The New Feudalism

image by Patricia M on flickr, Public Domain

Feudalism is an ancient political and economic system that is a natural outgrowth of societies suffering from massive inequality of wealth and power. The words feudal and fief both come from the old Germanic term meaning “property”, “cattle” (chattels), or “capital”. The system entails giving the lower, working castes the right to retain a small part of the harvest that comes from their labour on the ruling castes’ property. The modern system of rents is directly descended from feudalism. So is the modern system we call capitalism.

In such a system, the moneyed castes rarely need to compete among each other for the services of lower caste labourers — in a growing population, there are always more labourers than there is work to do. In most cases, the result is a system of involuntary and indentured servitude: You have no choice but to work for the upper castes, or starve, and your allegiance is secured by a contract with severe legal consequences if its terms are breached. In the modern system, this is arranged by ensuring the lower castes live in shoddy houses with large mortgages, and are forced to work to make the enormous monthly payments back to the ruling castes on these mortgages, or the enormous rents, which are fixed by the upper castes to ensure the continuing precarity of the working castes. In past times, the cost of default was a lifetime of unpaid labour in a debtor’s prison. Nowadays, the cost of default is to find yourself and your family living in the streets, begging. The system constantly reminds the working castes that they are only a month or two away from beggary, so they had better behave.

As in earlier times, almost no one moves from the working castes to become part of the ruling castes. While the myth that this is possible is entrenched in many ancient and modern fables (think: Cinderella), the truth is that there is essentially no “upward” or “downward” mobility in the caste ranks — you will die in the caste you, and your parents, were born into. There have been exceptions, the most notable being the so-called merchant castes that have arisen from time to time who were able, by exploiting weaknesses in the capitalist system, to steal, borrow, or marry their way into enough wealth to break through the clay ceiling.

The most remarkable of these is the man who is arguably at once the biggest business failure and the most incompetent national leader in the entire history of the human race. Thanks to his father’s money, and lack of inter-caste mobility, even he is seemingly incapable of falling out of the ruling castes.

The ruling castes have always enjoyed the self-delusion that they are better than the lower castes, and have been afforded their privilege because of their competence or the will of the gods. In ancient times they amused themselves by waging wars against other ruling cast fiefdoms, and by intermarrying to ensure the grievances between them didn’t jeopardize their positions. The modern ruling caste chiefs use the myth of representative democracy to con the working castes into believing their ability to choose between two ruling caste members actually gives them some say in the running of the political and economic system.

And once “elected”, the ‘leaders’ proceed to amuse themselves by waging wars against other ruling cast fiefdoms, allegedly on behalf of freedom and democracy and the gods. This has not changed in ten thousand years.

Other members of the ruling castes used to amuse themselves by getting involved in the senior priesthood, the military, or the arts. Again, nothing has changed, except the activities that the idle ruling caste members engage in with almost singular incompetence now include running business empires, or launching themselves into space as “new pioneers”, heroes in their own minds. The media, paid for by the ruling castes, know better than to question their role in promoting and lauding such adventures. The Emperor’s new gown is wonderful, your Highness.

The holy grail of the ruling castes has always been Empire — an empire so strong and so vast that there are no members of the ruling castes that have not either been subsumed into it or, if need be, obliterated. In business, the term Empire is also used, and its idealized form, which has only recently become officially legal to aspire to, is called monopoly. What could be happier than having all the ruling castes sharing all the world’s wealth according to some private agreement, and hence having all the working castes with no choice but to do exactly what they’re told — to labour for the benefit of the ruling castes and retain a pittance to keep them from penury — obedient from the day they are born to the day they die?

In both business and political affairs, the final stepping stone towards monopoly or empire is oligopoly or oligarchy. Tellingly, the term oligarch (meaning a member of a small colluding clique that governs with absolute power), is used to describe both business and political cliques, since their membership is often interchangeable and since together they are the de facto rulers in almost every country in the world today.

But that last step is slippery. Even the most arrogant oligarchs are nervous when so much political and economic power is held in so few hands. It only takes a few oligarchs, a little more psychopathic than the rest and delirious with the drug of power, to turn on the others and upset the plan for absolute Empire and monopoly.

If you look at the political realities in the world today, you have two main types of power structure (outside of perhaps Scandinavia, there are almost no outliers left):

  1. Pseudo-democracies where a small number of parties, all controlled by and financed by oligarchs of the country’s ruling castes, make meaningless promises to the working castes while redistributing ever more power and wealth from the working castes to the ruling castes.
  2. Autocracies where a single, usually psychopathic ‘strong man’ leader rules indefinitely through intimidation, financed by oligarchs of their and other countries’ ruling castes in return for the right to pillage all their resources.

And if you look at the economic realities in the world today, you only have one type of power structure — in each industry, an oligopoly of 3-6 global mega-corporations buys out or crushes any competitors, uses their financial power to control the political ‘leaders’, lobbies to endlessly deregulate their industry, and ‘encourages’ the political leaders to ‘privatize’ more and more of government’s activities and wealth to the mega-corporations.

The political and economic oligarchs and oligarchies are indistinguishable, and often move back and forth between the two realms of power.

This is what untrammelled capitalism has led us to. We now have multi-billionaires with the wealth and power of medium-sized nations. We now have two kinds of fiefs — the political ones and the economic ones. But the working castes pay fealty to both. And both use their power to steal more and more from the working castes. And so, the Gini index — the wealth, income and power gap — between rich and poor continues to soar.

What we are living under today is a modern form of feudalism, with a new veneer but the same workings underneath. Your labour pays for the lords’ yachts and space adventures. Your taxes finance their endless wars. It’s doubtful that the serfs of medieval times thought that their lot in life was fair or just; it was what they were born into, the only life they’d ever known or could imagine.

Nothing has changed in ten thousand years. The wage slaves toil on, thinking that life is often unfair and unjust, but incapable of imagining any other way to live, except perhaps if they were to win the lottery. And meanwhile, the ruling castes, oblivious to their privilege and responsibility, go on destroying the planet and subjugating and oppressing the rest of the human and more-than-human life upon it.

We are a strange species. We know we have precipitated the sixth and most rapid extinction event in the history of the planet. But we just get up each day, talk about who slapped who on TV last night, and think about where we’d like to go when the pandemic’s over.

This entry was posted in How the World Really Works, Our Culture / Ourselves. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The New Feudalism

  1. Jerry McManus says:

    Great observation, we are a very strange species indeed.

    My own theory is that there are two constants in every pre-industrial civilization going all the way back to the so-called “neolithic revolution”. One is domesticated wolves and the other is beer. Given just how miserable life appears to be under agriculture compared to hunting-gathering, is it really such a stretch to imagine that early agriculture was actually slavery?

    The guys with the big dogs forced everyone else to grow grain for their beer, and all of the exploitation and injustice in the world for the last 10,000 years flows directly from that.

    Anyway, your post fits in nicely with this little gem that I’m currently enjoying (found via r/collapse):
    Our hunter-gatherer future

  2. realist says:

    According to Mancur Olson feudalism is quite an improvement over the “state of nature”, stationary bandits are more benevolent than roving bandits. :-)

  3. Joe Clarkson says:


    Thanks for the link to the article by John Gowdy. The final sentence is the key takeaway, “We became human as hunters and gatherers and we can regain our humanity when we return to that way of life”. There will be lots of unfortunate events between now and that final return. Young people will have the misfortune of seeing most of them (if they live long enough).

  4. Jack Alpert says:

    The key to unwinding this predicament is to stop having children. Stop feeding the beast. It is not a social or personally acceptable solution but it does unwind 10,000 years of experience.

    Jack Alpert PhD Director:
    Stanford Knowledge Integration Laboratory
    (C) 913 708 2554
    13617 W. 48th Street Shawnee, KS 66216
    600 word summary of Jack’s work

  5. Brutus says:

    The basic dynamics you outline are appreciated, but there’s quite a bit of variation to the way things have manifested over time. So I wouldn’t agree that nothing has changed in 10,000 year, hedges and caveats notwithstanding. For instance, the degree/amount of power gathered and developed to destroy (not so much build) has increased dramatically in the industrial era. Large tracts of Europe and the Middle East were deforested during the Greek and Roman empires, but those effects could not compete with today’s wholesale destruction of the entire biosphere. In addition, social obligations from the ruling classes toward their subjects, vassals, or citizens were formerly binding on (some) rulers, who were true statesmen, beneficent and just in their administrations. Our present era is rather one of callous disregard outside the economic elite, where social bonds barely exist and subgroups are set against each other to keep them from unifying against their “betters.”

    I am curious about one thing, though: do you believe there exists a secret, backroom, handshake conspiracy (e.g., the World Economic Forum setting up the Great Reset) that perpetuate the dynamics you outline? Or is it merely venal profiteers exploiting a system they inherited just like the rest of us? Or something else, perhaps?

  6. Dave Pollard says:

    Brutus: No secret conspiracy, no venality, just well-intentioned people doing their best. There’s a meme going around that says: It’s amazing what people can get used to. So I think that’s what’s happening. People behaving the way they have been taught to behave, largely subconsciously, obliviously. All behaving in accordance with their conditioning. And unable to imagine another way to live that isn’t just a pipedream. And the net result is what you see.

Comments are closed.