AP Photo by Aaron Harris Over the years I’ve attended a lot of conferences and conducted a lot of attendees’ reviews. A lot of factors differentiate good speakers from bad ones, but one of the top ones, which to me shouldn’t be that much of a factor, is a mysterious combination of energy, enthusiasm and self-confidence that might be called presence. It conveys to the audience:
You can try to fake some of these things, but the audience will see right through you. I’ve seen very slick, highly paid people speak, but behind the theatrics there’s a deadness in the eyes that says “I don’t really care” that only really inattentive audience members would miss. I’ve seen speakers try to mask ill-preparedness or nervousness with false bravado, but that “caught in the headlights” look in their eyes is a dead giveaway. You either have presence, or you don’t. There is much to say for preparation and practice as a means of overcoming lack of self-confidence. When you simply read your speech, no matter how brilliantly composed, your audience will conclude you aren’t prepared — and be annoyed that you didn’t just send them the speech so they could read it themselves. Proper sleep and a modest shot of caffeine can ensure you have lots of energy. But nothing can make you care about the subject if you don’t. To really care, both about what you’re talking about and about your audience, you have to have something really novel, fascinating and/or important to say, to convey to or persuade your audience. You have to have skin in the game — your success or failure at conveying your message or persuading your audience has to mean something to you and to them. What distinguishes a presentation most from a written report is that with a presentation you know immediately when it’s over whether it’s succeeded. The difference between an audience riveted and animated by what you’re saying, and polite applause at the conclusion of your presentation, is all the difference in the world. We all want attention and appreciation more than anything else from our fellow human beings. The fact that presentations, like stand-up routines, give us the opportunity to get both, or to miss the opportunity and get neither, is what makes the stakes so high, and what makes so many people nervous about public speaking. Sometimes they try to mask that nervousness with an appearance of being indifferent or nonchalant. Big mistake — that will come across as either arrogance or disengagement, or as what it really is, a sign of nervousness and hence ill-preparedness. There’s another self-destructive impulse of a lot of speakers not to spend a lot of time going over and over their material until it’s polished and until they know it cold. There are a number of possible explanations for this surprisingly common quirk:
Whatever the cause, under-preparing is a bad habit, and it’s a bit of an insult to the audience. Although I confess I’m still lost without my notes, I no longer use bullet-point slides and I am getting better at this, because it really pays off. The best speakers have only pictures and graphics on their slides, and work without notes. I’m still a mediocre speaker, and it’s taken me years to reach that level. I’ve learned from experience that there are some things you can do to come across as better than you really are:
While these hints may give you a bit of a safety net, they don’t compensate for the lack of presence. So, no matter what:
Number 3 is the most important. As important as knowledge and focus are, passion is even more important. I’ve seen nervous, tongue-tied speakers muddle through presentations extraordinarily well simply because they obviously felt very strongly and deeply about what they were saying — so the audience made allowances. When people sense that you really care about and believe in something passionately, and want to convey that passion to them, they will go out of their way to pay attention. The same applies, in a way, to writing. A blog doesn’t give you the immediate and intense feedback that you can get in a presentation or face-to-face conversation, but the comments, e-mails and amount of buzz each article creates give you a pretty good idea of what your audience thought of it. Much online writing is almost purely matter-of-fact — links to other online information, distillations of books or lists or summarizations of the most pertinent points on any important subject. Many of my most popular posts are synoptic, and their value comes in saving readers’ time and, sometimes, provoking their thinking. Passion is not essential to such communications. But the articles I’ve written that are argumentative, that have a point of view, that take a stand, are the ones that draw the most comment, evoke the most emotion and action, and attract regular readers as opposed to opportunistic ones. In writing, as much as in oral discourse, what you know and what you can tell are interesting and useful, but what you really believe in, what you instill with every ounce of passion in your heart and soul, is what people remember, what changes them. And what can save the world. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
This is a great follow-on for your post on listening. I think television has trained us to listen to the slick, trained speaker, and to shun the less skilled as amateur, when it’s the ideas, passion and heart of a speech we should really listen to.This is an age of specialization. Unfortunately speech-giving has become a specialization, like acting, the performance more studied than the material. If Al Gore had been a professional speaker would he have had a better chance at becoming president? Now that he’s living his passions he seems to be a better speaker than ever before.The one thing that can probably improve any non-professional speaker’s effectiveness is to pay attention to voice. It’s the pro’s stock in trade, training the voice. (I have a terrible speaking voice, which gives out way too soon to do much public speaking, so maybe this is just me focusing in on my own shortcoming–my excuse for hating to speak.)
The danger of point #3’s later part (only speaking about subjects your audience cares about) is that one can only ever preach to the choir. Reality shows that this is indeed the case: people whose ideas do not find acceptance within a group go out and find another group more receptive to their ideas. This brings the question: How can one ever effect change if the golden rule (as deducted from the above 3rd point) is to not bring up issues the audience is not receptive to?
My response is to say I am taking a stand and am full of passion for something I believe in and now SophisticaWorld.com is going to become a reality; the point :: after 2.5 years and a little blog someone big, very big, reached over and said this is it to me. The rest is history and you can read what a dime, a computer, and an internet connection can turn in to. Hope this inspires all and when the new world site is up its free to join and you can have your world on SophisticaWorld because the Epiture technology allows for it to be so. This is the work I’ve been doing to change the world.best, michaelps. you won’t find perfect spelling, or properly validated CSS or whatever that is on this site :: just the guts, the sweat, the passion to drive home a message and some very important people picked up on it and now everyone of us in the world can benefit from this.
Great post. I completely agree that passion is the potatoes in public speaking. It’s hard to get that passion across in a blog post, but you seem to have driven some to me in this post. Well done, and thanks for the friendly reminder to go passionate or go home.
Martin-Eric, I think the key is to find the way in for *that* audience. Except for really obvious disconnects, there’s usually common ground to be found somewhere.Fantastic post, Dave. I just did my first semi-standup type thing this Friday. Passion and honesty were, I believe, key in getting the audience on my side.
Thank you for this post. I have not visited your site for a while and I happened to “Stumbleupon” it today. It came at a good time for me. Thank you.
Your phrase “You can try to fake some of these things…” remided me a clinical tale in Oliver Sack´s “The Man who Mistook his Wife for a Hat” (neuroscientist in the film “Awakenings” ) called “The President´s Speech” where he explains the reaction of a group of Aphasic patients-(people who cannot understand words as such, but are able to get general meanings out of slow and natural conversations)- in a hospital, who had been waiting for the presidents speech on tv. —When he began talking, the mayority of the group “convulsed with laughter”, a few where outraged, bewildered, one or two looked apprehensive… but most of them looked amused”.. “The president was, as always, moving – but he was moving them, apparently, mainly to laughter. ¿What could they be thinking? ¿Where they failing to understand him? ¿ Or did they – perhaps – understand him too well?” —- Next time I have to give a conference I´ll rehearse imagining this guys are my audience…..!
I agree. #3 is critical. I will listen anyone talk about anything if they light up talking about it. That’s an easy pleasure. If I care about something, time flies. If the spark’s not there, drudge won’t budge anyone.
You hit the nail on the head in stating that nothing can compensate for a lack of presence. I know this firsthand.