The Innovator’s Solution tells you what you need to do to cannibalize the markets of incumbents and create entirely new markets, by focusing on the needs of over-served customers and non-customers. But it’s a lot harder in practice than in theory, and it needs some unique skills and hard-to-obtain knowledge. [Posted from Orlando] In previous articles, I’ve summarized Clay Christensen’s approach to innovation (established companies focus on what he calls ‘sustaining’ innovations while new entrants focus on ‘disruptive’ ones), and about the research approach that he suggests for identifying and assessing innovation opportunities. His second book, The Innovator’s Solution, looks in greater detail at disruptive innovation, which he breaks into two types:
The part of Innovator’s Solution that most intrigued me was the section on how to identify potential disruptions and how to identify customers for them. To identify potential disruptions, he suggests, you should ‘segment’ the market by the circumstances of use of the product or potential product (i.e. what the product gets ‘hired to do’ or what ‘job it does’ that needs to be done), rather than by customer identity (demographics) or product attributes (category). The focus is therefore on when/why/how it would it be used, not what it would feature or who would use it. This is a needs-driven strategy, requiring a lot of research & cultural anthropology. It means discovering who needs ‘coolth’, and when and how they need it, not who needs an air conditioner. This is hard for established, risk-averse, inflexible companies to do because:
Hence it is often best to have the innovation in established companies done by a new, autonomous division or group, free from the constraints, prejudices, risk-aversion and ‘why rock the boat’ thinking of the existing operations. To identify customers for disruptive innovations, Christensen says you need to look for:
It’s important that these potential customers perceive the product to be ‘foolproof’: easy to use, easy to learn, easy to buy (though if the product is for recreational use, customers may buy a product with a steeper learning curve if the learning is fun). Equally important is that there be available, and hungry, channel partners (sources of supply, distributors, retailers, marketers etc.) to help you get it to market — if these partners and their materials and skills are scarce, or disinterested in you, customers may give up on you before you’re able to deliver reliably. The rest of the book provides suggestions on the right roles for your company in developing the innovation, how to partner with other appropriate companies to optimize competencies and synergy, how to find the non-commodity, high profit points in the customer value chain, the importance of setting up the right people, process, values, alliances and organizational structure for innovation, how to align your strategy to support innovation (using an emergent, complex system-friendly strategy), and how to address financing and risk issues in innovation ventures. The final section addresses the role of senior management in disruptive innovation. Leaders, he says, must exercise three key responsibilities: (a) allocate appropriate, patient resources; (b) establish a process to continuously generate disruptive innovations; and (c) detect and adapt to changes in markets and other elements of the system. The four elements of a ‘disruptive growth engine’ therefore are:
In these areas, Christensen is on comfortable and solid ground. But I keep coming back in my thinking to how an organization can actually apply his earlier advice on how to identify potential disruptive innovations and how to identify customers for them (and which comes first anyway?) It’s a lot easier in theory than it is in practice, as I can tell you from personal experience. Let’s take the example of a company that has expertise in the textile industry, for example. They have an established market in specialized blankets, and some scientific expertise in weaving and in thermal properties of materials. If they’re threatened by new low-cost Asian competitors in this mature market space, how would they go about becoming a disruptive innovator? They wouldn’t talk to existing customers — that’s for sustaining innovation not disruptive innovation. They wouldn’t do competitive analysis — except perhaps if they could identify some over-served customers. Other than raw imagination and a lot of serendipitous reading and lateral thinking, it’s hard to imagine how such a company, even with a separate, empowered innovation team, could begin to identify either the unmet needs within their competency to deliver, or the customers that have these needs. What Christensen needs to add is a whole process to surface these needs and customers. Who, other than established buyers of blankets, might be interested in textiles with thermal properties? Hospitals and doctors dealing with hypothermia? Insulation companies? Gardeners and farmers seeking to protect crops from frost? Swimming pool cover manufacturers? Expedition outfitters? And since good thermal properties also insulate against heat, should we also consider cooler manufacturers, refrigerators, umbrella makers, UV-ray protectors etc.? The possibilities are endless. How do we effectively brainstorm and then filter the potential customers and potential opportunities? The answer, I think, is a discovery process, but one somewhat different and more dependent on brainstorming, creativity, very broad environmental scanning, research, cultural anthropology and exploratory conversations than the one I have suggested for achieving understanding in complex situations. How, do you think, should such a discovery process be structured? If it were your job to develop the process to find new customers for new products meeting new untapped needs, that are within your company’s competency to provide, how would you go about it? This process just might be the holy grail of entrepreneurship. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
Great article Dave. Well argued. I have read Christensen’s books and he focuses in on the core problem very accurately. But like you I found his proposals in the Innovator’s Solution to be rather theoretical. I help orgnizations improve innovation and my advice is to use internal and external sources for new ideas leading to radical innovations. If you can define problems and ideal outcomes then you can throw down a challenge to a team to come up with outlandish proposals. They often need help with methods to force them to be bizarre and approach the problem in new ways. At the same time you need someone who is charged with trawling outside for ideas and technologies that might be relevant. Sometimes this combination can lead to the radical innovation you need.
Dave, I also find it helful to distinguish between different types of disruptive innovations to help businesses understand the disruption process. In a blog posting about types of disruptive innovations I describe the difference between disruptive technologies, disruptive products, disruptive processes and disruptive business models. They all have different all have unique characteristics and consquences…
Airliners have been bedeviled by bloated pension/health care costs, cutthroat competition, and nosebleed energy prices for the last couple of years.That meant investing in airliners was equivalent to getting body slammed by the Roc. On a fire hydrant. Twice.Apparently, with fuel prices stabalizing, a turnaround is on its way; several household name airliners have seen their shares edge higher on the news.On Monday, Prudential (PRU) raised its earnings estimates for some carriers to reflect “reduced fuel price assumptions.”Everyone’s got their eye on the big name domestics, but we could care less — we’re all over the Brazilians like a bad rash.Meet Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes (GOL).The small South American airliner has shrugged off fuel costs, emptied people off Brazil’s crowded buses, and seen its share price pop.Shares are up 12% since we recommended the stock three weeks ago (12/6).We’ll refresh your memory:”…the low-cost, low-fare airliner has been profitable since 2002 and now commands about 28% of Brazil’s airline market. What’s Gol’s secret formula? It’s their structure — a mix of Southwest’s (LUV) efficiency and Jet Blue’s (JBLU) value proposition.Gol keeps things simpler than Thoreau: one Boeing fleet, one class of service. In addition, Gol manages fuel and labor costs better than its US counterparts. For instance, Gol’s average pilot salary is $35K; in comparison, Southwest drops roughly $200K on each of its pilots. That explains Gol’s juicier operating margins.The skies of Gol’s future certainly look bright — Gol has plans to expand heavily, but not beyond it core, underserved South American market…there are over 500 million people in South America to which Gol can offers its peanuts. Gol has first-mover advantage, which will be its leg up on the competition as it strives to maximize revenue-per-seat and amass market share. If fuel costs stabilize even further, expect to see shares of Gol really soar in 2006………”Gol is a veritable success story because it’s both a low end and a new market disruptor.__________________________________________