Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.



December 24, 2010

Will You and Your Community Survive Collapse?

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 03:03

Resilience-Abilities-1

Recently I have been writing about the need for a more existential approach to Transition and to building personal and collective resilience to cope with the coming economic, energy and ecological crises, and perhaps even the collapse of our teetering and unsustainable civilization. The idea of that approach was to start with ourselves: To ask ourselves “What does it mean to live a good life?”, rather than “How should I prepare for the transition to a post-cheap-oil, post-stable-climate, post-industrial-economy world?”

From the answer to that existential question, comes an assessment of how we must change, what fundamentally different things we must do, and what we must do fundamentally differently from how we d it today. Incrementalism is no longer sufficient. Though we must conserve, recycle, reduce, reuse, and produce and spend less “stuff”, this alone is not going to be enough, even if we all were to do it. The issue of “how we must change” is a question both for us as individuals and for those with whom we live in community, because the overwhelming consensus is that in order to live sustainably we must relocalize our society, and that means doing things in community, not as part of a fragile, costly, opportunistic and predatory “globalization” economy and society.

It seems to me that the first step in assessing “how we must change” (and hence perhaps the logical and essential first step in any Transition Initiative) , is to take stock of the abilities we have now, and the abilities we will need to live post-transition, resiliently and sustainably, in a relocalized world.

So I pulled together several lists of abilities that I have written about or worked on over the past few years:

  • The “survival skills” list that I have mindmapped several times and suggested as a framework for “unschooling”
  • The list of essential abilities that we brainstormed in a recent Bowen in Transition meeting
  • The list of twelve core competencies and capacities I propose in my book about making a living for yourself, Finding the Sweet Spot
  • The list of abilities I suggested in a recent article were essential to being a good facilitator or a good mentor
  • The list of qualities needed for good presentations from Heather Gold (edit: this line added Dec. 24; it was an oversight to have omitted it)
  • The list of “patterns” that a group of us have been working on for a “pattern language of group process” (including essential abilities for good conversation and collaboration); I’ll be writing more about this project in the near future

What I came up with was a list of 65 abilities (diagrammed above) that tended to fall into five main types:

  • Knowledge: Acquired information that is essential context for understanding how the world works and how we might do things better.
  • Innate Capacities: Inherent abilities, aptitudes we’re born with (evolution has selected these qualities for survival for all species, not just humans, and you can see all these capacities simply by watching the birds, or wild creatures at work or play. Many of these innate capacities are drummed out of us by the education system or other social indoctrination and can be lost. And they must be practised to be retained.
  • Acquired Capacities: These are also abilities that come to us naturally, but they generally emerge from practice and with maturity as we become adults
  • Skills: Learned abilities that come from applying our knowledge and capacities in practicable ways. None is inherent; all are learnable.
  • Behaviour Patterns: These are complex abilities that involve the sophisticated application of a mix of knowledge, skills and capacities. Many of these are rare and hard-won and all must be practised. It’s been my experience that in hierarchical organizations and social structures these behaviour patterns are almost non-existent. They emerge generally from groups of people finding the most effective way to work together as peers. This is where the real “ability gap” lies, I believe, if we are to be effective in our Transition Initiatives, in becoming more resilient personally and collectively, and in building a new and better society after civilization’s collapse.

I think most of these 65 abilities are fairly self-explanatory. I have added notes to the five I think are not. I went through a lot of other possible abilities which I finally grouped into this list of 65 (if you’re curious, here’s my worksheet listing which are grouped with each of the 65).

It’s a fairly imposing list. No wonder living in intentional community is such a challenge! So what good is this list? Here’s what I did with it:

Resilience-Abilities-2

  1. I wrote each of the 65 abilities on a “post-it” sticky note (I used 4 different colours for the 4 different types)
  2. On a large whiteboard, I made a map, as shown above, to delineate areas where I had the ability, needed to improve it, or didn’t have it at all, and likewise areas where those in my community(ies) had or lacked the ability. I posted each of the 65 sticky notes in the appropriate spot on the “map”. If I was the best in my community at some ability, it went on the far left side of the map. If it was an ability many of us in the community are good at, it went in the middle (midway between left and right) and so on.
  3. I considered the degree to which I am or will be very dependent on my community (stickies on the right side of the map), and the degree to which it will be very dependent on me (stickies on the far left side of the map). I realized that some of the latter abilities are not recognized in the community, and I need to take responsibility (in Transition activities at least) for conveying these as areas where I can provide a unique contribution to my community.
  4. I considered the degree to which my community is unprepared for crisis (stickies in the bottom section of the map). There were a lot more than I expected, given the number of capable and experienced facilitators here on Bowen Island.
  5. I created my own personal “learning plan”. I have a lot to learn, even if I continue to be dependent on others in my community in a number of areas where I will probably never be particularly competent.
  6. I asked myself: Looking at this map, and imagining some of the crises we are likely to face in the coming years and decades, Could I survive collapse (answer: I’m not sure)? Could my community (answer: I’m not sure)? From what I know of the world, could most communities (answer: probably not)?

I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts on this. As a tool for Transition Initiatives, would this be a useful first step to assess current personal and community strengths and weaknesses? Or would it be so overwhelming that it would just discourage potential Transitioners before they’d begun?

And is it useful as a personal “taking stock” tool, to measure your own resilience, and what you need to learn in the years ahead?

December 19, 2010

What Would You Do About Afghanistan?

Filed under: How the World Really Works — Dave Pollard @ 00:30

cartoon carlson

Cartoon by Stuart Carlson, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, from four years ago

The greasy politicians, the corporate war profiteers and the compliant media are working together to present us with the usual “you’re with us or you’re with the enemy” dichotomy on the interminable war in Afghanistan.

Like most modern “intractable problems”, it’s not a “complicated problem” at all (as we should have learned in Vietnam and a hundred other civil and regional conflicts, you can’t “impose” democracy on people). It’s a complex predicament: We have to learn to understand and live with it, and intervene in ways that make sense, without the expectation that such interventions will “solve” it, and with the humility to appreciate that things are the way they are for a reason, one that is usually self-reinforcing, and that our primary goal in any intervention should be to not make matters worse.

Here are some ‘facts’ about the situation in Afghanistan that few people, regardless of ideology, dispute:

  • Afghanistan is an ecologically devastated country, and has been for a long time. Its natural beauty and ability to support life have been desolated by horrific overpopulation relative to carrying capacity, centuries of overgrazing, bombing, landmines, and reckless misuse and waste of water and other resources. The reason opium poppy cultivation drives the entire economy is that nothing much else can grow there anymore, at least not at a scale sufficient to allow its people to trade for the things they desperately need and cannot provide for themselves.
  • Historically, the country has been repeatedly invaded, pillaged and then abandoned, leaving behind a vacuum that local warlords and rival militias have filled. Despite serious internal power struggles, no one has really been in “power” in all of Afghanistan in centuries. The Soviets decided to support one progressive faction to bring some stability to the country, leading millions of conservatives to flee to Pakistan and organize as mujahideen (“strugglers”) to overthrow the Soviet-backed regime, which they did with the help of covert and overt US and Pakistani arms and support. When the Soviets withdrew, the warlords and rival militias once again filled the power vacuum.
  • The Taliban, largely consisting of refugees who had fled to Pakistan as mujahideen, waded into this desperate situation with a promise of an alternative to the despotic warlords and endless wars between militias. With military and financial support from Pakistan, they won a civil war against supporters of the country’s post-Soviet government, and installed a brutal and repressive regime, which was toppled by the NATO invasion in 2001.
  • The country today is not centrally governed. It is once again run by local warlords who use power and propaganda to brainwash and cow their populations. The so-called national government is totally corrupt and substantially governs only in the capital district of Kabul, thanks to massive ongoing financial and military support from NATO nations.
  • If/when the US/NATO leaves, another civil war among rival militias, and a Taliban resurgence, are almost certain. The majority of the Afghan people don’t want civil war or another Taliban government.

The NATO invasion and war with various insurgents has cost at least a trillion dollars, killed thousands of mostly innocent people, further crippled the country, and lasted longer than either world war. Despite the promises of Obama, there is no reason to believe the current situation, which is chaotic and rife with corruption, can or could be improved by more or different foreign military, political and/or economic intervention.

So what should be done? I confess that I was sufficiently taken in by the reports of the mistreatment by the Taliban of its people that I supported the initial invasion, but I am no longer sure that was a defensible position. The current situation is untenable and unsustainable, and the reports given to Obama about the situation have been universally dismal. Few think the current interventions are working, but most think withdrawal is not an option either. Vietnam all over again.

If we are willing to admit that invading, even with the best of intentions, was a mistake, then what? Are we obliged to atone for that error by prolonging the inevitable, compounding the human and financial losses indefinitely? What is the value, and cost, of saving face? I recognize that pulling out of Afghanistan now will cause enormous suffering in a country that has suffered endlessly for decades already. It will embolden despots and desperate people everywhere. It will be a humiliating admission that even the best-intentioned military actions are, in a world where guns, bombs, mines and other technologies are cheap, easy to obtain and effective at oppressing citizens, probably going to fail, and make the situation worse.

Because it’s a predicament, not a problem, there is no “answer”. We will ultimately be forced by some other, more urgent, crisis to abandon Afghanistan. The real question, now, is, What is the best use of our people (especially the energies of the millions of our people whose jobs are in one way or another security or social welfare related) and our money, to make the world safer, happier, more livable? That is an existential question, probably far beyond the capacity of politicians, corporations and media to even think about.

My answer is another question: How can our energies and money (which is actually, if we were to be honest, our children’s money, since we’ve spent all ours and our spending now is just increasing the debts they will have to repay) best be applied to reduce the aggregate amount of suffering in the world?

Although my answer to that second question is probably not that different from what any thinking, caring, informed person would come up with, I dare not speak it, because my answer flies in the face of too many of the beliefs we hold sacred, and which we will probably cling to as our civilization continues to careen off the cliff. My answer would suggest that maybe we need to give up many of the hard-fought rights and freedoms we cherish. It suggests maybe the time for big governments and big organizations and globalization is past. It suggests that the way most of us in affluent nations (and I include myself) live, is an outrage, unforgivable. It suggests that just about every thing we have been taught about the world, and how to conduct ourselves in it, is wrong.

And, worst of all, it suggests that what we must do, to act in the best interests of all life on Earth now, is beyond our individual and collective capacity. It is, like the situation in Afghanistan, hopeless.

December 15, 2010

Does It Matter Who Is Perpetrating the Destruction of Our World, or Why?

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 02:09

[Keith Farnish thinks it's useful, perhaps even necessary, to get angry at the perpetrators of the destruction of our world. He believes it can shake us out of our lethargy and our sense of helplessness. I've never found anger particularly useful, since I usually end up feeling that the objects of my anger didn't mean to do anything outrageous, so I feel angry and upset at myself more than at them. But perhaps that's precisely the perpetrators' intent: Just as they would have us accept our share of 'blame' for the BP Oil Spill, the Alberta Tar Sands and other ecological disasters, if they can convince us that we are complicit in our world's destruction, and they are merely trying to provide us with what we think we want or need, then the heat is off them. Maybe he's right.

Following is an article I wrote as an introduction to the chapter on The Tools of Disconnection in Keith's upcoming book Underminers, that explores this in more detail.]

tools-of-disconnection

Paved With Good Intentions

Keith Farnish tells us we need to get angry before we will be moved to act to undermine the industrial civilization that is killing our planet. Then, he says, we need to focus our attention on the “tools of disconnection” — the means by which the perpetrators of our disconnection from our intuition, our positive emotions, our senses, each other, and all-life-on-Earth keep us disorganized, confused, fearful and dependent. Our undermining actions, he asserts, should be aimed at accelerating the inevitable demise of industrial civilization with minimal suffering, balancing the risks to ensure we don’t get caught, and acting strategically to get maximum impact from our actions. The sooner we precipitate civilization’s fall, Keith says, the sooner its damage can be minimized, the sooner nature can begin to restore balance to our world, and the sooner the survivors of collapse can begin creating a better, sustainable way to live.

So who are these “perpetrators” Keith speaks of? They are the private and public corporations that depend on endless accelerating use of resources, production, consumption and waste, and which, as the book The Corporation explains, they pursue with pathological and amoral single-mindedness.

They are the politicians, judges, lawyers, police and military forces that, working hand-in-hand with these wealthy corporations, create and enforce laws and wage wars in their own self-interest, not ours. They are the media, the shills, the advertisers and PR firms, the education system and the bought economists and junk scientists who perpetrate the propaganda that everything is fine and there is no other, better way to live than industrial civilization.

And they are the religions, the therapists, and the techno-salvationists (“human ingenuity and invention will solve all our problems”) who are complicit in reinforcing the propaganda by telling us that it is our fault as individuals when things are bad, and that with necessary struggle, industrial civilization will prevail and make things better for all of us despite our personal weaknesses and sins.

The combined economic, political, media and psychological power and hegemony of these four groups of perpetrators constitute the self-reinforcing and completely uncritical and totalitarian system that Mussolini dreamed of — it was labelled fascism but he called it corporatism. Its task is to completely subjugate and control the populace, to brainwash them so completely that there is no opposition, no dissent, just a perpetual machine of unthinking monolithic human production and consumption.

Through its political messages, its advertising, its scare tactics, its lies, its withholding of information, its theft and violence, its indoctrination, its creation of false choices and false rewards, it keeps us in its thrall, disconnected. Each of us an obedient part of the system.

But what is this “system”? Can it really control us that effectively in this world where often-conflicting information and ideas are ubiquitous and free? And why would so many people — not just psychopaths like Mussolini — willingly become perpetrators of such a system?

The liberal/progressive worldview holds that we are all, at heart, innocent and good. Surely, then, the perpetrators of this terrible, unsustainable, teetering system had the best of intentions? They must have meant well, didn’t they?

This worldview also holds that getting angry isn’t the answer, that we need to appeal to people rationally, with the facts. The truth, we believe, cannot long be suppressed, and when people learn it, they will, if this system is so bad and brutal, instinctively work to dismantle it and replace it with one in the common good, a truly democratic system.

Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert, author of the book Stumbling on Happiness, provides some clues on why this doesn’t happen. Our large brains, he argues, have made us too smart for our own good. Our brains can now construct their own reality, completely disconnected from ‘real’ reality, and live happily in that illusory place, in effect mistaking it for ‘real’ reality. And, as Eckhart Tolle has explained, an unintended consequence of the evolution of our complex brains is that we now have an ego, capable of inventing and believing stories that provoke negative emotional responses which in turn produce in our heads other stories. This vicious cycle of negative intellectual and emotional activity in our brains, disconnected from what is really happening here, now, has made us all mentally ill.

So two paradoxical consequences of our large brains are that (i) we can be fooled and emotionally manipulated by misinformation in a way no other creature can, and (ii) even if we are one of the perpetrators of this misinformation, we can fool ourselves into believing it, especially if that belief is reinforced by others who credulously accept the same beliefs.

Despite all of this, despite the fact that we are all in a sense perpetrators, all so disconnected and confounded by our egos and the imaginary realities our brains have invented that we don’t ‘really’ know what is real or what we are doing, Keith is correct about what must be done: We must act to dismantle industrial civilization. But how can we do that when we are so hobbled, so handicapped, so caught up in this vicious system of our own making?

Keith suggests several answers. First, we have to inform ourselves about what is really happening (by reading and studying thoroughly and by thinking critically and challenging everything) and what our ‘real’ options are (by studying history and reading both fiction and radical non-fiction). Second, we have to get angry enough at the system that is killing us all (it doesn’t much matter who the perpetrators are, or if we are ourselves perpetrators or complicit) to shake ourselves out of our passivity and unawareness and act. Third, we need to influence and educate others. Fourth, we need to become models, finding radically alternative ways to live and modelling those behaviours. And fifth, we need to reskill ourselves to facilitate both the work we must do to dismantle industrial civilization, and the capacity to live good lives during and after civilization’s collapse.

This is a tall order. The first step towards well-being is to appreciate the challenge we face, and the first step to doing that is is to understand the tools of disconnection and how they keep us cowed, and dependent.

December 12, 2010

Links for the Month: December 2010

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 22:30

(Sorry that I never got around to links of the month in November, so this is a long catch-up post)

marc-roberts-power-trip

(Cartoon by Marc Roberts)

PREPARING FOR CIVILIZATION’S COLLAPSE

What Happens Next: Dmitri Orlov describes the scenario for energy collapse in a Peak Oil world and asks, What will you do when the oil tankers abruptly stop showing up in your town or city? Sharon Astyk has been arguing that, in many industrialized nations, there will be a period of chronic shortages and rationing first, but will we be able to get past denial that this is a permanent change to our world, in time?

Speaking Honestly About Civilization’s Collapse: Writing in Yes!, the always-controversial Robert Jensen reveals comments from readers on how they are coping with the realization that there is no preventing the demise of our civilization. (Thanks to Tree for the link.) Sample:

Recently several of our visionary thinkers have moved from the illusion that ‘we have 10 years to turn this around.’ They now say clearly that ‘we cannot stop this momentum.’ It takes courage and faith to speak so plainly. What can we do in the face of this truth? We can sit face to face and find the ways, often beyond words, to explore the reality that we are all refugees, swimming into a future that looks so different from the present. We can find pockets of community where we can whisper our deepest fears about the world. We can remain committed to describing the present with exceptional truth.

Post Peak Medicine: An online manual for providing medical and emergency health services in a world after civilization’s collapse has been started, and is looking for specialists to write chapters on their areas of specialty.

Coping with Crisis Fatigue: Tom Atlee writes to a friend about crisis fatigue, and the challenge of letting go of outcome and the possibility of trying to control things we cannot, while simultaneously accepting responsibility and doing what we can to “look for positive possibilities and partner them into greater probabilities”.

James Kunstler Calls for National Post-Oil Energy and Transport Strategy: In a recent interview, James Kunstler argues that we need an immediate debate on the use of nuclear energy, massive investment in rail and boat transport infrastructure, and an oil rationing plan. Thanks to Tree for the link.

Why Derek Jensen Rescues Frogs: In Orion, Derek explains why the work of bringing down industrial civilization includes doing things locally in your own communities and ecosystems:

We need to use whatever means necessary to protect the land where we live. Too often people assert that this is code language for violent revolt against corporations. And then they assert that this is no solution at all, and therefore assert that I have offered no solutions. But when I say protect your landbase using whatever means necessary, I mean it. It’s not that hard to figure out. Sometimes it might mean violent revolt against corporations. Sometimes it might not… Yes, industrial capitalism must and will come down. Yes, the oil economy must and will cease. And there are those who can and will hasten the collapse of capitalism and the oil economy. And I aim to be, and in some senses already am, one of those people. But that doesn’t alter the fact that I can spend an hour or two on a Saturday afternoon helping the local frogs to survive. And you can do the same for the plants and animals you love, who live where you live, whose home is your home, and in whose home you live.

Joe Bageant Takes on the Hive Believers: My friend Joe pokes gentle fun at those who believe that technology, innovation or collective consciousness-raising is somehow going to be the salvation of our crumbling civilization:

It seems that 40 years in retrospect, the human hive enjoys monolithism and totalism far more than anyone would have ever guessed back in the sixties… If there can be a solution at this late stage, and most thinking people seriously doubt there can be a “solution” in the way we have always thought of solutions, it begins with powering down everything we consider to be the economy and our survival. That and population reduction, which nobody wants to discuss in actionable terms. Worse yet, there is no state sanctioned, organized entry level for people who want to power down from the horrific machinery of money. There are too many financial, military and corporate and governmental forces that don’t want to see us power down (because it would spell their death), but rather power up even more. That’s called “a recovery.”

Steady State Economy: Can We Get There from Here?: Rob Dietz at The Centre for the Advancement of a Steady State Economy asks two very important questions but his answer to the second requires a greater leap of faith than I’d be prepared to make. His questions and answers:

  1. Q: Which side of the industrial growth dilemma (that economic growth is unsustainable, but lack of growth destabilizes our economy)  is more likely to hold true moving forward? A: The former, because it’s a matter of physics, not policy.
  2. Q: Do we have better prospects for achieving sustainable growth or building a non-growing economy that is socially stable? A: Peter Victor’s model of the Canadian economy shows that with the right policies, we can achieve a non-growing economy that maintains full employment, virtually eliminates poverty, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, and maintains fiscal balance. The feasibility, then, rests on whether societies can generate the political will to adopt such policies (e.g., reducing the working week and year, changing the business structures, and shifting taxation to limit resource use). [My concern with this answer: Show me a society that has generated such political will in the absence of an indisputable necessity to do so. This isn't how change happens. Nice idea, though.]

Not Waiting for Collapse: Alan Wartes explains that if we really want to be ready for civilization’s collapse, we need to start building a resilient and sustainable economy in our own communities now, not waiting for the crises to happen.

Transition USA: Stuck?: Michael Brownlee reviews in depth the history of the Transition Movement in the US and comments on where it should go from here. (Thanks to Bowen’s Don Marshall for the link.) Some interesting excerpts that resonate with my own experience to date with Transition in my community:

As in all relocalization efforts, we had been trying our best to discover the ways to prepare our communities for a crisis that was just over the horizon and had not yet quite arrived, and attempting to do this without being seen as alarmists, doom-and-gloomers, or inciters of fear and anxiety…

The hope that we’ll be able to maintain our current way of life by substituting renewable energy for fossil fuels is wildly unrealistic and perhaps even dangerous. We now know that renewable substitutes will not come on line quickly enough or at large enough scale to be able to maintain our current way of life. We’re going to be facing a future with far less energy available to us. So this is not just Peak Oil, but Peak Energy! This is a reality we’re going to have to come to terms with, and we need to allow this to really sink in to our consciousness. It will change everything, and much sooner than we care to think about. It’s unavoidable that we will be going through a wrenching energy transition—likely beginning in the next couple of years—which will change profoundly how we live, where we live, and even who lives. This tells us that we simply can’t adequately prepare our communities with new technology alone, or with incremental decreases in energy consumption. We will need to live very differently—and we will have to hurry…

The kind of climate that has allowed civilization to flourish will be gone and humans will enter a long struggle just to survive. This means a very profound shift for human existence, one that we have hardly begun to accept. So this is not merely climate change we’re talking about, but climate disruption… [And] there will be no long-term economic recovery… We need to prepare for the end of economic growth… We will most likely experience roller-coaster periods of global recession followed by weak and partial recoveries; this will ultimately give way to grinding, long-term global depression. In the process, many of the institutions on which we have come to rely as anchors for certainty and normalcy and sanity [e.g. governments, education and health institutions, transportation and power institutions] will surely fail, some of them slowly, some of them suddenly and spectacularly…

The rate of adoption [of Transition] in the US seems to be slowing… in several other communities the effort for relocalization has already essentially stalled… [Transition Towns founder Rob] Hopkins may [in his rewriting of the Transition Handbook in the form of a pattern language] be condemning Transition to the same kind of fate that has befallen a mechanistic view of Nature and the universe…

[Citing john Michael Greer] The situation we face is not a problem that can be solved but a predicament of our own making… Catalyzing self-organization of a community around relocalization or Transition is entirely different from community organizing… Transition is not a movement for bringing about change… Transition is a movement for preparing our communities for the [profound] changes that are coming.

Getting Out of Dodge, Now: A guest author on Dmitri Orlov’s blog argues that the situation in the US is already so far gone and so vulnerable that those wanting to escape the worst effects of the coming collapse would be wise to find somewhere else to live now. As Sharon Astyk remarks, however, for Americans, the problem is, where?

LIVING BETTER

bob mankoff suicide cartoon

(Cartoon by Cartoon Bank president and New Yorker cartoonist Bob Mankoff)

Elinor Ostrom’s Common(s) Sense: Nobel economist Elinor Ostrom addresses some of the myths about the Tragedy of the Commons that have led cynics and right-wing libertarians to call for private ownership of everything, and explains how the “Tragedy” can be averted.

Kything: Beyond Presence: In her healing work (some of it with people with terminal illnesses) Beth Patterson employs a practice called kything that is as close as you can get to unconditional, generous love:

While everyone knows what it means to be physically present to someone, and many know what it means to be psychologically present to another, fewer are aware of the possibility of soul-to-soul or spirit-to-spirit presence. Louis M. Savary and Patricia H. Berne… define the verb “kythe” (rhymes with “tithe”) as “to present your soul to another” or to “show your true Self to another…”  In the family…  it can promote love, sincerity, and openness. Kything may be used in physical healing, therapy, and relaxation techniques, in providing emotional support, and dealing with loneliness or grief. It can affirm and strengthen your courage, self-esteem, and capacity for compassion. It can increase your commitment to spiritual values. [Beth goes on to explain the three steps to kything: Becoming personally present, shifting focus to the other person, and making a deep connection with that other person.]

Profile of Intentional Community: A very long and candid portrait of life in co-housing, ecovillages and other intentional communities, showing what works, and what sometimes doesn’t. Thanks to Tree (whose facilitation work is also profiled in the article) for the link.

POLITICS AND ECONOMICS AS USUAL

(Cartoon by Zachary Kanin from The New Yorker)

Why Our Banks Are Worthless: In the New Yorker, John Cassidy explains that modern “investment” banks produce almost nothing of value, and suggests that it would make more sense to reinvent banks as public non-profit utilities in service to the people of the communities where they are located. Instead, average pay at investment banks is now $340,000, and the industry generates 1/3 of all profits in the US (generating a comparable proportion of the so-called GDP) despite the fact “it’s an industry that doesn’t design, build or sell a single tangible thing.”

More Eco-Disaster in the Alberta Tar Sands: On the heels of the discovery that the extreme right-wing federal and provincial governments have been seriously arm-twisting the US to accept Alberta Tar Sands oil (using the Department of Environment, supposedly in the protection business, as lobbyists), comes news that the cannons used to scare birds away from the project’s toxic sludge dumps “trailings ponds” are now failing, requiring thousands of poisoned birds to be euthanized. What will it take to stop this Big Oil / Big Government eco-terror? Meanwhile, some Americans who will have to create the new mega-roads to carry to the massive sludge-mining equipment from China, or who will have the toxic bitumen sludge passing through their neighbourhoods on the way to refineries, are starting to object. And the Canadian House of Commons passed a resolution calling for an embargo on ships carrying the bitumen back to China, or to the Western US, but the Prime Minister, who considers his government above the law, immediately announced they will ignore it. He listens to Big Oil, not the elected members of Parliament.

Fed Reserve President Calls for Reintroduction of Glass-Steagall: In a NYT op-ed, Thomas Hoenig, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, says that the big banks remain not only too big to fail, but, because of their structure and reward systems, too big to succeed. Only a breakup of the banks and return to the limited mandates and risk constraints imposed by Glass-Steagall can reform the banking system before another financial crisis occurs.

Canadian and US Spokespeople Call for Assassination of WikiLeaks Founder: Although it’s quite possible that Julian Assange has what Clinton-watchers used to call a personal “zipper problem”, the call by American presidential candidate Sarah Palin and senior Canadian government advisor Tom Flanagan to have him assassinated for daring to embarrass their governments is frighteningly beyond the pale. Watch to see if he’s silenced in his prison cell by some hired flunky before his case comes to trial or any further leaks are published. This is how fascism begins. Glenn Greenwald reports on the hatchet job the mainstream media have done on Assange. In the meantime:

The Horror of the BP Oil Spill: In Orion, Terry Tempest Williams writes about what happened, what is still happening, and what has been left behind off the coast of Louisiana. Not easy reading. Meanwhile, Ian Angus is furious at the apologists on all sides of the political spectrum who say all of us, not BP, are responsible for the spill. Thanks to Tree for the second link.

How the Homeland Security Pat-Downs Play Into Tea Party Hands: The staggering incompetence of Homeland Security and the inability of the Obama administration to control or dismantle this juggernaut, will probably create more Tea Party Republicans than all the corporatist-sponsored rallies combined. Take a look at this site, operated by libertarian right wingnut Bob Barr and fellow fear-mongers. Effective, no? You almost have to wonder if they put the head honchos at Homeland Security up to it. And when Obama’s bungling isn’t enough to sustain the shift to the extreme right, racist ads like this (thanks to Raffi Aftandelian for the link, and the one that follows) can always be counted on.

How the US Banks’, Fed’s and Government’s Money-Printing Fraud Works: The artificial voices are annoying, but the text of this animated conversation is compelling, accurate and provocative at explaining how the fraudulent printing of trillions of $US merely ratchets up the unsustainable bubble.

Bayer Corp Diverts Attention From Its Bee-Killing Pesticide: Even the NYT has been caught up in the obfuscation by Bayer Corp which is attempting to persuade people its new and enormously profitable (and now banned in parts of Europe) pesticide isn’t behind the global hive collapse. Thanks to Tree for the link.

FUN AND INSPIRATION

Big Bang is Bust: A second compelling new theory, this one by Roger Penrose, supports the thesis that our universe is infinite in space and time, that there is no beginning and no end, no smallest particles and no outer limit. The idea of a limitless, infinite, perpetual universe always struck me as more intuitive than the religious insistence of scientific orthodoxy on a single “big bang” event. It’s good to see scientists actually pushing past the dogma. No string (theories) attached, either.

francoise gamma walkeremilio gomariz hands

The Art of the GIF: While most early animated GIF files were annoying, some of the new ones designed by artists are amazing. The two above, from Francoise Gamma and Emilio Gomarex, are from Changethethought.

A Thought Experiment for White Guys: “Dwight Towers” reposts a Colours of Resistance piece on our white male domination culture, and how we affluent straight white guys can sensitize ourselves more to it.

Why We Procrastinate: A fascinating New Yorker article by James Surowiecki, reviewing a new compendium called The Thief of Time, suggests that often our impulse to procrastinate goes against our better judgement. The reason, he says, may be that we have more than one “self” and these selves struggle against each other, with procrastination resulting when “the bargaining process goes wrong” and our short-term focused self’s irrationally wins out. In the absence of “will power” he says, we rely on external forces to force us to do what we should, and if those forces are absent, we procrastinate. (Dilbert author Scott Adams once famously argued that working-from-home programs would never succeed because without a boss looking over your shoulder, most of us would just spend all day masturbating.) Surowiecki concludes: “it might be useful to think about two kinds of procrastination: the kind that is genuinely [contrary to better judgement of what you should be doing for your long-term benefit] and the kind that’s telling you that what you’re supposed to be doing has, deep down, no real point. The procrastinator’s challenge, and perhaps the philosopher’s, too, is to figure out which is which.”

Franklin Veaux’s Map of Polyamory: Poly is not as simple as just “loving more than one other person”. Thanks to Natalie Shell for the link.

Smart and Silly Inventions: Pictures of a set of 18 new product ideas (not sure if they actually exist or if these are just prototypes or photoshop designs) that range from the brilliant to the ridiculous. An another intriguing idea: “Windstalks”, based on biomimicry principles, instead of wind turbines. Or at least, paint the turbine blades purple to protect birds and bats. Thanks to Tree for the links, and the one that follows.

Why Corporatists Intentionally Exclude Us to Spawn “Apathy”: Dave Meslin at TedX Toronto explains that governments, big corporations, political parties (just look at our electoral systems), charitable organizations and media encourage what appears to be public apathy, and discourage public engagement, because they actually don’t want us engaged. They prefer us to be passive, uninvolved spectators. Effective public involvement, he says, is collective, imperfect (we learn from making mistakes), and voluntary (not heroic or invited). A great presentation.

Could Eating Worms Cure Chronic Inflammatory and Other Immune Hyperactivity Diseases?: A series of stories on sufferers of ulcerative colitis and other “autoimmune” diseases (most of which are increasing at an alarming rate in affluent nations) who have voluntarily ingested parasitic worms, suggests that humans and our digestive system parasites have co-evolved for millions of years, and these parasites play a vital role in regulating our immune systems. By flooding our bodies with antibiotics we have disrupted the balance in our guts, and a disease epidemic has resulted. Some might say this is a metaphor for what humans as a whole have been doing to our planet since our natural predators were eliminated. I just know that as an ulcerative colitis sufferer, my life was changed by a disease that stems directly from the ignorance and arrogance of the medical and industrial establishments. Thanks to Beth Patterson for the NPR link and David Maurus for the CNN link.

Fiddle and Bow: Canadians Natalie McMaster and Bruce Guthro. Doesn’t get much better than this.

The Earl of Salisbury: William Byrd’s Renaissance classic has always been one of my favourites of the genre. Now John Renbourn teaches you how to play it. And for an amazingly different performance, here’s a woodwind transcription.

THOUGHTS FOR THE MONTH

hugh mcleod - life is too short

(Cartoon by Hugh Mcleod)

From PS Pirro’s new blog: “At some point you remember everything you knew before. That is the point of departure, when your new life’s journey begins.”

From Ralph Waldo Emerson: “What you are speaks so loudly I can’t hear what you say.”

From Albert Einstein (thanks to Paul Heft for the link): “The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.”

From Robin Wheeler: Alone, alone. (Thanks to David Parkinson for the link, and the one that follows.)

From Walt Whitman (Leaves of Grass):

This is what you shall do: Love the earth and sun and the animals, despise riches, give alms to every one that asks, stand up for the stupid and crazy, devote your income and labor to others, hate tyrants, argue not concerning God, have patience and indulgence toward the people, take off your hat to nothing known or unknown or to any man or number of men, go freely with powerful uneducated persons and with the young and with the mothers of families, read these leaves in the open air every season of every year of your life, re-examine all you have been told at school or church or in any book, dismiss whatever insults your own soul; and your very flesh shall be a great poem and have the richest fluency not only in its words but in the silent lines of its lips and face and between the lashes of your eyes and in every motion and joint of your body.

From Susan Werner: Her song My Strange Nation:

My Strange Nation has ocean on two sides
And the ‘Bama Crimson Tide in the south
Tilted slightly toward the north, the immigrants pour forth
Seeking Phoenix and life hand to mouth

My strange nation tilts sharply to the right
With our leaders straight and white as our teeth
Our population’s mixed, but Florida was fixed
In my Strange Nation, America

My Strange Nation, built on the backs of slaves
Who were sailed here cross the waves from far away
This cruel experiment was ended by a president
Who was both a Republican and Gay

My Strange Nation gave the Indians our germs
They surrendered on our terms (as in Died)
Their survivors filed appeals, so we gave them roulette wheels
In my Strange Nation, America

But my Strange Nation has lost its mind again
Sending young women and men off to war
For reasons that aren’t clear unless you’re standing near
To the rich and the righteous and the bored

And my strange nation, enamored of the cross
And who will win the toss of the coin
The circus and the bread distract us from the dead
In my Strange Nation, America

But my Strange Nation will surely come around
For you cannot hold us down for long
We’ll sputter and we’ll cough and throw the despots off
And recover the soul that makes us strong

And my frustration is just a product of
My strange but loyal love for this land
For its mountains and its lakes, tornadoes and earthquakes
For its poets and pioneers, for its fetishes and fears
For its freedom of dissent, for its greasy government

And I will not change this stance (I will not move to France)
I will always hold out one more chance
For my Strange Nation, America

December 10, 2010

Transition (2014)

Filed under: Preparing for Civilization's End — Dave Pollard @ 16:57

An (imagined) future entry in Internet Movie DataBase:
Transition Town

Transition (US, 2014)

Screenplay co-written by members of the Dark Mountain artists’ collective
Actors: members of Transition networks from West Coast North American communities
Produced by TransitionCulture.org

Synopsis:

As the film opens, twenty people from a dozen households in Cascades, a progressive urban neighbourhood within a city in Oregon, USA, are meeting for their monthly reading club. The book being studied this month is the Transition Handbook. Instead of setting aside the book after the meeting, the group decides to transform itself into a Transition community, and begins to self-organize to make its members more sustainable and self-sufficient, reduce their collective environmental footprint, and make the neighbourhood more resilient to possible energy, ecological and economic crises.

Over the next ten years the group begins to redefine itself as a true community, becoming more cohesive, setting aside significant parts of their land and investment resources as community property for food growing, self-education, grey-water recycling, self-financing, community transportation and the creation of new sustainable enterprises, operated as cooperatives designed specifically to increase the community’s self-sufficiency. As it grows slowly to 500 members, the community develops enough renewable energy resources to drop off the grid, creates its own well-being clinic, its own theatre and art/artisan/music production and performance institute, and its own internal currency. In the process, some neighbours drop out and leave, others, attracted by the publicity the neighbourhood is getting, move in, and as this happens, relationships are inevitably complicated by idealism, love, distrust, impatience and ideology. At one point, frustrated by rezoning and other impediments to what they are trying to do, Cascades closes its streets to through traffic and threatens to secede from the city that surrounds it.

The political dispute is set aside when a major economic and energy crisis hits. OPEC countries, concerned about the crushing level of American debt and the instability of the US dollar, act on rumours of the dollar’s devaluation by creating a new currency based on oil reserves, and requiring all purchases to be made in the new currency. The US threatens military action but China, Russia and many European nations (the EU has, by this time, substantially broken up) agree to purchase OPEC oil in the new currency. Supplies of oil to the US are throttled, the US dollar plummets, trade seizes up, and many US companies and governments go bankrupt, including the government of the city in which Cascades is located. The resilience preparedness that Cascades’ Transition initiative was designed to provide is put to the test.

As Cascades thrives relative to the rest of the country, its members reach out to show other communities in the area what they have accomplished, and how to replicate it. As the film ends, a proposal is made to create, in the political vacuum and turmoil of the times, an Autonomous Communities Federation in the Pacific Northwest to replace bankrupt state and local governments. But uncertainty remains: Is this a truly new and sustainable model of urban living, or is it repeating the patterns that led to the unsustainable and un-resilient behaviours of the past? And new crises loom: Will even Cascades be able to survive what seems to be a global disintegration of interdependent markets, systems, institutions and infrastructure?

December 1, 2010

Why We Do What We Do

Filed under: Our Culture / Ourselves — Dave Pollard @ 15:55

why-we-do-what-we-do

I was researching some of my old posts the other day and realized there is a synergy among three of them that I hadn’t recognized before. This article will attempt to pull them together to create a theory for why we do what we do.

The three articles are:

1. From last December, my article Intuition, Chemistry and Heart-Sense explained how our emotions dominate our decision-making. As the drawing above describes, our senses inform our instincts, our emotions and our intellect, and both our instincts and our intellect inform our emotions and our decisions (though our instincts do so immediately, before we think, while our intellect takes its time, and, with the advantage of hindsight, second-guesses and sometimes overrides our initial decisions). Meanwhile, our emotions dominate our decision-making most of the time. Our chemistry (e.g. pheromones) is the result of the interplay between our instincts, senses and emotions, while our heart-sense (what our heart “tells us”) is the result of the interplay between our intellect, senses and emotions.

2. In a pair of recent articles entitled Too Smart for Our Own Good (part one and part two), I attempted to illustrate Eckart Tolle’s thesis, that wild creatures and human beings who have re-learned presence live the conscious, integral life shown on the right diagram above. For such creatures, the triggers that cause suffering for most humans just bounce off; they fail to have any enduring impact. The spirit remains integral, unruffled and unpolluted. By contrast, as an unintended consequence of our very large brains, most humans live in the unhappy, anxious state shown in the left diagram. For them, triggers produce a vicious cycle of negative thoughts and “stories” (the “egoic mind”) and negative emotions (the “pain-body”). The stories we tell ourselves about the past, the future, ourselves and others are fictions, but our insatiable human egos grab onto them, and these thoughts trigger emotions like anger, fear, jealousy, hatred, self-hatred, shame, irrational denial, irrational hopefulness, nostalgia, and anxiety, which fester in us and cause our egoic minds to invent even more stories to justify and perpetuate the pain-body negative emotions. Both the egoic mind and the pain-body are easily triggered by negative events and memories (real or imagined), and the ego even casts a shadow over our sensory and instinctive lives, which the egoic mind cannot control and therefore does not trust. We therefore become “possessed” by our egos, which are not us, which leads us to be unhappy for no reason, or complacent and unrealistically expectant (and then shocked and disappointed). Our egos would have us believe that our thoughts and beliefs and feelings are “us”, when in fact all along we are really the consciousness that lies behind those thoughts, beliefs and feelings. Presence, then, is the capacity to push out and free ourselves from our egos and the negative thoughts and emotions that “normally” possess us, that we “normally” identify with.

3. Many of my articles over the years have explained what I call “Pollard’s Law“: We do what we must, then we do what’s easy, and then we do what’s fun. This is my observation about how we prioritize the things we want to do. This is not a criticism of human nature — all natural creatures behave this way because from an evolutionary perspective this has proved to be a successful strategy for living. But what it means is that we never have time left over for the things we think we “should do”, especially the larger, longer term projects, because they are always pre-empted by the needs of the moment. The “what we must” in Pollard’s Law is very personal — our imperatives are a mix of instinct, emotion, sense and intellect, and they are volatile — they may include finding love, or doing something out of a sense of outrage that impels us, or even giving up our lives. They may be tainted by our egoic mind and pain-body. But for most of us, many of the things we would love to do, or think we should do, never reach this level of imperative, so we hold back — we wait; we hope; we dream.

Put together all three of these models of who we are and what we do, and you end up with the complex, holistic model in the diagram above, which, I think, can be used to understand (and perhaps even change) what drives us to do what we do (and not do). Here’s how this model applies to me at the moment:

  • I have relearned in recent years to trust my instincts and live naturally (my hedonism, nudism, exuberant idealism, love of wild places and wild creatures and creature comforts are lifelong personal attributes). But although I am working to get attuned to my senses and emotions , I am still very much possessed by ego, still not truly present except in rare moments.
  • The primary stories I tell myself (the ones I need to let go of if I hope to become present) are about a world of lost beauty, cruelty and suffering, about gaia’s death and a coming long and painful civilizational collapse, about people’s unreasonable, cruel, unfair, manipulative, wilful, ignorant, irrationally expectant, power-abusing and dysfunctional behaviours. These stories trigger feelings of anger, indignation, grief and despair (my pain-body reactions) and, when I realize later my anger was overblown, feelings of shame and self-hatred. One consequence of this is that I became so stressed after being triggered four years ago that it precipitated a latent chronic disease, ulcerative colitis, that I will now have to live with for the rest of my life.
  • A related, second set of stories I tell myself are about perceived dangers and uncertainties. These stories trigger feelings of anxiety and fear (of loss or suffering). Thanks to my great imagination, I am very good at imagining the worst, and reacting to those fictional worst-case stories as if they were real and imminent.
  • A third set of stories I tell myself are about my propensity to, in one way or another (and with my procrastinator’s best of intentions, of course) promise what I cannot deliver. These stories trigger feelings of self-dissatisfaction (letting people down) and self-loathing.
  • On top of all this, I suffer from recurring social anxiety tinged with misanthropy (notably triggered by crowds of strangers). Sartre said we human beings project our worst fears and most deeply disliked personal characteristics onto other people rather than facing them inside ourselves, seeing in strangers the worst of what we perceive in our own personality. I’m not yet clear what the stories are behind this anxiety and misanthropy (which date back to my early school years), nor am I able to tease apart my frequent loathing of strangers from the often-accompanying self-loathing. This may all be related to the second and/or third set of triggers and stories, but maybe not. Whatever it is, it’s another strong influencer of my behaviour.

As a result of the pall this casts over me, there is a constant battle going on between (a) who my senses and instincts (the unclouded, trusted, chemical part of me, the part that is a complicity of my bodily organs) tell me I am, and what they tell me to do, and (b) who my confused, easily-triggered and untrusted mind and emotions, the cultural part of me, tells me I am, and what it tells me to do.

My personal imperatives, therefore — my “must dos” under Pollard’s Law, are:

  • To fall, and to be, in love (which, while it lasts, vanquishes the egoic mind and pain-body and makes me whole, present); and
  • To avoid stress, which means not reading or listening to bad news about our world, working to develop my resilience, avoiding vexatious people and situations of tension and conflict, avoiding dangerous risks (e.g. bad weather, especially driving, and loss of freedom or security), avoiding physical discomfort, avoiding crowds of strangers, and avoiding any situation where people have what I think may be unreasonable expectations of me.

If you know me, this explains a lot. It explains why I am no longer living in places that get very cold weather or treacherous road conditions. It explains why I have changed jobs over the years, why I was obsessed for years with achieving financial security, and why I retired early. It explains why Tree had to rescue me during my last bad anxiety attack (and why, when the vicious cycle of egoic mind and pain-body takes control of me, I spiral down quickly into unfathomable helplessness, anxiety and depression).

It explains why I am poly, and why I am vegan. It explains why, whenever I face conflict, even on projects I’m passionate about, I disengage myself and flee. It explains why I’m not personally working on the front lines to end the atrocities of the Alberta Tar Sands and factory farming, although I think I “should”. It explains why I’m not living in intentional community, despite believing passionately that this is the only sustainable and resilient model that can take us through the Long Emergency ahead.

It explains why I have no perseverance, and why I try to avoid commitment and responsibility. It explains why I am still deciding what I want to do/should do/can do, without being broken in the process, months after retiring and having the opportunity to do anything I “want” to do, and why I am afraid to grab the dragon’s tail. The real dragon, I know, is my own ego, and it’s the hardest one to slay. As James Taylor (who has fought similar demons to mine) asks: Where will we hide, when it comes from inside?

In short, this model explains most of what I do, and don’t do, and the disconnects between what I believe and what I do.

At the beginning of this year I wrote a new personal bio, to take stock of who I am now:

Vegan, earth-loving, earth-grieving, idealistic, poly, somewhat unsociable and inattentive, unschooled, self-dissatisfied, nudist, intuitive, corpocracy-hating, anarchist, doomer (about industrial civilization), optimistic (about post-civ society), radical, unspiritual, hedonistic, impatient, easily-discouraged, overly-analytical, comfortably retired (from paid work), generalist writer, dreamer and imaginer of possibilities.

So now you know why I am so. And why, because and despite who I am, I do what I do, and don’t do what I don’t.

Yet.

Powered by WordPress