One of my presentations at next month’s KM World & Intranets conference is about adding meaning and value to information. This article reflects some of my early thinking on this subject. The word ‘understand’, which does not appear to have a precise counterpart in any other language, literally means “comprehend (=grasp) and appreciate(=be able to evaluate) sufficiently to pass on to others”. It is about instructions and the passing on of those instructions down the hierarchy. In English, then, there is a sense that “Do you understand?” means more than “Do you comprehend?” — it means “Do you know what you must therefore do and tell others to do?” I’ll avoid the temptation to infer how this reflects on both the exaggerated importance of hierarchy, and the sometimes perverse purpose of the education system, in anglophone nations. Most other languages use the term comprehend (=grasp) instead, though most have a second word equivalent to the French entendre (=stretch toward) to convey a nuance of the learning process that English seems to ignore. The ‘understanding’ process in other languages, then, is not just a means for passing on instructions, but rather a means of coming together, a meeting of minds, for no necessary purpose than the sheer joy of communicating, sharing thoughts powerfully and effectively. It was of course an anglophone, GB Shaw, who said “The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has occurred”. To us anglophones, I guess, the only way we know if our communication was ‘understood’ is if it was effectively conveyed on and carried out by our subordinates. No wonder there’s no precise English translation for joie de vivre! So how do we ‘understand’? By what process do we ‘grasp’ and ‘stretch toward’ each other to gain meaning and value from the information we convey? And what tools and devices can we employ to do so more effectively? To answer these questions I went through a cross section of my library, and websites about learning, comprehension and communication, and compiled the following table of processes, results of those processes, and supporting tools that can be used to enhance understanding. It’s strictly a subjective sampling, but I think you’ll find it interesting:
(You may have noticed that newspapers and other news media and ‘feeds’ don’t make my table at all. That reflects my bias, I suppose, that this information is meaning- and context-free, and hence for the most part has no value at all.) I’m still thinking about all this, so if I’m missing any important processes, tools or end-products that help add meaning to information, please let me know and I’ll add them. This adding-of-meaning is mitigated by a lot of endemic dysfunctional information behaviours that we are all prone to (arising from information politics, information unawareness, faulty sense-making and poor information-sharing reward systems), and specifically the five hurdles to effective communication that tend to impede meaning from being conveyed:
Collectively, all the ‘end-products’ in the middle column of the table above constitute our ‘understanding’ of the information and the issue behind it. These end-products allow us to ‘make sense’ of the information we read, see and hear. The more extensive and effective the processes followed (from the first column), therefore, the greater will be our understanding. Our preference for, and the amount of value we get from, the different ‘end-products’ varies greatly by individual, and is a function of how we learn — some learn best by reading, others by synthesizing, listening, visualizing, observing, or doing hands-on. No one process, tool or end-product ‘fits all’. As information professionals, and as educators, we need, I think, to develop a greater appreciation of how we come to understand (and sometimes misunderstand) information. If we want our co-workers, and those we love, to be more understanding and more effective learners, we need to study the processes that they use (and fail to use, or use badly) to process information. We need to appreciate the learning/understanding ‘end-products’ that they value, and help them become more adept at using the tools that support the mental processes that underlie these end-products. We need to work with them, one-on-one, to help them improve their information processes, and hence produce more valuable information ‘end-products’, for their own comprehension and for conveying it to others. We need to become more adept as using these tools ourselves, and, as information intermediaries, we need to use these tools more extensively to enhance and add value to the content we manage before we disseminate it to others. And we need to develop new and better information processing tools — tools that add meaning and value to information, rather than just shuffling it around in its ‘raw’ state. Currently, we spend the lion’s share of our time acquiring, storing, compiling, organizing, and disseminating information, with little or no thought of how the ‘listener’ will use it. If we can get away from our ‘content’ role and start devoting more of our time in a ‘context’ role — observing and teaching people how to use the content effectively in the context of their own jobs and lives — we might just find that our value to the organizations we serve and the people we love will go up immeasurably. Postscript: The final version of the table above will include hotlinks to web pages on each of the tools in the right column. When I’ve done that, I’ll repost this article to include these links. |
Navigation
Collapsniks
Albert Bates (US)
Andrew Nikiforuk (CA)
Brutus (US)
Carolyn Baker (US)*
Catherine Ingram (US)
Chris Hedges (US)
Dahr Jamail (US)
Dean Spillane-Walker (US)*
Derrick Jensen (US)
Dougald & Paul (IE/SE)*
Erik Michaels (US)
Gail Tverberg (US)
Guy McPherson (US)
Honest Sorcerer
Janaia & Robin (US)*
Jem Bendell (UK)
Mari Werner
Michael Dowd (US)*
Nate Hagens (US)
Paul Heft (US)*
Post Carbon Inst. (US)
Resilience (US)
Richard Heinberg (US)
Robert Jensen (US)
Roy Scranton (US)
Sam Mitchell (US)
Tim Morgan (UK)
Tim Watkins (UK)
Umair Haque (UK)
William Rees (CA)
XrayMike (AU)
Radical Non-Duality
Tony Parsons
Jim Newman
Tim Cliss
Andreas Müller
Kenneth Madden
Emerson Lim
Nancy Neithercut
Rosemarijn Roes
Frank McCaughey
Clare Cherikoff
Ere Parek, Izzy Cloke, Zabi AmaniEssential Reading
Archive by Category
My Bio, Contact Info, Signature Posts
About the Author (2023)
My Circles
E-mail me
--- My Best 200 Posts, 2003-22 by category, from newest to oldest ---
Collapse Watch:
Hope — On the Balance of Probabilities
The Caste War for the Dregs
Recuperation, Accommodation, Resilience
How Do We Teach the Critical Skills
Collapse Not Apocalypse
Effective Activism
'Making Sense of the World' Reading List
Notes From the Rising Dark
What is Exponential Decay
Collapse: Slowly Then Suddenly
Slouching Towards Bethlehem
Making Sense of Who We Are
What Would Net-Zero Emissions Look Like?
Post Collapse with Michael Dowd (video)
Why Economic Collapse Will Precede Climate Collapse
Being Adaptable: A Reminder List
A Culture of Fear
What Will It Take?
A Future Without Us
Dean Walker Interview (video)
The Mushroom at the End of the World
What Would It Take To Live Sustainably?
The New Political Map (Poster)
Beyond Belief
Complexity and Collapse
Requiem for a Species
Civilization Disease
What a Desolated Earth Looks Like
If We Had a Better Story...
Giving Up on Environmentalism
The Hard Part is Finding People Who Care
Going Vegan
The Dark & Gathering Sameness of the World
The End of Philosophy
A Short History of Progress
The Boiling Frog
Our Culture / Ourselves:
A CoVid-19 Recap
What It Means to be Human
A Culture Built on Wrong Models
Understanding Conservatives
Our Unique Capacity for Hatred
Not Meant to Govern Each Other
The Humanist Trap
Credulous
Amazing What People Get Used To
My Reluctant Misanthropy
The Dawn of Everything
Species Shame
Why Misinformation Doesn't Work
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
The Right to Die
CoVid-19: Go for Zero
Pollard's Laws
On Caste
The Process of Self-Organization
The Tragic Spread of Misinformation
A Better Way to Work
The Needs of the Moment
Ask Yourself This
What to Believe Now?
Rogue Primate
Conversation & Silence
The Language of Our Eyes
True Story
May I Ask a Question?
Cultural Acedia: When We Can No Longer Care
Useless Advice
Several Short Sentences About Learning
Why I Don't Want to Hear Your Story
A Harvest of Myths
The Qualities of a Great Story
The Trouble With Stories
A Model of Identity & Community
Not Ready to Do What's Needed
A Culture of Dependence
So What's Next
Ten Things to Do When You're Feeling Hopeless
No Use to the World Broken
Living in Another World
Does Language Restrict What We Can Think?
The Value of Conversation Manifesto Nobody Knows Anything
If I Only Had 37 Days
The Only Life We Know
A Long Way Down
No Noble Savages
Figments of Reality
Too Far Ahead
Learning From Nature
The Rogue Animal
How the World Really Works:
Making Sense of Scents
An Age of Wonder
The Truth About Ukraine
Navigating Complexity
The Supply Chain Problem
The Promise of Dialogue
Too Dumb to Take Care of Ourselves
Extinction Capitalism
Homeless
Republicans Slide Into Fascism
All the Things I Was Wrong About
Several Short Sentences About Sharks
How Change Happens
What's the Best Possible Outcome?
The Perpetual Growth Machine
We Make Zero
How Long We've Been Around (graphic)
If You Wanted to Sabotage the Elections
Collective Intelligence & Complexity
Ten Things I Wish I'd Learned Earlier
The Problem With Systems
Against Hope (Video)
The Admission of Necessary Ignorance
Several Short Sentences About Jellyfish
Loren Eiseley, in Verse
A Synopsis of 'Finding the Sweet Spot'
Learning from Indigenous Cultures
The Gift Economy
The Job of the Media
The Wal-Mart Dilemma
The Illusion of the Separate Self, and Free Will:
No Free Will, No Freedom
The Other Side of 'No Me'
This Body Takes Me For a Walk
The Only One Who Really Knew Me
No Free Will — Fightin' Words
The Paradox of the Self
A Radical Non-Duality FAQ
What We Think We Know
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
Healing From Ourselves
The Entanglement Hypothesis
Nothing Needs to Happen
Nothing to Say About This
What I Wanted to Believe
A Continuous Reassemblage of Meaning
No Choice But to Misbehave
What's Apparently Happening
A Different Kind of Animal
Happy Now?
This Creature
Did Early Humans Have Selves?
Nothing On Offer Here
Even Simpler and More Hopeless Than That
Glimpses
How Our Bodies Sense the World
Fragments
What Happens in Vagus
We Have No Choice
Never Comfortable in the Skin of Self
Letting Go of the Story of Me
All There Is, Is This
A Theory of No Mind
Creative Works:
Mindful Wanderings (Reflections) (Archive)
A Prayer to No One
Frogs' Hollow (Short Story)
We Do What We Do (Poem)
Negative Assertions (Poem)
Reminder (Short Story)
A Canadian Sorry (Satire)
Under No Illusions (Short Story)
The Ever-Stranger (Poem)
The Fortune Teller (Short Story)
Non-Duality Dude (Play)
Your Self: An Owner's Manual (Satire)
All the Things I Thought I Knew (Short Story)
On the Shoulders of Giants (Short Story)
Improv (Poem)
Calling the Cage Freedom (Short Story)
Rune (Poem)
Only This (Poem)
The Other Extinction (Short Story)
Invisible (Poem)
Disruption (Short Story)
A Thought-Less Experiment (Poem)
Speaking Grosbeak (Short Story)
The Only Way There (Short Story)
The Wild Man (Short Story)
Flywheel (Short Story)
The Opposite of Presence (Satire)
How to Make Love Last (Poem)
The Horses' Bodies (Poem)
Enough (Lament)
Distracted (Short Story)
Worse, Still (Poem)
Conjurer (Satire)
A Conversation (Short Story)
Farewell to Albion (Poem)
My Other Sites
I am really enjoying learning from your blog. Thanks a lot!
If I am able to really “understand” X, good enough as to be able to pass the information to others, it means I have enough previous metaphores that allowed me to make sense of X, so, that means I also know what is the previous, needed information, required to produce sense… ¿How do I know if the other person will be able to make some kind of sense?….. I find useful Dilts 6 logic levels (from Gregory Bateson´s logic levels) of understanding 1.- enviroment (answers to where,when and with whom) 2.- behaviour (what)3.- resources or capacities (how) 4.- beliefs and values ( for what and why) 5.-Identity (Who) 6.- Trascendance or spirituallity.– In #1 person is affected by the environment and in #6 the person is able to affect environment. This 6 stages are constantly interacting in our different cognitive processes….. While I am understanding something as well as in the passing/receiving information process. The kind of answer I get from my interlocutor will tell about the efectivity of my communication. ¿Was I able to produce understanding?
My father once said to me, “We may comprehend death, but we will never understand it.”
This might be there, but another process is noticing, which is the trigger for sensemaking. Related to this is mindfulness which Weick talks about as a way of noticing. I talk about noticing a bit here: http://www.anecdote.com.au/archives/2006/08/sensemaking_sta.html
Thanks – a good and useful post. I look forward to the next version. The topic reminds me of a previous attempt to capture the nuances of understanding. Perhaps you remember Robert Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land, which introduced the concept of “grok”. In the American Heritage dictionary it is defined as “to understand profoundly through intuition or empathy.” A made up word, but a useful one.
Thanks everyone. It’s interesting that several readers have told me that noticing/paying attention/mindfulness was missing from the first column of my table. If as Bohm says “giving simple attention…is the primary creative act” then it may also be the most important meaning-adding process, and art, as one of the corresponding ‘end-products’, could be the most important means by which we come to understand, in the (non-anglophone) sense of grasping, stretching-toward, and coming-together. Grok that?
I think your table gives a very valuable view on knowledge and learning.Given your past focus on learning and organizations and mention of David Bohm, I’m surprised that dialogue and discussion aren’t explicitly in the table. I’m sure this concept is included in conversing/consulting and in collaborating, but I think that Senge’s exploration of the differences between dialogue and discussion in his work would be relevant here and worth highlighting.
Great list to think on!When I read a newspaper or magazine then it is my context… what’s on my mind; what my subconscious is stewing on that makes what I read relevant and connect with me.