Something strange happened around 1980 in the US and Canada, and perhaps in other countries as well. Women of all ages, who had previously been more conservative than their male cohorts, crossed over and became more liberal, both socially and economically, on almost every issue. Prior to that, if women hadn’t had the vote, we might have had more liberal regimes (e.g. a majority of men voted for JFK; a majority of women for his opponent, Richard Nixon). But men generally get their way, and for the most part women’s votes haven’t made a difference to the final outcome. Since 1980 the men=conservative, women=liberal gender gap has steadily widened. What’s really interesting to imagine is what the world would probably have been, and would be like today if men didn’t have the vote:
The chart above shows (red dots) the US gender gap in political and economic worldviews. The gender gap for Canada is very similar, except the dots are proportionally further left and further down. Michael Adams explains this gender gap in his books Fire & Ice and American Backlash (from which the above chart is adapted) which look at the even larger gaps between the US and the rest of the world’s affluent nations, and between the young and old in the US. A report by three Canadian universities provides a more detailed look at the gender gap. While it’s dangerous to generalize, these studies suggest that:
I’m hard put to know what this means, and why it is so pronounced and so recent. What’s your theory? What has happened over the last fifty years to create and then widen a gender gap that, if either gender were deprived of the vote, would make such a profound difference in the present realities and futureprospects for our world? Categories: Frames, Left & Right
|
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
Here’s my theory. It’s based on comments from my mother (alive, 93), and my aunt (deceased, would be 107). In 1972, my aunt, a lifelong Republican, stood up in her little blue suit at the local Republican Women’s luncheon, and said she thought the war in Vietnam was a bad thing and we should get out. I was stunned by this act of courage (she was then 70). She said, “Look at you. You have the pill. You have a career. You have MS. magazine. I’ve missed the life that would have meant. But I have a voice. That’s my revolution.”Women have not changed (we would have no old growth redwood groves if it weren’t for women’s environmental efforts, just to name one issue among thousands) … the community of courage that has built up over the last several decades has just made it possible for us to speak up/speak out and vote for ourselves.Of the twenty or so married women I know who openly discuss their voting choices, only two have husbands who would be considered progressives.
But of course welfare dependence and government employment correlate with higher patterns of voting for democrats. One key demographic you don’t mention is marriage. Married women vote conservative more often than unmarried women. The usual interpretation is that unmarried women with children look to the government to take care of them.And it’s not surprising that women voted more liberal than men. Women consistently score 10 to 20 points lower than men on measures of political knowledge, regardless of their education or income level. Fewer women than men can name their senator or know one First Amendment right. They are less likely to discuss politics, contact public officials or join a political organization.It’s true that the sought after “swing voters” are mostly liberal women. So smart candidates will try to sound personal and try to win a popularity contest that is quite disconnected from policy. Bill Clinton’s strategist, Dick Morris, said the democrats needed to keep black voters “poor, ignorant, and voting democrat.” The same strategy ought to work with unmarried mothers.The current liberal=democrat and conservative=republican configuration is under considerable stress, and it’s possible to hope for a realignment. I dislike both Democrats and Republicans and would like to see a party that combined a sane concern for the environment with greater respect for localism and federalism and a commitment to rule of law, understood as fidelity to a written constitution and caution in regards to all special and local legislation. The original Constitution understood quite well the need for both centralized intelligence and distributed and decentralized decision-making. Madison was a far more brilliant systems thinker than the midgets who’ve interpreted his handiwork to oblivion.
a simple guess to answer your question: Wimmin’s Lib. LOL. Excellent brain work, Mr. Pollard!Lovely to discover a homo sapiens among us.I’m sick and tired of homo rapiens. (I discovered you when I was looking for stuff on John Gray. Straw Dogs was fun for me as finally someone has put my very old conclusions down on paper and published.)Cheers, and you can quote me: “The end of the world will not be a bang nor a whimper, but a bovine fart.”
Increased equity & parity among women and men. Not that we’ve really arrived there yet… otherwise, Gore would be in his second term, and we would not be in Iraq, etc., etc. We (the US) would be less hated in the rest of the world. I’m not yet 60, but it isn’t that far away anymore. I’m old enough to remember when women’s consciousness raising groups were still embryonic (I was just slightly too young to really take advantage of one then); also: Ms. Magazine, women getting their own credit, not having to quit a job because of getting married or becoming pregnant, no longer having to put up with inappropriate sexist behavior and remarks on the job, flat shoes becoming acceptable footwear, as well as pants. It doesn’t seem all that long ago, sometime during my second marriage (1980’s?), that I heard one of my then-husband’s peers say that what had really changed (or was wrong?) was that now (then) everything had to be negotiated. (Really!) In other words, men/husbands could no longer take it for granted that their wishes would always win out. It seems that a growing proportion of women of each generational group now takes it for granted that their wishes will be considered when a couple has a decision to make. Perhaps a lot of women learned their lesson with Nixon. I remember reading about him before the 1972 election, and being completely horrified by his career up until then. I wasn’t even 20 years old.
My theory…Women are smarter than we men. More apt to not want their children to die in a needless illegal war. Less prone to homicidal tendencies. Smarter.