Interview Questions for Blog-Hosted Conversations

podcast

The podcast conversations I want to host on this site are with, and between, people who believe we have a responsibility to begin acting now to cope with, and help our children and grandchildren cope with, the impending crises that our overpopulated society and overextended economy will inevitably produce.
 
I want to let these conversations go where they will, but to have a common jumping-off point — a ‘leading question’ if you will. In typical left-brain, analytical style, I had originally thought of asking people which crises they predicted we’d face when, and how they thought they’d adapt to them. 

But then I thought: What if the people who have some of the best ideas, those who will be best equipped to cope with these crises, are uninterested in predicting how they will unfold? I have argued for the importance of resilience and ability to Let-Self-Change, so perhaps what we are doing to prepare for future eventualities, to educate and enable those we love, or just to make the world a little better right now, is more important than the predicted context in which these abilities will be applied. Perhaps it might be better to avoid the prognostications and lead off the interview with questions like this:

  1. What do you think are the most important skills and capabilities that we, and future generations in this century will need in order to cope with whatever the future may hold?
  2. How do you see yourself acquiring these skills and capabilities, imparting them to loved ones and being a role model for our children and grandchildren? Do you envision needing to change where you live, how you live, or how you make a living to do so? How so?
  3. Given that our current political, economic and educational systems seem to be part of the problem, do you envision working to reform them, or rather disengaging from them to create a society that is more community-based and self-sufficient? Or do we have to do both? How do you think we should do either or both?
  4. What’s the most important life lesson you’ve learned so far?
  5. What’s the first, next step you think you need to take to pave the way for this, to make the world a little better? What’s holding you back, if anything?

These are tough questions. I wouldn’t want anyone to spring these questions on me in an interview, without having the time to consider my answers. So it’s only fair that I ‘interview myself’ first. Here are my answers:

Critical Life Skills

  1. I think the critical life skills people will need in the future will be much the same as the ones they needed in the past. They’ll need a broad understanding of how the world works. They’ll need self-reliance skills: How to grow your own food, make your own clothes, look after your own health, fix things when they break. They’ll need good imaginations and critical thinking skills. They’ll need the capacity to pay attention, to focus their senses and trust their instincts. They’ll need to learn to collaborate with others, and to form communities that work. They’ll need to learn how to make a living themselves, locally, in community, since there will be no one to offer them a job. They’ll need to learn to be patient, to educate themselves, and to be adaptable and resilient to rapid change. My generation, the boomers, were late in acquiring many of these skills, and some we haven’t picked up at all. I sense the generations that have followed us are even worse at these things. They’re better than we are at self-directed learning, fortunately, but some of these things can’t be learned on-line; they need hands-on practice. We’ll have to learn these skills and capacities ourselves, and then show them to the generations that follow. We also need to study and learn from the lessons of crises of the past: depressions, pandemics, natural disasters, droughts, famines, political brinkmanship. We have a lot to learn.
  2. I’ve been very fortunate all my life, so I’ll soon have the time and savings to learn these skills. It will be fun learning these things when I don’t have to, at my leisure, when the cost of failure is minimal. But many of my generation and those that follow are living beyond their means, and they won’t have pensions to fall back on. We’ll need to be the role models and teachers for those who can’t afford to be. The intentional communities and natural enterprises we create in our later years, starting very soon now, will be important laboratories, where our failures will be important lessons for all and our successes will be critical models for a future where failure won’t be an option. 
  3. I’m now at the point where I think it’s a waste of time trying to reform our political, economic and educational systems. They’re broken beyond repair, and hopelessly unwieldy. We need to start again at the community level, with the right, passionate people doing bold, disciplined experiments and creating radically simple model intentional communities, self-managed community ‘unschools’ and model natural enterprises that work.
  4. My most important lesson so far has been the importance of Let-Self-Change, instead of trying to change the system. Second most important: Reconnecting with my senses, my instincts, and all-life-on-Earth.
  5. I have a bunch of self-sufficiency skills to learn over the next couple of years to make me more well-rounded. And I want to get the Natural Enterprise book published and the Centre that will support that book and help people help each other to create joyful, responsible, sustainable businesses up and running. Then I’ll be ready for my first big step, co-creating a model intentional community. At that point my pension will kick in, which will give me more time to volunteer on various projects.

If you have experience as an interviewer, I’d welcome your thoughts on additional (or different) questions to ask, how far off track to let the conversation go, what types of answers and tangents to anticipate in advance, or anything else you can counsel before I start this process.

Another thought: I’ve been intrigued by some recent interviews I’ve heard on CBC where the interviewer’s questions are edited out. I wonder how this would work in blog-hosted conversations? Is it still a ‘conversation’ if all you hear is one voice?

Category: Other Blogging Articles

This entry was posted in Using Weblogs and Technology. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Interview Questions for Blog-Hosted Conversations

  1. Quinterra says:

    As true as that is, people today are too busy and/or too lazy and lethargic to focus on anything other than the here and now. We can’t focus on a better future when we’re just trying to make it through the day. Kids or anyone between thirteen and thirty are being forced to pursue a practical career, and that’s if they have the funds to do so. I sure wasn’t aware of my true passion when I was thirteen, and I’m lucky to know that before thirty. People today are working stressful and unsatisisfying jobs to do what? Live (if you can call that living) and teach our kids to do the same?! Until people are truly free without the government and society on our backs we’re going to keep living like this. In your words: “the only life we know”.

  2. One person with years of experience at this is Julian Darley of Global Public Media. His interviewing technique gets everything out of the interviewees in a form palatable for listeners. He also has a great streaming solution for the site.

  3. lavonne says:

    I did radio interviews for 22 years. Your questions are excellent. How far to let things go off on tangents: that will depend on your interviewing style and the choices you make as you go along. There’s no right or wrong. As long as it’s interesting to you — your audience will probably find it interesting too. We read your blog, after all, because we are interested in the same things you are. I liked to follow tangents where they led, and used my list of questions as a guide to keep us more or less on-track, or to fall back on when the tangent was played out, or when my mind went blank — and trust me, that WILL happen.I LOVE to hear/see documentaries where the interviewers voice is edited out but practically speaking, the editing is a LOT of work for one person to take on. You would need more people to help you if you want to do that and keep up your other activities/commitments. I did two half-hour interviews a week as well as a daily news shift, plus being a single parent. Don’t forget to include research time in your planning. The best way I found to juggle it all was to pretend that I was doing the interviews live — no going back to edit out mistakes, unless they were egregious or the interviewee asked me to edit something out. The half-hour time frame was important for keeping me on-track, as well imposing some structure on the interview — a beginning, a middle and an end. Occasionally, an interview would go so well that I would ask the person to stay for another segment, and we would do another full half-hour for the next week’s show; that was gold.Don’t be afraid to blurt out stupid questions — they can lead to great answers. My dumbest question ever, to Gloria Steinem: “What’s it like to be famous?” Her gracious answer: “It’s like having friends wherever you go.”

  4. Don Dwiggins says:

    If you remember Bill Moyers’ NOW series of programs, he varied the usual interview format with occasional dialogues among diverse groups of guests, with only a leading theme or two to give a little guidance. Going even further, you might get some inspiration from Open Space Technology (http://www.openspaceworld.org/cgi/wiki.cgi?AboutOpenSpace).Sounds like a grand adventure!

Comments are closed.