappear.

A larger problem is that, even now, there is a dearth of skills at doing the seven things that add value to information. Doing great research is a rare ability, and insightful research is lost in oceans of superficial, thoughtless regurgitation and academic esoterica. Few people care to take the time needed either to do great investigative work, or to think creatively and profoundly about what all the mountains of facts really mean. And the short attention spans of most of their potential audience is not a great encouragement either.

But it’s interesting to see how, no matter how the intermediaries and governments and corporatist packagers of drivel to dumbed-down consumers obfuscate, trivialize, neglect and deny any obligation for doing the real job of adding value to information (and making what’s important interesting), somehow there is always someone out their to take up the slack. Government censorship has never been a match for citizens’ passion to know important truths. The education system can never quite stamp out all the creativity and intellectual curiosity of its inmates. And there is always someone out there prepared to risk everything to speak truth to power, to the deceived, to the deniers, and to the ignorant.

For all the worthless news served up to us by the dinosaur media conglomerates, there is more useful, valuable information available to us today than ever before, and the magical thing about it is that the people providing it are doing it not for money or glory, but because they care about the truth. And the more they inform us, against all odds, the more we come to care too. And when a connected, organized group of people come to care about something actionable, watch out: there is no stopping them. It’s the phenomenon that has brought down tyrants and empires, and brought us just about everything that is worthwhile in our struggling society.

As Margaret Mead said: Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.

Category: The Media

This entry was posted in How the World Really Works. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The Future of the Media: Something More Than Worthless News

  1. Welcome back, optimistic Dave!

  2. Jon Husband says:

    In the past, if I recall correctly, you have wondereed whether you should keep blogging or whether what you were doing by writing so much from that vast brain of yours was actually of any use:Government censorship has never been a match for citizens’ passion to know important truths. The education system can never quite stamp out all the creativity and intellectual curiosity of its inmates. And there is always someone out there prepared to risk everything to speak truth to power, to the deceived, to the deniers, and to the ignorant.This, above, given that we now have the interconnected digital infrastructure known as the web, is IMo why blogging etc. is critical for us all.Hierarchy (controlling and hoarding the strategic informnation) evolving to something else ?Stan Davis, in Future Perfect (1987):“Electronic information systems enable parts of the whole organization (here, we can read organization in the large sense, as a nation or society as well IMO) to communicate directly with each other, where the hierarchy wouldn

  3. Ivor Tymchak says:

    The demise of the mainstream media is a particular interest of mine as it is the main instrument of control for the power elite. A lot of people know this and so a cognitive dissonance emerges; when the media reports that the government advises people not to panic, most people interpret that as meaning ‘panic!’. Any suggested actions by the media therefore can backfire. It would also be nice Dave if you could give real examples of what the media should be advising and how the public could use that information.

  4. Great post, looking to use the hole where the old media exist for helping people work together and tell their own stories and triumphs. We can now use media for what its for: communication, and be immediate with each other with the rest of our time!

  5. h/t KMO @ the C-Realm: Al Giordano of NarcoNews goes ballistic on David “The Wire” Simon’s recent Senate testimony on the future of journalism and why citizen journalism cannot work.Among numerous money shots:

    Memo to my remaining daily print colleagues and their nostalgia club: Get over it and get over yourselves. It

Comments are closed.