If you read economists’ reports, you’ll find the word productivity mentioned a lot. It’s key to competitive advantage and a healthy economy, they say. Ours is dropping, compared to other countries where people work harder and/or work smarter, they say. Automation improved it for factory workers and agriculture, but we need to improve it for office workers, they say.
This is sheer propaganda. Productivity is a euphemism for profit margin. Of course the corporatists obfuscate this fact by defining productivity deliberately obscurely: as the amount of ‘output’ per unit of ‘input’. What this means is the ratio of revenue (that’s how right-wing economists measure ‘output’) to cost (that’s how they measure ‘input’). This is precisely the definition of profit margin. When neocons lament that worker productivity is inadequate, what they are really saying is that their corporate profits are inadequate, and that unless workers make severe and continuous sacrifices to increase these corporations’ profit margins from domestic operations they will take the money they gouged from consumers in this country and invest it all in struggling nations that are so desperate that they will do anything, . This is the Wal-Mart Dilemma, illustrated above in the red boxes, but taken to the next level. What Wal-Mart is doing to suppliers, forcing them to lower prices every year to keep their contract, until they are bankrupted, is what corporatists are now trying to do to workers, forcing them to accept lower real wages, fewer benefits, and work longer hours, or they’ll find another ‘supplier’ for their labour — China. More specifically there are six ways you can increase corporate profit margins, oops, I mean productivity:
While of course none of these things is sustainable indefinitely (the Robber Barons tried a century ago), when you have corporations and governments conspiring together to do all six of these things, this race to the bottom can continue for years. That is precisely what is happening now. We now have a situation where year-over-year profit margins of the world’s largest corporations have been increasing by 20% or more every year for a decade, and are expected to continue to do so indefinitely. The average annual profit growth rate predicted by analysts for the S&P 500 stocks is about 23% annually, for at least the next five years, and it is on that basis that stock prices are so wildly overvalued and shareholder expectations are so relentlessly excessive. The return on investment for these companies is now at least three times a reasonable ROI for investments with commensurate risk. We, the citizens and consumers, are completely funding this windfall for the executives and controlling shareholders of big corporations, and we are expected to continue doing so indefinitely:
The chart above, which proposes a solution for the Wal-Mart dilemma by converting the red ‘vicious cycle’ into the green ‘virtuous cycle’, also suggests the solution for all of these corporate abuses. It would require our intervention, through citizen and consumer action as well as through our elected officials, to do all of the following (take a deep breath):
This is all, of course, dreaming in technicolour. All of these actions are perfectly reasonable, and could be put into place quite quickly and inexpensively. But it would entail the most massive redistribution of wealth and power in the history of civilization. Those who have ‘worked the system’ to gain a wildly disproportionate share of each nation’s wealth and power now undoubtedly believe they are entitled to keep it, by force if necessary. So it won’t happen, at least not in an orderly, reasoned way. But I’m not suggesting ideal, radical solutions here just to be provocative or to make you feel badly about their impossibility. The status quo is unsustainable, and eventually, by one means or another, these changes will occur. The next Great Depression, pandemic disease, global and regional wars, the End of Oil, global warming, and ongoing revolutions of various types will all force us to come to grips with the fatal flaws in our economic system and in the political system that enables it to continue. We will implement all these changes when, and only when, we have no other choices left. But the next time you hear corporate executives or government officials lamenting our lack of ‘productivity’ and blaming it on lazy or uneducated workers, just ask them why 23% annual growth in corporate profit margins isn’t enough, and by what magical thinking they believe such increases are somehow sustainable forever. Or better still, ask them to explain to their children why this year’s and next year’s profits are more important than leaving them with a world, an economy or a society that is sustainable, just,or even livable. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
It’s good to have all the crazy ideas grouped together.Just to pick on one. Who are you to tell ME that I can’t work more than 35 hours if I choose to do so? I’m glad to hear your society will be equalitarian, it just won’t be free. How dare you?
Bil, enforcing the 35 hour workweek leaves you free time to plan your revolt. Think of it as a little seed allowing for evolution in the system.
Before you title a blog post “The Productivity Myth”, it might help to become slightly acquainted with the concepts involved, at least the definitions. This web page at the Bureau of Labor statistics: http://www.bls.gov/lpc/home.htm is very helpful. You might consider auditing a college Econ class since almost everything you said is wrong. If you see a graph labeled “productivity growth”, it’s invariably output per hour. Of course “unit labor costs” are also measured, but it is not the same thing as productivity.I don’t know whose productivity you had in mine when you say “Ours is dropping” The productivity growth in the United States over the last decade has been astounding. I know Canada hasn’t been as strong, but it’s not so bad, really. I don’t know exactly which corporations you mean when you say “profit margins of the world’s largest corporations have been increasing by 20% or more every year for a decade”. Corporate profits in the U.S. declined (as a percentage of GDP) from 1995 to 2001. They’ve increased sharply since then, but they’re just a bit above 1995 levels. http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=3735&sequence=3#figure2-9 (I can’t find a graph online that includes later years.)If you’re going to advocate seizing the means of production and a dictatorship of the proletariat, you should at least get your basic facts right.
How good it would be to see any answers from you, Dave – particularly to Ken’s refutations.I think it makes it too easy for you to wriggle away without progress, the way comments on your weblog are old-fashioned, subordinated off the page. Perhaps you should change this?
You did not understand, especially Wissbegieriger, who wants Dave to edit the blog script @ salon LOL!!
Dave, you inspired me to set off to google to find the name of a book by Jeremy Rifkin… I’d heard him discussing it and how the last big increase in “productivity” or “efficiency” had NOT been shared with workers… when computers became a part of the work force. It’s not as if we got an extra day off, after all, even though PC’s had a similar effect.Anyway, I couldn’t find the book, but I did find this, and thought if you hadn’t seen it, that you would want to. Maybe what you’re struggling with is that breakthrough to a new consciousness that Rifkin refers to: “…a new philosophy of science based on empathy, relationship, and community…” It seems to me that it’s the whole premise of your blog. (I can only imagine the ripples that already emanate from here.)In my worldview, efficiency is vastly over-rated, and redundancy has been so taken for granted, that in those instances when we really need it… it isn’t there. (e.g., safety nets)
Your point about the green strategy being utopia, because the economic powers indirectly have control over legislation and over the police thru their political friends, along with your mention of the Barons, brings to mind a little research project I did recently:Barons are a recuring theme in several books about successfully disconnecting oneself from the system, which prompted me to investigate exactly what is meant by the term “Baron”. One has to go back to the Medieval times to find out. Basically, the principle is that people who own a significantly big enough chunk of land and who are totally self-sufficient, effectively constitute an autonomous State, not subject to the Law of surrounding countries. In other words, all-encompassing ownership and absolute self-sufficience gives someone the right to call the shots on their own domain. This is also why Barons are called “Free Lords” in several languages: free, because they are not subject to any country’s Law and lord, because they effectively are the Law on their own property and thus cannot be subjected to another ruler’s Law.Not surprisingly, these Barons tend to have their own staff of servants maintaining the land and, more relevant to this particular thread, their own militia guarding the property and enforcing the Law of its Baron.How is this relevant here? We already know that most corporations has some vested interest in the paramilitary industry and that they leverage private property laws to justify having security guards with near-police authority. See, for instance, the way security guards at USA shoping malls act like they can effectively trample the Freedom of Speech of people wearing an opiniated T-shirt, claiming that political statements constitute disturbance of peace and that, the mall being private property, its owners can factually enforce any policy they damn well please.This is how corporations leverage the oldBaron priviledges and shamelessly manage to bypass laws and increase their wealth. Now, what if a group of people would buy a large piece of land under the same principles? Wouldn’t this, in effect, constitute a new country that can dictate its own laws and that would no longer be subject to those of surrounding countries? What if this group was a positively-minded intentional community? Wouldn’t that effectively bypass the transnational corporations’ free reign?Those are just ideas. Whatever someone choses to make of them is their own responsability.
PS: this strategy of maximum ownership not only guarantees that the pwoers that be pocket big, it also effectively keeps the proles in line. This is precisely why, at a time when Internet should allow for real democracy by informed voters, corporates and governments alike are doing everything they can to enpoverish the masses: the day someone no longer is self-sufficient, they effectively lose all power to make their own choices and to vote with their money, simultaneously losing any democratic leverage and living at the mercy of the powers that be.The reason for this is simple: true democracy can only succeed among people who truly are equal. Someone with a huge property and a fortune behind it can and in fact does have the luxury of participating in the decision-making processes of business and policy as a full-standing citizen. Proles simply do not have that sort of economic leverage, being at the mercy of the system and too busy making ends meet, and this is why democracy as practiced nowadays simply doesn’t work. What few people like to be reminded of is that Ancient Greece had slaves doing all the work (equivalent to today’s working class), while people who were full-standing Greek citizens had the luxury (and obligation) of participating in the democratic process, voicing their opinion over what needs to be done and who among them shall be empowered to do it.The true reason why the green solution won’t happen is because we are not talking among equals. For as long as the green agenda is less profitable than the red one, it won’t happen. Thus, at best, we can invent immensely profitable business models that fit the green agenda, but few of us can factually claim to be among the Barons with the power to implement them. Still, the exercise of finding ecologically sane models and of promoting them is a good one that, if adopted by any Baron, can have tremendously positive consequences. Let’s do it!
And yet one more: it ought to be remembered that Canada and USA happened when Europeans got fed up with their country’s absurdities and set sail to build a better land. True enough, they stole land ownership from natives, but the point is that until a State was founded there, it mostly was a question of people claiming a piece of land just large enough to build a farm and be happy with their family and friends, outside the reach of British, French and Spanish lawmakers, cohabiting with the natives (one might recall how several pioneers of American conquest were lone adventurers who took a local as their wife).There’s huge agricultural lands in the former Soviet empire that stand there abandoned, including whole villages of somewhat derelict but usable housing and facilities, ready to be taken back into active duty. Granted, Russia and the former stans are not exactly politically easy, but word has it that the farther you live from the capital, the less chances you stand of being bothered by civilization.There’s probably other places worth investigating as well.
Great thinking, love it, Dave.I like to to imagine things along the lines of if we were really serious about…. then we would …If we were really serious about reducing material content of our commercial systems we would require people to pay for goods first when they threw them away. (no-one would discard anything)If we were serious about employment for everyone, sales tax would be lowest on high (in nation) employment goods (all goods would miraculously become high labour, and even unemployable people would find themselves approached to be on someone’s payroll)If we were serious about oil dependance, every house would have a transport vulnerabltiy index on it based on e.g closeness to public transport, heating needs, facilities within “walkshed”. But we’re not, are we, serious, if we were it would show mor, wouldn’t it?
Friends, thanks for the comments, embellishments and additional references.As for the critics, so quick to take my words out of context — the idea of limiting work to a 35 hour week is to redistribute wealth and to prevent labour exploitation. I would not presume to tell anyone what they can do after they clock off ‘paid’ time. If they want to work themselves to an early grave, more power to them. If they want to take up a hobby and broaden themselves, that’s fine too. If they want to numb themselves with drugs, alcohol and/or sex, bravo. All I’m saying is that they can’t have more than 25x more of the pie than anyone else, no matter how hard they work. And if that offends your libertarian sensibilities, then so be it. I said it was dreaming in technicolour. But sometimes it’s useful to imagine what a sensible world would be like.