How the ‘science’ behind ‘skeptical environmentalists’ denial of global warming can be traced to a typo, the rantings of an architect, and the conspiracy theories of Lyndon Larouche. I‘ve written before about our propensity and desire to be seduced by false comforts. We really want to believe what we really want to believe. And, damn it, if the facts don’t fit with our existing frames, beliefs and worldviews, well then change them, or ignore them, or find some that do. Nowhere is this all too human tendency more evident than in deniers of crisis. We would rather bury our heads in the sand than believe a catastrophe is imminent. Every time a tyrant has plunged his people into horrific oppression or a megalomaniac has launched a brutal war against his neighbours in the quest of global dominion, thousands of normally bright, responsible people have shrugged it off as an exaggeration, an overstatement, a misrepresentation. “No one could ever treat their people as badly as some allege Stalin is doing”; “No one has anything to fear from Joe McCarthy unless they’re done something illegal.” “It’s just a correction, the market will bounce back by 1930”, We were tacitly complicit in the atrocities of Nazi Germany, Rwanda, and now in Darfur because we just didn’t, and don’t, want to know how bad it is. It’s upsetting, it’s overwhelming, and it doesn’t jibe with our parochial, rosy view of human nature. For every chance to avert catastrophe with prompt and decisive action, there have been armies of deniers, “do-nothing” advocates, tellers of Chicken Little stories, working furiously to thwart action, usually successfully. One of the latest examples of this phenomenon has been the denial of global warming and the rise of so-called ‘skeptical environmentalists’ (not actually environmentalists at all, but shills for corporatist mega-polluters, dupes and paid lackeys for others with a vested interest in sweeping environmental problems under the rug). There is a huge and organized effort underway to try to play into our desire to be seduced by false comforts on the environment. It is well bankrolled and very successful. And the media play along witlessly: Far be it for them to report on an issue the public apparently doesn’t want to hear about. In a recent article in the Guardian entitled Junk Science, George Monbiot shows exactly how it works. Please read this article in its entirety. Here’s the punchline: It is hard to convey just how selective you have to be to dismiss the evidence for climate change. You must climb over a mountain of evidence to pick up a crumb: a crumb which then disintegrates in your palm. You must ignore an entire canon of science, the statements of the worldís most eminent scientific institutions, and thousands of papers published in the foremost scientific journals. You must, if you are David Bellamy, embrace instead the claims of an eccentric former architect, which are based on what appears to be a non-existent data set. And you must do all this while calling yourself a scientist.
The dupes in this case include UK botanist David Bellamy (influential president of the Conservation Foundation, the Wildlife Trusts, Plantlife International and the British Naturalistsí Association), as well as New Scientist magazine and the Washington Post. The ‘sources’ of the data allegedly counter-indicating global warming include a huckster architect self-promoting a book on a new ice age, and wacko conspiracy theorist, hate-monger and US wingnut presidential candidate Lyndon Larouche. Once a few ‘respectable’ dupes have been set up, the corporatist spin machine goes into overdrive, citing and reciting them, until the virus has spread so far that attempts to attack it are fruitless. The neocon Bush administration has purged itself of responsible scientists and replaced them with deniers, an essential prerequisite to maintaining ‘plausible deniability’. A recent survey by UCS indicates that new corporatist bosses in environment branches of US government are ordering employees to falsify and suppress reports and ignore regulations to sustain this deniability. This is nothing more than cynical exploitation of the public’s desire not to know. And meanwhile, corporatist mega-polluters like the huge Koch Industries (the second largest private corporation in the US) use puppet think-tanks, lobbying and huge campaign donations to get their massive environmental crimes settled out of court without criminal charges, and to get the environmental laws they routinely violate overturned, or at least unenforced. These crimes involve hundreds of cases of poisoning of our water and our air with tons of carcinogens and toxins, and the subversion of laws and justice that would put these criminals behind bars where they belong. Never heard of Koch? That’s OK, you don’t want to know. And corporatist shills (you don’t want to know who’s behind them, and they won’t tell you who they are) will tell you that it’s all right, these chemicals aren’t really bad for you, and they have just the junk science to support their claims. Don’t you feel better now? Cartoon by Tom Toles in the Washington Post |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
Just as a side note, that frog thing is not true – frogs *do* jump out of water if it’s heated slowly ^-^
Nice try. I love the way you set up counterarguments as being irrational. “If you don’t agree with my point of view you are defective because you’re like the frog in a slow cooking pot.” Sorry Dave. Won’t wash. There are well meaning, even as equally well meaning people as you, that don’t buy the science (notice I din’t say “science”) behind global warming.Given we are slated to spend Billions of Dollars in Canada to buy Credits that may not do anything for us, we better make sure. Let aloneIf you want to have a debate about global warming, or any other topic for that matter, then have a debate about facts or waht you believe to be facts.Conspiracy theories do not become you. You have far to much intellegence for that. I know, I see it every day.John
a flu pandemic in nature.com
There may well be well-meaning people who don’t `buy’ global warming science, but they are ill-informed, usually by the same process that is so well described here.Actual scientists — not crackpot economists, not oil industry or mining industry consultants, but actual scientists — who look at the evidence are convinced. Any bright layperson who goes through the (say) IPCC summary of the science to date pretty much has to be convinced. And what’s the usual argument provided by the denialists? Why, all the evidence and agreement is just evidence of a conspiracy, of course, where the Scientific Estabilishment is oppressing the hardworking people who know the truth! Which just shows such people have no idea how science works; you *make* a name for yourself by proving old ideas wrong; there’s no incentive at all to buy into a consipiracy.Of course, the other approach is to use the approach the evolution deniers use; fund a couple crackpots, then repeatedly hype the crackpot results to pretend that there is a real controversy. But there isn’t. Not in evolution, not in anthropogenic global warming. In both cases, the only real questions are the implications.