HAIKULOGISMS & HAIKUTHYMEMES– A CONTEST

I

A Haikulogism is a syllogism in haiku form. A syllogism must have a primary premise that is universal, stated as either a positive or a negative (e.g. everything that lives, moves), a secondary premise that can be either a universal or a particular statement (e.g. no mountain moves), and a conclusion that follows logically from the two premises (e.g. no mountain lives). I’m not stuffy about whether the premises are demonstrable or unarguable — controversial, debatable premises could actually be more interesting. And you’re free to state the secondary premise before the primary one if that suits the metre of the haiku form better.

The haiku form has many rules, some of which preclude entirely the possibility of a Haikulogism. So for purposes of this contest the only rules that must be followed are (a) it must be a three line 17 syllable composition, the middle line having 7 syllables and the remaining lines 5 each, and (b) it must have a ‘break’ or ‘turn’, a shift in perspective between the second and third lines. Natural imagery in the first two lines, traditionally found in haiku, would be wonderful but is not critical.

A Haikuthymeme is an enthymeme in haiku form. An enthymeme must have either a primary or secondary premise (e.g. Bush lied), and a conclusion (e.g. he cannot be trusted). It is left up to the reader to supply the missing premise (e.g. you can’t trust liars), from their own knowledge, so that the conclusion still follows logically.

So here is a terrible example of a Haikulogism:

And here is a terrible example of a Haikuthymeme:

You will not find Haikulogism or Haikuthymeme in the dictionary or Google — I just made them up. But the idea of combining them is not actually new.

I’m sure you can do much better than my examples. Maximum of three entries per person, please. Brain hurt, yet?

Artwork above — ‘Moon Maiden’ by Sioux artist Ioyan Mani — you can buy her work here.