This diagram illustrates Joanna’s five-step personal ‘Work That Reconnects’ process, described in her book Coming Back to Life:

She starts her facilitator training with the Gratitude step. The audience is split into pairs, and the pairs take turns asking each other these four “open questions” to elicit gratitude, for about 2 minutes each:

1. Some things I love about being alive on Earth are…
2. A place that was magical to me as a child was…
3. A person in my life who helped me believe in myself was/is…
4. Some things I appreciate about myself are…

She argues that gratitude is a revolutionary act — that it contradicts the relentless message of the industrial growth society that we, and what we have, are never enough, so we are made to be perpetually dissatisfied. Gratitude breaks this hold on us, showing us that we are sufficient, and hence liberates us from industrial growth society’s propaganda, mindset and entrenched behaviours.

Next, she introduces the three elements of the “great turning”, a concept that her colleague David Korten wrote a book about. The turning, she says, is from the industrial growth society to a life-sustaining society. It’s a three-stage shift:

1. First, we need to appreciate that the industrial growth society is unsustainable, since our planet has a finite amount of resources and a finite capacity to handle waste. When these limits to growth are exceeded, we get collapse, as we’ve seen in fisheries and many other human-stressed ecosystems. Any society based on perpetual increase in production, consumption, and hence pollution and waste, will inevitably collapse, so we need to help it do so in ways that are less destructive than what it is doing to our world.
2. Secondly, we need to work on all three dimensions of the work that reconnects (activism/holding actions; creation of new structures and models; and understanding and shifting our consciousness about what is happening and what is needed), to enable this great turning, because if we focus on just one, we’ll burn ourselves out. These three dimensions are depicted in the diagram below (I’ve taken some liberties with some of the wording, but have not changed the essence of this illustration). Joanna suggests that we need to learn to tell compelling stories about successes in each of these three dimensions. She also proposes we ask some additional “open questions” to help us with this:
1. To be alive at this time of crisis, what’s hard for me is…
2. What I appreciate about living in this time of crisis is…
3. These are the ways I see myself participating in this great turning…
3. Third, we need to appreciate that this whole effort could fail, and so we don’t have the luxury of doing this work in half-measures. Likewise, we must avoid expecting success (which could make us complacent and reduce our energies and resolve) and avoid expecting failure (which would make us defeatists, and also reduce our energies and resolve). It takes courage to walk the line between these two dangerous expectations, and to do work in all three dimensions:

The above chart really appeals to me for several reasons:

• It comes to grip with the knowing/doing disconnect I’ve been writing about lately. The ‘head’ component, understanding and communicating what is and what is possible, is what we writers do all the time, and which many of us feel is no longer enough, and not catching on fast enough. The other two components show us what we’re missing, what else we have to do, in balance. Likewise, the ‘heart’ component, the creative one of trying to create new and better structures and models to replace the unsustainable industrial growth model, which those in the communities, permaculture, unschooling and transition movements are pioneering, can be similarly discouraging if that’s all we do, because it’s a slow process, and people will only join these movements when they’re ready. And the ‘hands’ component, the work of activists, can similar be discouraging because it’s all about ‘holding actions’, not letting things get worse, rather than making them better, and because this component of work is largely destructive rather than constructive (and can also be dangerous, for the activist’s health and personal freedom, if they are caught or even associated with anti-growth activities). We need to engage in all three dimensions in balance, to keep our heads, hearts and hands working to a common end and appreciating how all three types of actions work together.
• As I wrote before, I think our activism needs a positive spin. Rather than talking about dismantling civilization (which sounds negative, violent and as if it could cause even more suffering), or about holding actions (which sounds hopeless, one step forward two steps back), I’d prefer to talk about Taking Back the Earth from the corporatist criminals who are destroying it. I wrote earlier:

• In the middle of the three circles I have put a list of the things I have passion for, the things I love doing. That personalization of Joanna’s model allows me to see how the things I love to do can contribute to all three dimensions of the work that reconnects, to bring about the great turning. The first two of these ‘things I love doing’ (imagining/reflecting, and writing) are things I have identified as being in my ‘sweet spot’ (the intersection between what I love doing, what I do uniquely well, and what’s needed in the world that I care about). These two things map most closely to the ‘head’ dimension of understanding and communicating, which is why most of what I have been doing in my spare time for the last six years has been in this dimension. But now I can begin to see how all of these ‘things I love doing’ can be applied to one or another of the three dimensions, that they are all needed in the world, so that, providing I develop sufficient competency and/or capacity in these things, all of them can be in my ‘sweet spot’. If this is so, perhaps the Work That Reconnects is my sweet spot, is the work I’m meant to do? If so, how remarkable to have discovered it at precisely the time I now have the opportunity (through my retirement from paid employment) to pursue this work!

For those following Joanna’s videos, this takes us to the end of the sixth video. The seventh video describes an exercise that Joanna uses to advance the Being Present stage of the work that reconnects, called “the Milling”, that entails random walks of the group around the room and then five ‘stops’, each with a different set of instructions for non-verbal communication one-on-one with a different partner, whose objective is to increase the participant’s sense of presence and awareness, and capacity for attention and appreciation for others doing the work that reconnects. This is going to be a difficult journey, one requiring great commitment and collaboration, and we need, Joanna says, to develop in ourselves a reciprocal love, kindness, compassion, respect, joy and peacefulness for others sharing that journey, to sustain ourselves through it.

What Joanna calls “despair work”, honouring our pain for the world (or what I’ve called our unbearable grief for Gaia), she addresses in several ways (again, e.g. through Open Sentence or Milling exercises, or small-group exercises) including an intriguing whole-group exercise called The Truth Mandala. She lays out a large circle in the room with four quadrants, into which she places a bunch of dead leaves, a stick, a stone, and an empty bowl respectively. In the centre she places a napkin:

She explains that each quadrant represents a set of emotions that stem from our pain for the world, as noted above. She goes on to describe how this exercise should be carried out:

• Explain to the group that (a) the pain we feel for the world is universal; we all sense it, (b) this pain is unprecedented; never since the start of our civilization have we faced the possibility of the end of our society and a massive life extinction event, and (c) we tend to block or repress this pain, for fear it will deeply depress or paralyze us; the consequence is that we end up suppressing our instinct for the preservation of life (which suits the profiteers of our murderous industrial growth society just fine).
• Reframe the ‘silent scream’ of these emotions as our deep capacity to hear within ourselves the sound of the Earth crying, and hence as a feeling of deep compassion in which we “suffer with” all-life-on-Earth. Explain that this instinctive compassion remarkably transcends personal ego and needs; it is inherently generous, and reflects and expresses the deep interconnectivity of all-life-on-Earth.
• Inform them that hope lies underneath all parts of the mandala, and there are positive instincts, feelings or opportunities corresponding to each of the pain/grief emotions (shown in the brown ovals in the above diagram).
• Avoid patronizing Work That Reconnects participants by telling them what they feel, or should feel, and don’t judge them by their exterior demeanour or distracting them by being overly comforting; honour the pain and grief they express and feel.
• For 60-75 minutes, invite (but don’t compel) participants to enter the mandala, pick up one of the objects and briefly, standing or sitting, let it speak through them. They may choose to speak on behalf of another person or creature. With the napkin in the centre of the circle they can choose to recite a poem, or express a movement, or anything else they choose. They are not limited to one quadrant. They may choose to be silent. Advice them that whatever is said will be strictly confidential, and others should not repeat or talk about anything anyone has said without their permission. There should be no response voiced to what is said, no offering of comfort, and no referral to previous speakers.
• The facilitator needs to appreciate that people are not used to expressing these kind of feelings publicly, and the intensity of expression may bear little correlation to the intensity of sorrow or grief of the participant speaking.
• A ritual opening to the mandala exercise may be appropriate e.g. a collective “ahhhh…” to represent all that has not yet been said by the group.

Joanna also uses a breathing meditation practice she calls “breathing through”, for coping, honouring our pain and staying aware. It entails picturing us being “breathed by life”, and by letting life’s images of pain, suffering, violence or even numbness “breathe through us”, through our hearts (letting our hearts be broken) and then released to the vast healing power of Gaia and the world. This is not meant as a means of coping with the pain and grief, but instead as an awareness practice, preparatory to action.

The next step is the process of creating the courage to act, what Joanna (referring to the work of Joseph Campbell and Jung and Bateson) calls the realization of The Ecological Self, through a journey not to hyper-individualistic perfection but to self-knowledge and discovery and connection, by moving towards what we fear. She refers to the deep ecology movement, and describes a process by which we actually shift identity from the separate one which the industrial growth society ascribes to us to one which is a part of and connected with all life on Earth, in permanent flux, imperfect, amoral, unbounded, ego-less. We are not doing this work because it is ethical, responsible, the right thing for us to do for some “other”. We are doing it because it is in the collective “self”-interest of all-life-on-Earth, which is our self-interest.

Joanna is a big fan of systems theory and systems thinking, as a means of achieving the Seeing With New Eyes step of the Work That Reconnects. Readers will be familiar with Dana Meadows’ points to intervene in a system, and the flow view of reality rather than the traditional (since the Renaissance, anyway) element, building-block, “stuff-based” view. Under the “stuff-based” view, power is a property, and is about how one object can dominate or have command over another; it’s about competition and scarcity and defense. The ecological systems or “relationship/pattern-based” view, by contrast, is one of continuous flows, one of how instead of what. Under this worldview, power is power with, not over, it’s about cooperation and abundance and generosity. The self is then reconceived as not a separate, defined set of stuff, as we’ve been conditioned to think, but as an integral relationship.

The four useful properties of systems for “New Eyes” ecological thinking are: (1) every system is an indivisible, unanalyzable whole with synergies and emergent properties, (2) systems self-regulate in their collective interest through feedback (the basis of Gaia theory), (3) systems evolve and adapt when stressed, and (4) all systems are holons (i.e. have subsystems with the same properties). Joanna offers a game called “The Systems Game”, described in her book, to practice this thinking. She also talks about other wisdom traditions (Eastern religions, paganism, indigenous spirituality, eco-feminism, some martial arts, as well as the deep ecology movement) that can help with this thinking as well.

Another exercise Joanna uses to enable “New Eyes” thinking is called Widening Circles or the Four Voices Exercise. Participants gather in threes and each takes 15 minutes to move an argument of their choosing through four perspectives:

1. One’s own voice
2. An adversary’s voice (this teaches us to move beyond fear)
3. A non-human voice (this teaches us to move beyond anthropocentrism)
4. A future voice 7 generations hence (this teaches us to move beyond short-term thinking)

One way of moving beyond this short-term thinking is a “deep time” ritual exercise called Harvesting the Gifts of our Ancestors. It involves the group physically moving backwards in widening circles, as if through time, to the dawn of humanity, and then forward again, with a musical and narrative accompaniment. This is a fascinating imaginative exercise that I’d enjoy experiencing. Another technique is the Seventh Generation exercise, where participants arranged in a double circle imagine and re-enact a conversation between today’s citizens (outside circle moving in one direction) and those 7 generations hence (inside circle moving in the opposite direction). The topics are selected questions that the facilitator asks that are answered alternatively by the inner and outer circles (e.g. “Ancestor, what is it like to live in a world of such violence, species extinction and inequality?”). The assumption is that human exist and live sustainably 7 generations hence in 2200, with some knowledge of history in 2010.

For the final step in the Work That Reconnects, Acting on what we know (Joanna calls this “going forth”), an exercise that is used called Goals & Resources entails partnering and taking turns asking and answering six collaborative questions:

1. If you were unblocked by fear, what would you do to contribute to the healing of this world?
2. What would you like to actually do in the next year to move towards this goal?
3. What resources do you already have (personal and external) that will help achieve this goal (avoid modesty)?
4. What resources do you still need to learn/acquire to achieve this goal?
5. What obstacles can you see yourself throwing in your own path to hold you back?
6. What can you do in the next day/week to move towards this goal?

The group also contributes resources that they can offer each other, and each person concludes by reading back what their partner undertook to do, to them as their “marching orders from the universe”.

Joanna suggests that people interested in this work, attend a workshop to learn to facilitate, and then pull together a study group that goes through the process above and some of the exercises to help them move forward. I’m looking forward to getting a copy of the book, and hope to attend one of her facilitation workshops in the next year.

It’s a great framework. I think Keith Farnish’s book Time’s Up provides some further guidance on the Taking Back the Earth dimension of this framework, which I’ll write more about soon. I also think it’s essential that we work together to refine and align our answers to the 6 questions above. We have to start looking at The Work That Reconnects as a kind of “Natural Enterprise”, one where we need to work collaboratively to identify what we’re uniquely equipped to do, and want to do, to bring about this great turning, and then apply those gifts and passions in “enterprises” with those whose gifts complement our own. More about that soon too.